Buy new:
$10.63$10.63
FREE delivery May 2 - 3
Ships from: YourOnlineBookstore Sold by: YourOnlineBookstore
Buy used: $6.88
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform 1st Edition
Purchase options and add-ons
In The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform, Andrew Koppelman explains how the Court's conservatives embraced the arguments of a fringe libertarian legal movement bent on eviscerating the modern social welfare state. They instead advocate what Koppelman calls a "tough luck" philosophy: if you fall on hard times, too bad for you. He argues that the rule they proposed--that the government can't make citizens buy things--has nothing to do with the Constitution, and that it is in fact useless to stop real abuses of power, as it was tailor-made to block this one law after its opponents had lost in the legislature. He goes on to dismantle the high court's construction of the commerce clause, arguing that it almost crippled America's ability to reverse rising health-care costs and shrinking access.
Koppelman also places the Affordable Care Act within a broader historical context. The Constitution was written to increase central power, he notes, after the failure of the Articles of Confederation. The Supreme Court's previous limitations on Congressional power have proved unfortunate: it has struck down anti-lynching laws, civil-rights protections, and declared that child-labor laws would end "all freedom of commerce, and . . . our system of government [would] be practically destroyed." Both somehow survived after the court revisited these precedents. Koppelman notes that the arguments used against Obamacare are radically new--not based on established constitutional principles.
Ranging from early constitutional history to potential consequences, this is the definitive postmortem of this landmark case.
- ISBN-100199970025
- ISBN-13978-0199970025
- Edition1st
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateMarch 22, 2013
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions8.3 x 0.8 x 5.6 inches
- Print length208 pages
Editorial Reviews
Review
"This is the definitive book on the Affordable Care Act decision. Koppelman explains clearly and concisely the history of the lawsuit, the mandate it challenged, and the constitutional provisions on which the challenge was based. Most importantly, Koppelman explains the decision's implications for the future." --Timothy Jost, The Washington and Lee University School of Law"Unlike the Affordable Care Act itself, Koppelman's Tough Luck Constitution is a short and enjoyable read. Like the Act, this book speaks truth about the public interest and offers a hopeful vision for the health care reform." --William Eskridge, Yale Law School"Professor Koppelman's analysis of the constitutional fight to stop health reform is must-reading for anyone who desires a deeper understanding of the Constitutional story behind one of the most intense legal battles ever waged over a seminal advance in U.S. social welfare policy. Neither health policy nor constitutional theory and practice will ever be quite the same." --Sara Rosenbaum, George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services
Book Description
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; 1st edition (March 22, 2013)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 208 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0199970025
- ISBN-13 : 978-0199970025
- Item Weight : 11.8 ounces
- Dimensions : 8.3 x 0.8 x 5.6 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #4,042,212 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #584 in Health Law (Books)
- #1,104 in Constitutional Law (Books)
- #1,822 in Constitutions (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Andrew Koppelman is John Paul Stevens Professor of Law, Professor (by courtesy) of Political Science, and Philosophy Department Affiliated Faculty at Northwestern University. He received the Walder Award for Research Excellence from Northwestern, the Hart-Dworkin award in legal philosophy from the Association of American Law Schools, and the Edward S. Corwin Prize from the American Political Science Association. His scholarship focuses on issues at the intersection of law and political philosophy. He has written more than 100 scholarly articles and eight books, most recently Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022). You can find his recent work at andrewkoppelman.com.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Everything is presented clearly enough, but I struggled a bit with the constant references to earlier Supreme Court decisions and the precedents they set, and also with some of the legal language. Still, none of it was too off-putting for, in my case, a reader who knew little of the law in general and Constitutional Law in particular.
It turns out that a book with a narrow focus on the legal arguments is a welcome one. After all, experts, reporters, and the general public alike were confused and quite suprised by Justice Roberts' decision to uphold the main argument against Obamacare's mandate, and yet find that mandate, and most of the rest of Obamacare, constitutional on a different basis. What was his judicial reasoning, and what were his personal reasons? This book gives useful background and compelling insight into both questions.
Koppelman is pretty fair in presenting the legal arguments made against the Affordable Care Act and its mandate; however, his personal attitude about those challenges is clearly seen in this paragraph near the end of Chapter 4:
"Isn't it odd that the mandate, which a few years earlier was the Republican alternative to Clinton's health plan, suddenly became, once Obama supported it, an intolerable intrusion on a new, unenumerated liberty? May we not suspect that, if Obama had rejected the mandate and chosen a different mechanism, those wonderfully creative Republicans would have invented a different constitutional rule, which that mechanism would have violated?"
