Enjoy fast, FREE delivery, exclusive deals and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$19.99$19.99
FREE delivery: Sunday, May 28 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $8.94
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.98 shipping
98% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
89% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
84% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Thy Kingdom Come: How the Religious Right Distorts Faith and Threatens America Paperback – September 25, 2007
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, CD, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $24.04 | — |
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length288 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherBasic Books
- Publication dateSeptember 25, 2007
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.73 x 8.5 inches
- ISBN-100465005209
- ISBN-13978-0465005208
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Lowest Pricein this set of products
Solemn Reverence: The Separation of Church and State in American Life (Truth to Power)Paperback - Most purchasedin this set of products
Jesus and John Wayne: How White Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a NationPaperback
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Basic Books; Reprint edition (September 25, 2007)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 288 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0465005209
- ISBN-13 : 978-0465005208
- Item Weight : 12 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.73 x 8.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,368,694 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,575 in Church & State Religious Studies
- #1,670 in History of Religion & Politics
- #2,706 in Political Conservatism & Liberalism
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

A prize-winning historian and Emmy Award nominee, Randall Balmer is the John Phillips Professor in Religion at Dartmouth College. Before coming to Dartmouth in 2012, he was Professor of American Religious History at Columbia University and at Barnard College for twenty-seven years. He has lectured at the Chautauqua Institution, the Commonwealth Club of California and the Smithsonian Associates and to audiences around the country. He has been a visiting professor at Dartmouth College and at Rutgers, Yale, Drew, Emory, Northwestern and Princeton universities, and he has also been a visiting professor in the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. Mr. Balmer was Adjunct Professor of Church History at Union Theological Seminary for seventeen years, and from 2004 through 2008 was a Visiting Professor at Yale Divinity School. He was ordained an Episcopal priest in 2006.
Mr. Balmer, who earned the Ph.D. from Princeton University in 1985, has published widely both in academic and scholarly journals and in the popular press. His commentaries on religion in America have appeared in newspapers across the country, including the Des Moines Register, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the San Diego Times-Union, the Dallas Morning News, Slate, the Philadelphia Inquirer, New York Newsday, the Albany Times-Union, the Nation and the New York Times. His first book, "A Perfect Babel of Confusion: Dutch Religion and English Culture in the Middle Colonies," won several awards, and his second book, "Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory: A Journey into the Evangelical Subculture in America," now in its fifth edition, was made into a three-part documentary for PBS. Mr. Balmer was nominated for an Emmy for his script-writing and for hosting that series.
His second documentary, "Crusade: The Life of Billy Graham," was aired on PBS and also appeared in A&E's Biography series. "'In the Beginning': The Creationist Controversy," a two-part documentary on the creation-evolution debate, was first broadcast over PBS in May 1995 and then recut and broadcast in fall 2001.
The author of more than a dozen books, Mr. Balmer has co-written a history of American Presbyterians, a book on mainline Protestantism, and another book, "Protestantism in America," with Lauren F. Winner. Other books include "Encyclopedia of Evangelicalism," published by Baylor University Press, and "Religion in Twentieth Century America," part of the Religion in American Life series, published by Oxford University Press. A spiritual memoir, "Growing Pains: Learning to Love My Father's Faith," published by Brazos Press in 2001, was named "book of the year" (spirituality) by Christianity Today. More recently, "God in the White House: How Faith Shaped the Presidency from John F. Kennedy to George W. Bush," was released by HarperOne in January 2008, and "Evangelicalism in America" was published by Baylor University Press in 2010. His first biography, "Redeemer: The Life of Jimmy Carter," was released in 2014.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I purschased this book as a part of a book group looking for a Christian/Evangelical perspective on current political issues in order to challenge and stretch ourselves. After a review of multiple titles, we settled on this book only to be extremely disappointed.
Mr. Balmer tries to intimidate criticism of his book in his conclusion by asserting that he fully anticipates that the Religious Right establishment will attack him personally rather than his arguments in an attempt to discredit him. Unfortunately, this is absurd because Balmer utterly fails to provide any actual arguments. This is because his book is nothing more than angry criticism.
Balmer does nothing more than set up straw men which he easily knocks down with his brand of righteous anger. But more disturbing is that his criticism are meaningless because they make no meaningful distinctions, i.e., they can be used to tear down anything and everything regardless of its value or correctness--including any position he might propose as better. But then, Balmer utterly fails to present any other position.
Balmer proposes that Christian Republicans use selective literalism of the Bible to support their positions even though Balmer does the same thing. Balmer than oversimplifies his opponents. And then further down, Balmer goes on to advocate what amounts to selective complexity saying his own positions are more complex. In short, he is intellectually dishonest, an intellectual lightweight out of his depth, and does a disservice to all interested in discussing these issues.
Let me provide some examples lest you think I did not read the book and to hopefully provide a more useful review...
First, regarding selective literalism and my allusion to selective complexity in Mr. Balmer's book, Balmer asserts that there is nothing in the Bible regarding abortion. p. 5. He then goes on to discuss how he believes this to be an attempt by the Religious Right to avoid divorce issues which were on the rise in the 70s. p. 6. His conclusion is that if the Religious Right were so literal about the Bible, why aren't they trying to outlaw divorce. p. 10-11. This logic is faulty, simplistic and misleading.
The conclusion includes basic assumptions about the role of government which he does not discuss. Even assuming that Balmer is correct that the Bible is more clear about the right and wrong of divorce than abortion, it does not follow that this "literalism" mandates governmental action and force of law following those things which are "clearest." The application of the force of the state behind a policy is more complex. It includes consideration of the basic philosophy of the role government in society and other such issues. But without even going into that, the basic rebuttal to Mr. Balmer from a Biblical view (which is what Balmer is trying to address) is that divorce is certainly bad, but it was also allowed by Moses.
Balmer has a very good point in that the Religious Right often tries to externalize the bad guys (p. 10), but his assertion that the Religious Right is selectively literal actually comes down to very different views about the role of the government in such issues. As a person with a background in the Religious Right in multiple states and cultures (e.g., Virginia, Italy, and Colorado), the Religious Right is often concerned with poverty, divorce, and public education, but they don't necessarily see them as all the purview of the government. In other words, it is more complex than what Balmer superficially represents.
Which brings up Balmer's selective complexity. p. 18. Mr. Balmer laments the abortion issue being reduced to bumper stickers so that he can defend is refusal to oppose abortion. In short, he says that it is more complex than just being against murder. He starts wanting to draw distinctions between moral issues and legal issues. p. 19. He starts talking about federalism and state's rights. p. 19. These are all courtesies he failed to extend to the opposing position.
By the way, this is also called setting up a straw man. He oversimplifies the other side so that he can easily counter it. He then makes his own side sound much more involved and complicated so that it is harder to counter his own position. This is not honest intellectual consideration of the issues, it is setting up straw men.
Second, so that you will not think that I only ready the first chapter, I will now address a later issue--education. Mr. Balmer decries the homeschool and private school movement as fundamentally destructive of democracy. p. 107-108. In short, Balmer asserts that since the beginning of the 19th century, common schools have taught democracy to our citizens. p. 107. He uses this as support for stopping the migration out of schools by private and home schoolers. But his argument is altogether faulty. The very changes in the school system which Balmer admits are the catalyst for the private/home school movements began to take place in schools in the mid 20th century. pp. 87-91. In other words, the tradition of public schools since the 19th century was that they allowed or mandated prayer, they taught the Bible, they taught decidedly Christian ideals, and they even taught creationism. It is of those schools, the praying, insulated, unchallenged, and myopic schools to which Balmer refers when he says they "served to make America what it is" and "provided a laboratory for democracy." pp. 93, 107. Balmer therefore has no real basis to assert that the changes which he likes have not already destroyed the public schools' democratizing influence. And I am not asserting that he is wrong, only that his book is bad because he fails to even address these fundamental issues while drawing conclusions based on assumptions he never addresses.
Balmer's straw men extends to his use of certain figures in the Religious Right to make his points. Unfortunately, being personal or using one person as a specific example says nothing about the Religious Right as a whole. Balmer instead often takes one person, on the extreme and tries to paint the picture of all people on the Religious Right as the same. For example, Gary North and Rushdoony on page 64-65. Balmer's tone assumes his reader is being introduced to these figures for the first time and they are certainly on the extreme of the conservative Christians. Even so, I have not found a lot of anti-Semitism in their writing as suggested by Balmer. p. 64. And that then raises the issue of whether Balmer has accurately portrayed these people he writes about. As a person who has paid attention to, or read the writings of, a lot of the central figures of the Religious Right, he is often wrong about the few people I am familiar with, and because his arguments are otherwise basically dishonest and extremely biased, he has no credibility when describing them those figures.
Take Rick Scarborough... pp. 37-40 for example Balmer has some great criticism of that guy in which I heartily join, but he is not the Religious Right, he is one pastor of one church in Texas. And more than that, I can no longer trust Balmer that he is giving me an accurate picture of the guy. He is instead at most a straw man because he is the perfect person to set up Balmer's criticisms, he is the example that makes Balmer's point. However, a true argument which is addressing the argument instead of particular persons, takes the best of the other side and hits it head on. Balmer only cherry picks the examples he can beat up and the arguments are therefore lame, inaccurate, and useless for the larger debate.
These are only some of the myriad notes in the margin of my copy of the book. Suffice it to say that the length of this review is indicative of what I could write on almost all of the issues raised by Balmer and other reviewers. But I will relent hoping that I have presented something someone might be able to use in their search for a satisfying book on the issues.
The social evil against which conservative Christians railed most vehemently was divorce until it was demonstrated that conservative Christians led the nation in divorce rate (they also abandoned evangelical Christian president, Jimmy Carter in favor of divorcee Ronald Reagan). "To get from divorce to abortion in the early 1980s, the leaders of the Religious Right resorted to a favorite evangelical redoubt, the RUSE OF SELECTIVE LITERALISM. The Religious Right simply ignored or explained away Jesus' admonitions about divorce and focused instead on a political issue that had traction at the time." (Emphasis added) 8.
"Selective literalism continues to serve an important function for the Religious Right. It allows them to locate sin outside of the evangelical subculture (or so they think) by designating as especially egregious those dispositions and behaviors, homosexuality and abortion, that they believe characteristic of others, not themselves. This externalization of the enemy is a favorite tactic of fundamentalists everywhere, be they Muslim fundamentalists of the members of the Religious Right." 10.
Other issues championed by the Religious Right strike Balmer as equally disingenuous and/or misguided:
Prayer in schools -- Jesus criticized those who made prayer into a spectator sport - "go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father."
Creationism -- Until the intelligent design creationists "can devise experiments consistent with the scientific method to test their claims, they should stop parading as scientists." 140. "Intelligent design is religion, not science and the proper venue for the propagation of faith is the home or the church, not the university." 138.
Home schooling -- "For much of the twentieth century, evangelicals found comfort within their subculture as a place of refuge from the outside world, which they came increasingly to regard as both corrupt and corrupting. The homeschool movement and the impulse to send children to religious schools merely represent an extension of that fortress mentality." 107.
Anti-environmentalism - "for decades, evangelicals have neglected the environment because it seemed to them unimportant in their grander scheme of biblical interpretation." 145. Now groups such as the Interfaith Council for Environmental Stewardship which is a coalition of Religious Right leaders aiming to counteract the environmental movement, with support from James Dobson, Charles Colson among other high profile of the Religious Right, simply "echo the pro-business and antiregulatory sentiments of political conservatives." 154.
Torture - unconscionable silence. [Who Would Jesus Torture?]
Perhaps most disturbing of all is how "Leaders of the Religious Right [Dobson and others] have expressed their disdain for toleration and for pluralism itself." 90. "Their ideology, laced as it is with the rhetoric of militarism, represents a betrayal of the faith. The shameless pursuit of affluence and power and political influence has led the Religious Right into shady alliances and has brought dishonor to the gospel." 189.
Balmer is one of a growing number of evangelical Christians that are speaking out against the curse of a militant religiosity in America that calls itself Christian. It's about time.






