Buy new:
$29.36$29.36
Delivery August 13 - 26
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Active Dinc
Save with Used - Good
$9.99$9.99
Delivery Friday, August 9
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Dream Books Co.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Unfair: The New Science of Criminal Injustice Hardcover – June 16, 2015
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
Purchase options and add-ons
A child is gunned down by a police officer; an investigator ignores critical clues in a case; an innocent man confesses to a crime he did not commit; a jury acquits a killer. The evidence is all around us: Our system of justice is fundamentally broken.
But it’s not for the reasons we tend to think, as law professor Adam Benforado argues in this eye-opening, galvanizing book. Even if the system operated exactly as it was designed to, we would still end up with wrongful convictions, trampled rights, and unequal treatment. This is because the roots of injustice lie not inside the dark hearts of racist police officers or dishonest prosecutors, but within the minds of each and every one of us.
This is difficult to accept. Our nation is founded on the idea that the law is impartial, that legal cases are won or lost on the basis of evidence, careful reasoning and nuanced argument. But they may, in fact, turn on the camera angle of a defendant’s taped confession, the number of photos in a mug shot book, or a simple word choice during a cross-examination. In Unfair, Benforado shines a light on this troubling new field of research, showing, for example, that people with certain facial features receive longer sentences and that judges are far more likely to grant parole first thing in the morning.
Over the last two decades, psychologists and neuroscientists have uncovered many cognitive forces that operate beyond our conscious awareness. Until we address these hidden biases head-on, Benforado argues, the social inequality we see now will only widen, as powerful players and institutions find ways to exploit the weaknesses of our legal system.
Weaving together historical examples, scientific studies, and compelling court cases—from the border collie put on trial in Kentucky to the five teenagers who falsely confessed in the Central Park Jogger case—Benforado shows how our judicial processes fail to uphold our values and protect society’s weakest members. With clarity and passion, he lays out the scope of the legal system’s dysfunction and proposes a wealth of practical reforms that could prevent injustice and help us achieve true fairness and equality before the law.
- Print length400 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherCrown
- Publication dateJune 16, 2015
- Dimensions6.5 x 1.25 x 10 inches
- ISBN-100770437761
- ISBN-13978-0770437763
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book's content fascinating, convincingly plausible, and insightful. They also describe the visuals as really insightful. Opinions are mixed on the character flaws, with some finding them good and others difficult at times.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book's content fascinating, excellent, and compelling. They say it offers insight into the criminal justice system, bias, and fundamental knowledge of law. Readers also mention that the book offers a brilliant expose about how cognitive bias impacts every aspect of the judicial system. They find the ideas convincingly plausible and helpful.
"...Benforado won me over with his mastery of this fascinating topic, great pacing, and excellent insights and dare I say judicial use of the best of..." Read more
"...The author has put together a fascinating book on crime, the legal actors involved, and the problems that result...." Read more
"Whenever I read these types of books they're an eye-opening experience...." Read more
"...case for re-thinking criminal justice in the U.S.. It is written for a general audience (I am not a lawyer and found it easy to read)...." Read more
Customers appreciate the visuals in the book. They also say it provides an insightful look at problems in the criminal justice system.
"...Kudos!5. A clearly defined theme, “Injustice is built into our legal structures and influences outcomes every minute of every day...." Read more
"A disturbing, powerful look at America's so-called "justice system"...." Read more
"...This is a very illuminating and well-written book." Read more
"Nice, interesting and informative book" Read more
Customers find the book readable, understandable, and timely.
"...This book is readable, understandable and timely in that America must wake-up to judicial unfairness and a system that badly needs revision...." Read more
"Great condition and fast shipper!!" Read more
"Amazing Book, Ships Quickly!..." Read more
Customers are mixed about the character flaws. Some mention that the author is a good writer, but there are pretty big gaps. They also say that the opinions of the author are relatively clear. However, some customers find the book difficult at times.
"...like what he's saying and the disciplines he's synthesizing, and he's a good writer, but there are pretty big gaps between his assumptions and a..." Read more
"...everyone should read, even though parts of it are shocking and difficult to accept...." Read more
"...The author's opinions are relatively clear, but the book does a decent enough job of leaving the options up for debate rather than dictating any..." Read more
"...Absolutely amazing book and author!" Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
“Unfair" is a fantastic, well-researched look at what is at the heart of our unfair criminal system. Law professor Adam Benforado has provided the public with an eye-opening gem grounded on the best current science, historical court cases and insightful research. He explores the nature of the criminal mind, eyewitness memory, jury deliberations, police procedures, and intuitions about punishment. This enlightening 402-page book includes twelve chapters broken out into the following four parts: I. Investigation, II. Adjudication, III. Punishment, and IV. Reform.
Positives:
1. A well written, well-researched book that is grounded on sound logic and good science.
2. A fascinating topic, the new science of our unfair criminal justice system.
3. Mastery of a complex topic and innate ability to educate and enlighten at an accessible level.
4. I love the tone and pace of this book. Benforado is very careful not to oversell the benefits of science while at the same time clearly showing what good research has uncovered and the shortcomings of our system. Kudos!
5. A clearly defined theme, “Injustice is built into our legal structures and influences outcomes every minute of every day. And its origins lie not inside the dark heart of a bigoted police officer or a scheming D.A. but within the mind of each and every one of us.” Intriguing.
6. Provides many interesting cases and immerses sound logic and science into each one. David Rosenbaum’s story illustrates an unacceptable chain of mistakes. “The physical disgust they felt may have generated an explanation for David’s condition that involved lack of discipline and poor character—drunkenness—rather than another potential cause: a stroke, seizure, diabetes, head injury, or drug interaction. And once the ETOH label was attached, David was in trouble.”
7. Confirmation bias and its impact to our criminal system. “Once David was labeled a drunk, the responders and medical professionals appeared to focus on finding evidence that supported that description.”
8. A fascinating look at false confessions and what leads to them. “False confessions and incriminating statements are the leading contributors to wrongful homicide convictions, present in over 60 percent of the known DNA murder-exoneration cases in the United States. More broadly, they appear to have been a factor in about 25 percent of all post-conviction exonerations.”
9. Great use of neuroscience. “Some scientists have claimed that roughly half of the variability in antisocial traits across the population comes down to the genes that people are born with. All things being equal, if you have a Y chromosome, you are several times more likely to engage in violent criminal behavior. And psychopaths and pedophiles are both disproportionately men. But it can be hard to separate out the impact of genes from social factors: after all, men and women are subjected to very different arrays of experiences and expectations.”
10. A look at how lawyers break the rules and what can be done about it. “We should worry, then, about the enormous control that prosecutors have over the state’s evidence and witnesses: they are the ones who decide if and when the defendant’s team will receive the ballistics report or the DNA report or a copy of the witness statement or the initial police write-up.” “Research suggests that the more prosecutors are focused on winning, rather than on achieving justice, the more likely they will be to act dishonestly.”
11. The role of juries. “Of course, the faith we have in our own perceptions and our cynical discrediting of those with whom we disagree can create trouble even when a jury does get to consider the case. As jurors, we are often oblivious to how our own preexisting commitments, beliefs, and biases shape our impressions, but we quickly and easily spot them influencing others.”
12. Surprising findings and tidbits used throughout the book. “Recent research suggests that a person’s weight can influence juror assessments, with male jurors more likely to reach a guilty verdict when the accused is an overweight woman than when she is thin.”
13. So how reliable is our memory? “There is, for instance, compelling evidence that eyewitness identifications are frequently inaccurate. When the actual perpetrator appears in a lineup along with several innocent fillers, witnesses fail to pick anyone out about a third of the time.”
14. The impact of race. “Research suggests that people are 50 percent more likely to make an error in identifying a person from another race, although individuals who have a lot of contact with the other race tend to be more accurate.”
15. Great stuff on separating truth from untruth. “Overall, it turns out that we are quite bad at ferreting out deception. In a recent analysis of more than two hundred studies, participants were able to identify lies and truths correctly just 54 percent of the time, only marginally better than chance.”
16. An excellent chapter on judging. “Although she was forced to retreat from her statements about how gender and ethnicity influence judging, Justice Sotomayor was right: identities and personal experiences do “affect the facts that judges choose to see.”
17. So what drives us to punish? “Indeed, there is a growing scientific consensus that it is a desire for retribution—not deterrence or incapacitation—that has the strongest influence on why we punish.”
18. A look at prison life. Ugly facts. “A country that abolished slavery 150 years ago now has a greater number of black men in the correctional system than there were slaves in 1850 and a greater percentage of its black population in jail than was imprisoned in apartheid South Africa. Black, male, and no high school diploma? It’s more likely than not that you will spend time in prison during your life.”
19. Compelling arguments on what we can do to improve our society. “The starting point of any reform comes in understanding and accepting this reality. We all need to look at the criminal justice system through new eyes. So, raising awareness about psychology and neuroscience research is critical.”
20. Notes and a formal bibliography included.
Negatives:
1. I have one main negative, the lack of links to notes. A real shame since I’m one of those readers who loves to dig deeper into the references. That being said, I’ve read and reviewed a number of books that makes references to such research and Benforado is on point.
2. Charts and diagrams would have complemented this excellent narrative.
In summary, I absolutely loved this book! It has two of my favorite subjects fused into one, where science meets our criminal system and all that it implies. Benforado won me over with his mastery of this fascinating topic, great pacing, and excellent insights and dare I say judicial use of the best of our current science. It’s been a while since I’ve read a book this good, kudos. I can’t recommend this book enough.
Further recommendations: “The New Jim Crow” by Michelle Alexander, “Uncertain Justice” by Laurence Tribe, “Thinking Fast and Slow” by Daniel Kahneman, “The Nine” By Jeffrey Toobin, “The Roberts Court” by Marcia Coyle, “Braintrust” by Patricia Churchland, “The Blank Slate” and “Better Angels of Our Nature” by Steven Pinker, “The Believing Brain” by Michael Shermer, “Subliminal” by Leonard Mlodinow, “We Are Our Brains” by D.F. Swaab, and “Are You Sure?” by Ginger Campbell.
If you consider yourself a sufficiently critical person concerned with (Capital J) Justice - you owe it to yourself to read the book and consider how our own minds are predisposed to prejudice by instinct, and the result is hazardous to investigative and judicial prudence.
Here are a few of the more interesting points the author makes:
* Eyewitness testimony, and human memory, is flawed
* False confessions are not only possible but common. Scary statistics (60% of DNA exonerations involved false or incriminating confessions).
* Why prisons don't work very well
* How everyone is biased, and what we can do about it
* How to make the court system more fair, including some radical ideas (virtual courtrooms for example)
* Damning evidence on the true unfairness of the system and who its tilted towards
With a book that is willing to jump into the fray so completely, there were some points that I disagreed with as well. The author's proposal of a shift away from blame, the belief that there is not real evil in the world, and some of his proposals (like virtual prisons) feel like a big stretch. Regardless of what you think of those things or the other proposals made, you will be forced to think and think deeply with this book.
Highly recommended.







