Buy new:
-38% $15.57$15.57
Delivery Monday, July 29
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Pro Reads
Save with Used - Good
$5.47$5.47
Delivery Friday, July 26
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: ICTBooks
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the authors
OK
Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years, Updated and Expanded Edition Paperback – October 22, 2007
Purchase options and add-ons
Trillions of dollars spent on reducing fossil fuel use would have no effect on today's rising temperatures. The public policy key, Singer and Avery propose, is adaptation, not fruitless attempts at prevention. Further, they offer convincing evidence that civilization's most successful eras have coincided with the cycle's warmest peaks. With the added benefit of modern technology, humanity can not only survive global climate change, but thrive.
- Print length304 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherRowman & Littlefield Publishers
- Publication dateOctober 22, 2007
- Dimensions6.05 x 0.69 x 9.07 inches
- ISBN-109780742551244
- ISBN-13978-0742551244
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
Editorial Reviews
Review
Fred Singer and Dennis Avery highlight the many fallacies associated with the hysterical claims of dangerous climate change and unsubstantiated computer projections surrounding the theory of human caused global warming. They have managed to lay out, dissect, and expose the facts in a thoroughly readable style. Unstoppable Global Warming is a ‘must read' for everybody who is interested in the real issues surrounding climate change. -- William Kininmonth, Australasian Climate Research
Singer and Avery skillfully present their case for the existence of a solar-induced 1,500 year cycle that generates warming and cooling of the Earth's temperature irrespective of the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases. The authors even more skillfully argue the implications of their findings to the ongoing heated debate regarding the human contribution to observed and future changes in climate. -- Robert C. Balling, Jr., Arizona State University
Fred Singer and Dennis Avery have put together an impressive collection of 'reasons to believe that global warming may not be as bad as some people are telling us'―in other words, that natural variations, rather than human-emitted greenhouse gases, have tended to control climate. Their exhaustive list of scientific references, mostly from refereed journals, only underscores their statements. Bravo for a job well done! -- George H. Taylor, State Climatologist, Oregon Climate Service
This book is must reading for anyone concerned about global warming. The authors stress that "consensus" has no place in science, only hard-headed testing of speculation. Their testing of the earth's erratic, moderate warming since 1850 leads them to the planet's recently discovered―but already broadly studied―1500-year climate cycle. -- Frederick Seitz, former President, National Academy of Sciences
Real science in, real science out. A masterpiece of understanding, dispelling the computer myths of manmade global warming. Please read this book. -- David Bellamy, Order of the British Empire, academic, author and host of British TV documentaries
A wonderful new book. . . . meticulously researched and footnoted. ― The Washington Times
...a thoughtful book by two respected scientists... -- National Association of Manufacturers ― Shopfloor.Org
Recommended ― Choice Reviews
This well written book is arguably the best book to date on the politics and science of global warming. ― Hawaii Reporter
t is a very readable book that avoids scientific jargon and does not drown its major points in a flood of data, yet provides 449 references for anyone desiring to find and read the facts found and explained by international researchers. ― Philadelphia Bulletin
argues that climate change is part of a natural cycle, not man-made, and seeks to debunk dominant scientific consensus on global warming. ― Sunday Star Ledger
. . . Highly recommended. ― Albuquerque Journal
For those who would like to read the science rather than the politics of climate change I suggest Skinner and Avery's Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years. ― The Bellingham Herald
“I would like o recommend that the author of the letter read the following books which are chock full of data exposing the global-warming hoax: “Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1,500 years” by Fred Singer, a distinguished research professor at George Mason University…perhaps if the author of the letter were to read these books, he would understand the truth concerning the global warming hoax, rather than swallow the propaganda of the leftists who want to tax U.S industries into oblivion.”
― Pensacola News Journal
Product details
- ASIN : 0742551245
- Publisher : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; Updated and Expanded edition (October 22, 2007)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 304 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9780742551244
- ISBN-13 : 978-0742551244
- Item Weight : 13.8 ounces
- Dimensions : 6.05 x 0.69 x 9.07 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #610,920 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #319 in Weather (Books)
- #569 in Climatology
- #1,244 in Environmental Science (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors

Dr. S. Fred Singer, an atmospheric and space physicist, is one of the world's most respected and widely published experts on climate. He is professor emeritus of environmental science at the University of Virginia. He directs the nonprofit Science and Environmental Policy Project, which he founded in 1990 and incorporated in 1992 after retiring from the University of Virginia.
Dr. Singer served as professor of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA (1971-94); distinguished research professor at the Institute for Space Science and Technology, Gainesville, FL, where he was principal investigator for the Cosmic Dust/Orbital Debris Project (1989-94); chief scientist, U.S. Department of Transportation (1987- 89); vice chairman of the National Advisory Committee for Oceans and Atmosphere (NACOA) (1981-86); deputy assistant administrator for policy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1970-71); deputy assistant secretary for water quality and research, U.S. Department of the Interior (1967- 70); founding dean of the School of Environmental and Planetary Sciences, University of Miami (1964-67); first director of the National Weather Satellite Service (1962-64); and director of the Center for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Maryland (1953-62).
Dr. Singer did his undergraduate work in electrical engineering at Ohio State University and holds a Ph.D. in physics from Princeton University.
Dr. Singer has published more than 200 technical papers in peer-reviewed scientific journals, including EOS: Transactions of the AGU, Journal of Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, Science, Nature, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Geophysical Research Letters, and International Journal of Climatology. His editorial essays and articles have appeared in Cosmos, The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, New Republic, Newsweek, Journal of Commerce, Washington Times, Washington Post, and many other publications. His accomplishments have been featured in front-cover stories appearing in Time, Life, and U.S. News & World Report
Dr. Singer is author, coauthor, or editor of more than a dozen books and monographs, including Global Effects of Environmental Pollution (Reidel, 1970), Is There an Optimum Level of Population? (McGraw-Hill, 1971), Free Market Energy (Universe Books, 1984), Global Climate Change (Paragon House, 1989), The Greenhouse Debate Continued: An Analysis and Critique of the IPCC Climate Assessment (ICS Press, 1992), Hot Talk Cold Science - Global Warming's Unfinished Debate (Independent Institute, 1997, 1999), Climate Policy - From Rio to Kyoto (Hoover Institution, 2000), Unstoppable Global Warming - Every 1,500 Years (Rowman & Littlefield, 2007, revised ed. 2008), Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate (Heartland Institute, 2008), and Climate Change Reconsidered: The 2009 Report of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (Heartland Institute, 2009).
Dr. Singer is an elected Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), American Geophysical Union, American Physical Society, and American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics. He was elected to the AAAS Council and served on the Committee on Council Affairs, and as Section Secretary. In 1997, NASA presented Dr. Singer with a commendation and cash award "for important contributions to space research."
Dr. Singer has given hundreds of lectures and seminars on global warming, including to the science faculties at Stanford University, University of California-Berkeley, California Institute of Technology, State University of New York-Stony Brook, University of South Florida-St. Petersburg, University of Connecticut, University of Colorado, Imperial College-London, Copenhagen University, University of Rome, and Tel Aviv University. He has also given invited seminars at Brookhaven National Laboratory, the Max Planck Institute for Extra-Terrestrial Physics in Munich, the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg, and the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado.
Dr. Singer has been a pioneer in many ways. At the Applied Physics Laboratory of Johns Hopkins University, he participated in the first experiments using high-altitude research rockets, measuring the energy spectrum of primary cosmic rays and the distribution of stratospheric ozone; he is generally credited with the discovery of the equatorial electrojet current flowing in the ionosphere. In academic science during the 1950s, he published the first studies on subatomic particles trapped in the Earth's magnetic field - radiation belts, later discovered by James Van Allen.
Dr. Singer was the first to make the correct calculations for using atomic clocks in orbit, contributing to the verification of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, and now essential in the GPS system of satellite navigation. He also designed satellites and instrumentation for remote sensing of the atmosphere and received a White House Presidential Commendation for this work.
In 1971, Dr. Singer calculated the anthropogenic contribution to atmospheric methane, an important greenhouse gas. He also predicted that methane, once reaching the stratosphere, would transform into water vapor, which could then deplete stratospheric ozone. A few years later, methane levels were indeed found to be rising, and the increase in stratospheric water vapor was confirmed in 1995.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers say the book is well researched and does a great job showing how global warming happens. They find it informative, easy to read, and well organized. Readers also say it's excellent and well worth the price.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book well researched, and mention it provides a good account of climate history. They also say it includes everything on the topic, and is essential reading for people who think that human activities are causing climate change. Customers also appreciate the thoughtful response and good argument for a global warming cycle.
"...Singer offer a great opportunity to access some, with plenty of references for follow-up." Read more
"...The Chapter Endnotes total 524.2. The history is interesting.3...." Read more
"...This book includes everything on the topic...." Read more
"Gives a good account of climate history world wide showing the definitive 1500 year cycle as well as the Roman warming, the cooling during the dark..." Read more
Customers find the book informative, well-written, and logical. They also say it's clear, concise, and full of good arguments. Readers also mention that the book is comprehensive and scientifically sound.
"...educated general public. It is clear and easy to read, even more so inthe 2007 edition...." Read more
"...4. The writing is clear, and the main points are easy to grasp.5...." Read more
"...They have also included a well written 11 page glossary...." Read more
"Dr. Singer presents a very comprehensive and scientifically sound summary of the history and present knowledge (as well as its current limits) of..." Read more
Customers find the book an excellent, invaluable resource on global warming. They also say it does a very good job of presenting not only the science but also the political and social aspects of the issue.
"...Overall and excellent read without a lot of obscure technical speak and having good citations and explanations...." Read more
"...fires. The authors deserve a careful reading.The book does fabulously well in debunking some reallybad global warming science...." Read more
"...But contrary views do exist, and this book does a very good job of presenting not only an alternative theory to explain current temperature..." Read more
"...Dr. Singer does a terrific job of marshalling and annotating his position, remaining calm as others scream to be believed and firmly planting is..." Read more
Customers find the plot convincing, unstoppable, and well-footnoted.
"...And it is unstoppable. In addition, the authors state that global warming is not primarily caused by carbon-dioxide...." Read more
"Makes a very convincing case...." Read more
"...This work will show you why. Factual, solid, real. Read it before you proceed to join the gaggle." Read more
"It was actually a fun and informative read. The author makes a pretty convincing case for the 1500 year cycle...." Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
For example, it presents evidence of intentional, or at least criminally negligent, presentations of data in some key studies and official reports, especially UN reports on climate change, that are then happily splashed across headlines to sell media. There is even evidence of political editing of key UN reports--after the scientists have signed off on them--that fundamentally change the findings (and this all came well before the Climategate emails came to light).
Executive summary of what the reviewed evidence suggests:
1) The Earth is in the upswing of a medium-term climate cycle. While there are many overlapping cycles of various durations, this one has been happening about every 1,500 years for at least the past hundreds of thousands of years, utterly independent of human activity, most likely fueled by a solar output cycle.
2) A great number of the individual surface temperature readings that show greater warming are flawed due to changes in the environments immediately around the temperature recording stations, mainly from urbanization (for example, the construction of heat reflecting parking lots next to recording stations).
3) Climate modeling using supercomputers is incredibly flawed and the results cannot be trusted. In some cases, there is circumstantial reason to believe that key modelling studies supporting the man-made global warming hypothesis are based on flawed data and characterized by the careful selection of only that data that supports the hypothesis and the ignoring of data that does not.
4) Hard measures of temperature change that *are* reliable, including satellite data, tree ring studies, ice core studies, and studies of the movement of tree lines up and down mountainsides show compelling evidence from all over the world that supports the 1,500-year cycle hypothesis, and either does not support, or strongly contradicts, the man-made climate change hypothesis.
5) The long-term data does indicate that carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been *correlated* with changes in temperature. However, these temperature changes *follow* such changes in carbon dioxide rather than preceding them, and do so with *a lag of several centuries*.
6) Oceans are not going to flood, islands are not going to sink, and species are not going extinct as a result of human carbon emissions (each of these topics is treated in turn).
7) And in any case, warmer climates are *better* for most life forms, for food production, and for reducing the incidence of violent storms, compared to periods of cooling.
Unstoppable climate-change scare-mongering enables a massive power grab for the state. Legitimate, valid, scientific evidence has little to do with it. Selection and bias are rampant, as are misinterpretation and misreporting by both researchers and the media. However, if you are interested in considering some legitimate evidence for yourself, Avery and Singer offer a great opportunity to access some, with plenty of references for follow-up.
on global warming, which is said by some extremists to be on the verge
of being out of control, as in the book The Revenge of Gaia. To make the dogma more scary, there is a further claim
that the years from about 1980 to the present have been the hottest in
history, and that more storms and more severe storms have resulted.
Extemists have made it clear that humans must stop burning most fossil
fuels in favor of wind and solar power. The true costs of doing so are
never admitted -- turning the standard of living in developed countries
back 150 years.
According to UGW, international panic over these alarms resulted in the
Kyoto Protocol for reduction of emissions of CO2, implemented by a few
countries in 2005. According to UGW, the only result will be payments of
billions of dollars to the government of the Russian Republic, with no
reductions of CO2 emissions into the atmosphere by the countries making
the payments. So UGW gives the evidence from the Russian Academy of
Science in 2004 to reject Kyoto because: (1) the world's temperatures do
not follow CO2 levels; (2) the world was warmer in the Roman Empire
period and during the Medieval Climate Optimum (1000-1250 AD) than now;
(3) there is a much better correlation between warming and solar output
than with CO2 levels; (4) sea levels are not rising faster than 15 cm
per century since 1850, even in the slightly warmer periods; (5) they
did not expect tropical diseases to worsen with some warming; and (6)
that there is no increase in incidence of storms or their intensity due
to recent mild global warming, with which the British delegation
concurred. With no explanation, Russia ratified the Kyoto Treaty in
2005. The obvious explanations, if broadcast, were that Europe and Japan
would pay Russia $ billions to burn more Russian fossil fuels, and that
Russia would gain entrance to the World Trade Organization.
To take the Russian Academy of Science's reasons in order, UGW showed
that: the most blatant attempt to fabricate the Earth's temperatures was
that of Michael Mann, PhD, University of Massachusetts, whose infamous
graph of global temperatures form 1000-2000 AD became known as "the
hockey stick". It showed a general sag in temperature from 1000-1920,
leaving out the higher temperatures from 1000-1250 AD than we now have,
then a huge leap. Iinvestigation by a pair of Canadian researchers (see
Essex & McKitrick, 2002) found that Mann's raw data, obtained by them
with great difficulty, was flawed by every imaginable misuse and
selection of data (details are given), including faulty use of tree-ring
widths, an old standard for weather estimation. Mature trees not only
grow faster when they are warmer or have more rain, but also when there
is more CO2, which was ignored by Mann.
UGW cites evidence of many kinds to show that there were two periods
hotter than now in the last 2000 years, such as the Danish colonization
of Greenland, then the later failure of the colony; on the extent and
location of farmland in many locations, including in the Roman Empire
and in China; isotopic ratios in fossils; length of the sunspot cycle,
and other data. One recent finding, since 1979, is satellite data
showing that the sun is producing 0.05% more radiation per decade. The
temperatures used by pseudoclimatologists to scare us are obviously
tainted by urban heat island effects. New York City has warmed up, as
have Pasadena and Tokyo; but the warming can hardly be global since
Death Valley, CA, McGill, NV, and West Point, NY, have cooled (Crichton,
2004).
Unfortunately, this revised UGW did not focus on the actual CO2 record
from direct chemical assays. CO2 levels were actually higher than now 3
times between 1812 and 1965 (Beck, 2007). This alone demolishes any idea
that higher CO2 levels will cause runaway warming; it already did not.
Now about that so-called consensus on warming: UGW gives 6 examples of
groups of scientists not in agreement with the "warming by CO2"
hypothesis in the 1990s. The largest group was over 17,100 mostly
American holders of science or engineering degrees who signed a petition
expressing doubt about man-made global warming and opposing the Kyoto
Treaty. Of these, fully 2,600 had climate science credentials. Perhaps
the most important group was the 50 US State Climatologists, 90% of whom
agreed with the statement: "scientific evidence indicates variations in
global temperature are likely to be naturally occurring and cyclical
over very long periods of time" (p66). Mass media: beware of your
credibility -- there is no consensus!
Another of UGW's strengths is recognizing that: "Water vapor is the
most important greenhouse gas even during the current [minor] warming
[since about 1980]. Water vapor makes up about 60% of the natural
greenhouse effect, with CO2 making up an estimated 20%..." (p40). Not
knowing whom to believe in 1997, and to see who was correct about the
relative infrared absorption of greenhouse gases, I determined an
infrared spectrum of humid air at 40° north latitude. Fully 92% of the
absorption was due to water vapor, and 8% to CO2; no methane or CFCs
were detected (Kauffman, 2004).
UGW may be the best overall 21st century book on climatology for the
educated general public. It is clear and easy to read, even more so in
the 2007 edition. You should consider having one as an antidote to the
prevailing unscientific dogma on this subject.
Beck, E.-G. (2007). 180 Years of Atmospheric CO2 Gas Analysis by
Chemical Methods, Energy & Environment, 18(2), 259-282.
Crichton, M. (2004). State of Fear. New York, NY: HarperCollins, pp 86,
190, 370-381, 393-4. (Original sources given therein.)
Essex & McKitrick, (2002). Taken by Storm. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Key
Porter Books, Ltd., pp154-174.
Kauffman, J. M. (2004). Water in the Atmosphere. J. Chem. Ed., B81(8),
1229-30.
Top reviews from other countries
Riportando le misurazioni con cui è stata ricostruita la storia delle variazioni di temperatura nel corso dei millenni, l’autore osserva come queste ultime si presentino da sempre, con una certa ciclicità: ovvero indipendentemente dalla presenza umana.
Il libro è interessante poiché porta informazioni che, corredate da una folta bibliografia, paiono scientificamente fondate nonostante si discostino dall’attuale main stream mediatico.
Unstoppable Global Warming is written in a non-technical, thoroughly readable and enjoyable style, making this a fascinating contribution to the heated debate on the human impact on observed and future climate change. Unstoppable Global Warming is a highly recommended read.







