Outerwear Edit from Shopbop
To share your reaction on this item, open the Amazon app from the App Store or Google Play on your phone.

These promotions will be applied to this item:

Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.

You've subscribed to ! We will preorder your items within 24 hours of when they become available. When new books are released, we'll charge your default payment method for the lowest price available during the pre-order period.
Update your device or payment method, cancel individual pre-orders or your subscription at
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Viral: The Search for the Origin of COVID-19 Kindle Edition

4.7 4.7 out of 5 stars 1,121 ratings

"Chan and Ridley write with an urgency...that inspires gripping depictions of what viruses are, how infectious-disease laboratories work and wonderfully lucid descriptions of bats. . . . They powerfully recount how dangerous pathogens can both leak from a lab and emerge in nature." (New York Times Book Review) 

Understanding how Covid-19 started is crucial for the future of humankind. Viral is the most incisive and authoritative book about the search for the source of the virus.

A new virus descended on the human species in 2019 wreaking unprecedented havoc. Finding out where it came from and how it first jumped into people is an urgent priority, but early expectations that this would prove an easy question to answer have been dashed. Nearly two years into the pandemic, the crucial mystery of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is not only unresolved but has deepened.

 In this uniquely insightful book, a scientist and a writer join forces to try to get to the bottom of how a virus whose closest relations live in bats in subtropical southern China somehow managed to begin spreading among people more than 1,500 kilometres away in the city of Wuhan. They grapple with the baffling fact that the virus left none of the expected traces that such outbreaks usually create: no infected market animals or wildlife, no chains of early cases in travellers to the city, no smouldering epidemic in a rural area, no rapid adaptation of the virus to its new host—human beings.

 To try to solve this pressing mystery, Viral delves deep into the events of 2019 leading up to 2021, the details of what went on in animal markets and virology laboratories, the records and data hidden from sight within archived Chinese theses and websites, and the clues that can be coaxed from the very text of the virus’s own genetic code.

 The result is a gripping detective story that takes the reader deeper and deeper into a metaphorical cave of mystery. One by one the authors explore promising tunnels only to show that they are blind alleys, until, miles beneath the surface, they find themselves tantalisingly close to a shaft that leads to the light.

Due to its large file size, this book may take longer to download

Editorial Reviews

Review

"Chan and Ridley write with urgency in defending why people ought to take the SARS-CoV-2 lab-leak hypothesis seriously...That urgency inspires gripping depictions of what viruses are, how infectious-disease laboratories work and wonderfully lucid descriptions of bats...They powerfully recount how dangerous pathogens can both leak from a lab and emerge in nature." 

New York Times Book Review

"Viral collates a series of circumstantial but damning points in favour of the lab-leak hypothesis." — Sunday Times (London)

"Chan and Ridley's new book is a viral whodunnit that is sure to appeal to armchair detectives." — The Guardian

“Alina Chan and Matt Ridley assemble perhaps the most comprehensive case for the lab-leak theory currently available.”   — Wall Street Journal

“Both journalists and armchair detectives interested in the mystery of the coronavirus were discovering Chan as a kind of Holmes to our Watson. She crunched information at twice our speed, zeroing in on small details we’d overlooked, and became a go-to for anyone looking for spin-free explications of the latest science on COVID-19.” — Boston Globe Magazine

About the Author

Dr. Alina Chan is a postdoctoral researcher with a background in medical genetics, synthetic biology, and vector engineering. At the Broad Institute of MIT & Harvard, Dr. Chan is currently creating next generation vectors for human gene therapy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Dr. Chan began to investigate problems relevant to finding the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and in parallel spearheaded the development of the COVID-19 CoV Genetics (covidcg.org) browser for scientists worldwide to rapidly track virus lineages and mutations by locations and date ranges of interest.



Matt Ridley's books have been short-listed for six literary awards, including the Los Angeles Times Book Prize. His book The Agile Gene: How Nature Turns on Nurture won the award for the best science book published in 2003 from the National Academies of Science. He has been a scientist, a journalist, and a national newspaper columnist, and he is the chairman of the International Centre for Life in Newcastle, England. He is also a visiting professor at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York.

Product details

  • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09794TRBB
  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Harper (November 16, 2021)
  • Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 16, 2021
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • File size ‏ : ‎ 17057 KB
  • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
  • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Print length ‏ : ‎ 416 pages
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.7 4.7 out of 5 stars 1,121 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Matt Ridley
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Matt Ridley's books have been shortlisted for six literary awards, including the Los Angeles Times Book Prize (for Genome: The Autobiography of a Species in 23 Chapters). His most recent book, The Agile Gene: How Nature Turns on Nurture, won the award for the best science book published in 2003 from the National Academies of Science. He has been a scientist, a journalist, and a national newspaper columnist, and is the chairman of the International Centre for Life, in Newcastle, England. Matt Ridley is also a visiting professor at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York.

Customer reviews

4.7 out of 5 stars
1,121 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Customers say

Customers find the book's research thorough and detailed. They appreciate the unbiased insights and evidence-based explanations. The book is described as an excellent, well-written summary that is easy to understand by both professional and lay readers.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

40 customers mention "Research quality"37 positive3 negative

Customers find the book provides a thorough account of the topic. It provides detailed background information and an unbiased perspective on events. The authors do a great job of laying out the evidence in a way anyone can understand. They condense lots of scientific data into a readable whodunit that makes a complicated topic easy to understand. Overall, readers describe the book as an eye-opening synthesis that is hard to put down.

"...The story is woven together well and the cases are made for both sides with the evidence weighing more heavily, but not with certainty, on a virus..." Read more

"...What makes this a great book is that the authors give a balanced analysis of the two major possible sources for the Covid-19 pandemic: the Wuhan wet..." Read more

"...There is no doubt that there is the potential for uncovering the greatest evil in human history. The probability is not zero...." Read more

"This book is a very competent and highly readable summary of the evidence that very strongly suggests a lab leak as the origin of SARS-CoV-2...." Read more

21 customers mention "Readability"21 positive0 negative

Customers enjoy the book's readability. They find it a well-written, enjoyable read that provides good insights into events and questions. The book is described as a reliable and worthwhile read.

"...What makes this a great book is that the authors give a balanced analysis of the two major possible sources for the Covid-19 pandemic: the Wuhan wet..." Read more

"This book is a very competent and highly readable summary of the evidence that very strongly suggests a lab leak as the origin of SARS-CoV-2...." Read more

"...Neither book makes the other redundant, both are well worth reading to gain perspectives on the origins of the pandemic that has killed 5 million..." Read more

""Viral" is very good and replete with great information and extensive explanation of the science surrounding SARS‑CoV‑2...." Read more

16 customers mention "Readable"16 positive0 negative

Customers find the book readable. They appreciate the authors' effort to provide readers with an understanding of COVID's peculiarities. The book is written for a popular audience, though the complexity of the material. Readers appreciate the detailed background so they understand the implications behind each jargon.

"...The authors spend time giving the reader and understanding of the peculiarities of COVID...." Read more

"...I recommend this highly readable book to anyone interested in the range of possible causes for the worst pandemic of the last 100 years." Read more

"...gave a very detailed background so that readers appreciate the implications behind each jargons, such as Furin Cleavage Site (FCS), viral evolution,..." Read more

"Well written and logical, as with other Matt Ridley books that I have read...." Read more

An incredibly well-written, unnerving and vital read.
5 out of 5 stars
An incredibly well-written, unnerving and vital read.
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry, there was an error
Sorry we couldn't load the review

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on November 23, 2021
    Almost two years into the Pandemic facing a further mutated and more infectious virus there is no conclusion on the origin of the virus. There is also a complete lack of interest out of China to allow for a forensic investigation and the consequences of which is that there is now a significant lack of trust in the conclusions out of China or the WHO. Viral explores this topic with much detail and gives the whole history of interaction between scientists in China and their international peers. Furthermore they go through how random individuals trawling through public databases found clues about the genome overlap Covid-19 and bat genomes associated with miner deaths in Yunnan a decade ago. The story is woven together well and the cases are made for both sides with the evidence weighing more heavily, but not with certainty, on a virus accidentally escaping from a lab. It is quite gripping as well as highly concerning.

    The book weaves together a dense story starting with the mysterious death of several miners in Mojiang County in 2012. In a bat cave in this county several miners came down with pneumonia and significant health deterioration with unknown origins. Speculations included fungal and viral infections but nothing identified as known disease. The authors give some perspective on the subsequent studying of these cases as masters and doctoral dissertations published on these cases but these remained within Chinese databases and were not the subject of international publication. The mine from which this occurred remains completely closed to any investigation and is not willingly discussed by China. The authors and a large number of scientists believe these cases and that cave are the likely origin of Covid. The caves of Yunnan are filled with species of bats which are the most abundant source of zoonotic viruses. Their large communities and close proximity of living leads to large virus pools that are not suited to humans or other animals but are potentially a few mutations away from being able to jump species. The authors discuss how the study of such bat populations and their viruses was the business of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, run by Dr Shi. A prominent character in the story of Covid. Their team analyzed bat viruses for years and sequenced their findings (though did not share their results and then only partially until internet sleuths found evidence of their existence on the internet). Thus the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) studied and analyzed bat genomes with coronavirus structures for years. Furthermore the institute along with general scientific momentum likely engaged in gain of function research on viruses with the ambition of getting ahead of the next pandemic by putting oneself in the position to understand viral evolution better. This sort of scientific attitude is controversial with both advocates and skeptics able to make strong cases. It is hard to imagine in a country like China their ambitions don't completely dominate any interest in ethics, but of course this is speculative.

    The author spend time highlighting how lab leaks happen, giving examples in the Soviet Union as well as the US. They also discuss the level of biosafety labs that have been constructed and the safety protocols around research type and lab type. In this the author's highlight that the safety standards of Chinese labs is questionable, as they often dismissed their western peers who helped build the labs leaving a scarcity of lab technicians trained to use such highly specified equipment. A topic Chinese scientists no doubt would instinctually disagree with, but the examples given are highly concerning though there is no one given the opportunity to rebut them. The authors discuss the level of security in the WIV and its capacity to work on both genome analysis and gain of function research.

    The authors spend time giving the reader and understanding of the peculiarities of COVID. The most obvious is that a virus which jumps species is extremely unlikely to be highly infectious. The binding receptors for humans and the original animal host will be different requiring mutations, thus usual first cases are people in extremely close proximity to animals often catch but don't transmit. In the case of COVID its original mutations were few meaning the virus was immediately suited for human transmission. The tracing of the chain of infections led to at best the fish section of the wet-market, which was originally given as the origin. This should now considered to be of negligible probability. The second story pushed by Chinese officials is it was transmitted in frozen food, this too has negligible probability as a scenario and there is no evidence for it either. The authors discuss pangolins and civet cats and how they are vessels for bat viruses rather than a source of virus. So one also gets decent biology lessons throughout. There is a discussion of how the spike protein is so effective and how it is unique to COVID indicating some chance of engineering. This of course would be highly disputed by Chinese policy makers but that is purely their self interest being displayed loudly rather than substantiated with evidence.

    The authors weave throughout the story the reality of Chinese authorities and Dr Shi's team not being cooperative. There was late release of genome data, non-existent record keeping of early patient data. Non-sense privacy arguments on sidelining blood analysis of patients in Wuhan in 2019. Overall its pretty shocking how little China has been willingly providing on the origins of Covid but then not so shocking when considering their initial desire to cover up the outbreak. There are so many extremely strange instances of, very close but prior to the outbreak genome data being taken offline and or renamed. Of course there's an excuse for everything but the collage of evidence points to a lack of transparency that projects guilt, whether or not such is the case. If anything confidence on the China narrative on the origin of Covid is now deservedly low, while confidence in the case for a lab leak, accidental as it would have been has risen.

    Viral is exciting and a dense collection of evidence on the origins of COVID. It attempts to be even in its analysis giving arguments for each side and claiming at the end the authors have yet to form their own conclusions but the writing suggests otherwise. It suggests the authors believe the evidence is stacked towards a lab leak, but an unintentional one. As a reader one will come to the same conclusion but of course that is partially due to the authors putting together the evidence the way they do and not having the other side respond. That being said scientists on the other side, who really are pursuing science and not agents of the state, like Dr Shi, have refused to respond to their questions forcing the reader to come to the same conclusions as the facts the authors put together take one to inescapable. Unfortunately this is increasingly an instance where China's closed autocratic political instincts don't sit well with the scientists investigating the topic. And whether its instincts that are counterproductive or whether its their need to cover up a mistake has amplified a growth in mistrust that wont just go away. Nor has it led to a stronger introspection for all scientific research done in the name of getting ahead of a problem ignoring the probability of creating a problem, namely gain of function research, were it actually a lab leak. It will take the world a long time to get over this pandemic and the exercise of getting to the bottom of the origin of it at the moment is more anti-cathartic than anything.
    119 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on October 20, 2023
    The authors make a compelling case that the Wuhan Institute of Virology (presumably a highly secure bio-safety laboratory) cannot be ruled out as a possible source for the emergence of the SARS2 virus and the Covid-19 pandemic. What makes this a great book is that the authors give a balanced analysis of the two major possible sources for the Covid-19 pandemic: the Wuhan wet market (where wild animals are sold for food) and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The authors interviewed dozens of key players involved in the search for the cause of the Covid-19 pandemic. The fact that the so-called experts have widely divergent views on who should take the blame makes for a very exciting thriller. I recommend this highly readable book to anyone interested in the range of possible causes for the worst pandemic of the last 100 years.
    2 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on December 14, 2021
    It was in 2012 that a >97-99%, ACTG protein production instruction set for SARS-Covid later covid-19 was genetically revealed at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). No one was told. Unintended papers inferred and 18 months later admitted that 2 mining victims were the first humans to die in that year. A WIV chief would early on say that the peculiar mining deaths were meaningless. People die in small villages every day. Nothing would come of it. Except, that chief knew and was operationally expert with a very dark secret. She had a famous American scientist associate who knew the same thing.

    China's Covid-19 secrets have been progressively revealed by an informal, global team of known and anonymous data scientists, odd fellows and viral scientists coagulated online under the acronym "Drastic" to embrace the challenge of discovering "Where did covid-19 come from?"

    Have we heard about the "bombshell" investigation from Drastic and perhaps a majority of esteemed virologists dissatisfied with CCP response? No, the MSM has not mentioned that a majority of virologists with a few staunch, well-known, exceptions have come to accept that a Wuhan lab escape proposition. Is the media too invested in its 2020 Trump's fault and DNC/MSM conspiracy tale of transparent and helpful China? It can no longer be discounted. In fact, Trump's MSM labeled covid 'conspiracy' answered far more questions in retrospect than the MSM/scientist bat soup and pangolin stew fake news.

    'Viral: The Search for the Origin of COVID-19' is not a political ideology narrative. If anything, a liberal bias peaks through in several passages in spite of attempts to avoid it. 'Viral' is a deep dive into the scientific method in action when encumbered by investigator self-interest, observer bias regarding what they wish were the facts though woefully unencumbered by evidence ... raised to the power of a violent, tyrant run police state with self-delusions of global dominance as the newly minted supermen of the 21st century.

    US scientific institutions, whether they realize it or not, have and will be shaken to the core by the pandemic. Faith and confidence in ‘respected’ expert opinion telling the public what the science “is” will be so much more difficult after this fine mess. The reason is simply that those we once might trust have been caught backpedaling, re-editing, and more simply, hornswoggling the public using an embarrassingly naïve, amateurish, and ineffectual MSM.

    Has the MSM revealed that there is zero evidence of animal-to-human covid transmission? Or that there was never a trace of covid-19 evidenced from the Wuhan wet market? No evidence months before the MSM ran with the fake news? That even the WIV was aware that the lack of evidence was damning for zootic propagation? That bats and pangolins are not even consumed in Wuhan? That this gain-of-function generic research was forbidden by international treaty until 2012 for the express reason of this pandemic? That a specific, non-majority opinion school of US virologists was keen to overturn the no-gain-of-function research convention to execute the experiments in Wuhan?

    My answer is “NO!”. I did not know. As a science PhD, I would have noticed such narrative and data outliers. I was indeed paying close attention and suspecting that the WIV is the Occam's Razor best source from day one in January 2020. Little did I know that the whole story began in 2012. That the science was deeply hidden by the CCP, WHO, and US consorts through disgusting fakery. It was fortuitous that some scientists had taken screenshots before the post-escape from China data sets.

    Having read several books on the subject, I can tell you that as of this mid-November, 2021 book release, this is by far the most complete narrative supported by excruciating detail, evidence, and timelines. 'Viral' demands a page and line rebuttal by the powers that be. The WIV, CCP, the EcoHealth US commercial consortium, US gov't agencies, and the MSM owe the public the truth. The WIV has now admitted a year and a half later that 8 ‘other’ similar pandemic level viruses have been ‘studied’ since 2012-2015. But, we're told that these are state secrets not to be shared internationally. How can this be as we carry on in a state of fear and economic disaster? Several individuals by name that we know have a lot of explaining to do.

    The book concludes without indictment. Short the vast majority of the CCP-side story, it's the only technically competent conclusion. Yes, covid-19 might-maybe have come from animals naturally except, there is no evidence. Yes, mutations that made covid-19 so well adapted to humans can be the product of years-long product of intense, dedicated WIV process of virus culture line iterations. Except, the CCP has withheld, destroyed, and edited out data that might tell.

    Viral is the very best true science crime primer I've chanced to read. There is no doubt that there is the potential for uncovering the greatest evil in human history. The probability is not zero. Who can stand that truth? Or, we’d perhaps prefer a simple lab accident too humanly embarrassing for Xi to share at the risk of blame and economic and political consequences. Brave Chinese virologists at the center have been disappeared. Other unnamed WIV associates have privately hinted that someday the truth will out. At least one defected and promptly canceled as a right-wing dupe by the MSM without much notice. A great debt is owed to missing CCP scientists who retained a conscience to leave breadcrumbs along the path.

    For the covid interested, this is must-read on many levels technical, behavioral spanning into the political and economic.
    29 people found this helpful
    Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
  • enrique p sandoval lobato
    5.0 out of 5 stars Valioso documento.
    Reviewed in Mexico on February 21, 2022
    Todos deberían leerlo y enterarse los riesgos que corre nuestra especie. Estamos amenazados por la soberbia y la corrupción. Los dos últimos años son la muestra.
  • Noah
    5.0 out of 5 stars Exellent objective assembly of very current information- Everyone should read this!
    Reviewed in Canada on December 3, 2021
    It seems like every subsequent book on this subject is getting better researched and more enlightening. The authors certainly lead, but the reader is left to accept or reject the overall hypotheses that have been put forward. I'm pretty sure that anyone who is interested enough to work their way through this book will come away convinced that there is little doubt where this virus came from, smoking guns are all over the place some scientific, some human nature, some defined by the coverup. Hopefully this book will help move the subject firmly from a conspiracy to main stream scientifically verified facts. The real conspiracy- likely a future book, is how the CCP, aided and abetted, wittingly or unwittingly, by international bodies, foreign governments, the media and scientific entities, managed to suppress various truths for over 2 years now If not for books like this, we would be none the wiser.
  • ky
    5.0 out of 5 stars Xi’s Xenophobia Puts Humanity in Harms Way
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on August 3, 2022
    A very disappointing tale which Alina Chan & Matt Ridley tell masterfully. Their forensic attention to the detail makes this book a delight to read. I presume it will not be available in Chinese translation and on sale in all good bookshops from Canton to Beijing? And in that fact lies the soul of this story. Many Chinese citizens have shown how brave, honest, clever, and well meaning they are, doing the right thing, because it is the right thing to do. But an autocratic dictatorship does not change its spots whatever the century.
    Dr Peter Daszak of the EcoHealth Alliance comes across as self serving and duplicitous. He has not acquitted himself well in this pandemic. I am surprised he has not been arrested and questioned for obstructing the investigation into the cause of so many deaths. Daszak’s lack of integrity and downright dishonesty would appear to have helped the CCP hide the truth. But he is not alone. Many Western scientist and journalists have shown a decided lack of judgment. Whatever happened to follow the data, follow the science?
    Dr Fauci and the NIH, in funding gain-of-function projects at WIV, has shown a level of naivety completely inexplicable at his level of responsibility.
    Daszak and Fauci’s actions have done little to prevent future pandemics and both have shown little evidence they understand that is their primary responsibility. It is why they were given public funds in the first place.
    Many scientist in Holland, Spain, Canada, and France have done much to seek out the truth and Alina and Matt have done a brilliant job of putting the jigsaw together.
    It’s a tragic tale of human deceit. That so many scientist and politicians do not feel driven to find out how and why so many died is a sad reflection on today’s world.
    If you are interested in understanding what little the world does know about the pandemic, ‘Viral’ is the book to read.
  • Witch
    5.0 out of 5 stars Libro molto interessante.
    Reviewed in Italy on February 5, 2022
    Storia avvincente e supportata da argomentazioni e prove convincenti
  • PJochum
    5.0 out of 5 stars Wissenschaft - wie ein Krimi
    Reviewed in Germany on January 10, 2022
    Ich habe schon mehrere Bücher von Matt Ridley gelesen, aber dieses ist das spannendste! Die Akribie und Unvoreingenommenheit, mit der die beiden Autoren Informationen zusammengetragen und bewertet haben, ist faszinierend und wissenschaftlich vorbildlich. Das Buch ist auch für einen naturwissenschaftlich interessierten Laien lesbar, erfordert aber im Mittelteil doch einige Anstrengung. Angenehm ist's auf dem Kindl zu lesen: Da hält man den Finger auf den unbekannten Begriff und bekommt die Übersetzung. Man lernt nicht nur viel über die Corona-Geschichte, sondern generell eine ganze Menge über moderne Virusforschung, deren gefährliche Experimente (gain-of-function) nicht nur in China, sondern auch in USA, und über die unsägliche Rolle der WHO und der chinesischen Regierung. Die Idee der Autoren, die beiden sich gegenüberstehenden Hypothesen - Laboratory-Leak oder Zoonosis - am Schluss in Form einer Art virtueller Gerichtsverhandlung von zwei Anwälten vortragen zu lassen, macht das Buch fast zu einem Krimi. Man kann nicht aufhören zu lesen. Ebenfalls faszinierend ist die Aktualität: Die beiden Autoren haben Ereignisse bis Ende September 2021 im Buch verarbeitet. Sie fällen zwar kein endgültiges Urteil, neigen aber ganz klar zum Lab-Leak-Ursprung, der von allen Beteiligten mit allen Mitteln zu vetuschen versucht wird.

Report an issue


Does this item contain inappropriate content?
Do you believe that this item violates a copyright?
Does this item contain quality or formatting issues?