One of the most haunting stories I've ever read. It's so creative I can barely believe it. Still, slow-motion nightmarishness. A mix of the philosophic and gruesome blood hash death! It gets the Kelly D. Snuff Maximus Award for nastiness and blood drenched slaughter. If they ever made a movie that followed the book strictly, it'd make John Hurt's chest exploding scene seem like Winnie the Pooh getting his head stuck in a pot of honey.
Isserley is an extremely surgically-altered alien female who drives around Northern Scotland in search of fresh meat; alien as in outer space—not from Central America or Syria. Not that she or her peers can eat such meat; earthling/vodsel is a delicacy on her planet. It's far too expensive for her class to purchase. They were allotted the “poorer-quality mince, the necks, offal and extremities.” Lovely. Yeah, Isserley is from an unnamed planet choking on its own runaway pollution. The wealthy, "elite," live their entire lives inside and let the lower classes provide their sustenance and riches. Therefore, obviously, Isserley's is a low-level job, but still considered above the drudgery of working in the "New Estates," located in a hideously overpopulated and claustrophobic underground. It’s a more technologically advanced type of Morlock society, if you will. In the mind’s eye they think of themselves as the civilized society, and humans as the “savages.” However, these aliens actually seem to be physically closer to what vodsels call canine. Michel Faber does a great job of translating their native thoughts and communications into English without being the slightest bit intrusive.
Interestingly, there’s a category of space traveling elites from her planet that would be labeled here on earth as “tree-hugging environmentalist whackos.” Isserley hates them. In fact, when one of these alien environmentalists comes to planet earth, “Amlis Vess,” he releases three of the captive vodsels which were being prepared for slaughter. After which, there’s a nightmarish, keystone cops slapstick scene wherein Isserley and a meatpacking laborer have to hunt down the fugitive vodsels before they’re found out! It’s cold, and the naked, grotesquely-fattened-by-space-steroids vodsels are shivering and turning blue; their bodies bloated like Michelin men. Their teeth have been pulled and they're castrated for good measure. They can’t talk and only “moo.” S*** drizzles down their overfed, stammering legs. After this Benny Hill saxophone corralling situation ends, the two exhausted chasers look at each other and start to laugh. Unbelievably hellish hijinks, eh?
Isserley knows earthlings far better than the elites do. The elites have only heard rumors that vodsels can communicate with any sophistication. When Isserley tours the vodsel stockyards with Vess, one swollen, mewing vodsel writes out the word “mercy” in the dirt floor of their corral. Vess is curious if it means anything. Isserley says “of course not.” She knows that vodesels can write, however. She's watched enough TV to know that. Nonetheless, she misinterprets the word as “murky.” She does not provide information about vodsels to the nobles because she despises “humans” like Amlis Vess. Isserley is not a happy space camper. Her cynicism runs deep. She thinks vodsels are shallow, empty animals. They lacked “siuwil, mesnishtil, slan, hunshur, hississins, chail and chailsinn. They couldn't siuwil, they couldn't mesnishtil, they had no concept of slan. In their brutishness, they’d never evolved to use hunshur; their communities were so rudimentary that hississins did not exist; nor did these creatures seem to see any need for chail, or even chailsinn.” These terms obviously relate to the intellectual and philosophical depth of her civilization. At the very end of the novel, you get a glimpse of the Buddha-like nature of these elements in her culture.
Isserley is brutally raped by a serial murdering vodsel in a scene that made me wanna puke.
“His penis was grossly distended, fatter and paler than a human's, with a purplish asymmetrical head. At its tip was a small hole like the imperfectly closed eye of a dead cat.”
“After a minute with his urine flavored flesh in her mouth, the knife-blade on her neck was
lifted slightly, replaced by hard stubby fingers.”
“'Murky,' she pleaded.”
Thankfully, she hideously kills this scumbag.
This ordeal drives Isserley a bit insane, which manifests itself in a temporary gory-maximus-blood-lust; she brings in a sedated vodsel and demands that she be allowed to watch his grisly, thick gouts of crimson castration. This adds to her already complete and everlasting cynicism. Too bad her revenge-by-proxy is taken out on a genuinely good vodsel. Between the grotesque inequality of her culture, and the barbarism of most of the vodsel males she meets on her travels, it would be bizarre if she was NOT filled with hopeless pessimism.
The message is pretty clear, male vodsels blow.
I have some problems with the book. For instance, the aliens have to know that vodsels can build cars, planes, and even rocket ships. But they don't know if they can write? What the hell was Faber thinking? What the hell were his editors thinking? Unless I missed something, this is an egregious f-up. I could not blame someone for not liking this book because of that major flaw. But I'm a forgiving reader. My philosophy is that in a fictional world, anything can make sense—even nonsense. In art, sometimes pieces don't fit together “correctly” without the “flaws.” It doesn't “sound right.”
“Under the Skin,” the movie, doesn't have this “flaw.” It's even more of a feminist story than the book, and the book is plenty feminist. The book's story telling is extremely loud, whereas the movie's story style is deafeningly quite. The cinematic version is made even more chilling because of the stark contrast between the quiet characters and the in-your-face, roaring sound design and score. Also, the movie is fast, the score is not. Silence is a powerful, POWERFUL tool. A book is wall-to-wall, rock 'n roll movement. Of course, a novel DOES give us a lot of information that we have ponder in solitude, and that's a completely in-your-head sort of silence. The final scene reminded me of the burning dowry deaths of the Middle-East, as well as our burn-the-victim-not-the-rapist culture.
Both the book and the movie are brilliant, and they complement each other—weirdly.
| Print List Price: | $17.99 |
| Kindle Price: | $14.99 Save $3.00 (17%) |
| Sold by: | HarperCollins Publishers Price set by seller. |
You've subscribed to ! We will preorder your items within 24 hours of when they become available. When new books are released, we'll charge your default payment method for the lowest price available during the pre-order period.
Update your device or payment method, cancel individual pre-orders or your subscription at
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
There was an error. We were unable to process your subscription due to an error. Please refresh and try again.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
See Clubs
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Under The Skin Kindle Edition
The basis for the film starring Scarlett Johansson, award-winning author Michel Faber's Under the Skin blends elements of science fiction, grotesque comedy, horror, and thriller into a genre-jumping meditation'' (Washington Post Book World).
Isserley cruises the Scottish Highlands picking up hitchhikers. Scarred and awkward, yet strangely erotic and threatening, she listens to her hitchhikers as they open up to her, revealing clues about who might miss them if they should disappear.
Under the Skin takes us on a heart-thumping ride through dangerous territory—our own moral instincts and the boundaries of compassion.
''A fascinating psychological thriller. . . [that] hovers between the real and the fantastic.''—Baltimore Sun
''Original and unsettling, an Animal Farm for the new century.''—Wall Street Journal
''A satiric novel eerie and touching in equal parts.''—San Francisco Chronicle
Isserley cruises the Scottish Highlands picking up hitchhikers. Scarred and awkward, yet strangely erotic and threatening, she listens to her hitchhikers as they open up to her, revealing clues about who might miss them if they should disappear.
Under the Skin takes us on a heart-thumping ride through dangerous territory—our own moral instincts and the boundaries of compassion.
''A fascinating psychological thriller. . . [that] hovers between the real and the fantastic.''—Baltimore Sun
''Original and unsettling, an Animal Farm for the new century.''—Wall Street Journal
''A satiric novel eerie and touching in equal parts.''—San Francisco Chronicle
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherHarper Paperbacks
- Publication dateJuly 16, 2001
- File size1519 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Customer reviews
4 out of 5 stars
4 out of 5
3,555 global ratings
How customer reviews and ratings work
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on January 4, 2016
Reviewed in the United States on July 16, 2023
Story 4/5
Narration 5/5
When I started my reading of, Under The Skin by Michel Faber, I didn’t know that the book had been made into a movie, and I didn’t even read the blurb.
My curiosity was piqued thanks to comments, from two of my friends on Goodreads, about it.
So I started this story, with no idea of what I was going to read. I love starting a book this way.
At first, I thought it was a tale about a serial killer picking up hitchhikers. But, I rapidly realized it wasn’t that at all, because of the mysterious clues left by Michel Faber in the first chapters.
I prefer to review books without spoilers. Therefore, I’ll try to explain my thoughts, about this very good book without saying too much. In my opinion, the story is more impactful for the readers that way.
In this complex tale, Michel Faber created new words to describe certain characters. At the beginning, I was confused by that, but little by little the mysterious atmosphere that the author had put in place cleverly, became clearer. So I realized that, there’s more to the story than what I initially thought. This book makes the reader reflect upon humanity, with a capital H.
Why "humans" are considered superior of others being? Why "humans" think that it is acceptable to kill living creatures, they can’t communicate with? There are so many deep questions raised by this story.
In Under The Skin, "humans" aren’t who you think they are, in the main characters point of view.
Isserley, is a complex main character. At first, she seemed without empathy, then I realized she is a broken individual, who’s executing ceaseless orders from her hierarchy, which are leading to horrifying acts of violence and cruelty. She doesn’t want to see what is clearly visible. She doesn’t want to see that her actions are inhumane. She doesn’t want to acknowledge that her conception of Humanity is corrupted, and that the "animals" she hunted and trapped deserve to be understood, until it’s too late.
I liked this story, the plot, and the important thematics that are developed. I liked the fact that, the reader, has the "animals" point of view as well. But I wish the story was more balanced between Isserley’s denial about the consequences of what she done, and her realization of what is really happening. I think the book is too centered around her denial. In my opinion, If it was the primary intention of the author, Isserley’s awakening shouldn’t have been mentioned.
Nonetheless, I highly recommend this book!
Narration 5/5
When I started my reading of, Under The Skin by Michel Faber, I didn’t know that the book had been made into a movie, and I didn’t even read the blurb.
My curiosity was piqued thanks to comments, from two of my friends on Goodreads, about it.
So I started this story, with no idea of what I was going to read. I love starting a book this way.
At first, I thought it was a tale about a serial killer picking up hitchhikers. But, I rapidly realized it wasn’t that at all, because of the mysterious clues left by Michel Faber in the first chapters.
I prefer to review books without spoilers. Therefore, I’ll try to explain my thoughts, about this very good book without saying too much. In my opinion, the story is more impactful for the readers that way.
In this complex tale, Michel Faber created new words to describe certain characters. At the beginning, I was confused by that, but little by little the mysterious atmosphere that the author had put in place cleverly, became clearer. So I realized that, there’s more to the story than what I initially thought. This book makes the reader reflect upon humanity, with a capital H.
Why "humans" are considered superior of others being? Why "humans" think that it is acceptable to kill living creatures, they can’t communicate with? There are so many deep questions raised by this story.
In Under The Skin, "humans" aren’t who you think they are, in the main characters point of view.
Isserley, is a complex main character. At first, she seemed without empathy, then I realized she is a broken individual, who’s executing ceaseless orders from her hierarchy, which are leading to horrifying acts of violence and cruelty. She doesn’t want to see what is clearly visible. She doesn’t want to see that her actions are inhumane. She doesn’t want to acknowledge that her conception of Humanity is corrupted, and that the "animals" she hunted and trapped deserve to be understood, until it’s too late.
I liked this story, the plot, and the important thematics that are developed. I liked the fact that, the reader, has the "animals" point of view as well. But I wish the story was more balanced between Isserley’s denial about the consequences of what she done, and her realization of what is really happening. I think the book is too centered around her denial. In my opinion, If it was the primary intention of the author, Isserley’s awakening shouldn’t have been mentioned.
Nonetheless, I highly recommend this book!
Reviewed in the United States on October 17, 2013
SPOILERS HERE. WARNING.
So the first third or so of Under the Skin, before too much was revealed, I loved. The suspense was great, and I also really like the way Faber drew the main character (this continued throughout the book). After it was mostly clear what she was up to, though, the whole thing kind of faltered. And turned into a very unsubtle, flat-footed polemic about - SPOILER SPOILER - the ethics of eating meat. One character was introduced to essentially be the mouthpiece for the anti-meat side, and it reminded me of that interminable radio speech by John Galt in Atlas Shrugged. I mean this wasn't nearly so bad, but it had something of that feel. Now to be clear, I AM a vegetarian, and for ethical reasons, but this still all annoyed me. It just wasn't done well. I was expecting the novel to be a novel, not a diatribe, and besides, stuff like this has to be just right or it ends up hurting the cause, not helping it (hello PETA).
That aside, I did very much enjoy elements of the book. The suspense, careful selection of details, the pace (at the beginning, at least), the attention to the main character and her subtleties, even the ending I liked quite a bit. It just handled the political material badly to my mind. I will buy another of Faber's books for those reasons.
So the first third or so of Under the Skin, before too much was revealed, I loved. The suspense was great, and I also really like the way Faber drew the main character (this continued throughout the book). After it was mostly clear what she was up to, though, the whole thing kind of faltered. And turned into a very unsubtle, flat-footed polemic about - SPOILER SPOILER - the ethics of eating meat. One character was introduced to essentially be the mouthpiece for the anti-meat side, and it reminded me of that interminable radio speech by John Galt in Atlas Shrugged. I mean this wasn't nearly so bad, but it had something of that feel. Now to be clear, I AM a vegetarian, and for ethical reasons, but this still all annoyed me. It just wasn't done well. I was expecting the novel to be a novel, not a diatribe, and besides, stuff like this has to be just right or it ends up hurting the cause, not helping it (hello PETA).
That aside, I did very much enjoy elements of the book. The suspense, careful selection of details, the pace (at the beginning, at least), the attention to the main character and her subtleties, even the ending I liked quite a bit. It just handled the political material badly to my mind. I will buy another of Faber's books for those reasons.
Top reviews from other countries
RB
5.0 out of 5 stars
If I had a top-ten best novels I’ve ever read, this would be in it, easily
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on August 19, 2021
I’m quite amazed that it’s not 5 stars from everyone, but I’ll speculate as to the possible reasons for this, to try to convince those who might love it, to read it.
I am genuinely envious of anyone getting to read it for the first time. About 2/3 through I went back and re-read the first third to get to enjoy the suspense a bit longer; I read the entire novel in 2 days.
This is my third full-length Michael Faber novel with only one non-Faber novel in between - I even read some of his short stories (and I don’t like short stories in general) just because I can’t believe I’ve only just discovered this author.
I would not have picked up this novel based on the blurb - the wonders within cannot be gleened from it unless you already know the author. Apart from the very occasional annoying non-British word or phrase (it’s set in Scotland but Faber is multi-national and his British characters occasionally say American things), the writing is superb. I’m trying to think why someone wouldn’t gobble up this novel… it is philosophical, the author has a mind that wonders in a way that mine does, and in fact this novel’s premise is a established philosophical thought experiment. If you’re not philosophically-inclined, you might not like it (or maybe you will still! I hope so!) But it’s absolutely nothing like those Michael Haigh books - Faber hasn’t got his philosophy from Wikipedia, he’s likely not even aware of the connections, he’s just got an inquiring, interesting mind.
But on top of that, I’ve never found an author who so wonderfully sets up a mystery - I wondered many things but I still didn’t land on the answer in advance, and even better, rather than being tempted to flick through to the end to find out I re-read from the start to eek it out - it’s not just that you don’t know, it’s that finding out is a delicious unfolding.
It’s a wonderful novel, perhaps aimed more towards those who enjoy the sort of novels studied in English Lit classes at school over the sort of novels that have covers with titles in white capital letters that take up nearly the whole page (don’t judge a book by it’s cover, but judge from
a book’s cover the intended audience of the publishers - it’s a pretty good guide!) I was completely hooked from the first chapter. I wish he had written 40 novels already for me to read! But I realise that his genius means he can’t churn them out….
My new favourite author.
I am genuinely envious of anyone getting to read it for the first time. About 2/3 through I went back and re-read the first third to get to enjoy the suspense a bit longer; I read the entire novel in 2 days.
This is my third full-length Michael Faber novel with only one non-Faber novel in between - I even read some of his short stories (and I don’t like short stories in general) just because I can’t believe I’ve only just discovered this author.
I would not have picked up this novel based on the blurb - the wonders within cannot be gleened from it unless you already know the author. Apart from the very occasional annoying non-British word or phrase (it’s set in Scotland but Faber is multi-national and his British characters occasionally say American things), the writing is superb. I’m trying to think why someone wouldn’t gobble up this novel… it is philosophical, the author has a mind that wonders in a way that mine does, and in fact this novel’s premise is a established philosophical thought experiment. If you’re not philosophically-inclined, you might not like it (or maybe you will still! I hope so!) But it’s absolutely nothing like those Michael Haigh books - Faber hasn’t got his philosophy from Wikipedia, he’s likely not even aware of the connections, he’s just got an inquiring, interesting mind.
But on top of that, I’ve never found an author who so wonderfully sets up a mystery - I wondered many things but I still didn’t land on the answer in advance, and even better, rather than being tempted to flick through to the end to find out I re-read from the start to eek it out - it’s not just that you don’t know, it’s that finding out is a delicious unfolding.
It’s a wonderful novel, perhaps aimed more towards those who enjoy the sort of novels studied in English Lit classes at school over the sort of novels that have covers with titles in white capital letters that take up nearly the whole page (don’t judge a book by it’s cover, but judge from
a book’s cover the intended audience of the publishers - it’s a pretty good guide!) I was completely hooked from the first chapter. I wish he had written 40 novels already for me to read! But I realise that his genius means he can’t churn them out….
My new favourite author.
11 people found this helpful
Report
Ramya R
4.0 out of 5 stars
Go for it
Reviewed in India on January 6, 2021
Fiction lovers can definitely try this book. It unfolds very slowly - the reader knows that something is not quite right but not able to put a finger to it. At some places, it is rather crude and gives a jerk to the reader. I recommend this read.
One person found this helpful
Report
Pooklet
5.0 out of 5 stars
Beautiful. Heartbreaking. Shocking. Violent.
Reviewed in Canada on November 19, 2016
This novel makes you question what it means to be human; what it means to try and fit in -- to try and hide -- in a society that is alien to you; what it means to be in physical pain and emotional pain; what it means to be abused, violated, raped.
I cried when I read this book. It awed, astounded, and at times, terrified me. I highly recommend it -- not just to sci-fi lovers, but to anyone who is interested in the bigger questions: gender issues, sustainability, capitalism.
I cried when I read this book. It awed, astounded, and at times, terrified me. I highly recommend it -- not just to sci-fi lovers, but to anyone who is interested in the bigger questions: gender issues, sustainability, capitalism.
Clarissa Marinho
5.0 out of 5 stars
Livro excelente!
Reviewed in Brazil on March 1, 2016
A história é extremamente bem escrita, diferente, e nos envolve desde o começo. A leitura flui e não se sente o tempo passar.Vale muito a pena!
Christian Blom
2.0 out of 5 stars
Silly
Reviewed in Italy on December 8, 2015
I usually don't write negative reviews, but this book irritated me so much that I cannot avoid to voice my opinion.
The story is in the category of fiction. An extra-terrestrial woman is driving around in Scotland looking for lonely men. The woman has undergone many alterations to her body in order to look like a woman from the earth. In particular her breasts are of extraordinary measure. When a "good specimen" appears on the road asking for a lift, she takes him in the car and interviews him during the drive. If the man is without family and otherwise nobody is awaiting him, she makes him unconscious by means of an hypodermic syringe and brings him to the factory where he is operated on to serve the purpose of the alien organization.
Sounds silly to you ? It is ! It is the most idiotic novel I have read - and I have read a lot! The only positive point is that the book is well written, So Michel, you can write, write something worth reading.
The story is in the category of fiction. An extra-terrestrial woman is driving around in Scotland looking for lonely men. The woman has undergone many alterations to her body in order to look like a woman from the earth. In particular her breasts are of extraordinary measure. When a "good specimen" appears on the road asking for a lift, she takes him in the car and interviews him during the drive. If the man is without family and otherwise nobody is awaiting him, she makes him unconscious by means of an hypodermic syringe and brings him to the factory where he is operated on to serve the purpose of the alien organization.
Sounds silly to you ? It is ! It is the most idiotic novel I have read - and I have read a lot! The only positive point is that the book is well written, So Michel, you can write, write something worth reading.
2 people found this helpful
Report







