Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
How the EPAs Green Tyranny is Stifling America (Encounter Broadsides) Paperback – May 10, 2011
Up to 50% off select Non-Fiction books
Featured titles are up to 50% off for a limited time. See all titles
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Discover books for all types of engineers, auto enthusiasts, and much more. Learn more
Top Customer Reviews
All of that changed, Trzupek argues, when Carol Browning became the energy "czar" for the country and Lisa Jackson took over the EPA. As Trzupek sees it, the EPA has gone from regulatory creep to leap, and he predicts the results will be devastating for the US economy, already struggling to recover from a "Great Recession" that was itself the product of government mismanagement.Read more ›
One of the great misconceptions, I believe, of the W. Bush administration is that he was no friend of the environment. In this writing, Mr. Trzupek points out that, under Bush II the air, water and soil got cleaner than it was under Clinton, just as it got cleaner under Clinton than it had under Bush I, and so on. But Trzupek also writes that the Obama administration couldn't settle for the "regulatory creep" of previous administrations going back to Nixon. He, instead, gave us Carol Browner and Lisa Jackson, the Terror Twins of the Green movement. He also points to what may turn out to be a lesson in the Law of Unintended Consequences (something Obama's White House seems to excel in): should the environmental Left get its way and legislate those big, bad, Earth-destroying corporations out of existence...they might find they dry up and blow away as well -- service industries like the environmental movement depend on the wealth creation of those corporations to fund their activities.
Perhaps one of the best recommendations for this broadside can be found by reading between the lines of another review. While the first review deals entirely with the work itself, the second is a whiny diatribe against the author. There isn't a shred of information -- not even opinion -- about the subject matter itself.Read more ›