Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
90% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
+ $3.99 shipping
84% positive over last 12 months
You’ve got a Kindle.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Enter your mobile phone or email address
By pressing "Send link," you agree to Amazon's Conditions of Use.
You consent to receive an automated text message from or on behalf of Amazon about the Kindle App at your mobile number above. Consent is not a condition of any purchase. Message & data rates may apply.
Follow the Author
OK
Vietnam: The Necessary War: A Reinterpretation of America's Most Disastrous Military Conflict Paperback – July 16, 2002
| Michael Lind (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
Enhance your purchase
Michael Lind casts new light on one of the most contentious episodes in American history in this controversial bestseller.
In this groundgreaking reinterpretation of America's most disatrous and controversial war, Michael Lind demolishes enduring myths and put the Vietnam War in its proper context -- as part of the global conflict between the Soviet Union and the United States. Lind reveals the deep cultural divisions within the United States that made the Cold War consensus so fragile and explains how and why American public support for the war in Indochina declined. Even more stunning is his provacative argument that the United States failed in Vietnam because the military establishment did not adapt to the demands of what before 1968 had been largely a guerrilla war.
In an era when the United States often finds itself embroiled in prolonged and difficult conflicts in places like Afghanistan, Kosovo, Bosnia, and Iraq, Lind offers a sobering cautionary tale to Ameicans of all political viewpoints.
- Print length314 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherFree Press
- Publication dateJuly 16, 2002
- Dimensions5.5 x 1 x 8.44 inches
- ISBN-100684870274
- ISBN-13978-0684870274
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
Fareed Zakaria managing editor, "Foreign Affairs" A quarter century after its bitter end, Vietnam remains America's most controversial war and Michael Lind's book is sure to set off new sparks about it. Looking at the war from the heights of grand strategy and the inner reaches of domestic politics, Lind makes a fresh, highly intelligent, and passionate case for rethinking the conventional wisdom. Agree with it or not, it is compelling reading.
John Patrick Diggins Distinguished Professor of History, City University of New York Graduate Center Most Americans prefer to forget the Vietnam War. Lind compels us to remember it in all its complexity and tragedy and to consider military and diplomatic possibilities that almost no other author or statesman has though of raising. Moving through the pages of this richly provocative book is an agitated originality.
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Free Press; Reprint edition (July 16, 2002)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 314 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0684870274
- ISBN-13 : 978-0684870274
- Item Weight : 12.5 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 1 x 8.44 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,322,111 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,245 in Southeast Asia History
- #2,456 in Vietnam War History (Books)
- #4,955 in Philosophy of Ethics & Morality
- Customer Reviews:
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
About the author

Michael Lind is the author of more than a dozen books about U.S. political and economic history, politics and foreign policy. He has explained and defended the tradition of American democratic nationalism in The Next American Nation (1995), Hamilton's Republic (1997), What Lincoln Believed (2005), The American Way of Strategy (2006), and Land of Promise: An Economic History of the United States (2012). His most recent book is The New Class War: How to Save Democracy from The Managerial Elite (2020).
Lind's works of fiction and poetry include The Alamo (1997), named by the Los Angeles Times Book Review as one of hte best books of the year, and Bluebonnet Girl (2003), illustrated by Kate Kiesler, an Oppenheimer Toy Portfolio Gold Book Award winner.
Educated at the University of Texas and Yale University, Lind is a columnist for Tablet and a contributor to American Affairs, American Compass and Project Syndicate. He has been an editor or staff writer at Harper's Magazine, The New Yorker, The New Republic, the National Interest, co-founder of New America, and Assistant to the Director of the U.S. State Department's Center for Foreign Affairs. He has taught at Harvard, Johns Hopkins and the University of Texas.
A fifth generation Texan, Michael Lind lives in his home town of Austin, Texas, where he is Professor of Practice at the Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs of the University of Texas at Austin.
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
At the very end of the book Lind writes: 'The Vietnam war was neither a mistake, nor a betrayal or a crime. It was a defeat". But the war accomplished its goal of containing Communism in Vietnam and not letting it spill into Southeast Asia or unwind the gains of the War with Japan. The Vietnam War was fought to protect Japan from being threatened by Communism and becoming a Communist satellite. The empirical proof that the war was not a defeat is that Indonesia, Taiwan, South Korea and Japan (the "Asian Tiger" nations) became Capitalist and trading partners after that war, not Communist satellites even though some remained authoritarian. The Vietnam War was misunderstood by American media as also a defeat.
This is an important distinction because the US has been fighting another war of containment of Islamic Revolution in the Middle East that is also misunderstood by the public and the media. Maybe Mid East nations need to resist Islamic Terrorism themselves without US assistance and intervention, but without US help the Mid East would likely be controlled by an organized criminal network called Islamic Terrorism centered in Iran and now joined by the Muslim Brotherhood crime network in Turkey. The Egyptians took back their country in 2012 from this organized crime network.
Lind is an astute intellectual and I have read his other books. But this book omits the central truth that the Vietnam War was a victory for Capitalism and free trade against collectivization and totalitarianism. How Lind could miss this is beyond my comprehension. Two stars and worth reading only to refute the author's thesis.
At times the book reads like it was designed for domestic political consumption and winning points on one of the cable talk shows that are broadcast from various parts of the Washington, D.C. area. It is far more sophisticated than what anyone will find on those shows, though.
Lind basically calls it like he sees it and manages to rankle almost anyone who has a stake in American public life: Republicans, Democrats, liberals, conservatives, the religious, the military, the antiwar movement and pacifists, the American intellectual community, and the civil rights movement to name just a few. Those few groups that do not get offended in some form from this book are probably not all that important in the first place. In the process, he punctures many myths. Chapter three on the failure of the U.S. military in Vietnam--rejecting the idea popular among veterans that the politicians kept them from winning the war--alone is worth the price of the book. He also goes after the antiwar movement and argues in convincing fashion that it became the witting pawn of the North Vietnamese and that many of the leaders crossed the line between dissent and disloyalty. The chapter on American politics and culture is interesting, but he makes the United States far more historical conscious than is actually the case. It is also difficult to take serious an argument that claims Wisconsin and Oregon are part of New England. Few people will buy all his arguments, but he will make you stop and think a bit.










