Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- To view this video download Flash Player
Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11 1st Edition
Purchase options and add-ons
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda. The popular chant, "9/11 was an inside job," is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that "19 bad guys with box cutters did it." Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court. Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime. You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief. You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don't even know what crime to charge them with. If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you'd better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. Yet, before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory. My research is not speculation. It is a forensic investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11.
- ISBN-100615412564
- ISBN-13978-0615412566
- Edition1st
- PublisherThe New Investigation
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 2010
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions10.5 x 7.5 x 1.5 inches
- Print length544 pages
Frequently bought together

Customers who bought this item also bought
Product details
- Publisher : The New Investigation; 1st edition (January 1, 2010)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 544 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0615412564
- ISBN-13 : 978-0615412566
- Item Weight : 3.3 pounds
- Dimensions : 10.5 x 7.5 x 1.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #82,028 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #55 in Terrorism (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Dr. Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials. She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and has served on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division. Dr. Wood received her B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992).
Dr. Wood started to question the events of 9/11 on that same day when what she saw and heard on television was contradictory and appeared to violate the laws of physics. Since that day she has used her knowledge of engineering mechanics to prove that the collapse of the World Trade Center twin towers could not have happened as the American public was told. In this interview, Judy Wood talks about her book “Where Did the Towers Go?”
The book is the culmination of years of work and study that she’s been presenting on her website DrJudyWood.com about the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11/01. She has been tracking and collecting many of the anomalies witnessed on that day and found evidence for a strange effect related to the work of John Hutchison called “The Hutchison Effect.” We discuss how directed-energy weapons might have been involved in destroying the towers. Topics Discussed: forensics, interference energy, John Hutchison, hurricane Erin, tornados, towers turning to dust, anomalies, strange effects, physics, WTC1, WTC2, WTC3, WTC4, WTC5, WTC6, WTC7, NIST, classified technology, The Billiard Ball Example and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Something repels me from her analysis, for what she is essentially implying as indeed much more directly are many others who may have issues with her work or aspects of it IS that a network or group of highly-placed and very influential people out there (whoever they may be) fell so low and to such a level of treachery,perfidy, malice and sheer bare-faced evil that together they devised a fiendishly wicked plot and equally as sickening, deceitful and morally wicked, an on-going cover up so as to persuade the American public to support a general war on terror,a loss of their own civil rights and freedoms and 2 specific wars(so far) aimed at a false and malicious retribution,all this in addition to the mass murder of predominantly American citizens,including children, and high treason.
Let us make no bones about it.Dr Wood stays resolutely with the science and ONLY WITH THE SCIENCE for sure but if the science is correct and the burden of proof discharged,or is even enough to prove that the offical explanation could not have happened( and that terrorists used explosives is entirely untenable )then the charges above are total,unarguable,UNIMPEACHABLE and absolute.
9/11 was for me as for most of the world a deeply shocking event.To witness people allegedly celebrating what they saw as the come-uppance of the US Empire was equally as repulsive and like the vast majority I accepted that this was a terrorist attack but did not believe that an invasion of Afghanistan was warranted and protested the lack of real proof that Hussein in Iraq had any involvement whatsoever.This has since been accepted as the case with a public apology from the then US Secretary of State who himself was misled into presenting false evidence to the UN.
Several years passed until I read Prof Griffins "the New Pearl Harbour" wherein he makes a convincing case amongst much else that fire does not bring down sky-scrapers and never has.With the discovery of thermite material in the dust I consequently became slightly convinced through a lack of scientific background that a new explosive material had brought down the towers, having discounted the idea that fire and collison damage combined had been the cause-ignoring Tower 7- as indeed the NIST Report does, showing the structures to be highly redundant and deliberately constructed to withstand such a crisis.
But I needed to have a scientist with specific relevant skills and experience to help explain 9/11 to me and indeed was looking around and asking for some time until I heard of Judy Wood.Before however looking more closely at the book itself I want to address 2 specific related issues.Firstly ,Dr Wood and Richard Gage et al agree that the official explanation of pancake collapse is deeply and hopelessly flawed but disagree on the true cause.Wouldnt it be so helpful,sensible and more likely to bear fruit if the positive aspects of their agreement were emphasised and there was an understanding to disagree and to debate politely on the rest?Secondly, some people claim with some good reason that another investigation would just be another cover up and cite the HSCA into President Kennedys assassination as their example.Yet what else is there? Does anyone imagine that somehow criminal investigations will suddenly be opened into any of this?With President Obama having made numerous statements aimed at quenching the science and retaining the official fiction the very best that anyone can hope for beyond the court proceedings launched by Dr Wood- and where is this just now?-all that is left is another inquiry,this time one which is fully independent,properly financed and which has full powers of subpoena.
Possibly I have jumped the gun in this review by the comments above and should have written first that I find the science Dr Wood offers and the evidence she clearly lays out established proof that a new directed energy weapon pulverised the towers effectively turning them into dust in mid-air.There have been attempts to debunk Dr Wood claiming her seismic data is wrong,that toasted cars had been towed to FDR Drive and that she has underestimated the damage to the bathtub.Let us say there were something in any of these 3 claims, and she admits that the towing is possible though the evidence of nearbye Seaport explosions is purposefully omitted in the criticism.Her case,however, so much much wider than any of this, demonstrates a preponderance of evidence not simply that fire could not have brought down the towers and certainly not in the accepted time-frames but that the cause of this disaster was the employment of a highly classified top-secret new weapon- the new Hiroshima- which turned the towers into dust by molecular disassociation.Indeed the weight of evidence is so vast, wide-ranging and so clear-cut that the criticisms above are mere pin-pricks/cysts on an elephants backside in her overall assembly of the facts.Furthermore, it is very clear that Dr Wood whose training and experience in damage- cause observation increase further still the power of her understanding when wedded to her wholly relevant formidable scientific academic background wrote this book fuelled and driven by the DICTATES of conscience and that it is born from a deep scientific integrity so intrinsic to her very nature that she has felt it necessary to risk all,including ridicule from the intellectually lazy or dishonest, to get it out to a public which has been deliberately and wickedly kept in ignorance.This book is a massive work in every sense but still very readable by the non-scientist and is CERTAINLY the most important book of the last 100 years if not longer.Everything Prof Larsen claims in his powerful review is true and more.
Dr Wood has opened up 9/11 for us, FOLLOWING THE EVIDENCE AND LETTING THE DICE ROLL WHERE THEY MAY,without prisoners or hostages with brutal honesty and deep sensitivity,and is an inspired teacher......
Yes her conclusions are appalling,and make us recoil at every level from the foul disease which made this plot bud and which has sought ever since to cover it up.
Two final comments on other doubts about the book......
Firstly, some concern has been expressed about the chapter dealing with Hurricane Erin.Dr Wood reaches no final conclusions here and is completely open that a cold front was sweeping eastwards across the mainland towards New York.What however is striking is both the lack of weather information released to the American people about this huge hurricane running parallel to the US Eastern seaboard for several days,that it was so near to New York on 9/11 being visible in aerial photographs taken from there that day and the very abruptness and timing of the u turn it made and it is fitting and correct that this should be included in the book and adds to it.Secondly,similar concern has been expressed about the chapter "jumpers".If it does nothing else- and it does- this chapter brings home with an enormous jolt the reality of this tragedy and the very wickedness of what happened to ordinary people trapped in this building.Dr Wood, a trained observer,shows here from their behaviour and from the frequency of the jumping that something highly unusual beyond the appalling horrors of fire and smoke was going on within the building and that people were blown or swept out with enormous force and that no one carried anything and that others were disrobing.The criticism of her chapter seems to imply that its quite natural to jump from a burning building.In fact it's the very very last thing anyone would do and the suggestion that a queue of people desperate for oxygen pushed people some substantial distances from the towers sides entirely facile.
A TRUE SCIENTIST OF THE GALILEO TRADITION.....
An extraordinary work,a massive achievement, a profound demonstration of courage.....
Thank you Judy Wood.
I watched the DVD long before I bought and read this book. I was surprised the book was easy reading for me and I finished it in one sitting. This may have been due to my familiarity with the subject via the DVD. It may be due to the way it was written - simple and straight forward. Most likely this book was an easy read for me because it was fascinating. I could not put it down. It was rational and objective. I have no questions about anything the author presented - I agreed with everything except one. Building 7.
I watched this entire 911 occurrence on my C-band satellite with a 12 foot dish. News feeds come through the dish before they are broadcast in the news. There is a separate CNN feed which I was watching all day. At or around 4:20 PM (I think this was the time) I was watching a single reporter who was broadcasting one or two blocks from Building#7. A fireman approached this reporter and told him he had to leave because building #7 was being pulled in a few minutes. The reporter moved back a block or so and continued broadcasting. In a few more minutes a policeman approached him and he was again told to move because the building was going to be demolished. The reporter continued broadcasting as he moved back and his mike was open as both the fireman and the policeman told him to move further away because building #7 was about to be pulled.
Sure enough, in a few minutes, Building #7 fell as planned. I've maintained this is what I saw on the raw news feeds on my C-Band dish. Weeks later the owner of the WTC buildings was being interviewed and he also said that building #7 was intentionally demolished. Dr. Judy Wood does not disagree about the fall of Building #7 but she has a different recollection of the process or of the timeline. I've read so many different versions of #7 that I don't recall her position, but I made a mental note that she didn't see the same live raw feed broadcasts of the actual demise of building #7, and she didn't see the interview with the owner of the WTC buildings weeks later when he also stated that #7 was pulled when and where I saw it broadcast live. I made a mental note of this minor difference since I agreed with everything else this brilliant woman said.
For anyone who still wants to know what really happened when the towers fell, this book is mandatory reading. Also interesting reading are the reader reviews of the book - seems like the brightest amazon.com members have gathered around this book to discuss Dr. Wood's findings and free energy technology. The comments made are almost as fascinating as the book itself. I've never seen anything like this on amazon.com before. It's worth taking a look.
Top reviews from other countries
Those behind this will escape prosecution and the party line will always be terrorists were to blame.
Shame on those involved but…. We will never know the truth will we?
And we are really lucky that there was a person who has taken on the difficult and also dangerous task to reveal the truth by hard facts. Otherwise the lies would have succeeded to be taken for the truth - and all doubters silenced or ridiculed.






















