- Hardcover: 368 pages
- Publisher: Metropolitan Books; First Edition edition (May 17, 2000)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0805043810
- ISBN-13: 978-0805043815
- Product Dimensions: 6.3 x 1.2 x 9.6 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.5 pounds
- Average Customer Review: 11 customer reviews
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #3,000,635 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Virtual Tibet: Searching for Shangri-La from the Himalayas to Hollywood Hardcover – May 17, 2000
"The Dream Daughter" by Diane Chamberlain
A rich, genre-spanning, breathtaking novel about one mother's quest to save her child, unite her family, and believe in the unbelievable. | Learn more
Customers who bought this item also bought
From Publishers Weekly
The Dalai Lama! The Beastie Boys! Prayer wheels! Lost Horizon! Brad Pitt! Schell (Mandate of Heaven), a prolific China expert and the dean of UC-Berkeley's journalism school, has produced a fluent, enlightening, well-researched and often disillusioning chronicle of Tibet and "Tibet"--the first a real place of high mountains and Buddhist tradition, the second a Western image of the place, presented in memoirs, films, T-shirts and benefit concerts from Marco Polo to Kundun and beyond. Schell begins with his first visit to the real Tibet in 1981, fills in his readers with relevant history and belief, then moves to Hollywood, where the Dalai Lama has become "a warmhearted, even cuddly religious icon." Schell meets and evaluates "self-styled Tibetan Buddhist[s] in the Hollywood pantheon," from Richard Gere, who appears impressively dedicated, to Steven Seagal, who comes off here as secretive and egomaniacal and who claims to be a reincarnated lama. The author travels to Austria to interview former SS member Heinrich Harrer, who wrote the book Seven Years in Tibet. And--after much effort--he reaches the Argentinean location where the Brad Pitt vehicle based on Harrer's book is being shot: there he finds a dedicated director, fake lamas, real llamas and quite real, somewhat disoriented, Tibetans. After neat historical digressions, Schell returns to the present-day triangle of Hollywood-China-Tibet: noting that neither Tibet movie made much money, Schell concludes that both China and Hollywood "had occupied Tibet [and] found it disappointingly indigestible. Unfortunately, only Hollywood showed signs of... retreat." (May.-- found it disappointingly indigestible. Unfortunately, only Hollywood showed signs of... retreat." (May)
Copyright 2000 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From Library Journal
Tibet has a mysterious aura, as remote to Western thought and culture as its location. Schell, dean of journalism at the University of California, Berkeley, and author of 14 previous books and numerous magazine articles, writes about the mystery of Tibet, interweaving an account of the filming of Seven Years in Tibet (which starred Brad Pitt and was based on Heinrich Harrer's book of the same title). Consequently, Schell's focus is dual: he simultaneously discusses Tibetan culture, religion, history, and geography and the filming of the movie, including casting and the building of the set for the holy city of Lhasa. (Ironically, the movie was filmed in the Argentine Andes and Hollywood, not Tibet.) Schell's account is, much like his previous books and articles, well written, well researched, and engaging. He has visited Tibet on many occasions and has served as an adviser on Asian affairs to President Clinton. A thorough bibliography accompanies the text. Highly recommended.
-Thomas K. Fry, Univ. of Denver Penrose Lib.
Copyright 2000 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Meanwhile, back in Hollywood----the Dalai Lama became a cult figure for many of the figures of Filmistan. The cultural destruction of Tibet under Chinese rule came to the attention of many who previously could not have found Tibet on a map. In the 1990s, not one, but two movies were produced about Tibet----the film version of Heinrich Harrer's "Seven Years in Tibet" and "Kundun", more the story of the Dalai Lama. Since filming on site was out of the question due to politics, the former was filmed in Argentina starring Brad Pitt. Schell weaves an interesting tale, alternating between the story of Tibetan travellers and the production of the film. In the end, it seems that the film and real Tibet merged because the film brought the extinct version of Tibet back to life for Tibetan actors and film audiences everywhere. "...in the popular imagination of the West, the plight of the Tibetans....occupied against their will....has been added to the lure of Tibet as a mystical place of physical beauty and spiritual refinement." But haven't Westerners created "virtual Tibet" in order to improve the quality of our lives, to give hope that somewhere out there Shangri La really exists? Wasn't Heinrich Harrer an unreconstructed Nazi? Do we know much about real Tibet? These are very interesting questions because Tibet is not the only place, nor Tibetans the only people, to suffer "virtualization". I recommend this book if any of this interests you.
As a Mongolian Chinese American, it has pained me to see my fellow Americans presented with much delusion about Tibet by Hollywood. For one, the Free Tibet movement dismisses the existence of millions of real Tibetan minority people in central China. I have been quite despondent while watching the "Free Tibet" movement paint China into a mono-ethnic nation, thereby erasing any ethnic identity from the real minorities in central China.
Most of the American scholars focus on Tibet in studying this issue, but they totally ignore the real minorities in central China.
For my minority Chinese heritage, I wish to say this to a reviewer who compared the Tibet myth to Dr. King's dream: As far as I'm concerned, the Dalai Lama is not Dr. Martin Luther King. Dr. King had a dream for America. He helped all African Americans to gain self respect. He never forgot African Americans are all over the U.S. I don't see the Dalai Lama ever speak about how his fellow Tibetans in central China. They are swept under the carpet as the Tibet movement tries to convince the West that "Tibet was invaded", that "the Tibetans are a race distinct from the Chinese".
Ghandi wanted a whole India, not to split it.
The Free Tibet movement calls for ethnic segregation for the Tibet region under euphoric terms. It has built a great myth that sugarcoated Ethnic Segregation into supposed "freedom".
This movement is doomed because it does not have the support of real minorities in China. Just as most African Americans will not support a Black Nation, nor will most Europeans support an Aryan Nation, most minorities in China prefer a multiple ethnic nation.
What really matters is how America will fare at the end. The "Free Tibet" movement can hurt our nation. In the past, the Chinese people held a loving attitude toward the U.S., due to our saving China from the Japanese invasion during WWII. Now their feelings are changing. There is a great love for multiple ethnic culture in China. When we engage in "Free Tibet", many Chinese people are angry at the U.S. for wanting to split China.
In this new millennium when the Sino-American relationship is vital to world peace, Tibet has been a thorn in that relationship, and is an threat to world peace.
America may suffer decline in this century if we took the wrong direction on this issue. What's at stake is not what happens to Tibet. The Tibetans in China will have the ultimate say. What's at stake is what will happen to America as a result of helping the Tibet movement.
"Virtual Tibet" may be one of the most important books this year. It can help enlighten us how much of what we think of Tibet is but an illusion. I hope books like this will help call attention to a more realistic view on this issue.
It is sad to see how this book is being panned by the pro-Tibet campaign people, to the point of using phrases such as "communist party line" to attack a respected American scholar. McCarthism lives in Tibet movement. I'm not surprised. I've seen many Tibetan followers levy accusations of "communist" at anyone whose view does not promote their myth.
I do agree with the reviewer who says Tibet has colonized the West. How did the West allow this colonization? It shows a great weakness on the West's system to be manipulated so easily.
The real issue here is the West's need to save itself from Tibetan colonization. Reading Virtual Tibet may just be the first step.