In summary, this book posits that germ theory itself is a scientific absurdity relying upon sophistry, fallacious syllogisms, falsification, and supposition - a bold assertion in today's climate. But, where is the laboratory verified evidence of the virus? Does it actually exist? Can there be genuine rebuttal to anything written in this book? In short, NO. The arguments herein are from the sources of the viral studies themselves. Thus, all retorts you'll read in these comments are ad-hominem in nature, not scientific.
Laughably, there are no etiological studies proving that an airborne 'virus' is the sole a cause of any disease. The studies themselves admit to this in the fine print. If you're new to researching a priori medical theory, or are still skeptical, I'd recommend reading Virus Mania along along with a book called 'What Really Makes You Ill ' by Dawn Lester, as it expounds more on the causative principles of disease.
As the authors prove, no 'virus' has ever been properly isolated, separated, purified, proven to attack a cell, replicate inside a host, and induce similar symptoms across samples within a true controlled environment. Instead, we're made privy to Dr. Frankensteinesque experiments in which deadly lab chemicals mixed with a 'virus sample' (in reality a blood sample that was never proven to be contagious), are injected into animal brains until they die. Hypothesis: When injecting poisonous chemicals into an animal brain, it may develop a problem with or without a germ.
These studies are then presented to the world as scientifically 'settled' and without room for debate, when they never consisted of a control sample to see if the injected poison would have the same effect without the additive. As any 3nd grader knows, real science use controls to test a working hypothesis. Virologists must have failed that grade. The people in the comments leaving negative reviews would do well to re-examine the very definition of the scientific method.
To this very day, viruses have not been scientifically proven via Koch's postulate in any form of controlled environment. Not a single study bothers to rule out environmental toxins, food supply, water supply, air supply, electromagnetic effects, pharmaceuticals, et al. In fact, there is less scientific evidence to support the 'airborne killer germ' theory than the demonic entities of the medieval church.
Instead virologists rely upon studies such as David Baltimore's RNA virus paper for evidence, when that paper is intrinsically flawed. In-fact, most viral studies come riddled with intellectual 'looking' citations that attempt to convince readers that the 'science is settled'. Not even close. If one examines the citation papers closely, they will quickly find a lack of scientific methodology to support the conclusions relied upon.
I give the authors of virus mania credit as being one of the first to identify PCR testing (which is used both to determine 'infection' as well as 'sample transference' in studies) as a spurious metric. Today, virologists rely upon such testing, instead of evidence-based electron microscopy, to claim: Voola! 'virus X has moved and caused infection'.
Yet, a PCR test was designed to copy DNA, and certainly not to reverse transcribe RNA, as virologists today are (mis)using it. The inventor of PCR himself, Kerry Mullis, lamented it being used for 'viral testing'.
More specifically, PCR tests have no industry standardization, and thus rely on any number of factors such as cycle amount and primers which can give each lab widely different results. Testing lacks even a standard place to scrape a sample from the human body. Thus what we have is a recipe for nonsense. Lookup a PCR expert named Steven Bustin (on infectious myth podcast) for even more information from a testing specialist.
To show you just how ridiculous it all is, allow me to re-examine the 'granddaddy' of modern virology, David Baltimore, and his RNA virus study. To follow along please lookup Nature Magazine, volume 226, 1970.
First, Baltimore mixes his 'RNA virus' in a 'reaction solution' that he never expounds upon, presumably chemical in nature. And since cells can naturally react and morph via certain enzymes, antiobiotics, and chemicals - as the authors of Virus Mania prove - the entire experiment is flawed from the beginning. Note, Baltimore doesn't use a control used to verify that a 'non-viral' sample wouldn't have a similar reaction.
Further, Baltimore makes the statement 'probable' many times, but never 'causal, let alone, 'proven'. Hence instead of direct, scientific observation, he fantasizes about what could be happening inside of the cell.
More absurdly, Baltimore claims the enzyme polymerase is 'only' found within the virus sample, and not in the other cells, which is demonstrably false. Especially as the enzyme polymerase in-fact occurs in all animal DNA. Yet this paper lives on today as 'scientific fact', and this study is cited via 'chain citation' in which new studies presume the old to be correct.
For the final laugh, the study admits Baltimore couldn't prove his 'virus' actually infected anything:
"Whether the viral DNA is integrated into the host genome or remain as a free template for RNA synthesis will require further study".
See the fraud? Buried deep within the study, the author admits his work is purely speculative and failed to prove viral ingress and replication. The tradition of nonsense lives on to this day, as modern abstracts make a wild claim contrary to what was proven within the study.
There is much more that could be written, but it would take a book. And as the authors have already written a good one for you, you should read theirs!
ISBN-13:
978-3752629781
ISBN-10:
3752629789
Why is ISBN important?
ISBN
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on March 19, 2021
Reviewed in the United States on March 19, 2021
Verified Purchase
Reviewed in the United States on April 24, 2021
Verified Purchase
Reviewed in the United States on April 22, 2021
Verified Purchase
Top reviews from other countries
KeithG59
Required reading
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 24, 2021Verified Purchase
emma clatworthy
Knowledge is the best defence in any situation
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 26, 2021Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
An eye-opener
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on March 2, 2021Verified Purchase
AshleyG
A brilliant, well researched, and thought provoking book.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on March 4, 2021Verified Purchase
AlanR
Educate yourself
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on March 7, 2021Verified Purchase
