- Paperback: 196 pages
- Publisher: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (August 15, 2017)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 1974617890
- ISBN-13: 978-1974617890
- Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.4 x 9 inches
- Shipping Weight: 9.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 86 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#284,134 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #365 in Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Politics & Government > Specific Topics > Censorship
- #633 in Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Politics & Government > Specific Topics > Civil Rights & Liberties
- #668 in Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Politics & Government > United States > National
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
+ Free Shipping
Trumped Up: How Criminalization of Political Differences Endangers Democracy Paperback – August 15, 2017
|New from||Used from|
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
About the Author
Professor Alan M. Dershowitz is one of the nation’s “most distinguished defenders of individual rights.” He is Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law Emeritus at Harvard Law School, and author of twenty-five works including The New York Times #1 bestseller Chutzpah.
If you buy a new print edition of this book (or purchased one in the past), you can buy the Kindle edition for only $2.99 (Save 63%). Print edition purchase must be sold by Amazon. Learn more.
For thousands of qualifying books, your past, present, and future print-edition purchases now lets you buy the Kindle edition for $2.99 or less. (Textbooks available for $9.99 or less.)
Try the Kindle edition and experience these great reading features:
86 customer reviews
Review this product
Read reviews that mention
Showing 1-8 of 86 reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
As you would expect from a professor of law at Harvard, the writing is superb. It is concise and clear and you don’t need a Harvard degree to understand it. Dershowitz deftly avoids the jargon of both academia and political extremism. Perhaps most refreshingly, he studiously avoids the weasel words and phrases (e.g., “experts say,” “mainstream opinion,” etc.) that have destructively diluted the authenticity of political dialogue and debate today.
In discussing “corrupt motive”, for example, Dershowitz concludes, “Anglo-American law is based on precedent. What happens today can be used tomorrow. So beware of creating precedents that lie around like loaded weapons in the hands of overzealous or politically motivated prosecutors.” Simple, concise, and clear.
By definition words are imprecise. Unlike oxygen and sunshine, they are a human convention. A skillful writer or orator can use the wiggle room that always exist in their meaning to promote a position that is strongly supported, but not entirely conclusive. We can’t expect anyone of the professor’s lingual skills not to utilize those skills any more than we can expect a MLB outfielder to intentionally drop a fly ball now and again to prove he is human. But while Dershowitz races up to the warning track in a few cases he always pulls up. It would be unfair, I think, to characterize anything in this book as distorted or misleading.
My only reservation about the book is that it doesn’t always stay within the lines of its title. While he covers the criminalization of political differences in depth, he does get sidetracked from time to time in his defense of Israel and, for example, the role of Keith Ellison on the Democratic National Committee, and his past disagreements with people like John Flannery and Noam Chomsky. His positions are well-reasoned and important expansions of the public record. I only worry that they will draw attention away from the primary theme of the book.
That is to be expected from a man of principle, however. The man has the fortitude it takes for constancy. And, in the end, I applaud the professor for both his passion and his courage.
At 193 pages it is a quick read. I highly recommend it.
He also brings up the concept of separate but equal branches of government. At this time the executive branch of government has too much power over the judicial branch of government when the question of legal issues are involved. The judicial branch needs to be allowed to perform its tasks without interference from the executive in my humble opinion.