Buy new:
$14.99$14.99
$3.97
delivery:
Friday, April 26
Ships from: symposia Sold by: symposia
Buy used: $7.54
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $5.98 shipping
99% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
98% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us To Choose Between Privacy And Freedom? Paperback – June 1, 1999
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length384 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateJune 1, 1999
- Grade level11 and up
- Reading age13 years and up
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.88 x 8.5 inches
- ISBN-100738201448
- ISBN-13978-0738201443
- Lexile measure1370L
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together

Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
David Brin has a Ph.D. in physics, but is best known for his science fiction. His books include the New York Times bestseller The Uplift War, Hugo Award-winner Startide Rising, and The Postman. He lives in Encinitas, California.
Product details
- Publisher : Basic Books; 0 edition (June 1, 1999)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 384 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0738201448
- ISBN-13 : 978-0738201443
- Reading age : 13 years and up
- Lexile measure : 1370L
- Grade level : 11 and up
- Item Weight : 1.01 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.88 x 8.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,820,021 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,722 in Civil Rights & Liberties (Books)
- #6,862 in Technology (Books)
- #49,286 in World History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

David Brin is a scientist, public speaker and world-known author. His novels have been New York Times Bestsellers, winning multiple Hugo, Nebula and other awards. At least a dozen have been translated into more than twenty languages.
David's latest novel - Existence - is set forty years ahead, in a near future when human survival seems to teeter along not just on one tightrope, but dozens, with as many hopeful trends and breakthroughs as dangers... a world we already see ahead. Only one day an astronaut snares a small, crystalline object from space. It appears to contain a message, even visitors within. Peeling back layer after layer of motives and secrets may offer opportunities, or deadly peril.
David's non-fiction book -- The Transparent Society: Will Technology Make Us Choose Between Freedom and Privacy? -- deals with secrecy in the modern world. It won the Freedom of Speech Award from the American Library Association.
A 1998 movie, directed by Kevin Costner, was loosely based on his post-apocalyptic novel, The Postman. Brin's 1989 ecological thriller - Earth - foreshadowed global warming, cyberwarfare and near-future trends such as the World Wide Web. David's novel Kiln People has been called a book of ideas disguised as a fast-moving and fun noir detective story, set in a future when new technology enables people to physically be in more than two places at once. A hardcover graphic novel The Life Eaters explored alternate outcomes to WWII, winning nominations and high praise.
David's science fictional Uplift Universe explores a future when humans genetically engineer higher animals like dolphins to become equal members of our civilization. These include the award-winning Startide Rising, The Uplift War, Brightness Reef, Infinity's Shore and Heaven's Reach. He also recently tied up the loose ends left behind by the late Isaac Asimov: Foundation's Triumph brings to a grand finale Asimov's famed Foundation Universe.
Brin serves on advisory committees dealing with subjects as diverse as national defense and homeland security, astronomy and space exploration, SETI and nanotechnology, future/prediction and philanthropy.
As a public speaker, Brin shares unique insights -- serious and humorous -- about ways that changing technology may affect our future lives. He appears frequently on TV, including several episodes of "The Universe" and History Channel's "Life After People." He also was a regular cast member on "The ArciTECHS."
Brin's scientific work covers an eclectic range of topics, from astronautics, astronomy, and optics to alternative dispute resolution and the role of neoteny in human evolution. His Ph.D in Physics from UCSD - the University of California at San Diego (the lab of nobelist Hannes Alfven) - followed a masters in optics and an undergraduate degree in astrophysics from Caltech. He was a postdoctoral fellow at the California Space Institute. His technical patents directly confront some of the faults of old-fashioned screen-based interaction, aiming to improve the way human beings converse online.
Brin lives in San Diego County with his wife and three children.
You can follow David Brin:
Website: http://www.davidbrin.com/
Blog: http://davidbrin.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/DavidBrin
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/cab801
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
But, at least according to David Brin, the future will be different. In the future privacy as we know it today will be nearly impossible to attain.
In the future privacy will be next to nonexistent because of the explosion of audiovisual, communications, andcomputer technologies. Cheap hard disks will allow people to collect massive information about transactions: who did what. Cheap cameras will allow people to collect massive amounts of information about locations: who was where. Cheap computer power will allow the sorting and searching of massive amounts of information in search of those nuggets of data relevant to any one particular person. And cheap computers will allow anyone--or anyone with access codes--to access what will essentially become the stored life history of anyone.
From David Brin's perspective, this change is coming. The only question is who will have access to the information that will be contained in the great surveillance databases. Will the information be "secret" and "private"--in which case only governments which may turn thuggish will have access? Or will the information be "open" and "public"--in which case we will once again be back in the village, where nearly everything is done in public and everybody knows everybody else's business: truly a global village.
Brin makes a good case that the technology will bring us to one of these two outcomes. And he argues that the first outcome--in which we try to preserve our "privacy" by restricting access to the great surveillance databases--is a very dangerous outcome. It is a dangerous outcome because secret knowledge is power, and if the twentieth century has proven anything it is that governments cannot be trusted with secret knowledge. The great tyrannies of the twentieth century flourished because their surveillance gave them control and their secrecy kept enough citizens from realizing what they were up to fast enough. The advent of modern audiovisual, communications, and computing technologies greatly amplifies the power of surveillance, and greatly multiplies the danger if it is not countered by a greatly amplified power of the people to survey the government. And popular surveillance over the government carries as a side effect a potential loss of privacy. Anything that restricts popular access to information about other citizens restricts popular access to information about the government as well.
I believe that Brin's book is not necessarily an accurate forecast. The futures that he envisions will probably never come to pass. And the choice that he foresees may well never be posed in the stark form in which he poses it. Yet the book is useful: the future Brin envisions is clearly one of the possible futures that might come to pass, and the consequences of what he sees as the wrong choice in that possible future could turn the twenty-first century into an abattoir that would make the twentieth century look like a Sunday picnic.
If enough people read Brin's book, or are brushed by the currents of thought in represents, then it may turn into a self-negating prophecy: a warning of dystopia that by virtue of the horror it paints helps avoid that horror. That was the function of George Orwell's 1984.
That is an honorable role for anyone's book.
An important aspect of privacy, the author points out, is accountability. Accountability, he writes, "is the one fundamental ingredient on which liberty thrives." But, he points out, whenever a conflict arises between privacy and accountability, people demand privacy for themselves and accountability for everybody else. This is illustrated clearly by governments that seek to avoid accountability by reducing the flow of information about their activities. In response, corporations and citizens attempt to hide their activities and identities from the government, thereby seeking to enhance their privacy and reduce their accountability as well.
In his discussion, Brin--a physicist--cites numerous authorities from various disciplines to support his arguments. He points out, for example, that "if transparency is the requisite condition in science, democracy, and free markets, it should come as no surprise that many economists now lean toward attributing most kinds of injustice, bureaucracy, and societal inefficiency to asymmetric information flows--where one person or group knows something that others don't."
Brin identifies several sources of disagreement about the connections between privacy and freedom. For one thing, he points out, "we cannot count on jurists to define privacy for us, or legislators to supply realistic protections for it." As a result, he says, "those tasks will largely be our responsibility during the decades and generations to come." Another source of disagreement is the form of reasoning used by partisans (who he refers to as the "strong privacy movement") who employ chains of tautologies to defend their position or to attack their opposition (the same tool used by many politicians and political radio talk show hosts). As those who have studied logic will know, however, the formal validity of deductive reasoning does not guarantee the truth of its conclusions.
The only misgivings I have for the book are its length--his points could have been made more succinctly--and the fact that although he quotes numerous sources in the book, he does not provide adequate references for most of the quotes.









