Bubble Witch Saga 3 Check out Santa's new ride Beauty Best Books of the Year Black Friday Deals Week nav_sap_plcc_ascpsc For a limited time. 3 months for $0.99. Amazon Music Unlimited. New subscribers only. Terms and conditions apply. PCB for Musical Instruments $24.99 for a limited time only Grocery Handmade Gift Shop Home and Garden Book a house cleaner for 2 or more hours on Amazon Black Friday deals: save 40% or more on Amazon Video Black Friday deals: save 40% or more on Amazon Video Black Friday deals: save 40% or more on Amazon Video  Echo Show Black Friday Deals Week: Fire tablets starting at $29.99. Limited-time offer. $30 off Kindle Paperwhite Shop Now HTL17_gno

Under the Bed
Format: DVD|Change
Price:$10.47+ Free shipping with Amazon Prime


on April 13, 2014
Novice director Steven C. Miller (Silent Night) takes a stab at an R-rated contemporized approach to the classic "monster under my bed" story. I was generally pleased with Don't Be Afraid of the Dark (2011) and The Boogeyman (2005), so why not give this a shot?

After years apart following the death of his mother, disheveled and angsty teen Neal (Jonny Weston; John Dies at the End, Taken 3) returns home to live with his father (Peter Holden; Alien Abduction) and younger brother Paulie. He had been sent away two years ago to "get well" after he burned the house down with his mother in it, defending himself from the monster residing under his bed. Now that he has returned, he learns his little brother has been tormented by the same demon every night.

The notion that an otherworldly monster can magically cross into our dimension through the floor under one specific kid's bed is pretty silly. Terrifying, in fact. That it only does so in the dark while you're asleep…even scarier. There was so much potential for dark figures and painfully drawn-out tension. But for some reason I never saw or felt either. And what about the story…actually, what exactly is the story? What drives this monster and how did it get in their house? Why did it want these boys? Are there more of these monsters? Don't Be Afraid of the Dark (2011) and The Boogeyman (2005) made at least some effort to explain their monsters, their motivations, their origins and their behavior. But here, it just seems that this monster came with the house and its abilities and weaknesses seem to change without explanation as the movie persists. That's really all we get.

Not willing to tell their parents this ridiculous story (as they haven't in years past), the two brothers unite to fight this monster. They arm themselves with flashlights, tape, wire, a power drill and duct tape. But is this monster really a threat? Neal was once psychologically tortured and sleep-deprived by this creature. But that creature had 365 opportunities a year to get the upper hand on a sleeping child and somehow never won! After Neal left, his younger brother made it 730 consecutive nights unscathed. If this monster was really in the business of eating children to survive, it clearly would have starved to death by now. It doesn't seem that menacing. A clawed hand reaching out from under the bed is scary, YES! But if it never does anything else…what's the big deal?

I think the filmmakers really thought this movie was scary…..it wasn't. Despite their addition of loud music prefacing "SOMETHING SCARY" every time the camera zooms in on something (like, for example, the edge of a menacing bed skirt), I never felt convinced that anyone old enough to buy their own ticket for this movie could possibly be frightened by it. Sophomoric scare attempts include a shaking washing machine and load noises, loud noises by themselves for no apparent reason, and close-ups of Neal looking at the bed with loud noises. Noticing a trend here?

THEN ALL THE SUDDEN EVERYTHING CHANGED!

For over an hour we sit back and wonder why this movie isn't rated PG-13 or even just PG. Then, after years of going hungry under the bed, the monster suddenly decides to show Neal's family and the audience that it is, in fact, not at all bound to the bed! Neal and Paulie are next door when the creature arrives and twists off the neighbor kid's head in a gloriously gory display. There's that R-rating we came for! When they run back home it follows them and tears their dad's head apart like a food processor. You hear that? It just followed them! Why the Hell did it just stay under the bed all these years? We went from a lame movie starring a rubber claw under a bed with loud music and no scares to a gore-slathered, slimy creature romp. The monster itself is actually pretty damned cool looking and the special effects are up to snuff as well. It looks like an inbred, disfigured Moorlock covered in snot.

Why on Earth the director waited so long to reveal this creature, the action and the gore is beyond me because all of the exposition leading up to this was completely empty and the other characters--the parents, the neighbors, some random love interest that never goes anywhere--really never offered anything to the story, which never made any sense to begin with beyond the simple fact that inexplicably there is a child-hungry monster under Paulie's bed.

If things weren't random enough yet, the monster actually fashions a hunter's rope snare, traps Paulie like an animal and drags him into the under-the-bed slimy Netherworld! So, just like in Poltergeist II (1986), Neal ties a rope around his waist and goes after him armed with a flashlight trident. I can't even believe what I'm writing right now! WTF is going on in this movie? Were the writers all high? When they come back to--ummmm…reality I guess--the monster now literally has the ability to teleport before our eyes like Nightcrawler in X-Men. Hooray consistency! Then Neal is about to lose a fight against our under-the-bed teleporting Netherworld snot monster when he discovers that his dead mother's ashes are its one weakness. Yeah! He throws his mother's ashes on the monster and that's what kills it!

After a slow, confusing start this film eventually catapults its audience into a tumultuous spin cycle of bonkers gore, creature effects and action which--despite making no sense whatsoever--make the whole experience worth the price of admission. In fact, the last 20 minutes were so off-the-wall entertaining that I don't regret buying this at all. Yes it's very dumb. But it's the kind of dumb I want to share with friends with an improvised drinking game.

Enjoy the madness.
0Comment| 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on July 14, 2016
Not good at all, really. If I hadn't paid to watch it I probably would've given a 2-star rating as the last 10 minutes was pretty decent. The lead up, however...the acting wasn't good, the dialogue wasn't good, and while the creature had an interesting backstory (created from dead skin cells that build up under the bed!) it wasn't really explored...Like I imagined, what's the relationship between the kid who's skin created this monster and the monster itself? Would the monster view the guy as a 'father' of sorts? Is he acting out his hidden desires?

Nope, none of this is explored in the movie - or even really hinted at. The last 10 minutes had some good effects & action, but it was boring until that point. If it becomes available for free, skip the first half of the movie and just start in the middle. You won't have missed a single thing, and you can see some relatively interesting creature design. Don't pay for it, though.
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on April 3, 2015
I'm using my mother's account firstly. I'm 17, and i love horror movies. I watch them a lot, more so right now since I'm able to get them on amazon's instant video. I read reviews before selecting a movie to watch. I read the reviews for Under The bed, and didn't see any dislikes, so I bought it. That was a mistake. The first signs of the thing under the bed is a bit creepy, but as the movie went on, I found myself bored and asking myself "why am I still watching this?" Of course this is just my opinion,but this movie is not worth the money to rent it, especially not to buy it. Thanks for reading! :)
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on May 27, 2017
Very disappointing film, it's like it's a sequel without the rest of the story being explained. I thought it was just me that was a bit confused but my friend borrowed it and rang me asking for the first part.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on March 12, 2017
wasn't what I expected. It dragged on in the beginning with a bit of few second action throughout the movie then got incredibly gory towards the end. The plot shifted so quickly I thought I was watching a different movie, Its ok if you buy it for a dollar at the pawn shop
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on December 31, 2014
Listen up people Steven. C Miller is just about the most low budget horror director out there. Now that being said maybe if you don't dig low budget u shouldn't watch his films ...Automaton Transfusion ..The Aggression scale..Silent Night ..banshee..and Under the bed are all very creepy gory just real good horror with a price tag that's less $ than a Hollywood crap movie but better to enjoy a guy who makes films His way and not give into the machine ....if u like creepy monster under you're bed movies literally then this is fore u . I don't give spoilers so enjoy 😉
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on June 13, 2015
I've seen better...better acting, suspense, cinematography. This is a 'B' movie at the best. I likely won't watch it again. Concept is overused in so many ways, and too many cliches. Ugh! I prefer novel ideas, something that keeps me thinking and not just cringing. Clearly this is an independent film, and though I don't have a problem with independents, they don't need to look low budget as well. I won't recommend this film as there are far too many good horrors to watch instead. Oh, and it drags on and on and on for suspense that turns out to be a huge let-down. Hitchcock would NOT approve.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on March 12, 2014
About half-way through the film I was looking for some reason to recommend it to others and I could not come up with any reason to do so. So, I will not here either!

I am always intrigued by the corners into which film writers and screenplay writers paint themselves in some films and the often goofy ways they attempt to extricate themselves (and the actors) from the situation they were placed. In this film, the story is not just disjointed but approached as if it were multiple mini-stories that are tied together in the end by merely writing in a particular character into a scene who has been ignored throughout the film. That type of story-telling is nothing if not annoying but in this case it makes the story ludicrous.

Spend your time somewhere else!
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on May 8, 2014
This movie has the same plot as many other horror movies: a young boy witnesses a loved one die in a supernatural way, and gets put in a crazy home because people think he imagined everything. He gets out when he is grown, to find that the same events that plagued him as a kid are happening to another child, and he vows to help said child. Come on, we've seen that plot in "Darkness falls," "Boogie man" and countless other movies, most recently, "Oculus."
The movie doesn't have much action until the end, and the special effects are horrid. The acting is overdone and unbelievable, especially from the father, who happens to have lots of dialogue, which would be awful, even is delivered by the best actor in the world.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on October 5, 2017
Okay movie a lil dragged out but worth a watch forsure
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Customers also viewed these items

The Elf
$12.99

Need customer service? Click here