Buy new:
$19.95$19.95
$4.25
delivery:
Wednesday, May 31
Ships from: gamesters3 Sold by: gamesters3
Buy used: $6.88
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $7.15 shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
93% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Undergrowth of Science: Delusion, Self-Deception and Human Frailty First Edition
| Price | New from | Used from |
- Kindle
$13.99 Read with Our Free App - Hardcover
$6.88 - $19.9532 Used from $3.00 6 New from $19.95 - Paperback
$8.978 Used from $7.19
Purchase options and add-ons
In The Undergrowth of Science, Walter Gratzer recounts the blind alleys that honest, dedicated researchers have wandered down--and had to be dragged out of by more cool-headed colleagues. Self-deception runs through each of Gratzer's many examples, a distressing if sometimes hilarious theme. We
meet the American researchers who convinced themselves that memories were captured in RNA molecules; if extracts from the brains of trained rats were injected into the untrained, they argued, the knowledge was passed along. Gratzer also describes the group of serious scientists took up the cause of
Uri Geller and assorted 11-year-old children who claimed to have the power to bend spoons with their minds--but only if the observers wanted them to succeed. When less biased researchers saw the children slyly bending the cutlery with their feet, their scientific defenders voiced outrage at the
unfairness of the test. Politics sometimes plays a role as well, as it did when the U.S. government spent millions looking into the strange and miraculous Soviet invention of polywater. It turned out to be normal water contaminated with silicates.
Gratzer guides us through the rogue's gallery of false discoveries, from mitogenic radiation to the recent (and infamous) cold fusion. Informative and entertaining, yet with a serious point to make, this book offers much insight into why good science sometimes goes bad.
- ISBN-100198507070
- ISBN-13978-0198507079
- EditionFirst Edition
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateNovember 9, 2000
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions6.2 x 1 x 9 inches
- Print length344 pages
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com Review
The book asks its readers to adopt a sophisticated skepticism, one that won't accept polywater or memory transfer with zeal but also won't rigorously reject continental drift or other crazy-but-correct ideas. Of course, Gratzer acknowledges that it's easiest to be skeptical with perfect hindsight, but by building on Langmuir's rules for recognizing "pathological science," he hopes to establish a more thoughtful scientific readership. While some scientists would just as soon see any reference to travesties like cold fusion go down the memory hole, The Undergrowth of Science reminds us to learn from our mistakes. --Rob Lightner
From Booklist
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
Review
"Highly recommended...[a] scholarly, well-researched book."--Choice
About the Author
Walter Gratzer is a biophysicist at the Randall Institute, King's College London. He is known to a wide readership through his book reviews, which appear regularly in Nature. His books include the Longman Literary Companion to Science and The Bedside Nature.
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; First Edition (November 9, 2000)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 344 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0198507070
- ISBN-13 : 978-0198507079
- Item Weight : 1.63 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.2 x 1 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #4,004,091 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #550 in Comparative Law (Books)
- #3,188 in Genetics (Books)
- #8,906 in Biology & Life Sciences
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The guiding spirit of this book is Irving Langmuir, a scientist who won a Nobel for his work on surfaces, but who brashly (and offensively to some) pushed his way into the research areas of other scientists. When he wasn't in the lab, he liked to pursue what he called "pathological science." He never wrote about this hobby, and only a transcript of a lecture he gave in 1953 remains, but Langmuir's Rules for spotting pathological science show up all over this book. The rules specify, among other things, that in pathological science, experimental results are very close to the limit of detectability (hardly noticeable, or noticeable at a very low statistical significance); there are claims of great accuracy; explanations are fantastic and contrary to experience; and any criticism of the "science" is met with excuses thought up on the spur of the moment.
What has happened to these scientists? Gratzer explains: "The germ of a pathological episode is usually an innocent mistake or an experimental mirage; the perpetrator is persuaded that he has made a great discovery, which will bring him fame and advancement in his profession. Once committed it is difficult to go back and to allow the principles of caution and skepticism that training and experience normally inculcate to overcome the excitement and euphoria of a brilliant success." Among the stories Gratzer covers are N-Rays, polywater, Lysenkoism, the foolish Nazi science of superstition, cold fusion, and more. These stories have all been told before, but it is useful to have them collected here. Gratzer writes for _Nature_ and has a clear style even when the physics gets a little intimidating. The lessons from the collected events should increase our admiration for how well science usually works, but should also remind us that there will always be fringe scientists. It is impossible to tell when the next cold fusion embarrassment will occur, but I hope we will be able to count on mainstream science to counter claims that HIV does not cause AIDS, that the world is less than 10,000 years old, or that people are being regularly abducted by aliens.
Top reviews from other countries
This book contains 11 chapters, each relating to an episode or episodes in the history of science where a scientist or scientists manage to delude themselves. Langmuir's Rules are often referred to. The author is a professor emeritus of science at King's College London.
Chapter 1 is about Rene Blondlot and the discovery of "N-rays", which only he and a few others could see.
Chapter 2 describes some misdiscoveries in biology, including mitogenic radiation and the case of the midwife toad, made famous in a book by Arthur Koestler.
Chapter 3 deals with some similar claims in physics. It introduces Irving Langmuir, a Nobel prize-winning chemist whose hobby was the detection of what he called pathological science. Langmuir produced a set of rules by which such science could be recognised.
Chapter 4 is about the remarkable properties of polywater, which turned out to be due to insufficiently clean apparatus and self-deception.
Chapter 5 is a collection entitled "the Wilder Shores of Credulity" - animal magnetism, electrical generation of mites, and the paranormal.
Chapter 6 relates the cold fusion fiasco.
Chapter 7 deals with medical fads. Gratzer pronounces that medicine, while based on science, is "based as much on superstition as logic". He writes "The training of medical students still does not predispose to scepticism or an open mind in the face of text-book authority." Unfortunately, that is precisely the criticism of scientific training today. It's easy to fool oneself in one's own discipline.
Chapter 8 reveals some distasteful episodes of nationalistic ill-feeling among scientists, particularly between France and Imperial Germany.
Chapter 9 details the effects of Soviet state intervention in science. Communism was regarded as an overarching science that subsumed all other sciences, which allowed opportunists to take advantage by promoting their own cockamany ideas. Chief amongst these was Trofim Lysenko, who did enormous damage to Soviet genetics (and food production).
Chapter 10 is a fascinating exploration of science during the Third Reich, combining racism, Horbiger's Welteislehre, and other daft pseudoscience.
Chapter 11 provides a brief overview of the eugenic movement.
The book is quite readable. There is a good index, and notes and further reading for each chapter. Gratzer expects a certain degree of education/knowledge in his readers - you are expected to know what anfractuosities are (don't ask).
And what of Langmuir's Rules for pathological science? Essentially, don't believe any experiment where the effects are just barely detectable. Of course, the world's best scientists, being ahead of the game, frequently perform experiments of this kind. Further information is provided in the only known talk Langmuir gave on this topic, on December 18th, 1953 (this can be found on the Web). Under pressure in the Q&A session, Langmuir said to follow Pasteur as an example. The historian John Waller, in Fabulous Science: Fact and Fiction in the History of Scientific Discovery , reveals what was at that time brushed over - Pasteur continued to fight even when the best evidence was against him. So the real answer for the scientist is to fight for what you think is correct rather than following the herd - the opposite of what Langmuir says. It's easy to fool oneself that science is a cut and dried business.
