Buy new:
$12.94$12.94
FREE delivery:
Oct 24 - 27
Ships from: bookbiz75 Sold by: bookbiz75
Buy used: $8.28
Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
86% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
95% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the Authors
OK
Top Secret America: The Rise of the New American Security State Hardcover – September 6, 2011
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$5.95
| $7.95 with discounted Audible membership | |
Purchase options and add-ons
A landmark exposé of a new, secret "Fourth Branch" of American government, Top Secret America is a tour de force of investigative reporting-and a book sure to spark national and international alarm.
- Print length320 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherLittle, Brown and Company
- Publication dateSeptember 6, 2011
- Dimensions6 x 1.25 x 9 inches
- ISBN-100316182214
- ISBN-13978-0316182218
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Essential reading."―Cryptome
"Mind-boggling."―Washington Lawyer
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Little, Brown and Company; 1st edition (September 6, 2011)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 320 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0316182214
- ISBN-13 : 978-0316182218
- Item Weight : 1.25 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 1.25 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,154,185 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,391 in Terrorism (Books)
- #1,453 in Political Intelligence
- #1,562 in Civil Rights & Liberties (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the authors

William Arkin is an author, journalist and analyst who has been working on the subject of national security for over 50 years. He currently works for Newsweek magazine as a senior national security correspondent. His unique career spans an early assignment in Army intelligence in Cold War Berlin to being a best-selling author today. He has written articles that have appeared on the front page of The New York Times,The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times. He has worked as a military advisor to the most influential non-governmental human rights and environmental organizations, equally at ease heading Greenpeace International’s response to the first Gulf War or teaching at the U.S. Air Force’s premier strategy school. He is weirdly proud to say that he spent the night in Saddam General Hospital after being injured by an unexploded cluster bomb in Iraq and that some of his fondest memories were picking through the rubble of Slobodan Milosevic’s Belgrade villa and Mullah Omar’s compound in Afghanistan. He is probably the only person alive who can say that he has written for both The Nation magazine and Marine Corps Gazette.
In 2021, Arkin will publish three books, The Generals Have No Clothes: The Untold Story of Our Endless Wars (Simon & Schuster), History in One Act: A Novel of 9/11 (Featherproof Books), and On That Day: The Definitive Timeline of 9/11 (PublicAffairs).
Arkin is co-author of the multi-award winning and national best seller Top Secret America: The Rise of the New American Security State (Little Brown), based up a four-part series Arkin and Dana Priest wrote in 2010. The book and series were the results of a three-year investigation into the shadows of the enormous system of military, intelligence and corporate interests created in the decade after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. The series was accompanied by The Washington Post’s largest ever online presentation, earned the authors the George Polk Award for National Reporting, the Sigma Delta Chi Society of Professional Journalists award for Public Service, was a Goldsmith finalist for Investigative Reporting and Pulitzer award nominee, as well as recipient of a half dozen other major journalism awards.
Arkin's other national bestseller was Nuclear Battlefields (Ballinger/Harper & Row) with Richardl Fieldhouse, the first book to reveal the locations of nuclear weapons around the world and introduce the concept of the "infrastructure" behind war. The book was a news sensation from the front pages of The New York Times to media in Italy, Germany, and Japan, and even earned Arkin a mention in a monologue on the Johnny Carson show. The Reagan Administration went as far as to seek to put Arkin in jail for revealing the locations of American (and Soviet) nuclear weapons; those were the days.
Arkin’s then worked on the multi-volume Nuclear Weapons Databook series for the Natural Resources Defense Council, a set of references which the Reagan Administration also sought to prevent from publication. His subsequent revelation of "mini-nuke" research efforts by the Pentagon in 1992 led to a 1994 Congressional ban and ultimately a pledge by the U.S. government not to develop new nuclear weapons. His discovery of Top secret U.S. plans to secretly move nuclear weapons to a number of overseas locations shattered governments from Bermuda to Iceland to the Philippines. Foreign Affairs, the bible of the foreign policy establishment, commented about Arkin in 1997: “The author is well known (and in some government quarters, cordially detested) as an indefatigable researcher in military affairs, whose cunning and persistence have uncovered many secrets ..."
Arkin then led Greenpeace International’s research and action effort on the first Gulf War, being the first American military analyst to visit post-war Iraq in 1991, and the first to write about civilian casualties and the cascading effects of the bombing of electrical power. Gen. Charles A. (“Chuck”) Horner, the commander of air forces during Desert Storm, said in a ten year anniversary interview in U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings that the briefing Arkin gave him on the war and its civilian effects in Iraq was the best he’d ever received.
Working for the activist organization Greenpeace in its anti-nuclear hey-day, Arkin conceived a worldwide “Nuclear Free Seas” campaign, which combined research and action that proved so successful at dogging nuclear armed ships and submarines visiting foreign ports that the headache convinced the first Bush administration to remove nuclear weapons altogether from naval vessels.
After the Gulf War, Arkin shifted his attention to the new era of conventional warfare. His groundbreaking research on the effects of the use cluster bombs in Iraq and Serbia formed the foundation for the international treaty that later banned their use. Arkin conducted the single most methodical assessment of the causes of civilian casualties after the Kosovo war (1999), a report done for Human Rights Watch that was accepted as authoritative by both NATO and the United States government. Arkin has also visited war zones in the former Yugoslavia, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Eritrea and Israel on behalf of governments, the United Nations and independent inquiries.
Arkin’s pioneering methods and meticulous work on the effects of conflict led also to a close collaboration with the United States Air Force, where he became a consultant. He was affiliated with the School of Advanced Air and Space Studies of the United States Air Force from 1992 to 2008 as lecturer and adjunct professor, and conceived and led the SAASS “Airpower Analyst” project to provide better tools for professional on-the-ground study. In 2007, he was National Security and Human Rights Fellow in residence at the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University where he worked on “Why Civilians Die.” He authored Divine Victory for the U.S. Air Force, a meticulous accounting of the 2006 Israel-Hizballah war.
All during his period, Arkin found room for independent journalism and writing. His New York Times op-ed in 1994 revealing the development of blinding laser programs led to a U.S. decision to agree to an international ban on such weapons. He was the first to write about the effects of cluster bombs, leading to a partial ban on their use. He wrote about the secondary effects of bombing electrical power infrastructure, leading to a shift towards "effects" based targeting. After 9/11, he was the first to write about the Bush administration’s preemptive nuclear war concepts, provoking front page coverage in Pakistan and throughout the Islamic world. Before the 2003 Iraq war, he revealed the details of prospective war planning in the highly compartmented "Polo Step" special access program, provoking one of the largest leak investigations in the history of the Defense Department. Arkin revealed the fundamentalist religious activities of Gen. William “Jerry” Boykin, then the architect of the global war on terrorism.
Arkin’s 2005 book Code Names: Deciphering U.S. Military Plans, Programs and Operations in the 9/11 World (Steerforth), the product of years of research, was featured on the front page of The New York Times and in an Emmy-nominated History Channel documentary. His 2006 revelations of renewed domestic intelligence collection by the Pentagon provoked not only a change in policy to end the so-called “Talon” suspicious activity reporting program but also to the eventual closing of the Counterintelligence Field Activity (CIFA) by Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates.
A 2003 Washington Post profile of Arkin commented: “From his home in the mountains of Vermont, William Arkin seems to have mastered one of the great juggling acts of the multimedia age -- persuading news organizations, advocacy groups and the Pentagon, through sheer smarts and a bulldog personality, to take him on his own terms.”
Over the years, Arkin’s research and journalism has brought his work to the front pages on dozens of occasions and he has appeared on television and radio countless times. As a long-time military analyst for NBC News, one of the few regular on-air analysts who was not a retired general or admiral, he brought both a journalistic and “civilian” perspective to contemporary military affairs from 1999-2019. He has appeared multiple times on CBS’ 60 Minutes, on Meet the Press, and other programs as an independent analyst.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The in depth work and analysis they have here produced is indeed worthy of the highest praise and of immense potential value to our nation.
It is obvious that many high level federal and contractor people opened up to these two highly talented researchers to allow us to gain an insight into the gigantic infrastructure of Top Secret America, and we owe our thanks to these individuals in addition to the authors.
The immense amount of money increasingly devoted to the agencies and programs in conjunction with the amount of inefficient overlap described in this work is frankly sickening and inexcusable.
Within the conclusions, here is a statement right on, absolutely correct, and is referring the mass of agencies, organizations, etc., involved in antiterrorism, intelligence, and cybersecurity and the enormous amount of overclassification and impossibility of ever insuring none of it will leak:
"The smarter and safer route is to design policies and construct foreign relationships based on operating forthrightly, in a way which won't embarrass us or harm anything of value when it is revealed." Great statement and objective. As long as we have politicians who feed at the trough of contractor profits derived from permanent war, however, it isn't going to happen.
My very high praise for this outstanding piece of important work is only mitigated slightly by some non-organizational assertions (in other words not concerning structure or budgets) and in some cases an appearance of not questioning what should have been questioned.
I suggest some items for consideration (samples), and please keep in mind that the following small points are to be taken in context of what is an outstanding piece - Top Secret America.
1) Ayman al-Zawahiri was not "in the ranks" of Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ); he was its leader, and it is difficult to understand why the obfuscation in this work. This man was a terrorist leader long prior to the US promoting of the little known bin Laden to the world. It should further be noted that al-Zawahiri was one of the five signers of the infamous 1998 Fatwah, attributed erroneously solely to bin Laden, and one of the four who at that time led organizations, in his case EIJ. The only signer who was an individual, not the leader of an organization was bin Laden.
Compare these bits of information to all that our public has heard about the authorship of this Fatwah. Knowing the above it is worth some thought why al-Zawahiri has been continually referred to solely as companion, doctor (his is a doctor), second in command, "side kick" (Dana Priest), etc., of bin Laden. He has always been a major terrorist leader. Of course now he is acknowledged as being in command of what is called al-Qaeda.
2) The USS Cole attack was not by al-Qaeda; it was EIJ, led by al-Zawahiri. Dana Priest had an opportunity to correct this error when she noted that the CIA stopped distributing reports on responsibility soon after the attack, but that opportunity was not taken.
3) Whereas it is stated that the evidence of WMD in Iraq was so well buried that very few people had actually seen the evidence, it would have been more accurate to note that such evidence did not exist. Put it this way: It was known that no substantial evidence was in existence. I certainly put that out continually.
4) The source Curveball: It was known that he was a flake prior to Powell's UN speech by both German Intelligence and the CIA, and the information broke publicly a couple days prior to that speech. Besides, there simply wasn't evidence to support anything he said.
5) Powell's UN speech was barely touched upon, but it was a complete disaster, as he now understands. However, at the time the speech was made almost every single assertion could immediately be refuted as baseless and outrageous. This disaster is an example which could have served in this book to point out how politics can and does control what is called intelligence when the objective is war.
6) The assertion is made that it is terrorists who "sought to undermine the openness of our government" and to "force it to become a fortress." Factually, no, that's our own government. The policies put into effect after 9/11 were done so by our government, not some foreign organization.
7) It is clear that a lot of value has been placed on what the 9/11 commission. Acceptance of a severely flawed investigation shouldn't be a given. It is not that the members should be faulted necessarily. Their ground rules and limitations insured the commission was worthless as an investigative body. There is yet to be a valid investigation of this subject.
8) It is asserted that Raymond Davis, CIA in Pakistan, shot "two would-be assailants." I wonder who is responsible for that designation of those he shot and then photographed lying in the street. According to Pak Intelligence, they were Pakistani intelligence agents following him for a good reason.
9) In praise of the effectiveness of drones, after an attack "a motionless body" and "helping to kill terrorists 5000 miles away ..." Well, actually, more than one "motionless body," and "helping to kill" countless others within the blast zones.
10) "... in Pakistan where a number of civilians have died in the (drone) attacks..." Actually, quite a number of civilians, and by most on the ground, on site evaluations following the drone attacks, the ratio has been about 9:1, civilians killed to suspects. In this book an assertion is made that because a Pakistani General agrees substantially with the CIA low count of civilians killed by drone attacks, that "helped confirm their (CIA) accuracy." Don't think so.
11) "... the US backed Northern Alliance..." ... "vanquish the Taliban" Fact: Prior to our invasion of Afghanistan, the Northern Alliance received its backing from Russia and Iran. It was the US Air Force, not the NA, which forced the Taliban from government. Further, the Taliban were not vanquished; they dispersed, and in fact are still, after 10 years, very much a presence.
12) The JSOC (Joint Special Operations Command) were "... blamed for deaths and torture they did not commit ..." Perhaps, but with not a single example given, we're left with the knowledge that indeed they are responsible for both many civilian deaths and torture. So, whereas the assertion probably has a basis in truth, it should be put within context.
13) It is quoted that in December 2001 al-Qaeda had a force of 3,000 and that after the battle of Tora Bora, the dead al-Qaeda were carried off by the truck load. Without questioning the amount of dead, in that "al-Qaeda" consisted of about 200 at the time, it is not made clear where the 3000 came from. Everyone we fight and kill is not a member of "al-Qaeda."
14) Reference is made to the "al-Qaeda operatives" in the Philippines. As I recall, when the US starting asserting al-Qaeda in the Philippines, the leadership of that outfit was very clear in objecting and asserting that they were neither al-Qaeda nor did they have any affiliation with al-Qaeda.
15) The Abu Ghraib abuse is referred to being as just "by low level army soldiers." That's misleading and a cop-out. Responsibility for those war crimes goes right up the chain of command. Those prosecuted are not synonymous with those responsible. And the reason for no further prosecutions was a decision made by the incoming OBama administration.
16) The claim is made that Abu Zarkawi, al-Qaeda top operative in Iraq, was captured June 7 2006. No, he was killed, on June 8 in a bombing raid, not captured. Two witnesses, a neighbor and Iraq police officer, both claimed he was taken off a stretcher and a US troop stomped on his chest and stomach until blood came out his mouth, and then died..
Abu Zarkawi (Zarqawi) certainly had no affiliation with either al-Qaeda or bin Laden prior to our invasion. He was non-affiliated out of Jordan, and was in Iraq for his leg. It is questionable that he ever was affiliated with al-Qaeda. What we called al-Qaeda in Iraq [AQI ], called itself the "Islamic State of Iraq." A more accurate term may be "the "non-aligned mujahideen" which he brought together from many other nations to fight in Iraq after our invasion.
17) It's timely to point out that the label "al-Qaeda" has been enormously over used. Everything and everybody who now want to attack us and whom we are fighting is not always either nor affiliated with al-Qaeda. As an example, even in Iraq as quoted from a DoD intelligence officer: "It was kind of a running joke in our office. We would sarcastically refer to everybody as al-Qaeda." Not just there has it been and is it being done.
I repeat: Within the conclusions, here is a statement right on, absolutely correct, and is referring the mass of agencies, organizations, etc., involved in antiterrorism, intelligence, and cybersecurity and the enormous amount of overclassification and impossibility of ever insuring none of it will leak:
"The smarter and safer route is to design policies and construct foreign relationships based on operating forthrightly, in a way which won't embarrass us or harm anything of value when it is revealed."
Thank you for reading this review, the length for which I apologize, and I realize that some of the above points may be other than commonly believed.
Those purchasing this book expecting to find exposures of corruption and other villainies will be doomed to disappointment. The story Priest and Arkin paint is rather one of numerous examples of well meaning, patriotic people desperately trying to fight what until recently was called the `the Global War on Terrorism' without a clue as to how to go about it. Millions of dollars have been ignorantly wasted in creating new organizations, the purchase of exotic hardware and software, and in the creation of far reaching programs all under the rubric of `Counter-Terrorism'. Because there has been no single authority guiding this growth, agencies and programs have tended to overlap and even duplicate each other. Because of misplaced secrecy one agency will spend millions on a project that duplicates what another agency is already doing.
This general confusion has been exacerbated by the extensive use of private contractors, indeed of the over 800 hundred thousand persons who hold security clearances in this country over 200 hundred thousand are contractor personal. Again most contractors are not the venal crooks that are often portrayed by journalists and writers who ought to know better. Although Priest and Arkin did not go into it, contractors in the secret world usually provide three types of services: 1) collection and analysis services which some in the U.S, Intelligence Community do not think are core intelligence functions; 2) the design of information systems or collection systems that will improve the speed and efficiency of intelligence production in agencies that have contracted for their services; and 3) operating what are considered specialty functions such as the IT infrastructure management. Contractors are also used in smaller numbers to fulfill a host of other roles with varying degrees of success. The use of contractors no matter how well qualified for their missions has clearly added to the uncontrolled expansion of the secret world.
Priest and Arkin in the best Washington Post tradition report on this uncontrolled growth of the Secret World, but do not pass judgment on it except in the most obvious cases of duplication of effort and clear cut waste. Yet if the reader is attentive it is obvious that most of the uncontrolled growth of secret world that they so accurately report on could have been prevented had the U.S. Government actually developed a coherent counter-terrorism strategy that could have guided an effective response to the threats posed by al Qaeda specifically and terrorism in general.
The Iraq war based on a defectors lie so we got to spend trillions of dollars on a war we thought was fighting evil.
I thought the book was interesting and it just showed you how our government waste money on programs that duplicate themselves, it's incredible.
I thought this comment on page 136 was interesting they said that "Napolitano and many in the Obama administration believe that the next iteration of terrorism to hit the United States would be attacked by disinfected immigrants" hmmmmmmmm
Lots more of interesting things in the book, I highlight when I read a book, and it's just too many highlights to talk about.
Top reviews from other countries
とても安く購入できるので大いに満足している。
この本はアメリカの先進の側面と、同時にそれが行き過ぎて社会の制約要因と化している側面を描いている。





