Buy new:
$8.53$8.53
$4.84
delivery:
May 10 - 11
Ships from: American University of Sovereign Nations Books Sold by: American University of Sovereign Nations Books
Buy used: $5.58
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $4.99 shipping
100% positive over lifetime
FREE Shipping
99% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
99% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
United in Hate: The Left's Romance with Tyranny and Terror Hardcover – March 3, 2009
- Kindle
$9.99 Read with Our Free App - Hardcover
$8.5336 Used from $1.58 8 New from $8.38 1 Collectible from $19.81
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length304 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherWND Books
- Publication dateMarch 3, 2009
- Dimensions6.4 x 1.3 x 9.6 inches
- ISBN-101935071602
- ISBN-13978-1935071600
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
Glazov is a well-known commentator who has appeared on top radio and TV shows, including Hannity & Colmes --The O'Reilly Factor and Laura Ingraham
From the Inside Flap
As history shows, leftist beliefs have spawned mass carnage and misery. Put into practice, they have caused the deaths of millions. Until now, it has been extremely difficult for rational people who value personal freedom to understand the motivations of those who live in comfort and yet embrace monstrous dictators, ideologies, and policies that leave only death and destruction in their wake.
In United in Hate, Dr. Jamie Glazov presents startling new insights into the toxic beliefs and torturously contorted thought processes of the leftists who lust to destroy the very freedoms that allow them to exist. Glazov explains the Left's love for and deification of totalitarian ideologies, from Marxism to radical Islam, with clarity and candor.
Why does the leftist believer reach out in solidarity to the most gay-hating, womanhating and minority-hating force on earth?
Why does the "progressive" heap adulation upon regimes under which he himself would be annihilated?
Why do radical feminists, who supposedly value women's rights, ignore the suffering of millions of women living under Islamic gender apartheid?
In this groundbreaking examination, Dr. Glazov at last reveals the vile and morbid forces that impel so-called "progressives" to embrace not just murderous ideologies such as Marxism and radical Islam, but the systematic elimination of all those standing in the way of their new utopia.
From the Back Cover
"An ambitious, original, and well-documented study that addresses some of the most interesting and important political-historical questions of our times."--Paul Hollander, author of Political Pilgrims and The End of Commitment.
"Jamie Glazov rolls over left-wing intellectual pretensions with a Mack truck that handles like a Porsche. He rounds them up--and when he's finished, there's nothing left." --Richard Perle, Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Reagan administration, now a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
"A must-read for those who care about truth, the rule of law, and any hope of ultimate stability for humankind. The redefining work for twenty-first century readers of an eternal message."--Robert C.McFarlane, National Security Advisor to President Reagan, chairman and CEO of McFarlane Associates, Inc.
"Reads like a thriller."--Lieutenant General Ion Mihai Pacepa, the highest-ranking official to have defected from the Soviet bloc.
"In years to come, this book will become a classic, not just for conservatives but for all Americans interested in the truth and how to combat a perfidious alliance."--Steven Emerson, author of American Jihad: The Terrorists Living Amongst Us and producer of the documentary Jihad in America.
"Jamie Glazov analyses with forensic skill how and why radical leftists come repeatedly to see virtue in the most murderous ruthlessness. Alas, his book will not be out of date for a long time."--Dr. Theodore Dalrymple, author of Life At the Bottom: The Worldview that Makes the Underclass.
"Any leftist who reads this, and has any honesty left in his mind, must recognize himself in this picture and, hopefully, be ashamed."--Vladimir Bukovsky, former leading Soviet dissident, author of To Build a Castle and Judgement in Moscow.
"A fascinating, illuminating, and extraordinarily insightful explanation of one of the most puzzling phenomena of our age: the alliance between the Left and the global jihad."--Robert Spencer, author of the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad.
"A must-read if America is going to survive the global war against radical Islam." --Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney, USAF (Ret.).
United in Hate is a must-read for all Americans concerned with the future of America. Jamie Glazov's writing is eloquent and thought-provoking."--Brigitte Gabriel, a renowned terrorism expert and New York Times best-selling author. She is the founder of Actforamerica.org.
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
In denial about the character flaws that prevent him from bonding with his own people, the believer has convinced himself that there is something profoundly wrong with his society--and that it can be fixed without any negative trade-offs. He fantasizes about building a perfect society where he will, finally, fit in...
A key ingredient of this paradigm is that the believer has failed to rise to the challenges of secular modernity; he has not established real and lasting interpersonal relationships or internalized any values that help him find meaning in life. Suffering from a spiritual emptiness, of which he himself is not cognizant, the believer forces non-spiritual solutions onto his spiritual problems. He exacerbates this dysfunction by trying to satisfy his every material need, which the great benefits of modernity and capitalism allow--but the more luxuries he manages to acquire, the more desperate he becomes. We saw this with the counterculture leftists of the sixties and seventies, and we see it with the radical leftists of today. Convinced that it is incumbent upon society, and not him, to imbue his life with purpose, the believer becomes indignant; he scapegoats his society--and ends up despising and rejecting it.
Just like religious folk, the believer espouses a faith, but his is a secular one. He too searches for personal redemption--but of an earthly variety. The progressive faith, therefore, is a secular religion. And this is why socialism's dynamics constitute a mutated carbon copy of Judeo-Christian imagery. Socialism's secular utopian vision includes a fall from an ideal collective brotherhood, followed by a journey through a valley of oppression and injustice, and then ultimately a road toward redemption.
In rejecting his own society, the believer spurns the values of democracy and individual freedom, which are anathema to him, since he has miserably failed to cope with both the challenges they pose and the possibilities they offer. Tortured by his personal alienation, which is accompanied by feelings of self-loathing, the believer craves a fairy-tale world where no individuality exists, and where human estrangement is thus impossible. The believer fantasizes about how his own individuality and self will be submerged within the collective whole.... As history has tragically recorded, this "holy cause" follows a road that leads not to an earthly paradise, but rather to an earthly hell in all of its manifestations. The political faith rejects the basic reality of the human condition--that human beings are flawed and driven by self-interest--and rests on the erroneous assumption that humanity is malleable and can be reshaped into a more perfect form. This premise spawned the nightmarish repressions and genocidal campaigns of Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and other communist dictators in the twentieth century. Under their rule, more than one hundred million human beings were sacrificed on the altar where a new man would ostensibly be created.
Product details
- Publisher : WND Books; 1st edition (March 3, 2009)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 304 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1935071602
- ISBN-13 : 978-1935071600
- Item Weight : 1.21 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.4 x 1.3 x 9.6 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,745,374 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,889 in Communism & Socialism (Books)
- #3,437 in Political Conservatism & Liberalism
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Others have documented this phenomenon, such as Paul Hollander in various classic works, including Political Pilgrims (1981) and Anti-Americanism (1992). Here Jamie Glazov makes an attempt at exploring and explaining the Left's love affair with terror and tyranny.
Glazov is very well qualified to do so, and not only because he has a PhD in history, specialising in US and Russian foreign policy. His personal story contributes much to this book. His parents were Soviet dissidents who fought against Communist tyranny and oppression.
They managed to escape to the US in 1972. Their initial taste of glorious freedom was soon soured when they learned that there were Western academics and intellectuals who actually hated them and the message they had to share. These Western apologists for Soviet murder and genocide wanted nothing to do with the Glazovs, and sought to denounce and demonise them in the strongest terms.
Back in the Soviet Union they had risked their lives to campaign for the millions who were being tortured and killed in the Gulag and psychiatric hospitals simply because of their political and religious beliefs. Yet in America they were being viciously attacked by an intelligentsia that loathed America while idolising Communist barbarism.
It was a shock the young Glazov never really recovered from, and here he seeks to assess and understand this most bizarre feature of Western life. And with the onset of militant Islam, he sees the whole scenario again being played out before his eyes.
The first half of this important book covers the earlier cases of Western fascination with, and blindness to, totalitarian nightmare states. The Soviet Union, Castros' Cuba and Mao's China were all objects of wild-eyed leftist venation and adoration.
Glazov reminds us of the words of the US ambassador to the Soviet Union, Joseph Davies, uttered during the height of Stalin's murder of millions. He waxed eloquent in his love of Stalin with these words: Stalin's "brown eye is exceedingly wise and gentle. A child would like to sit on his lap and a dog would sidle up to him."
French writer Jean-Paul Sartre could say this about another murderous thug, Fidel Castro: "Castro is at the same time the island, the men, the cattle, and the earth. He is the whole island." And Father Daniel Berrigan, another longstanding apologist for tyrants could say this of Hanoi's prime minister Pham Van Dong: he is an individual "in whom complexity dwells...; a face of great intelligence, and yet also of great reserves of compassion..."
Or consider the Sandinistas in Nicaragua, who after capturing power in 1979 managed to carry out 8000 political executions in the next three years. They made the nation a place of torture, repression and dictatorship. Yet plenty of Western lefties fell at their feet in worship.
German writer Gunter Grass, who was shown a `prison' which the Sandinistas wanted political pilgrims to see - not the actual prisons where inmates were beaten, starved, tortured and killed - came back with euphoric exhilaration: "The humane way in which sentences are carried out" he gushed, along with other sentimental sap.
Of course the Soviets had done just the same with the Gulag decades earlier, to fool gullible Westerners who came over for a look. Western lefties were just as ignorant and easily deceived in the 30s or 50s as they were in the 80s.
And they still are. The second half of this book looks at Islamic terrorism, and its Western apologists. There are plenty of leftists in the West who are convinced that Islamic terrorism either does not exist, or is all America's fault.
Again Glazov offers plenty of examples. The September 11 atrocity provides plenty of quotes. Norman Mailer called the suicide hijackers "brilliant". He excused the attack by saying, "Everything wrong with America led to the point where the country built that tower of Babel which consequently had to be destroyed".
Susan Sontag assured us that the terrorist attack was the result of "specific American alliances and actions". Film-maker Oliver Stone affirmed that 9/11 was a "revolt" and said the ensuing Palestinian celebrations were comparable to that of those seen in the French and Russian Revolutions.
Christian leader Tony Campolo could argue that 9/11 was a legitimate response to the Crusades. German composer Karlheinz Stockhausen described the 9/11 attacks as "the greatest work of art for the whole cosmos". On and on the apologists for terror and tyranny go.
These lefties offered more support for bin Laden and Saddam Hussein than they did George W. Bush. Film-maker Michael Moore denounced the US while extolling the terrorists: "The Iraqis who have risen up against the occupation are not `insurgents' or `terrorists' or `The Enemy.' They are the REVOLUTION, the Minutemen, and their numbers will grow - and they will win."
Glazov offers a chapter seeking to examine the psychological makeup of these leftists whose romance with tyranny and terror seems so hard to fathom. They are alienated from their own homelands, although seldom realise it. They espouse a secular religion, a secular utopian vision which speaks much of humanity but is happy to see individual humans crushed in the attempt to create their coercive utopia.
As this book reminds us, we really have two enemies to contend with: murderous totalitarian ideologies of every stripe, and their Western leftist support base. It is an insidious alliance which we all must be aware of. This book does a fine job of making that very clear indeed.
Hate: The Left's Romance with Tyranny and Terror." That question being
that, since the radical jihadists abhor everything the modern Left
stands for (so it claims); notably women's rights, gay rights, sexual
freedom, individual freedom and would without hesitation enslave or
slaughter these same Leftists - why do the post-moderns in our society
as a whole lend support and succor to the pre-modern cause?
Glazov's ideas are inspired from first hand experiences. He first
came to the United States with his parents as a refugee from the Soviet
Union. His parents were academics and were able to settle into the
academic world in the U.S. but Glazov noted that, after a time, his
parents became ostracized from that community. Why? Because they had
an unrelentingly negative view of communism (not at all rare for those
who suffered under it) and had the annoying habit of telling the truth
to people who were emotionally invested in the success of the Soviet
system vs. the American system.
Glazov explains the post-modern's support for tyranny in basically
psychological terms. He describes a sort of "believer's syndrome" in
which the Leftist, for reasons of guilt and alienation, builds him a
fantasy world in which he and the idea that animates him become the
prime mover of history. Take this passage:
"These people whom the believer loves from a distance are always the
supposed victims of capitalism and American "imperialism." He agonizes
over their suffering and revels in the moral indignation he feels about
it. The megalomania and narcissism from which most believers suffer
reinforce this dynamic. Convinced that the world revolves him, the
believer clings to the notion that the suffering of capitalism's
supposed victims is somehow his personal business. And to legitimize
his identification with them, he envisions himself to be a victim of
capitalist oppressions as well. Meanwhile by condemning his own
society, he provides himself not only a sense of belonging with other
supposed victims, but also a feeling of moral superiority that helps
counteract the humiliation he experiences as a result of his real life
estrangement.
"...Guilt is instrumental in the rotation of this circle. Usually coming
from and/or occupying a position of privilege, the believer is guilt
ridden about his material comfort and high social status. Ashamed that
he is not a genuine victim, he creates a myth that he is. By making
himself a member, in his imagination, of the poor, the oppressed, and
the downtrodden, he feels a sense of atonement. He is paying his karmic
debt by being a believer."
I am not sure, however, that I see the need for such a deeply
psychologically driven answer as Glazov. While his description of the
believer's psychological malady certainly is appropriate for a good
number of individuals on the Left, it seems to me that the
post-modern/pre-modern alliance can be explained by a simpler phenomenon
for most of those involved. That being specifically that the basic
tenets of pre-modern/post-modern worldview are completely normal and
natural for human beings.
The sense of grievance and "unfairness" that dominates the post-modern
Left and pre-modern takfiris is a normal outgrowth of our interpersonal
dynamics as crafted by evolution. And as the disgust at unfairness is a
universal, so too is the overwhelming desire to "fix" those inequities
by requiring the individual to conform to certain mores fashioned by God
or gods (in the case of the pre-moderns) or by "scientific" socialism
(in the case of the post-moderns) in order to create a utopian society.
This is perfectly normal behavior and so largely comes effortlessly.
Appreciation for the values of the modern, the values of The
Enlightenment, must be *learned*, however.
Respect for the individual vs. the community, privileging of reason vs emotion, the understanding
that all human interaction involves trade-offs and therefore, a perfect
society is not possible, but rather, through individual Liberty a "best
possible" society can be created - these things are not intuitive. They
must be taught. This is why The Enlightenment is always under threat
from generation to generation.
Therefore, the believer doesn't necessarily have to suffer from a
psychological illness to believe the things he does as it is completely
natural for him to do so. The affection that the post-modern holds for
the pre-modern is mainly fomented by the fact that their value systems
are so similar and that they are both threatened by the utterly alien
Enlightenment. And the pre-modern/post-modern axis is an easily
understandable case of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend."
Where Glazov really shines however, is in his lengthy documentation of
all the various instances in which the post-moderns have embraced
horrific tyranny, the romance with the pre-modern takfiris being only
the latest in a long line of support of appalling actors.
Glazov's description of the Left's embrace of men like Stalin, Mao,
Castro, Ho Chi Minh and Pol Pot; men guilty of the most horrendous
crimes against humanity is a good accounting. It should give anyone who
supports the post-modern project pause.
Glazov also does a good job of dissecting takfirism, describing its
foundational goals and desires, and why they dovetail so easily with the
post-modern Left.
All in all a good book. Essential reading in conjunction with Paul
Berman's "Liberalism and Terror" and Jonah Goldberg's "Liberal Fascism"
if you want to understand the pre-modern/post-modern axis.









