Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
If the Universe Is Teeming with Aliens ... WHERE IS EVERYBODY?: Fifty Solutions to the Fermi Paradox and the Problem of Extraterrestrial Life Hardcover – January 1, 2002
There is a newer edition of this item:
- Print length304 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherCopernicus Books
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 2002
- Dimensions6.14 x 0.69 x 9.21 inches
- ISBN-100387955011
- ISBN-13978-0387955018
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Most purchased | Highest ratedin this set of products
The Beginning of Infinity: Explanations That Transform the WorldPaperback
Product details
- Publisher : Copernicus Books; 2002nd edition (January 1, 2002)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 304 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0387955011
- ISBN-13 : 978-0387955018
- Item Weight : 2.93 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.14 x 0.69 x 9.21 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,328,459 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #682 in Microbiology (Books)
- #1,953 in Astrophysics & Space Science (Books)
- #2,402 in Astronomy (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
This book is a wonderfully informative introduction to the wide range of thinking about the subject of the possibility of extraterrestrial life. Stephen Webb uses the so-called Fermi Paradox as a launchpad for the discussion.
The Fermi Paradox is this: The numbers, along with the sound principle that there is nothing obviously special about Earth and its immediate environs, suggest that it's highly unlikely that we are the only forms of life in the Galaxy, and certainly not in the Universe! However, there remains the one incontrovertible fact in the whole discussion: there is simply no evidence for anyone else.
The question is: "Why?"
Webb considers 50 proposed answers to this question. In my estimation, he gives most of them as fair a shake as they deserve (if not fairer), and this is one of the most impressive aspects of the book. In a subject like this, where there is very little concrete evidence to restrain the sort of wild speculation and pontification of which people are so fond, it is very easy to get dogmatic one way or the other and to dismiss others' ideas without fair trial.
Webb, by contrast, proves extremely judicious, balanced, and careful in his analysis of the various proposed solutions to the Fermi Paradox. Obviously his word is not final, but he doesn't pretend that it is. He takes care to remind the reader of the speculative nature of any proposed solution to the problem, including his own.
As a beginner to thinking about extraterrestrial life, I found this book extremely useful as a guide to the options (so to speak) that are on the table right now. He classifies the solutions of the Fermi Paradox as being of three types:
1) Aliens are, or have been, here, but for one reason or another we haven't noticed it yet.
2) Aliens are out there, but for one reason or another they either cannot or will not communicate with us.
3) There are no (intelligent) aliens.
Under each of these headings fall a number of proposed answers to Fermi's question "If there are aliens, then where are they?" Some of them are delightfully thought-provoking, such as the idea that our Solar System is a sort of Galactic Zoo; others are a bit bizarre, such as the notion that we live in a simulation or "planetarium" built by aliens deliberately to deceive us into believing we're alone; and some are frightening, such as the idea that extraterrestrials haven't shown up yet simply because they were long ago annihilated by strange creatures of their own devising, called "berserkers", or the idea that too many alien civilizations have been killed off by a supernova, a gamma-ray burster, or some such catastrophe.
Webb's own (tentative) conclusion is that the solution of the Fermi paradox is that there are no intelligent aliens. He makes a clever analogy with the Sieve of Eratosthenes (used to find prime numbers by process of elimination) to whittle down the number of civilizations that might be trying to interact with us to essentially zero. Again, however, Webb is not dogmatic about this view; he acknowledges that the jury is still very much out on the question. However, he makes a fairly strong argument that the obstacles in the way of the flowering of intelligent life are too formidable to presume, as many do, that they have been overcome very often at all, even in a Universe as vast as this.
That said, I would not bet so much as a dollar of my own money that we are alone. I do not believe Webb has done full justice either to the number of stars in the Universe, to the Mediocrity Principle, or to the difficulties of interstellar communication. That last one really sticks in my craw. Too often, I hear arguments like this: "Sure, space travel is difficult. But it's not impossible, especially for alien civilizations that are surely far in advance of our own!" It took us 35 billion dollars, ten years, and millions of hours of labor from the brightest minds on the planet - just to get to the Moon! (Once we had accumulated the necessary knowledge over the centuries!) That is literally child's play compared with the sort of travel that alien visitation would require. As far as space probes go, we humans - in all our glory - have managed to send a paltry 4 objects out of the solar system, and as far as I know we have been unable to maintain communication with them.
As I say, it's easy (too easy!) to counter this by simply imagining "advanced" alien civilizations who have somehow worked out all the nitty gritty details that we still struggle with. All I want to say (and I am no expert at this point) is that, if there is such a thing as an unsolvable problem, efficient and worthwhile interstellar travel might be it. (Of course, if this is the case, then there may as well be no aliens at all....)
What about communication, via electromagnetic waves or lasers or what-not? Here again, I think Webb's conclusion does no justice to the sheer difficulty of interacting in this way on the scales involved. The distances are so large, the targets are so small, and the possible frequencies are so many that I think it's no cause for surprise or concern that we've found nothing yet. In fact, I think the biggest worry is that, regardless of whether or not aliens are "out there", the task is pretty much equally hopeless in each case!
Also, I'd like to point out that, even with all the resources at our disposal, we have located fewer than 500 confirmed exoplanets to this date (although recently enormous progress has been made by the Kepler mission). I think this shows that, even if you are an advanced civilization, you can't just pick up a telescope, point it at the sky, and find planets - let alone find whatever life may be on those planets!
Too often "alien" is taken as synonymous with "superhuman", and there is just no real reason to think the two are interchangeable.
In any case, buy Stephen Webb's book. Read it. Then read it again! You won't regret it!
Disagreement has a rather bad connotation in American culture, but in many other countries we also understand that it can be fun as this books shows and where it has its main value. The central point to promote good debates or controversy is remaining humble and accepting our chances to be wrong, which SW does very well all along. I personally loved his statement that real hard study fields are not those like physics (or mine, chemistry), but those like philosophy and religion (p. 113-4). Perhaps he his views weren't convincing just by saying that the universe is made of a few blocks -relatively easy to study for scientists- and not explaining at all why liberal arts should be more difficult than exact sciences, yet this is an example why I think he actually wants to promote debate or controversy. Philosophy, art and religion are topics where anybody's work can be objected no matter how smart he is (or gets top scores in GRE essay tests!). And SW's book is as philosophical as scientific while at the same time sets a tone to avoid falling in the poison of most controversies -like politics where many books are garbage, either liberal or conservative- or the arrogance of other scientists like Peter Ward who definitively rules out extraterrestrial intelligent life.
One reason why many people loathe philosophical debate is that writers get so lost sometimes that some debaters seem to be reinventing the wheel or worrying about irrelevant issues. These problems happened to SW as he advanced through his book. Let's see, in solution 31 he found that the time for intelligent life to emerge on Earth and the useful Sun's lifetime to feed life is about 2. This finding really got him since he started playing with number and numbers while getting freakier and freakier like in p. 145 where he said the following (re-worded just in case)
"Merely because we chose universes where to exist (how could we choose any other type of universe?") we can't infer that other intelligent species exist. We have to be here because we see ourselves to be here"
What the heck????!!! Nobody has chosen anything whatsoever. SW himself wonders how we could choose another universe. No options no selection, simple. Or maybe our souls choose where to be born, a better idea out there how we select this universe? And why couldn't we infer other intelligent species to exist if we chose our universe? And when SW says we have to be here because we see ourselves here...well I guess so (you wonder how a bacteria sees itself?) but I also wonder if he was actually addressing a marijuana-smoking audience (you've got to expand your readers-market!) Or maybe he was drunk. I'm just kidding, just kidding! Next in p. 148, SW shows how a star lifetime is related to life in planets. High-mass starts are hotter than low-mass ones and emit more UV radiation, but live less time. Hey SW, you see how being clear is not so difficult? This book has more stuff like this. Yet, it is well written as a whole despite some drawbacks. You must be patient to realize that some of his points are really relevant when speculating about intelligent alient loife.
SW might not have been deep also because he dealt with a wide arrange of topics, unlike P. Ward who simply said "no" and assumes life is exclusively carbon-based. In order to provide some more info SW added numbers to locate at the end of his book for more info. These numbers don't lead to bibliographic references, but to deeper information which is rather off the topic of the book. He still wasted some space like in p. 134 where he mentioned Gordon Moore and used a number which leads to a single one extra info, his birth year. Moreover, he should have placed bibliographic references right there where the numbers lead us. You'll see how he mentions some books, a number shows up, you go for it and then find to go to another page.
Yes, SW should make a new edition, explaining better some chapters, especially 28-31; talking less about Fermi; maybe less about chemistry because readers might be worn-out without real need (it's my major, not yours for most of you); maybe no math (the Sieve of Eratosthenes) in his conclusion which not really necessary, just say all factors mentioned through the book add up to exclude carbon-based life. Well, a topic which is only about speculation is not easy at all and this book still deserves 5 stars. Remember its good qualities.
Yes, you could enjoy this book, thinking and feeling the joy of debate when finding alternative answers to Fermi's paradox. Finally, it's not terrible for me to think we are alone in the universe, but if it is for you (or if you just can't stand debates) you'd better go to a church than this book, seriously.
Top reviews from other countries
It argues for and against each case and is a thought provoking and highly enjoyable read.
It explores the Fermi Paradox in great depth with the respect that the subject matter deserves.
The author draws his own conclusions at the end, which I now share ( I didn't before ). A real testament to the power of books !
There is no better broadly based book on the subject.
Superb.





