- Paperback: 224 pages
- Publisher: Pearson; 1 edition (January 11, 1982)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0201102382
- ISBN-13: 978-0201102383
- Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.6 x 8.9 inches
- Shipping Weight: 10.4 ounces
- Average Customer Review: 4.8 out of 5 stars See all reviews (10 customer reviews)
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #848,617 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Thinking Mathematically 1st Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Featured Springer resources in biomedicine
Explore these featured titles in biomedicine. Learn more
Customers who bought this item also bought
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Browse award-winning titles. See more
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Top Customer Reviews
Start from this book. There is no doubt that this is THE BEST ONE available when it comes to understanding the ways to crack hard problems or to go about analyzing and investigating them. The author says that it is important to "feel" the emotions while trying problems. You must bring into your cognition as to WHAT EXACTLY HAPPENED when you solved the problem or when you make progress. What clues did you succeed in getting and what did you miss. Keep track of all that and have a picture in your mind about your previous experiences about what kind you clues you typically fail to guess etc. He helps us VISUALIZE and REALIZE the process of investigating a problem in order to get a solution.
Research in pure math is truly speaking, a process of investigation. You have to spend time to come up with those chain of logical sentences which when connected gives you the proof for a Theorem. But in order to arrive at that, you need to investigate. This book is about the process of investigation. If you are really serious about doing research in math, get this book and read it VERY SERIOUSLY and multiple times. I read it the first time and felt like "ok .... I get it...." but when I tried to use it on solving a tough problem, I realized that I did not understand the process of investigation given in this book. I read it a few more times KEEPING IN MIND the kind of problems that I was attempting to solve and I swear it HELPS LIKE NO OTHER BOOK CAN. Be it a kid trying for math Olympiad or a budding researcher, you've gotta get this book. Now if you have a phenomenal professor who has Field's Medal and all that, then I don't know if you really need this book. But in any event, this is THE book to UNDERSTAND THE PROCESS OF INVESTIGATION in solving problems pertaining to pure math. It does have a lot of interesting puzzles and problems but they ARE NOT SUPER HARD. I strongly suggest that you try to apply these principles to solving the Olympiad problems in Arthur Engel's book on math Olympiad problems. Even though his strategy of "try for an hour and look at the solution" is the way to go if you have to solve all the thousands of problems in that book to prepare for Olympiad and learn the tricks properly, I suggest that you try the investigation mathod proposed in this book if you are not preparing for Olympiad so that you truly get a feel for what the authors are saying in this book titled Thinking Mathematically.
Added the following on April 14th of 2014.
There was a question that I was trying. It required me to prove that the harmonic series is never an integer. That is given a positive n greater than 1, the sum 1+1/2+1/3+....+1/n is never an integer. I was about to give up since I did not make a breakthrough in the problem. There is a chapter on "Still Struck" in this book that I read. Great chapter. I read that over and over with this problem in mind. Admittedly, I was about to give up after one week. Then I simply made a list of ideas that I had tried.
1. Let that sum corresponding integer n to be pn/qn where gcd(pn,qn)=1. Can I show that qn>1 for any n>1?
2. Can I show that one of pn, qn is always even and the other is obviously always odd?
3. Can I look at the algorithm to find the gcd to make an inference about pn and qn?
4. Can I assume that pn/qn = an integer for some n and arrive at a contradiction?
All these questions did not lead me anywhere directly. I needed a substantial fact to prove the statement. Strangely, I remembered this thing about harmonic series diverging. There, if 2^m <= k <2^(m+1) where k appears somewhere in the denominator of the harmonic series (hence 1 < k <=n), then they used the idea in the argument that 1/k is always greater than 1/2^(m+1). This made me think let me look at the powers of 2 in qn. Presto! Another deus ex machine. For a qn where n is such that 2^m <= qn < 2^(m+1), the highest power of 2 in qn when pn/qn is in its most reduced form (hence gcd=1) is 2^m!! That's it. If I could make this rigorous, then 2. above follows directly from this.
The thing is that tough problems are insight problems. If we need to show that statement A implies statement B or if we need to find something, then in either case, there are certain givens in the problem. Along with the givens, we need to use data from our memory to LOOK at as many facts as possible. The implication or the thing to be found will follow from ONE OF THOSE OBSERVATIONS. The problem will become harder if more than one thing has to be found. This is called the crux move of the problem as described by Paul Zeitz in his famous problem solving book.
Another crux move that could solve this problem is by making use of the fact that between n and 2n, there is always a prime.
All in all, I have realized that solving tough math problem is about discovery. Cognition fails me initially when I read a tough problem. Then with specialization and generalization on the problem and by mulling over the problem, it is possible to solve atleast some of them if not all.
I have been looking at another problem right now. Let f(n) be the sum of the digits of a number n. So f(1232)=8. What is f(f(f(4444^4444)))? This is an IMO problem.
I feel much better now when I look at such problems. I do not get struck the way I used to before. Before, I would be like a deer in headlights. Simply no idea what to do. Then look at the solution and go "this was so easy!!". Now I know that the solution will be based on a few observations and I have to MAKE THOSE OBSERVATIONS. I may or may not solve it. But there is a difference between the past and the present state of mind when I look at such problems. Before, I did not know what to do and as to how such problems are solved. Now I have the CONVICTION that it is about discovery of certain facts which will surely exist and will lead me to the solution. I may not solve all the problems. But I am glad that I developed the CONVICTION about the insight problems after I read Thinking Mathematically.
This book teaches the reader not only the thinking process of a mathematician but shows the reader how to develop an awareness of said process, which is essential to accumulate experience.
The process is basically broken down into a RUBRIC, a kind of flexible script. However, for the reader to understand the RUBRIC in depth, she must work through the problems presented throughout the text.
This is where, I believe, lies the strength of this book: the exercises are accurately placed in the text according to the part of the RUBRIC under examination. The reader will try to solve a problem, will get stuck (which one should celebrate because it's an opportunity to learn) and the issues that got her stuck will then be examined in the context of the RUBRIC. Only by working through the problem will the process of getting unstuck resonate.
This book was very insightful and I feel like I have grown as a mathematical thinker. Kudos to the authors!
If you make the effort to really go through this book bit by bit it will really help you think mathematically in all areas of your life.