Waive fee on a $200 Visa Virtual eGift card.
Buy used: $8.75
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime
FREE delivery Friday, December 27 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35. Order within 1 hr 14 mins
Arrives after Christmas. Need a gift sooner? Send an Amazon Gift Card instantly by email or text message.
Used: Good | Details
Sold by Super Bond
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: The disc (s) may contain minimal light scratches, dust, fingerprints, and markings. The digital code may not be included or valid. A sleeve cover may not be included. This Blu-ray / DVD/ CD is in good condition, with a great disc and cover. The Item may or may not come in its original packaging. The case and/ or box may have some shelf-life and usage wear, including small scratches, rips, dents, markings, stickers, and/ or other general wear.

In Time [Blu-ray + DVD + Digital copy]

4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 13,614 ratings
IMDb6.7/10.0

$8.75
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime
FREE Returns
Additional Multi-Format options Edition Discs
Price
New from Used from
Multi-Format
September 23, 2014
DVD & Digital Copy Included
2
$8.75
$15.95 $2.83
Watch Instantly with Rent Buy
Genre Mystery & Thrillers, Action & Adventure
Format Dolby, AC-3, Multiple Formats, NTSC, Color, Blu-ray, Subtitled, Dubbed, Widescreen, DTS Surround Sound, Digital_copy See more
Contributor Amanda Seyfried, Justin Timberlake, Andrew Niccol
Language English
Runtime 1 hour and 49 minutes
Digital Copy Notice: The purchase of this DVD or Blu-ray disc comes with rights to access a complimentary digital version from the production company. To access the digital copy, redeem the code included in your product packaging before the expiration date. Learn more

Product Description

Product Description

Note :Digital copy code printed on the item does not expire irrespective of Expiry date mentioned on the item

Every second counts in this sexy, stylish action-thriller starring Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried. In a future where time is literally money and aging stops at 25, the only way to stay alive is to earn, borrow, steal or inherit more time. But when a poor, working-class man (Timberlake) is falsely accused of murder, he teams up with a beautiful heiress (Seyfried) and must figure out a way to bring down the corrupt system before their dwindling life clocks run out!

Amazon.com

As a storyteller, Andrew Niccol tends to think big, tackling heady subjects such as genetic predestination (Gattaca), the nature of reality (The Truman Show), and celebrity in the cyber age (S1m0ne). In Time, Niccol's first film since 2005's Lord of War, has a typically gigantic premise--a world where everyone over 25 years old must pay for every continued second of their existence--but stumbles in the execution. While the ideas are exceedingly clever, the telling isn't especially witty. Justin Timberlake stars as a goodhearted but desperate minimum-wager trapped in a society where the rich are essentially immortal and the poor see their lifespan shorten with every purchase. (A cup of coffee costs 4 minutes, taking the bus also takes 30 minutes off of your life, and so on.) After being gifted with a century by a mysterious benefactor, he begins a romance with a beautiful socialite (Amanda Seyfried), whose father holds the key to the entire monetary system. Matters are complicated with the introduction of a relentless time cop (Cillian Murphy) with his own motivations for restoring the unnatural balance of things. Niccol has fun laying out the aspects of a world where even the elderly are genetically frozen at age 25 (the scenes where Timberlake interacts with his mother, played by a disturbingly spry Olivia Wilde, are an unsavory hoot), but has difficulty translating the ingenuity of his concept to a compelling narrative, which rapidly devolves into a mix of uninspired chase scenes and a succession of time-related puns that would have trouble passing muster on a Laffy Taffy wrapper. (The bad guys threaten to clean Timberlake's clock. Repeatedly.) While science fiction aficionados will find much to chew on in Niccol's askew reality, In Time never quite hits the marks that its own ideas suggest. As a film, it's more fun to think about than watch. --Andrew Wright

Product details

  • Is Discontinued By Manufacturer ‏ : ‎ No
  • MPAA rating ‏ : ‎ PG-13 (Parents Strongly Cautioned)
  • Product Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 0.7 x 7.5 x 5.4 inches; 0.8 ounces
  • Item model number ‏ : ‎ FOXS2295765BR
  • Director ‏ : ‎ Andrew Niccol
  • Media Format ‏ : ‎ Dolby, AC-3, Multiple Formats, NTSC, Color, Blu-ray, Subtitled, Dubbed, Widescreen, DTS Surround Sound, Digital_copy
  • Run time ‏ : ‎ 1 hour and 49 minutes
  • Release date ‏ : ‎ September 23, 2014
  • Actors ‏ : ‎ Justin Timberlake, Amanda Seyfried
  • Dubbed: ‏ : ‎ French, Spanish
  • Subtitles: ‏ : ‎ English, Spanish
  • Studio ‏ : ‎ 20th Century Fox
  • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B004LWZW7O
  • Number of discs ‏ : ‎ 2
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 13,614 ratings

Customer reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars
13,614 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers
Will (Justin Timberlake), time as currency
5 out of 5 stars
Will (Justin Timberlake), time as currency
The movie is unique, as it deal with immortality but limits life thru time as currency, for me it goods watch as its outside reality while keeping it grounded. the transfer seems good enough, but nothing special, keeping this as a nice to watch.
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry, there was an error
Sorry we couldn't load the review

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on December 13, 2024
    Got a used copy because i wanted blu + Dvd version. I wanted the New version but it was sold out . Anyway I got a copy Now. Thanks again
  • Reviewed in the United States on December 11, 2024
    As described
  • Reviewed in the United States on November 3, 2024
    "In Time" mesmerises with its unique time-as-currency premise! Justin Timberlake delivers a compelling performance amidst heart-pumping action. A thrilling, thought-provoking must-watch!
  • Reviewed in the United States on November 22, 2024
    In the future a 100 years or so people stop aging at 25, were you look like as old as a adult child, sounds like paradise, but there is a problem with it , catching it's controlled by a elite of people that lives well, and rest are servant to powerful, they had to earn it, betting it, or other. To live day by day. To survive another day. So there were renegades to change it. Sorta Robin Hoods of the times maybe.
  • Reviewed in the United States on April 30, 2012
    The concept behind In Time was amazing. Instead of running on money the people run on time. I found this really ironic because the way we make money is through time, and I think that is something the writer wanted to make very clear to the audience in this intense theoretically dystopian future. Instantly I felt connected to the protagonist Will, always searching for time yet always giving away time as well. The way we run around constantly complaining about how we don't have enough hours in the day, really seemed to be the general theme of it. The society created in the film really embodied a total dystopian society. The System is in complete control of the people, leaving no time for justice. The timekeepers following Will and admit that they have no cares or worries about justice. The system keeps everyone believing everyman for himself and aspires to survive be Darwin's fittest. They people live day by day and in the end want to be the people with the most time and that is why the system is able to maintain its control. The people follow the system because it is all they know. Some people don't even know the system is corrupt, because they see it through blind eyes. The female protagonist Sylvia is a perfect example of the deception the system uses on the people with the time/power. Sylvia is given everything from her father and knows how he does business, but because it is or her family and he what she knows she accepts the corruption as normal. She believes they are free to be or do or have anything because the lifestyle they live is all she knows. Even after she starts to trust will, she still continues to have that want for time, the want that she and will are trying to fight. Although the characters have freedom of most choice, they are still under control of something much more manipulative and controlling than the bureaucracy, technology. The humans them selves have become pieces of technology. The numbers on their wrists run electronically and are connected to a huge database system. Machines run everything including the humans. The scary idea that the machines are in charge completes a complete scene of dystopia. The people only know what they are taught but they do not look outside the box because they believe they are already so advanced through the technology that controls and runs them. They are also not very free because the people are constantly under video surveillance no matter where, when or why they go giving the machines and the people behind them the control. The citizens have been dehumanized by their constant connection to technology. They live day by day in an illusion that they are in a comfortable state. The segregation of different age wealth districts, have left the people in fear of other people and places, also keeping the technology in control. In a struggle day by day for time will embodies the hero that can change it all. The film was inspiring and eye opening to certain aspects of our somewhat near dystopian future.
    3 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on September 24, 2024
    Extremely amazing concept and great movie
  • Reviewed in the United States on December 10, 2013
    The movie was ok. I think the concept is great but the script lacks in intensity and has low character development. Do I recommend it: probably to the right people, but to the majority no. Watch it when you can for free and make up your own mind. I wrote a lot below to describe a bit more. But to be fair I am writing this at 4am, so I may ramble a bit.

    I really wanted more from this movie. The first 20 minutes were fantastic. Then it goes, as others reviewed would call it, "Spiraling out of control". People are paid with time. Once your time runs out on your arm clock you die. People can stay immortal as long as their clock never runs out. Poor people die quicker than rich people. You have Districts that contain different classes of people based on their time allotments. Justin Timberlake's character (Will) starts in the "Ghetto" and has a "mission" of destroying the gap of all the districts. Thats the premise and it's seems interesting enough and if it is done well, the story could be really good. Problems:
    1. They introduced a lot of Characters that could have been very strong, but were so underdeveloped that they left you in the dark. Everyone had a potentially intertwined story that could have been really interesting, but someone decided not to write.
    2. Sylvia Weis (Seyfried) was a hot mess. Her character went from weak to confused, and back to weak again, with moments of trying to be a badass. And to top it off the character really didn't need to be part of the movie.
    3. The Time Keepers...If there is a camera showing Will at the scene, surely there was footage of Henry going there on his own and dying on his own.
    4. Our first trip through the districts were made to seem like it was this whole expensive and long journey, but afterwards they travel from end to end like it was right next door. And do you only need to pay one way?
    5. The ghetto should have been more like a ghetto. And I am sorry, but how does 1 man with a posse of 4 run an entire district even after everyone gets free time. And how does he not know what is going on.
    6. Running away from the Time Keepers, but you make sure to stop and look back directly at them to give a stupid one-liner. What the hell. You are running away, RUN AWAY!
    7. The flipping convertible. I am sorry you both would be dead.
    8. If you have 2 people that you want to steal from and you are a group of 4, why are 3 of you waiting for 1 person to steal. Wouldn't all of you do it, it is more efficient.
    9. When you both look at your clocks with 1 minute to spare and counting, the whole stopping to say goodbye and giving a kiss seems a little drawn out. No urgency to the fact you both will be dead. I would have preferred a Shakespearian ending.
    10. Cillian Murphy - The end was a cop out.
    11. Really, 1,000,000 years. How about no more CLOCKS!
    Pros:
    Justin Timberlake did a pretty good job with this even though he was given some crappy lines. Someone did not edit the script properly.
    The movie editing surprisingly was pretty good. Except for the eye rolling lines every 10 minutes or so, the pace was well done.
    THE SOUNDTRACK is the best. Craig Armstrong.
    The scene where Will and his mom are running at each other was intense. The scene with Will and Sylvia not so much.
    Amanda Seyfried's hair - AMAZING! Perfect for this genre.
    17 people found this helpful
    Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
  • Mathew
    5.0 out of 5 stars Awesome job thanks
    Reviewed in Canada on November 2, 2024
    Gr8 movie and perfect timing!
  • Brenda
    5.0 out of 5 stars AWESOME MOVIE
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on December 3, 2024
    STILL REWATCH IT
  • JM
    5.0 out of 5 stars Buena película
    Reviewed in Spain on March 12, 2024
    La película llegó en su plástico, muy buen estado de conservación y se ve perfectamente, recomendado, saludos.
  • Keyur N.
    5.0 out of 5 stars Worthy purchase
    Reviewed in India on February 11, 2021
    Received in Google conditions as prescribed. Movie are sci fi genre.
    I enjoy love the concept.
  • Nelson
    5.0 out of 5 stars Bon film
    Reviewed in France on September 4, 2019
    Très bon film