Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $4.99 shipping
100% positive
& FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
81% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
An Unfinished Life: John F. Kennedy, 1917 - 1963 Paperback – May 4, 2004
| Robert Dallek (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Abridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, Abridged, Audiobook, CD
"Please retry" | $10.88 | $7.99 |
Enhance your purchase
Robert Dallek succeeds as no other biographer has done in striking a critical balance -- never shying away from JFK's weaknesses, brilliantly exploring his strengths -- as he offers up a vivid portrait of a bold, brave, complex, heroic, human Kennedy.
- Print length848 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherBack Bay Books
- Publication dateMay 4, 2004
- Dimensions5.5 x 1.5 x 8.5 inches
- ISBN-100316907928
- ISBN-13978-0316907927
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together

- +
- +
Products related to this item
Editorial Reviews
Review
"An intimate portrait indeed . . . unexpected and important. . . . This is nothing if not a profile in courage."―Ted Widmer, New York Times Book Review
"It's hard to believe that someone could find anything new to say about John F. Kennedy, but Dallek succeeds in this riveting and well-documented biography."―The New Yorker
"One of the most engrossing biographies I have ever read. . . . An Unfinished Life is nothing less than a masterpiece."―David Herbert Donald, author of Lincoln
"Neither debunking nor further mythologizing, Dallek fashions a balanced but fast-paced tale of sex and power that scribes from Shakespeare to Jacqueline Susann would have killed for."―Steve Dougherty, People
About the Author
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Back Bay Books; Reprint edition (May 4, 2004)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 848 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0316907928
- ISBN-13 : 978-0316907927
- Item Weight : 1.75 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 1.5 x 8.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #109,711 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #490 in US Presidents
- #841 in Political Leader Biographies
- #1,089 in Rich & Famous Biographies
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Robert Dallek is the author of Nixon and Kissinger, a Pulitzer Prize finalist, and An Unfinished Life: John F. Kennedy, 1917-1963, among other books. His writing has appeared in the The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, and Vanity Fair. He is an elected fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and of the Society of American Historians, for which he served as president in 2004–2005. He lives in Washington, D.C.
Products related to this item
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Dallek does a solid job of chronicling Kennedy’s early life. Like TR and FDR, Jack trod a path of Northeastern wealth and privilege that led to Harvard. Like both Roosevelts, he would have to overcome formidable health challenges. Dallek speculates that Jack’s father Joe most likely pulled some strings to allow his ailing son to see action in the South Pacific as the captain of PT-109. This was when I began to struggle with Dallek’s narrative. Dallek allows his access to newly obtained medical records to overshadow Kennedy’s wartime exploits. After wading through all the medical diagnoses and treatments, I had a good sense of the sinking of Jack’s boat and his heroic rescue of his men, but Dallek subsequently relates, “And for the next six weeks he got in a lot of fighting and, to his satisfaction, inflicted some damage on the enemy” (p. 100). What fighting? What damage?
Dallek makes it clear that for all his charisma, quick wits and eloquent speeches, Kennedy accomplished little during his 12 years in Congress, with his father playing a crucial role at every turn. Kennedy’s most notable (and controversial) action was to not vote to censure Sen. Joseph McCarthy for his Communist witch hunt. Kennedy did become a celebrity and launched his presidential run with the publication of “Profiles in Courage,” but as one of his colleagues put it, “Why not show a little less profile and a little more courage?” (p. 217). Even though JFK’s election in 1960 was every bit as close as Truman’s in 1948, Dallek’s account lacks the drama or verve of David McCullough’s “Truman.”
JFK was in the poorest health of anyone to become president. He was always taking at least ten different drugs, including pain killers, to treat a range of ailments, led by Addison’s disease and a bad back. As one doctor reviewing his medical files put it, Kennedy was “doped up” (p. 471). This makes it all the more amazing that JFK was competing with LBJ to be the most promiscuous president. Indeed, Dallek spends more time discussing Jack’s affairs, ranging from Marilyn Monroe to a White House intern (thinking of you, Bill!), than he does Jackie Kennedy and his two children.
Foreign affairs-wise, Kennedy is best known for approving the CIA’s botched invasion of Cuba in 1961 and the Cuban Missile Crisis a year later. Dallek is strongest in relating these two events, but he fails to convey the public’s widespread fear that the world was on the precipice of a cataclysmic nuclear war. Dallek and most analysts have praised Kennedy for standing up to Khrushchev's dispatch of nuclear weapons to Cuba, but what if the mercurial Soviet leader hadn’t turned back his ships once Kennedy imposed the blockade? You can only win a game of chicken if your opponent folds first. Yes, the missiles violated vague notions of the Monroe Doctrine, but did they qualitatively change the nuclear threat posed to the U.S.? No. Besides, Soviet troops remained even after the nukes were removed.
American also became a little bit pregnant in its military involvement in Vietnam on Kennedy’s watch. I would pinpoint the moment of conception as 15 November 1961 when Kennedy announced a tripling of the number of military “advisers” in Vietnam. Dallek does not provide the figures, but according to militaryfactory.com, more American soldiers died during Kennedy’s first year in office (16) than during the previous five years under Ike. The U.S. went from having several hundred to 16,000 troops dispatched when Kennedy died. Based on my reading of Ambrose's "Eisenhower," Ike saw Vietnam as a fool's errand. Kennedy also failed to listen to his policy coordinator at the State Department. Kennedy's failure to reject the hawks and conventional wisdom showed poor judgement and a lack of leadership on the critical issue of the decade--just as W, Hillary and Biden would do the same 40 years later (Iraq).
Dallek does make a strong argument that JFK would not have escalated like LBJ did in 1965 because he was more skeptical and would not be facing reelection. Still, Kennedy started America down a disastrous track that LBJ failed and even Nixon would struggle to take America off of.
Kennedy’s unambiguous accomplishments were more modest. He did sign the first nuclear arms control agreement with the Soviets and pledged to take Americans to the moon by the end of the decade. Amazingly, Dallek doesn’t even mention Kennedy’s famous “We Choose to Go to the Moon” speech at Rice University in September 1962. Instead, I found myself having to skim through pages of stillborn domestic policy initiatives.
My favorite accomplishment? Kennedy created the Peace Corps. I wanted to join when I was at U.C. Berkeley until I discovered they had pulled out of South Korea several years earlier. Kennedy’s ambitious domestic agenda, particularly expanding civil rights and social welfare, would have to be accomplished by his successor. To my great surprise, Dallek provides only a cursory account of Kennedy’s assassination, devoting only a few sentences to the event itself.
Reading about JFK made me realize that I have had the good fortune of meeting three of the most important people from Kennedy’s inner circle. Chief speechwriter Ted Sorensen gave a talk to my fellow interns at the World Affairs Council in SF when I was a senior. Ten years later, I made a point of introducing myself to Defense Secretary Robert McNamara at a conference in Washington, D.C. because we both went to Cal. And I interviewed key adviser Arthur Schlessinger for a Korean newspaper a few years after that. How I wish I had asked them about Jack!
This review makes me realize that I am more disappointed with Dallek than JFK because I still want to read much more about Kennedy and those around him. To his credit, Dallek mentions his favorite previous biographies of Kennedy, especially those by Richard Reeves and Seymour Hersh. I was surprised that Kennedy relied heavily on advice from Dean Acheson, which moves him up my supporting roles reading list. One of the joys of reading about so many presidents is discerning the thru-stories of folks who served multiple presidents, like like Lincoln's John Hay and FDR's Henry Stimson. I had planned to read “Profiles in Courage” until I learned it was written primarily by Sorensen. First I plan to read Chris Matthews’ “Bobby Kennedy” (2017). Bobby was Jack’s closest friend by far. Next will be McNamara’s “In Retrospect” (1997) as much to better understand the Vietnam tragedy. That means I should also read Max Hastings’ “Vietnam” (2018).
Professor Dallek spends much page space relating the endless physical ailments and treatments JFK endured for his entire life. While in a general sense I was aware of his back problems I didn't realize the extent of his illnesses before reading this.
The most remarkable realization that this book delivered to me was the understanding of the number of issues and dilemmas that he faced as president in such a short compressed period of time- Berlin, Cuba, Southeast Asia, CIvil Rights, Recession, nuclear proliferation all demanding his attention concurrently. I think the book does a good job of giving each the attention and detail required to assess Kennedy's handling of the situations but what it left me with was an appreciation once again of how volatile both foreign and domestic issues were in the early 1960s even though I lived through them as a young kid.
Interestingly the assassination is handled rather briefly in just a few pages ( I imagine because so much has already been written of it) and the author chose instead to move directly into an assessment of JFK's legacy. Overall this was a fascinating look at a leader who rose to the challenges that his time in office produced and raises interesting questions about how a potential second Kennedy term would have played out.
Outstanding Biography that I recommend to anyone interested in the period.
Top reviews from other countries
I recently read his biography of LBJ (shorter version), which I enjoyed very much, finding it conscientious and balanced.
In my view this volume has the same virtues. Dallek mostly succeeds in avoiding getting too swept away by the drama, glamour, and controversies of Kennedy and his entourage.
I found the early part of the book, particularly his relationship with his mother, father and elder brother Joseph, fascinating, as the author clearly did too.
Joe Kennedy would, and did, do anything to get his son the presidency, once his elder brother, who was seen as a sounder and healthier bet, had been killed in WW2.
But according to Dallek Joe would argue his corner with his son, but even when, as was often the case, his views diametrically opposed Jack’s, this would never compromise his support for him.
Also fascinating is how close his relationship with Bobby was, particularly in the campaign for the presidency, and throughout the years in power. Never mind LBJ, Schlesinger, Rusk, Sorensen or McNamara; Bobby was almost always his principal support, his gofer, his hatchetman, his Rottweiler.
For me, Kennedy’s presidency was defined by the cold war. When he came to power, Russia and the US had literally a handful of nuclear weapons apiece. This capability increased exponentially during JFK’s short time in office. Kennedy and Khruschev had to discover and define the limits of a new kind of politics. Both had extravert, dramatic natures and the game played out in a series of dramatic crises: the Bay of Pigs, Berlin, the Missile Crisis.
These last two, successfully managed by Kennedy after his errors in the first, were the making of him as president and established his own self-confidence and his domestic and international reputations.
There were also rumbling subplots in Latin America and Vietnam, in some ways even harder to solve, because to do so meant coming to grips with the very essence of the cold war. JFK, like so many presidents before and after, saw any left wing government anywhere in the world, as a potential launchpad for communism, and despite his pronouncements, Woodrow Wilson-like, of people’s rights for self-determination, over and over again Kennedy, again like so many other presidents before and since, sent in the CIA.
However, this was a process that Kennedy wrestled with, especially in Vietnam, and in my view it is the finest achievement of Dallek’s book to present this struggle in perspective.
Kennedy was aware of this contradiction, seeking to find ways of withdrawing from a repressive role in ways that would be acceptable to the US voters and to Congress.
Hounded by difficulties in Congress, Kennedy was able to achieve much less domestically, but nevertheless did not let this prevent him from a series of attempts to pass legislation relating to racial problems, education and health, initiatives which were mostly consummated by LBJ under more favourable conditions.
By and large I found this book admirably comprehensive, thoughtful and fair.
One minor quibble: I felt let down by the index which seemed incomplete on several occasions when I wanted to check something out.
Several aspects emerge clearly. One of the most remarkable is what Kennedy managed to achieve despite a catalogue of illnesses and the pain in which he frequently found himself, so much so that the American public did not know about this until after his death. The book documents in detail how Kennedy was reluctant, against the advice of military and naval chiefs and of some of his advisers, to commit American combat troops and sanction direct American attacks. Towards the end of his life he hoped to be able to disengage from Vietnam after the 1964 election. This did not mean that he did not sanction indirect measures to subvert Castro's regime in Cuba or Diem's in Vietnam.
His relationship with the mercurial Khrushchev before, during and after the Cuban Missile Crisis is very well brought out.
Kennedy's main interest was in foreign affairs. That was partly because in Congress an alliance between Republicans and conservative southern Democrats made effective domestic reforms - in education and Medicare - impossible. Most particularly was this the case in Civil Rights. He frequently voiced support for civil rights, but the civil rights leaders were disappointed that he did not support their demonstrations, claiming that they would make the passage of the Civil Rights Act, which he introduced only in June 1963, more difficult. Dallek suggests that, had he not been assassinated shortly before the 1964 election, he would have won that election against Goldwater with the same landslide majority that Johnson would achieve, and would have been liberated to enact all the reforms for which Johnson has, rightly, been given the credit.
Kennedy was fortunate that on the whole the press in his day did not report on his promiscuous private life. Clinton should have been so lucky!
My only major criticism of the book is that there is nothing on the contents of or the debate about the Warren Commission's report on the assassination of Kennedy.
I'd firstly say the book is a good biography, in that it covers his early life, his childhood and basically what made the man. Some books tend to rush this but Dallek really developed the Kennedy Family, and helped you understand what it was like in Massachutes at the time. The review of Kennedy's health is extremely developed as Dallek was the first author to get access to his full records. He really shows just how the illness sidelined JFK for much of his early life, and how it impacted his lifestyle choices. I'm glad Dallek doesn't go into depths about JFK's womanising, he mentions it and explains it but doesn't make the mistake of basing the whole book on it.
In regards to foreign policy, the book is a pure gem. It explains the evolution in Kennedy's mind, and goes through great depth to describe every event that JFK faced from the Bay of Pigs to Loas. The section on Vietnam is worth a read, for anyone who thinks that JFK supported the war! Civil rights could of been expanded a bit more, along with domestic policies but this is because JFK didn't achieve as much but Dallek still walks you though the options. The book also subtly puts in parts about his legacy throughout, saying what would of changed if he lived whilst not being 100% pro-Kennedy.
Overall it's a brilliant read because it offers comprehensive history of the era, a good insight into the 1960 election, a look at the master team assembled by Kennedy, a step by step guide to decisions and the overall rationale of JFK.
Any politics, or history fan should read this book just for the depth alone. Dallek gives a brilliant insight into John Kennedy




