Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the authors
OK
Top Secret America: The Rise of the New American Security State Hardcover – Bargain Price, September 6, 2011
A landmark exposé of a new, secret "Fourth Branch" of American government, TOP SECRET AMERICA is a tour de force of investigative reporting-and a book sure to spark national and international alarm.
- Print length320 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherLittle, Brown and Company
- Publication dateSeptember 6, 2011
- Dimensions6.25 x 1.25 x 9.5 inches
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
"This is an invaluable book, a breathtaking investigative account of America's vast new secret world...it offers an indispensable guide to anyone who worries about the explosive growth of what the authors call America's terrorism-industrial complex since September 11th....Priest and Arkin explain better than Congress ever has the staggering waste and ineptitude that inevitably has followed." (Los Angeles Times Bob Drogin )
"Priest and Arkin fully flesh out how the Byzantine security maze actually works, breaking down its components....The authors' arguments are compelling." (Washington City Paper Lydia DePillis )
"The book is far more ambitious than was the [Washington Post] series...and makes the team's investigation available in detail to those of us who live beyond the Beltway....Since Priest and Arkin themselves lack security clearances, part of the interest of their book is how they acquired so much secret information." (The Washington Post Richard Rhodes )
"Priest and Arkin blow the whistle on how, since 9/11 and the adoption of the Patriot Act, the government and its contractors use classification and security screens to conceal expenditures that have failed to enhance national security...This is an important book." (Publishers Weekly )
About the Author
William M. Arkin has been a columnist and reporter with The Washington Post since 1998. He has worked on the subject of government secrecy and national security affairs for more than 30 years. He has authored or co-authored more than a dozen books about the U.S. military and national security.
Product details
- ASIN : B00AF3O2V0
- Publisher : Little, Brown and Company
- Publication date : September 6, 2011
- Edition : 1st
- Language : English
- Print length : 320 pages
- Item Weight : 1.25 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.25 x 1.25 x 9.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #8,156,455 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #193 in Terrorism (Books)
- #290 in Civil Rights & Liberties (Books)
- #305 in Political Intelligence
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors

William Arkin is an author, journalist and analyst who has been working on the subject of national security for over 50 years. He currently works for Newsweek magazine as a senior national security correspondent. His unique career spans an early assignment in Army intelligence in Cold War Berlin to being a best-selling author today. He has written articles that have appeared on the front page of The New York Times,The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times. He has worked as a military advisor to the most influential non-governmental human rights and environmental organizations, equally at ease heading Greenpeace International’s response to the first Gulf War or teaching at the U.S. Air Force’s premier strategy school. He is weirdly proud to say that he spent the night in Saddam General Hospital after being injured by an unexploded cluster bomb in Iraq and that some of his fondest memories were picking through the rubble of Slobodan Milosevic’s Belgrade villa and Mullah Omar’s compound in Afghanistan. He is probably the only person alive who can say that he has written for both The Nation magazine and Marine Corps Gazette.
In 2021, Arkin will publish three books, The Generals Have No Clothes: The Untold Story of Our Endless Wars (Simon & Schuster), History in One Act: A Novel of 9/11 (Featherproof Books), and On That Day: The Definitive Timeline of 9/11 (PublicAffairs).
Arkin is co-author of the multi-award winning and national best seller Top Secret America: The Rise of the New American Security State (Little Brown), based up a four-part series Arkin and Dana Priest wrote in 2010. The book and series were the results of a three-year investigation into the shadows of the enormous system of military, intelligence and corporate interests created in the decade after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. The series was accompanied by The Washington Post’s largest ever online presentation, earned the authors the George Polk Award for National Reporting, the Sigma Delta Chi Society of Professional Journalists award for Public Service, was a Goldsmith finalist for Investigative Reporting and Pulitzer award nominee, as well as recipient of a half dozen other major journalism awards.
Arkin's other national bestseller was Nuclear Battlefields (Ballinger/Harper & Row) with Richardl Fieldhouse, the first book to reveal the locations of nuclear weapons around the world and introduce the concept of the "infrastructure" behind war. The book was a news sensation from the front pages of The New York Times to media in Italy, Germany, and Japan, and even earned Arkin a mention in a monologue on the Johnny Carson show. The Reagan Administration went as far as to seek to put Arkin in jail for revealing the locations of American (and Soviet) nuclear weapons; those were the days.
Arkin’s then worked on the multi-volume Nuclear Weapons Databook series for the Natural Resources Defense Council, a set of references which the Reagan Administration also sought to prevent from publication. His subsequent revelation of "mini-nuke" research efforts by the Pentagon in 1992 led to a 1994 Congressional ban and ultimately a pledge by the U.S. government not to develop new nuclear weapons. His discovery of Top secret U.S. plans to secretly move nuclear weapons to a number of overseas locations shattered governments from Bermuda to Iceland to the Philippines. Foreign Affairs, the bible of the foreign policy establishment, commented about Arkin in 1997: “The author is well known (and in some government quarters, cordially detested) as an indefatigable researcher in military affairs, whose cunning and persistence have uncovered many secrets ..."
Arkin then led Greenpeace International’s research and action effort on the first Gulf War, being the first American military analyst to visit post-war Iraq in 1991, and the first to write about civilian casualties and the cascading effects of the bombing of electrical power. Gen. Charles A. (“Chuck”) Horner, the commander of air forces during Desert Storm, said in a ten year anniversary interview in U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings that the briefing Arkin gave him on the war and its civilian effects in Iraq was the best he’d ever received.
Working for the activist organization Greenpeace in its anti-nuclear hey-day, Arkin conceived a worldwide “Nuclear Free Seas” campaign, which combined research and action that proved so successful at dogging nuclear armed ships and submarines visiting foreign ports that the headache convinced the first Bush administration to remove nuclear weapons altogether from naval vessels.
After the Gulf War, Arkin shifted his attention to the new era of conventional warfare. His groundbreaking research on the effects of the use cluster bombs in Iraq and Serbia formed the foundation for the international treaty that later banned their use. Arkin conducted the single most methodical assessment of the causes of civilian casualties after the Kosovo war (1999), a report done for Human Rights Watch that was accepted as authoritative by both NATO and the United States government. Arkin has also visited war zones in the former Yugoslavia, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Eritrea and Israel on behalf of governments, the United Nations and independent inquiries.
Arkin’s pioneering methods and meticulous work on the effects of conflict led also to a close collaboration with the United States Air Force, where he became a consultant. He was affiliated with the School of Advanced Air and Space Studies of the United States Air Force from 1992 to 2008 as lecturer and adjunct professor, and conceived and led the SAASS “Airpower Analyst” project to provide better tools for professional on-the-ground study. In 2007, he was National Security and Human Rights Fellow in residence at the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University where he worked on “Why Civilians Die.” He authored Divine Victory for the U.S. Air Force, a meticulous accounting of the 2006 Israel-Hizballah war.
All during his period, Arkin found room for independent journalism and writing. His New York Times op-ed in 1994 revealing the development of blinding laser programs led to a U.S. decision to agree to an international ban on such weapons. He was the first to write about the effects of cluster bombs, leading to a partial ban on their use. He wrote about the secondary effects of bombing electrical power infrastructure, leading to a shift towards "effects" based targeting. After 9/11, he was the first to write about the Bush administration’s preemptive nuclear war concepts, provoking front page coverage in Pakistan and throughout the Islamic world. Before the 2003 Iraq war, he revealed the details of prospective war planning in the highly compartmented "Polo Step" special access program, provoking one of the largest leak investigations in the history of the Defense Department. Arkin revealed the fundamentalist religious activities of Gen. William “Jerry” Boykin, then the architect of the global war on terrorism.
Arkin’s 2005 book Code Names: Deciphering U.S. Military Plans, Programs and Operations in the 9/11 World (Steerforth), the product of years of research, was featured on the front page of The New York Times and in an Emmy-nominated History Channel documentary. His 2006 revelations of renewed domestic intelligence collection by the Pentagon provoked not only a change in policy to end the so-called “Talon” suspicious activity reporting program but also to the eventual closing of the Counterintelligence Field Activity (CIFA) by Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates.
A 2003 Washington Post profile of Arkin commented: “From his home in the mountains of Vermont, William Arkin seems to have mastered one of the great juggling acts of the multimedia age -- persuading news organizations, advocacy groups and the Pentagon, through sheer smarts and a bulldog personality, to take him on his own terms.”
Over the years, Arkin’s research and journalism has brought his work to the front pages on dozens of occasions and he has appeared on television and radio countless times. As a long-time military analyst for NBC News, one of the few regular on-air analysts who was not a retired general or admiral, he brought both a journalistic and “civilian” perspective to contemporary military affairs from 1999-2019. He has appeared multiple times on CBS’ 60 Minutes, on Meet the Press, and other programs as an independent analyst.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book compellingly written and extremely informative, with one review noting its detailed footnotes. They consider it well worth the purchase. The narrative quality receives mixed reactions, with some describing it as terrifying.
AI Generated from the text of customer reviews
Select to learn more
Customers find the book compellingly written and easy to read.
"...Compellingly written with an abundance of detailed footnotes, Priest has done a masterful job with this book. Unreservedly recommended." Read more
"...KP. No more. Dana Priest is an excellent writer and bases her analyses and conclusions on facts. imagine that!" Read more
"...work so I bought this book based on the strength of her reporting - top notch - but even more for the PBS Frontlilne report she presented...." Read more
"Extremely informative. Well written. A real eye opener about what our government is doing. This is the second book I've read by Priest...." Read more
Customers find the book extremely informative, with one customer noting it provides a comprehensive view of the Surveillance State.
"...My very high praise for this outstanding piece of important work is only mitigated slightly by some non-organizational assertions..." Read more
"This is the most comprehensive view of the Surveillance State as it is in the 21st century...." Read more
"Dana Priest and William M. Arkin, have written an incredibly important book. "Top Secret America."..." Read more
"...Compellingly written with an abundance of detailed footnotes, Priest has done a masterful job with this book. Unreservedly recommended." Read more
Customers find the book well worth the purchase.
"I found this book to be very interesting and well worth the purchase...." Read more
"...Now somewhat dated, but well worth reading." Read more
"Great buy!..." Read more
"nice goods. Thanks..." Read more
Customers have mixed reactions to the narrative of the book, with some finding it terrifying.
"Terrifying factual account of what has happened to and in the intelligence community since 2001. If you are in this business, just ask for money...." Read more
"...when to break up what could be dry explanations with quotes and compelling anecdotes...." Read more
"Terrifying catalog of how our constitutional rights and personal privacy have been lost to a new Leviathan in the name of preventing terrorism...." Read more
"A Disturbing Expose on Counter Terrorism..." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on September 14, 2011This book essentially identifies the amalgamation of Federal agencies, Military units, and commercial firms that, for reasons of National Security, operate behind a veil of government mandated secrecy. This amalgamation has always been an important component of the U.S. National Security Establishment. Yet according to the authors of this book, since the tragedy of 9/11, the number of organizations within this veil of secrecy as well as the number of persons holding security clearances necessary to work at these entities had grown exponentially. The entire book is really focused on documenting this growth and exploring how selected parts of this secret structure work.
Those purchasing this book expecting to find exposures of corruption and other villainies will be doomed to disappointment. The story Priest and Arkin paint is rather one of numerous examples of well meaning, patriotic people desperately trying to fight what until recently was called the `the Global War on Terrorism' without a clue as to how to go about it. Millions of dollars have been ignorantly wasted in creating new organizations, the purchase of exotic hardware and software, and in the creation of far reaching programs all under the rubric of `Counter-Terrorism'. Because there has been no single authority guiding this growth, agencies and programs have tended to overlap and even duplicate each other. Because of misplaced secrecy one agency will spend millions on a project that duplicates what another agency is already doing.
This general confusion has been exacerbated by the extensive use of private contractors, indeed of the over 800 hundred thousand persons who hold security clearances in this country over 200 hundred thousand are contractor personal. Again most contractors are not the venal crooks that are often portrayed by journalists and writers who ought to know better. Although Priest and Arkin did not go into it, contractors in the secret world usually provide three types of services: 1) collection and analysis services which some in the U.S, Intelligence Community do not think are core intelligence functions; 2) the design of information systems or collection systems that will improve the speed and efficiency of intelligence production in agencies that have contracted for their services; and 3) operating what are considered specialty functions such as the IT infrastructure management. Contractors are also used in smaller numbers to fulfill a host of other roles with varying degrees of success. The use of contractors no matter how well qualified for their missions has clearly added to the uncontrolled expansion of the secret world.
Priest and Arkin in the best Washington Post tradition report on this uncontrolled growth of the Secret World, but do not pass judgment on it except in the most obvious cases of duplication of effort and clear cut waste. Yet if the reader is attentive it is obvious that most of the uncontrolled growth of secret world that they so accurately report on could have been prevented had the U.S. Government actually developed a coherent counter-terrorism strategy that could have guided an effective response to the threats posed by al Qaeda specifically and terrorism in general.
- Reviewed in the United States on September 17, 2011Dana Priest and William Arkin have produced a remarkable, very deep view of our entire antiterrorism, intelligence, clandestine operational set of networks.
The in depth work and analysis they have here produced is indeed worthy of the highest praise and of immense potential value to our nation.
It is obvious that many high level federal and contractor people opened up to these two highly talented researchers to allow us to gain an insight into the gigantic infrastructure of Top Secret America, and we owe our thanks to these individuals in addition to the authors.
The immense amount of money increasingly devoted to the agencies and programs in conjunction with the amount of inefficient overlap described in this work is frankly sickening and inexcusable.
Within the conclusions, here is a statement right on, absolutely correct, and is referring the mass of agencies, organizations, etc., involved in antiterrorism, intelligence, and cybersecurity and the enormous amount of overclassification and impossibility of ever insuring none of it will leak:
"The smarter and safer route is to design policies and construct foreign relationships based on operating forthrightly, in a way which won't embarrass us or harm anything of value when it is revealed." Great statement and objective. As long as we have politicians who feed at the trough of contractor profits derived from permanent war, however, it isn't going to happen.
My very high praise for this outstanding piece of important work is only mitigated slightly by some non-organizational assertions (in other words not concerning structure or budgets) and in some cases an appearance of not questioning what should have been questioned.
I suggest some items for consideration (samples), and please keep in mind that the following small points are to be taken in context of what is an outstanding piece - Top Secret America.
1) Ayman al-Zawahiri was not "in the ranks" of Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ); he was its leader, and it is difficult to understand why the obfuscation in this work. This man was a terrorist leader long prior to the US promoting of the little known bin Laden to the world. It should further be noted that al-Zawahiri was one of the five signers of the infamous 1998 Fatwah, attributed erroneously solely to bin Laden, and one of the four who at that time led organizations, in his case EIJ. The only signer who was an individual, not the leader of an organization was bin Laden.
Compare these bits of information to all that our public has heard about the authorship of this Fatwah. Knowing the above it is worth some thought why al-Zawahiri has been continually referred to solely as companion, doctor (his is a doctor), second in command, "side kick" (Dana Priest), etc., of bin Laden. He has always been a major terrorist leader. Of course now he is acknowledged as being in command of what is called al-Qaeda.
2) The USS Cole attack was not by al-Qaeda; it was EIJ, led by al-Zawahiri. Dana Priest had an opportunity to correct this error when she noted that the CIA stopped distributing reports on responsibility soon after the attack, but that opportunity was not taken.
3) Whereas it is stated that the evidence of WMD in Iraq was so well buried that very few people had actually seen the evidence, it would have been more accurate to note that such evidence did not exist. Put it this way: It was known that no substantial evidence was in existence. I certainly put that out continually.
4) The source Curveball: It was known that he was a flake prior to Powell's UN speech by both German Intelligence and the CIA, and the information broke publicly a couple days prior to that speech. Besides, there simply wasn't evidence to support anything he said.
5) Powell's UN speech was barely touched upon, but it was a complete disaster, as he now understands. However, at the time the speech was made almost every single assertion could immediately be refuted as baseless and outrageous. This disaster is an example which could have served in this book to point out how politics can and does control what is called intelligence when the objective is war.
6) The assertion is made that it is terrorists who "sought to undermine the openness of our government" and to "force it to become a fortress." Factually, no, that's our own government. The policies put into effect after 9/11 were done so by our government, not some foreign organization.
7) It is clear that a lot of value has been placed on what the 9/11 commission. Acceptance of a severely flawed investigation shouldn't be a given. It is not that the members should be faulted necessarily. Their ground rules and limitations insured the commission was worthless as an investigative body. There is yet to be a valid investigation of this subject.
8) It is asserted that Raymond Davis, CIA in Pakistan, shot "two would-be assailants." I wonder who is responsible for that designation of those he shot and then photographed lying in the street. According to Pak Intelligence, they were Pakistani intelligence agents following him for a good reason.
9) In praise of the effectiveness of drones, after an attack "a motionless body" and "helping to kill terrorists 5000 miles away ..." Well, actually, more than one "motionless body," and "helping to kill" countless others within the blast zones.
10) "... in Pakistan where a number of civilians have died in the (drone) attacks..." Actually, quite a number of civilians, and by most on the ground, on site evaluations following the drone attacks, the ratio has been about 9:1, civilians killed to suspects. In this book an assertion is made that because a Pakistani General agrees substantially with the CIA low count of civilians killed by drone attacks, that "helped confirm their (CIA) accuracy." Don't think so.
11) "... the US backed Northern Alliance..." ... "vanquish the Taliban" Fact: Prior to our invasion of Afghanistan, the Northern Alliance received its backing from Russia and Iran. It was the US Air Force, not the NA, which forced the Taliban from government. Further, the Taliban were not vanquished; they dispersed, and in fact are still, after 10 years, very much a presence.
12) The JSOC (Joint Special Operations Command) were "... blamed for deaths and torture they did not commit ..." Perhaps, but with not a single example given, we're left with the knowledge that indeed they are responsible for both many civilian deaths and torture. So, whereas the assertion probably has a basis in truth, it should be put within context.
13) It is quoted that in December 2001 al-Qaeda had a force of 3,000 and that after the battle of Tora Bora, the dead al-Qaeda were carried off by the truck load. Without questioning the amount of dead, in that "al-Qaeda" consisted of about 200 at the time, it is not made clear where the 3000 came from. Everyone we fight and kill is not a member of "al-Qaeda."
14) Reference is made to the "al-Qaeda operatives" in the Philippines. As I recall, when the US starting asserting al-Qaeda in the Philippines, the leadership of that outfit was very clear in objecting and asserting that they were neither al-Qaeda nor did they have any affiliation with al-Qaeda.
15) The Abu Ghraib abuse is referred to being as just "by low level army soldiers." That's misleading and a cop-out. Responsibility for those war crimes goes right up the chain of command. Those prosecuted are not synonymous with those responsible. And the reason for no further prosecutions was a decision made by the incoming OBama administration.
16) The claim is made that Abu Zarkawi, al-Qaeda top operative in Iraq, was captured June 7 2006. No, he was killed, on June 8 in a bombing raid, not captured. Two witnesses, a neighbor and Iraq police officer, both claimed he was taken off a stretcher and a US troop stomped on his chest and stomach until blood came out his mouth, and then died..
Abu Zarkawi (Zarqawi) certainly had no affiliation with either al-Qaeda or bin Laden prior to our invasion. He was non-affiliated out of Jordan, and was in Iraq for his leg. It is questionable that he ever was affiliated with al-Qaeda. What we called al-Qaeda in Iraq [AQI ], called itself the "Islamic State of Iraq." A more accurate term may be "the "non-aligned mujahideen" which he brought together from many other nations to fight in Iraq after our invasion.
17) It's timely to point out that the label "al-Qaeda" has been enormously over used. Everything and everybody who now want to attack us and whom we are fighting is not always either nor affiliated with al-Qaeda. As an example, even in Iraq as quoted from a DoD intelligence officer: "It was kind of a running joke in our office. We would sarcastically refer to everybody as al-Qaeda." Not just there has it been and is it being done.
I repeat: Within the conclusions, here is a statement right on, absolutely correct, and is referring the mass of agencies, organizations, etc., involved in antiterrorism, intelligence, and cybersecurity and the enormous amount of overclassification and impossibility of ever insuring none of it will leak:
"The smarter and safer route is to design policies and construct foreign relationships based on operating forthrightly, in a way which won't embarrass us or harm anything of value when it is revealed."
Thank you for reading this review, the length for which I apologize, and I realize that some of the above points may be other than commonly believed.
- Reviewed in the United States on July 20, 2013Format: HardcoverVerified PurchaseThis is the most comprehensive view of the Surveillance State as it is in the 21st century.
What are the consequences of privatizing National Security?
If National Security was grounds for abuse ever since the National Security Act of 1947, as we approached Y2K the rate of abuse simply became uncontrollable. We still don't know the consequences of this; we might not know for decades.
We do know, however, that the bulk of our personal information - including our most personal correspondence - is firmly in the hands of corporations which are working side-by-side with the National Security State. Some people don't care, but I suspect this is only so because most don't understand the implications of feeding a "big data" computer with every personal information possible.
850,000 people hold Top Secret clearances. That is partly what is moving the US economy forward, but the people must be very careful in case they want to survive beyond 2020. This book gives you some weapons for this survival.
Top reviews from other countries
-
木内 英一Reviewed in Japan on March 9, 20145.0 out of 5 stars 先進と制約、アメリカが抱える本質問題
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase日本語版を読んでから、原文を読みたくなったものを購入し読んでいる。
とても安く購入できるので大いに満足している。
この本はアメリカの先進の側面と、同時にそれが行き過ぎて社会の制約要因と化している側面を描いている。
-
NeoReviewed in Germany on April 21, 20135.0 out of 5 stars Dana Priest und Mitstreiter haben ein monumentales und solides Standardwerk, gleich einem Denkmal...
zu einer politischen Fehlentwicklung gesetzt, welches vielleicht erst in einem Jahrzehnt, wenn die Politik *"you'r either with us or with the terrorists"* unrühmliche Geschichte sein wird, bei der Aufarbeitung zukünftiger Historiker und Untersuchungsausschüsse der angerichteten Desaster als Standardwerk richtig geschätzt werden wird.
AjayReviewed in India on September 8, 20204.0 out of 5 stars Feedback
Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseInteresting
Lynn BrittneyReviewed in the United Kingdom on July 10, 20145.0 out of 5 stars Scary but true
Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseVery scary book written but written by very competent journalists who don't sensationalise anything. Their research is awesome and they have produced a book that shows, in minute detail, how the state apparatus has got out of hand in America.
PothReviewed in the United Kingdom on August 16, 20142.0 out of 5 stars Mildly interesting.
Well, mildly interesting. The thesis is that America panicked after 9/11 and the state has thrown money and people at "security", without any clear plan, or coordination, or objectives. "Headless chickens", comes to mind. It's now completely out of control, and has developed into a self-perpetuating monster. Unfortunately, the book is repetitive, and very little is new. Priest also intersperses her account with a lot of breathless passages about how she met secret people in secret places. I suspect some of these are not true, some are exaggerated, and some were deliberate attempts by the CIA at deflecting and undermining her credibility. Attempts that have succeeded. Yes, worth a quick flick through to get an idea of the incredible size and cost of America's secret state, but not really worth buying.






