& FREE Returns

FREE delivery: Friday, Sep 17 Details

Fastest delivery: Thursday, Sep 16 Details

In Stock.

As an alternative, the Kindle eBook is available now and can be read on any device with the free Kindle app.

$$25.95 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details

Secure transaction

Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.

Return policy: Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement

Add a gift receipt for easy returns

Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime

FREE delivery: Thursday, Sep 16 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon. Details

Used: Good | Details

Sold by more_books_less_money

Fulfilled by Amazon

Share <Embed>

Other Sellers on Amazon

$25.36
& FREE Shipping

Sold by: Book Depository US

$21.69
+ $3.99 shipping

Sold by: Ambis Enterprises

$32.66
& FREE Shipping

Sold by: Bahamut Media

Flip to back Flip to front

Listen Playing... Paused You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more

See all 3 images

Follow the Author

Bruce D. Porter

War and the Rise of the State Paperback – February 1, 2002

by Bruce D. Porter (Author)

14 ratings

See all formats and editions

Price

New from

Used from

Kindle

"Please retry"

$15.99

—

Paperback

"Please retry"

$25.95

$21.36

$4.06

Board book

"Please retry"

$10.00

$9.99

$1.04

Enhance your purchase

As Publishers Weekly notes, “Porter, a political scientist at Brigham Young University, demonstrates that wars have been catalysts for increasing the size and power of Western governments since the Renaissance. The state’s monopoly of effective violence has diminished not only individual rights and liberties, but also the ability of local communities and private associates to challenge the centralization of authority. Porter’s originality lies in his thesis that war, breaking down barriers of class, gender, ethnicity, and ideology, also contributes to meritocracy, mobility, and, above all, democratization. Porter also posits the emergence of the “Scientific Warfare State,” a political system in which advanced technology would render obsolete mass participation in war. This provocative study merits wide circulation and serious discussion.”

Print length

400 pages
Language

English
Publisher

Free Press
Publication date

February 1, 2002
Dimensions

6 x 1 x 9 inches
ISBN-10

0743237781
ISBN-13

978-0743237789
See all details

Start reading War and the Rise of the State on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Product details

Publisher ‏ : ‎ Free Press (February 1, 2002)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Paperback ‏ : ‎ 400 pages
ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0743237781
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0743237789
Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.06 pounds
Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6 x 1 x 9 inches

Best Sellers Rank: #1,599,555 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #10,787 in History & Theory of Politics
- #47,774 in Military History (Books)
- #91,379 in American History

Customer Reviews:
14 ratings

Customer reviews

5 star		67%
4 star		19%
3 star		6%
2 star 0% (0%)		0%
1 star		8%

How are ratings calculated?

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Subversive Teacher

A Fascinating Concept Whose Nuances are Critical

Reviewed in the United States on August 5, 2011

Verified Purchase

I read this book for a class called "War, Technology, and the Rise of the State", taught by Dr. Walter Opello, coauthor of The Nation-State and Global Order. Dr. Opello took Porter's word as gold although I remained highly skeptical at first, but Porter and Opello became more convincing as they presented their evidence. Porter did an excellent job of demonstrating the connection between warfare and the rise of nationalism, modernity, and subsequently the nation-state. Perhaps more interesting was the connection between modern warfare and the rise of Western social-welfare politics.

However, before war-hawks take too great a feeling of vindication from Porter's research, it should be noted the type of warfare fought post-WWII has had far less productive side-effects. A-symmetrical war, or warfare fought between uniformed soldiers and "terrorists, guerrillas, pirates, bandits, cartels, insurgents, etc" produces very little in the way of progressive social policy; post-modern wars don't end, they slowly burn indefinitely. In the end the book serves as both a valuable history lesson and staunch warning for the present.

5 people found this helpful

Helpful

Tom Munro

Schematic and Superficial

Reviewed in the United States on February 27, 1999

Verified Purchase

This book is rather schematic and develops a number of rules that it then tries to use to explain the development of nation states. Generally the feel of the book is that it is a rave based on secondary sources. The absurdity of the book can be seen in its discussion of totalitarianism. It suggests that the way totalitarianism comes about is through five steps. These are:
1 An all out industrial war which enlarges the size and authority of the administrative apparatus of the state.( This happened in Germany but it didn't in Imperial Russia. Russia had been an autocracy prior to the war. If anything the mechanisms it had set up to control the state weakened and collapsed. This led to the revolution of 1917. ) 2 Military defeat causes the collapse of the traditional regime.( You would have to agree with that.) 3 The disintegrative effects of way destroy or substantially weaken civil society.( Russia never had "civil society". It was a large rural country with a small elite living in cities. Germany was a more complex society. However it emerged from the war a democracy. It took 15 years for that to collapse. One would think that the depression and the fear of communism might be relevant to the support of Nazism rather than the collapse of civil society.) 4 In the resulting power vacuum mass movements capture the enlarged bureaucratic center and form a new regime using an organizational structure and approach to politics modeled on an army at war.( In Russia the communist had to create the Red Army the Checka and other means of repression. In Germany the instruments of repression were initially the SA and the SS. This is thus wrong) 5 After capturing the state, the new regime centralizes power and atomizes all opposition society for war.(Yes in Russia no in Germany.)
Anyone who is familiar with the history of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany will be aware that both countries had a very different character and history and neither will fit into this model.
The Soviet Union initially tried to run a command economy but faced with the collapse of the country introduced the New Economic Policy in the 20's. This meant in practice private ownership of land but the state ownership of industrial enterprise. The state at this time could if anything be described as reasonably fragmented. It was not dissimilar to the old Czarist regime, which as an autocracy had controlled the development of secondary industry to provide armaments. In the late 20's the Soviet Union did a complete U-turn on this policy and decided to Nationalize all land and to set up collective farms. The reason for this policy was so that the state could export the agricultural surplus and use the income to industrialize. This policy meant a huge decrease in the standard of living of farm workers. Such a policy was met with fierce resistance. The resistance led to repression and the deaths of millions of farm workers especially in the Ukraine. It was at this point that the Soviet Union became a strong centralized authoritarian state. Prior to that it had been an authoritarian state but not a strong and centralized one. In addition to building up a strong base of secondary industry the state also built up a large modern army.
The development of central structures meant that during the Second World War, even despite the loss of huge amounts of territory the Soviet Union was able to out produce the Axis countries in war production.
Germany unlike the Soviet Union was a wealthy country with a large industrial sector. After the First World War its constitution was that of a Federal Republic. Following the passing of power to the Nazi Party something which was accepted by the traditional elite's of the country there was little marked change to the country. An authoritarian political structure was set up and dissidents imprisoned but power was decentralized into a number of Gauls. Nothing at all happened to the industrial structure of the country. Prior to the war the only real economic policy was some government spending on roads which led to the achievement of full employment. In the late 30's the country engaged on a limited armaments program which was similar to that of Great Britain.
One of the problems faced by Nazi Germany was its inability to harness its own economy and also that of its allies to the war effort. Thus in 1941 German industry was only working 9 to 5. Private motor vehicles and Refrigerators were still being produced. The output of aircraft was so low that Germany's total of 3,000 aircraft in service was never exceeded despite the fact that both the United States and the Soviet Union had by 1944 20,000 aircraft available for service in Europe. In Germany, there were simply no strong central organs except those of state repression.
The book is highly artificial in the way that it tries to fit complex reality into simple schema. Give it a miss.

13 people found this helpful

Helpful

Michael L. Wilson

Great explanation of how War and Statism have grown together, and why.

Reviewed in the United States on June 2, 2013

Verified Purchase

This is a historical review and analysis of how the nation-state developed and was strengthened by, and resulted in, the expansion of war. Porter discusses how changes in economic structures, political structures, and taxation laid the groundwork for the horrific wars of the 20th century, which could only be carried out by centralized nation-states. Excellent insights. Very thought-provoking.

One person found this helpful

Helpful

John Hamill

Well argued

Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2005

I started reading this book solely to learn about the eighteenth century, but I found it to be so profound and well written that I had to read it al. Everyone who cares about freedom should read this book. Among the first sentences Porter says that like many people, when he first started to study history he found wars to be an annoying interruption of progress, but that he grew to appreciate that after each war the world was somehow different. The how and why are the subject of the book. Porter shows how war and the need to pay for war has led to increasing state power and larger government. Porter shows that in most European states kings used war to quash representative government, but he also shows the exceptions - Switzerland, Sweden, the Netherlands, Britain, and America. Porter shows how different circumstances in these countries helped lead to representative government of some kind. The 20th century tyrannies of fascism and communism and the rise of the welfare state are also convincing explained.

12 people found this helpful

Helpful

B. N. County

Somewhat superfical but intriguing....

Reviewed in the United States on June 17, 2008

As someone with a degree in Political Science with emphasis in Political theory and International Relations, I found this book to be a "mixed bag" of superficiality and intriguing ideas.

The superficiality, I think, is due to the author's tackling of a HUGE subject in a book of readable length. The subject matter simply deserves more depth than the 380 pages of this book allows. A book of perhaps three or four times that length would be needed to really get into the "meat" of this subject. And it would be read, and comprehended, by few.

What Porter has done has been to skim the surface of the subject: in effect outlining his thesis while giving examples - many examples - to support his conclusions. And those conclusions are intriguing.

This book is NOT for the professional political scientist. But it is an excellent "primer" that anyone else can, and should, read to profitably understand many of the forces at work in the world today.

Extensively annotated and referenced, one should think of this book as an introductory buffet of delicious samples, rather than a 5 course formal banquet.

3 people found this helpful

Helpful