.
This book was created, in my opinion, by Conservatives to explain Donald Trump’s election to President. The essays are uneven in connectedness and in quality. But I found two essays to be outstanding, that by Barry Strauss and the last essay by Roger Kimball. In general, the essays posit that Donald Trump was elected by a populous movement rather than by establishment processes and elites. Each essay attempts to explain why this occurred.
I liked Strauss’s essay because it has a solid analysis of why populous movements occur. In a nutshell, it is because the elitist establishment in their drive to forward their ideologies fail to address the needs of a population which on the surface, lacks an ideology. These needs are are seized by an ambitious demagogue who creates and leads the movement. The populist movement is usually short-lived because it lacks a convincing ideology. However, the demagogue often succeeds in gaining lasting power by creating a favorable reflexive establishment while the populous is often left no better off. When the demagogue fails, it is often disastrous.
I liked Kimball’s essay because of his analysis of the administrative state. Make no mistake: the United States to day is an administrative state which is nowhere consistent with the US Constitution. But I am getting ahead on myself in this review.
In Kimball’s word, “Still, I suspect that in the present context the apparently unbreakable association between populism and demagoguery has less to do with any natural affinity than with cunning rhetorical weaponization. “Populism,” that is to say, is wielded less as a descriptive than as a delegitimizing term. Successfully charge someone with populist sympathies and you get, free and for nothing, both the imputation of demagoguery and what was famously derided as a “deplorable” and “irredeemable” cohort. The element of existential depreciation is almost palpable.”
Thus, “Populism” is used by the establishment to dismiss those that disagree with their positions. But what are these positions? Who used the word “deplorables” in the last Presidential Campaign? Why, it was the representative chosen by the establishment.
Again in Kimball’s words, “The question of sovereignty, I believe, takes us to the heart of what in recent years has been touted and tarred as the populist project.” Who rules? In this case it is the administrative state, the “deep state,” or the “swamp.” In Kimball’s words, “we are increasingly governed not by laws but by ad hoc dictats emanating from semi-autonomous and largely unaccountable quasi-governmental bureaucracies, many of which meet in secret but whose proclamations have the force of law.” He points out that the 18th Century statesman would have accepted that the only valid law is that which was Congressionally pass. But today, the administrative state has subsumed much the Congressional responsibilities and placed both law making, enforcing and judicial duties in a large number of agencies where the people holding these responsibilities have not been elected by the people, the so-called, “knowledge class.”
The knowledge class, has under the Progressive Program, has shifted power away from the electorate to a body of self described, right people, enlightened professionals. What this body has shown itself to be good at is solidifying its own power and power base while ignoring the needs of the population.
Again in Kimball’s words, “That discovery stands behind the growth of the administrative state. We still vote. We still have a bicameral legislature. But behind these forms of a free government, the essentially undemocratic activities of an increasingly arbitrary and unaccountable regime pursue an expansionist agenda that threatens liberty in the most comprehensive way, by circumventing the law.” And so, populism has been a pejorative word used dismiss any effort to diminish the administrative state.
These essays are worth reading and thinking about. Clearly, the word “populist” is being used to describe President Trump. We need to ask the question, what is populism, then ask the question, why is this term being used and finally what does it mean for this nation. This book provides some of the answers.
Other Sellers on Amazon
$3.39
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
Zebras Books LLC
Sold by:
Zebras Books LLC
(2220 ratings)
98% positive over last 12 months
98% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$7.77
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
sweethomeliquid2
Sold by:
sweethomeliquid2
(112045 ratings)
95% positive over last 12 months
95% positive over last 12 months
Only 5 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$11.94
FREE Shipping
on orders over $25.00
shipped by Amazon.
FREE Shipping
Get free shipping
Free shipping
within the U.S. when you order $25.00
of eligible items shipped by Amazon.
Or get faster shipping on this item starting at $5.99
. (Prices may vary for AK and HI.)
Learn more about free shipping
Sold by:
Academic Book Solutions
Sold by:
Academic Book Solutions
(419838 ratings)
97% positive over last 12 months
97% positive over last 12 months
Only 9 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
Vox Populi: The Perils and Promises of Populism Hardcover – November 28, 2017
by
Roger Kimball
(Editor)
|
Roger Kimball
(Editor)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
-
Print length216 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherEncounter Books
-
Publication dateNovember 28, 2017
-
Reading age18 years and up
-
Dimensions6 x 0.75 x 9 inches
-
ISBN-101594039577
-
ISBN-13978-1594039577
Journey into Reading
Explore reading recommendations for children ages 6 - 12. See this week's recommendations.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Roger Kimball is Editor and Publisher of The New Criterion and President and Publisher of Encounter Books. He is also an art critic for the London Spectator and National Review. His most recent book is The Fortunes of Permanence: Culture and Anarchy in an Age of Amnesia (St. Augustine’s Press, 2012).
Start reading Vox Populi: The Perils and Promises of Populism on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Encounter Books (November 28, 2017)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 216 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1594039577
- ISBN-13 : 978-1594039577
- Reading age : 18 years and up
- Item Weight : 1.05 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.75 x 9 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#518,751 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #328 in Philosophy Criticism (Books)
- #2,055 in Arts & Photography Criticism
- #4,496 in Political Ideologies & Doctrines (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.8 out of 5 stars
4.8 out of 5
6 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on July 5, 2018
Verified Purchase
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on December 6, 2017
Verified Purchase
The mere thought of Donald Trump becoming President caused epileptic fits in elitist conservative “intellectuals” (scare quotes intended). What were they smoking at National Review when they published their Feb 15, 2016 NEVER TRUMP issue? This got them banned as sponsors from the Feb 25, 2016 Republican debate. If they thought Trump was a buffoon, why wouldn’t they wait to publish that issue until they had an opportunity to expose him? Could it possibly be a huge collective ego growing ever larger while they sat in their tiny offices only getting opinions from like minded ‘intellectuals”. Their opinions have only gotten more strident, infecting belt-way pundits to the point of hysteria. One must ask, ‘Why read them anymore?”
Then came the astounding March 2016 speech by Mitt Romney denouncing Trump. “Here's what I know. Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud. His promises are as worthless as a degree from Trump University.” When has a former failed Republican Presidential nominee ever inserted himself in such a negative manner in a Republican Presidential race? Has anyone noticed the irony about Trump’s “promises are as worthless as a degree from Trump University” when Trump overturned Obama’s Utah land grab this week in Romney’s home state?
While all this weeping and gnashing of teeth was taking place, there were other thoughtful conservatives asking the question, “Why were the elitists so wrong about Trump?” This lead to Vox Populi, a series of 12 essays from The New Criterion reviewing the history of populism and its effects. We only hear about “populism” when a major Republican political candidate wins against all the warnings of the chattering classes. There is a suggestion in its use that the people who voted for Trump were knuckle-dragging Neanderthals who were too stupid to have a right to vote. Of course, “populism” is never used when a liberal wins an election.
Vox Populi includes serious conservative thinkers who may have been shocked by Trump’s victory but would never consider being Never-Trumpers. With Roger Kimball as editor and the book part of a New Criterion 35th anniversary collection, one can be sure of thoughtful examination of populism and Trump's election. Connecting populist Roman revolts with Brexit, HL Mencken, the Founder’s fear of populism, and the brilliance of the American political system to control the emotions inherent in populist uprisings, these essays will calm the emotional, enlighten the confused, and enthuse those fatigued of recent politics. A conservative reader can trust the thoughtful reflections of Roger Scruton, Andy McCarthy, Victor David Hanson, and Conrad Black. These authors did not take Valium when Donald Trump got elected. They were reflective of American history and its people. “Populism” has had a negative connotation, suggesting totalitarianism (or perhaps an election that shocked elitists) but as Roger Kimball summed up at the end of the book perhaps “‘Populist’ is one word for the phenomenon (a growing recognition of the totalitarian goals of the administrative state). A reaffirmation of sovereignty, underwritten by a passion for freedom, is another, possibly more accurate phrase.”
Vox Populi is not only an excellent book to understand 2016 but an antidote to the hysterics of belt-way conservatives who didn’t get their own way.
Then came the astounding March 2016 speech by Mitt Romney denouncing Trump. “Here's what I know. Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud. His promises are as worthless as a degree from Trump University.” When has a former failed Republican Presidential nominee ever inserted himself in such a negative manner in a Republican Presidential race? Has anyone noticed the irony about Trump’s “promises are as worthless as a degree from Trump University” when Trump overturned Obama’s Utah land grab this week in Romney’s home state?
While all this weeping and gnashing of teeth was taking place, there were other thoughtful conservatives asking the question, “Why were the elitists so wrong about Trump?” This lead to Vox Populi, a series of 12 essays from The New Criterion reviewing the history of populism and its effects. We only hear about “populism” when a major Republican political candidate wins against all the warnings of the chattering classes. There is a suggestion in its use that the people who voted for Trump were knuckle-dragging Neanderthals who were too stupid to have a right to vote. Of course, “populism” is never used when a liberal wins an election.
Vox Populi includes serious conservative thinkers who may have been shocked by Trump’s victory but would never consider being Never-Trumpers. With Roger Kimball as editor and the book part of a New Criterion 35th anniversary collection, one can be sure of thoughtful examination of populism and Trump's election. Connecting populist Roman revolts with Brexit, HL Mencken, the Founder’s fear of populism, and the brilliance of the American political system to control the emotions inherent in populist uprisings, these essays will calm the emotional, enlighten the confused, and enthuse those fatigued of recent politics. A conservative reader can trust the thoughtful reflections of Roger Scruton, Andy McCarthy, Victor David Hanson, and Conrad Black. These authors did not take Valium when Donald Trump got elected. They were reflective of American history and its people. “Populism” has had a negative connotation, suggesting totalitarianism (or perhaps an election that shocked elitists) but as Roger Kimball summed up at the end of the book perhaps “‘Populist’ is one word for the phenomenon (a growing recognition of the totalitarian goals of the administrative state). A reaffirmation of sovereignty, underwritten by a passion for freedom, is another, possibly more accurate phrase.”
Vox Populi is not only an excellent book to understand 2016 but an antidote to the hysterics of belt-way conservatives who didn’t get their own way.
16 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on February 24, 2018
Verified Purchase
I think that the title chosen for this book severely limited the audience that might consider purchasing or at least reading it. One would be led to think that the subject of the book is Latin, Rome, or some related topic.
A better title might have been “Voice of the People” (a literal translation), or “Power to the People.” Another possibility would be “Populism in the Age of Trump.”
The book is a compilation of essays that were contributed to The New Criterion, a journal edited by Roger Kimball, in response to the election of Donald Trump and the British vote to exit from the European Union. Both were likely a reaction to the increasingly ubiquitous administrative state and the exclusion of the common folks from considerations of running for office or even being able to influence office holders. The “Basket of Deplorables” decided to use the ballot box to pursue their own (modest) interests, rather than acceding to globalism and the problems brought about in progressive politics.
The writers of the essays in this volume are not of one voice (pardon the pun), but share diverse views of popolism and its affects on politics. All, however, were convinced that politicians would need to consider the needs of people on the lower half of the socioeconomic strata. Sadly, many politicians of the Ruling Class run on a populist platform but then cave to the culture of the Beltway once they are elected. It will be interesting to see how the populist movement reacts to politicians who go back in their promises once they areesconced in office.
A better title might have been “Voice of the People” (a literal translation), or “Power to the People.” Another possibility would be “Populism in the Age of Trump.”
The book is a compilation of essays that were contributed to The New Criterion, a journal edited by Roger Kimball, in response to the election of Donald Trump and the British vote to exit from the European Union. Both were likely a reaction to the increasingly ubiquitous administrative state and the exclusion of the common folks from considerations of running for office or even being able to influence office holders. The “Basket of Deplorables” decided to use the ballot box to pursue their own (modest) interests, rather than acceding to globalism and the problems brought about in progressive politics.
The writers of the essays in this volume are not of one voice (pardon the pun), but share diverse views of popolism and its affects on politics. All, however, were convinced that politicians would need to consider the needs of people on the lower half of the socioeconomic strata. Sadly, many politicians of the Ruling Class run on a populist platform but then cave to the culture of the Beltway once they are elected. It will be interesting to see how the populist movement reacts to politicians who go back in their promises once they areesconced in office.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on December 23, 2017
V. thoughtful essays on the subject, by the best of writers.
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Pages with related products.
See and discover other items: Explore belt holders for closets





