Eric Margolis's "War at the top of the World" provides, as "The Economist" described it an "gripping and instructive" account of the issues and background to the contemporary conflict between India and Pakistan over Kashmir, that majority muslim state in a majority Hindu country. But it does much more too. Published in 2000 before smoke from 9-11 effectively blocked, at least in the popular media in the US and much of the west, any kind of wider analysis of modern geopolitics in the Himalaya - South/West Asia region, it provides observers of the region ...and of America's involvement in Afghanistan... with much of the background and wider context needed to unravel the otherwise seemingly bizarre politics of the region. It's a roadmap to the realities of the region that is easy to follow and hard to put down.
It is an excellent, indeed superior, journalistic account that integrates historical and geopolitical analysis, with a sufficient levening of first person travel writing to turn non-fiction into a page turner. Margolis makes the great spine of the Himalayas come alive. As someone who has spent time in the region and in Ladakh ("Little Tibet") Margolis's work added extra depth to my traveller's experience.
The recent assassination of Benazir Bhutto has boosted the relevance of Margolis's book even further. Pakistan, he reminds us, owes it's name to an anagram of Punjab, Afghanistan, Kashmir and Sind, yet only two of those four provinces are currently under Pakistani rule. The founders had bigger ideas. It also derives it's name from the word "Paak", meaning "pure". Pakistan's founders imagined it as a "land of the pure", a kind of muslim Israel. Maybe even a muslim "Eretz Israel". And like Israel, Pakistan has had a continuing struggle between those with secular versus theocratic visions for the country. Overlayng this spiritual struggle is the more down to earth conflict between the forces of "feudalistic democracy" as represented by the Bhutto's, who 'own' their populist political party in much the same way as the family owns vast landed estates, versus the Army, which like the military in Indonesia and Burma, is really a self governing corporate state within the state, a military economic complex that may direct as much as 25% of Pakistan's economy. Margolis's approach to geopolitics rightfully considers it as best seen as a branch of geography.
Pakistan's populous hug the valleys of the Indus in much the same way as Egypt's hug the Nile. Away from this long lifeline, terrain not humanity dominates. This makes Pakistan a strategically vulnerable state, prone to Indian dissection, as much from geography as history. In order to protect their rear, Pakistan perceives a need to dominate Afghanistan and has done so for decades through tribal proxies of various descriptions. Hollywood likes to portray the Afghan Soviet War as "Charlie Wilson's war", a CIA directed campaign against Soviet invaders. A kind of Bay of Pigs that actually worked. A more accurate label would have been "General Zia's war", as it was the Afghan military dictator, who overthrew corrupt civilian predecessors, who saw the need and opportunity to defeat the Soviets with Afghan tribal proxies and who wrangled US, British and Chinese underwriting of a campaign directed and supplied by Pakistani military intelligence, the ISI. More recently the so called "Taliban", actually the militant arm of the Pashtun tribes, who constitute some 55% of the population of Afghanistan have become ISI's favoured proxies.
Pakistani vulnerability, like that of Israel, also drove their quest for nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons have both strategic and tactical relevance to the Pakistanis. Besides the high profile sabre rattling with nuclear India, they are seen as a possible answer to the Indian Army's armour superiority, especially in the relatively open and "tank friendly" desert country of the south east. Margolis doesn't mention it but there are echoes here of NATO's cold war adoption of nuclear first strike posture as a counter to the Soviet's superiority in conventional armoured forces. Unlike American demands for Pakistan to help 'catch' Osama Bin Laden, these geo-strategic concerns actually have "life or death" relevance to Islamabad. Margolis shows how the nuclear tango between Pakistan and India is really a three way dance. In all probability India may have commenced it's drive for the bomb before China, even if Peking beat them to the first test. Margolis notes how India commenced it's nuclear program following their humiliation to superior Chinese infantry and logistics following Himalayan border conflicts of the early sixties. A doubly humiliating event as Nehru, a patron of "Third World" anti-imperialism and a die hard fabian socialist found himself pleading for support from the US Navy. India's bomb, of course, realised under the reign of Indira Gandhi was meant to perform multiple duty, as a badge of status, a deterrent to China and a bludgeon against Pakistan. In response Pakistani premier Bhutto, Benazir's father, ultimately executed by Zia, commenced the quest for an Islamic bomb and said his people would "eat grass" if needed to pay for it.
Margolis describes the history, geography and geopolitics of the "Little Tibets", Ladakh, Sikkim and Bhuttan as well as "Big Tibet" too. He shows China's drive to dominate the Tibetan plateau, a drive that has now given them the high ground over the Indian subcontinent and an integrated surveillance, military, logistics and transport network in the region that India would be pushing up hill, literally, to match.
As mentioned earlier, this is not just a perceptive analysis of diplomatic and defence matters, but a personal story. Margolis describes the key places, towns, peoples and individuals he met during many journeys into the Himalayas, Kashmir and Tibet. It includes first person descriptions of meetings with the Dalai Lama and jeep rides with Pakistani colonels. Margolis has the knack of description. I would not have considered Deng Xiaoping, 20th century Asia's greatest revolutionary before reading Margolis, but my guess is that when legacies are finally audited a century from now, Deng will certainly eclipse Mao. Although the final chapter on possible futures scenarios for China is highly speculative, most of his book is solidly grounded in the forces shaping today's headlines.
Highly recommended.
Buying Options
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
War at the Top of the World: The Struggle for Afghanistan, Kashmir and Tibet Kindle Edition
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
-
Kindle
$0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $4.99 to buy -
Hardcover
$1.9827 Used from $1.98 3 New from $9.95 1 Collectible from $25.52 -
Paperback
$5.6031 Used from $2.50 10 New from $3.85 1 Collectible from $8.95
-
LanguageEnglish
-
Publication dateMay 1, 2013
-
File size2374 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Amazon Business: Make the most of your Amazon Business account with exclusive tools and savings. Login now
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Beginning with the premise that South Asia is one of the most combustible regions on the planet (a 1993 CIA study rated Kashmir as the most likely place for a nuclear war to begin), veteran foreign correspondent Margolis goes poking around the region, wondering where the spark will originate, discussing Afghanistan (especially the heavy American and Pakistani involvement in the area), the border conflicts in Kashmir and Siachen between India and Pakistan, and China's occupation of Tibet, which he sees as a model for how China might come into bloody conflict with India. The book is good on military issues and useful as a primer for the uninitiated, especially on the way that British, American and Russian policies have fueled the arms and territory battles in Afghanistan and on what India's and Pakistan's battling has cost them in lost social and economic development. But the author's fondness for generalities and potted psychologizing can be wearying: Muslim Kashmiris are "a haughty lot," Sikhs are known for their "love of revenge," the leaders of the Afghan Army suffer from a "deficit in human talent that afflicts so many backward societies." Margolis even devotes a page to the proposition that Hindu anti-Muslim sentiment is partly due to Hindus feeling sexually inferior to Muslims since Islam "encourages a robust sex life" and some Indians believe that Muslims are better lovers because they are circumcised. (Mar.)
Copyright 2000 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an alternate kindle_edition edition.
Copyright 2000 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an alternate kindle_edition edition.
Review
"Essential reading for all who would understand where Asia is heading." -- Paul Bracken, author of Fire in the East
"His account of recent warfare in Asia's highest mountains is both gripping and instructive." -- The Economist --This text refers to an alternate kindle_edition edition.
"His account of recent warfare in Asia's highest mountains is both gripping and instructive." -- The Economist --This text refers to an alternate kindle_edition edition.
From Booklist
Having reported for years from the Khyber Pass and the Karakoram and Himalayan ranges, journalist Margolis here distills his experience with the geopolitics of this forbidding region. To outsiders, it might seem perplexing that Pakistan, India, and China should have fought wars over uninhabitable mountains, a bewilderment Margolis dispels by explaining the stakes in Kashmir and Tibet as viewed from Islamabad, New Delhi, and Beijing. It may seem bizarre that the battlefield, at 16,000 feet of elevation, is on the Siachen Glacier, where hypoxic, frostbitten Indians and Pakastinis regularly lob shells at each other. The author's explanation makes it more understandable strategically, for he who controls the glacier controls the only Pakistan-China road. Convinced that Hindu-Muslim animosities will again erupt in war, Margolis describes the tension between China and India, played out in their nascent nuclear and naval arms races. Combining vignettes of his travels (including to Lhasa) with strategic summaries, Margolis usefully draws attention to hot spots some believe are the most likely to set off a nuclear war. Gilbert Taylor
--This text refers to an alternate kindle_edition edition.
About the Author
Eric Margolis is Contributing Foreign Editor of the Toronto Sun newspapers and a syndicated columnist whose articles have been published in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and the Los Angeles Times. He has appeared on Good Morning America, CBS News, CNN, ABC and WNET.
--This text refers to an alternate kindle_edition edition.
Product details
- ASIN : B00CMGASXE
- Publisher : Routledge (May 1, 2013)
- Publication date : May 1, 2013
- Language : English
- File size : 2374 KB
- Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 258 pages
- Page numbers source ISBN : 0415930626
- Lending : Enabled
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,679,475 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.1 out of 5 stars
4.1 out of 5
56 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on January 13, 2008
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
4 people found this helpful
Helpful
Reviewed in the United States on November 1, 2011
Verified Purchase
This book was about a topic of which my family and I were well aware since we lived in that area for a year and a half back in the latter 1980's. It is factual, interesting, and a good rehash of the events at that time.
Reviewed in the United States on November 1, 2001
Verified Purchase
I posted a review of this book in February of this year before the events of September 11 took place, back when the concept of a world war in this region was new to me -- and, I daresay, to much of the rest of the unsuspecting American populace. Rather than split hairs over whether or not this book has academic footnotes or adequate copy editing as the rest of the reviewers seem to be doing, I would instead suggest that readers focus on the larger foreign policy issues raised in this book. The recent execution of Abdul Haq in Afghanistan is pointed proof that Margolis understands his subject matter all too well. I strongly recommend this book.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on November 15, 2004
Verified Purchase
I give Margiolis 5 stars for bravery to go to the front lines (I'll give him the benefit of the doubt) and -4 stars for this book. It's completely uninformed and does not tell the reader of anything that really happened in these countries. One wonders if he actually talked to real people. He is biased without supporting analysis. To begin with he doesn't do due justice to the Afghan conflict and the injustices caused to Afghanistan by the US and Pakistan, not just the Russians (who were of course the worst). Also, he even says to not believe the caution put forth by the US that OSama is a terrorist which shows his lack of foresight (read Ahmed Rashi who predicted). Moderate Afghans did not believe in the Kashmir war and if they were allowed to flourish by the US and Pakistan, Afghanistan would have entered the modern world before the Taliban. However separatists and fundamelists flourished and he even describes those who are from Iraq and other parts of the world very positively, much of whom are considered terrorists in post 9/11. Every country, including India has taken action against those it believes are separationists. This is true of the United States (with AIM the American Indian movement), China (Tibet,Xinkiang) Pakistan (NFP, Baluchistan, Sind), India (Kashmir, Assam), Indonesia (Timor), Russia (Chechenia, Ingushetia etc). Israel (Palestine/Lebanon) and many more. It is unfortunate that in all these cases human rights are an issue that comes up. The fact is that every country takes strong action against those that don't believe in its core values and does something to protect them. While I don't condone violence and the human rights violations that accompany these, Margiolis' view is decidedly one sided and uninformed. I don't condone violence and would prefer that the borders between Pakistan, Afghanistan, India and China be free of conflict so that people such as myself can travel and see the beauty and experience all cultures, muslim, Hindu, buddhist. However, reading this book will not give you true insight or the value of the cultures or the people. There are many instances where this book comes across as a biased, bigoted and shallow view of the subcontinent and the world. For better analysis of Pakistan and Afghanistan read Taliban by Ahmed Rashid and Soldiers of God by Kaplan.
14 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on March 17, 2000
Verified Purchase
Eric Margolis' book describes the sources and ongoing dynamics of the struggle for Afghanistan and its current consequences, then shifts to the ongoing India - Pakistan confrontation (a great deal "hotter" war than we in the USA seem to have realized). The professional apologists for Russia and India along with their associated disciples and partisans won't find much to like here, but it does provide a readable and interesting explanation of what the struggles in this area are all about, their historical roots and the potential consequences for the world at large. A darn good read and I recommend it highly. It has caused me to reflect more closely on what few bits and scraps of news on this issue and area I do get from the mass media. A definite read for foreign affairs and geopolitical junkies.
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
umer shaikh
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent read
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on October 15, 2014Verified Purchase
I would definitely encourage people to read this book it is a great tale bravery and sacrifice. unlike a lot of books out there written about these subjects Mr Margolis has actually experienced the highs in the mountains of Himalaya or the glaciers on the Pakistan side of LoC. there are personal relationships which give it a personal touch such as the author's experiences with the mujahideen leaders and the Pakistani leaders the Muslim world owes a great deal of respect to leaders like General zia ul haq and his ISI counterpart and mujhideen who stopped the Soviet empire from every reaching the warm Arabian sea. the latter part of the book showed me that india is not a small or backward nation which has over the last thirty years shown it means business the book shows india's success n failures and give a glimpse of the future were we will see a india confident and dominating south east Asia but also weary of the Chinese threat which could sent both countries and Pakistan on a collision which could devestate
south east Asia and bring massive losses to themselves and the world as I write this india is developing Inter continental missile which could hit the USA and China n Pakistan who are jointly working to counter this threat which nuclear missiles we could be in for another cold war. very scary indeed overall author's depth of knowledge of the region and the people is very good and interesting.
south east Asia and bring massive losses to themselves and the world as I write this india is developing Inter continental missile which could hit the USA and China n Pakistan who are jointly working to counter this threat which nuclear missiles we could be in for another cold war. very scary indeed overall author's depth of knowledge of the region and the people is very good and interesting.
Amazon Customer
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on August 15, 2018Verified Purchase
Good
Dave
5.0 out of 5 stars
The first hand reporting from a region not publicised enough.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on December 5, 2018Verified Purchase
A beautiful book written by a veteran reporter from a region he has travelled from the times of the Afghan war against the soviets.
A Reader
1.0 out of 5 stars
war at the top of the world
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on June 11, 2013Verified Purchase
It is a very important subject and needs unbiased writing to understand the situation. But while reading the book,I got the feeling that the author has a very partisan view that I feel makes his writing completely unreliable.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Manto
5.0 out of 5 stars
A travelogue of different kind.....
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 22, 2013Verified Purchase
Great book, especially if you are a Pakistani apologist. Actually, I think this book should be on the textbook list in Pakistan. This is the second book I have read by a Canadian author and presents an interesting angle for readers of the English language who are looking for a different perspective form the normal stereotyping dominant Anglo-Saxon American-British-Australian nexus narrative. Canadian's seem to challenge the Anglo-saxon narrative and present a much more balanced perspective on the world. Eric has presented a very balanced and concise view on the history of the many conflicts between China, India and Pakistan laced with tales of his many travels across the region. Starting from the last days of the Afghan jihad to the latest conflict in Siachin and Tibet, Eric has for me done a great job about outlining these conflicts by explaining the context, history and the nature of hatred between people involved. The best chapter was where he explains the hatred between Indians and Pakistanis.
Is the Indian paranoia with Muslims defined by a collective sense of inferiority complex coming out into the open after independence in 1947? Its a very interesting theory which for me explains the continued romance of the Indian media with every Pakistani 'threat', while at the same time choosing to completely gloss over huge liberties taken by China across the border repeatedly. Even as I write, Indian media seems to be fascinated by a story of a dead falcon with a spy cam attached supposedly launched by Pakistani ISI agents dubbing it as a drone while choosing to ignore Chinese Army's forward camps set up in the Ladakh region well inside the Indian territory.
Also why is Pakistan blamed for starting the Kargil escalation while India is left scot free for instigating war in the Siachin region?
Similarly China's psychology is very nicely explained by the notion that a powerful centre is absolutely vital for a peaceful China to develop. A weak centre on the other hand is an open invitation for foreign powers to starts chipping away pushing the country into chaos and dissent.
I loved the read as it read like a specialist travelogue.
Is the Indian paranoia with Muslims defined by a collective sense of inferiority complex coming out into the open after independence in 1947? Its a very interesting theory which for me explains the continued romance of the Indian media with every Pakistani 'threat', while at the same time choosing to completely gloss over huge liberties taken by China across the border repeatedly. Even as I write, Indian media seems to be fascinated by a story of a dead falcon with a spy cam attached supposedly launched by Pakistani ISI agents dubbing it as a drone while choosing to ignore Chinese Army's forward camps set up in the Ladakh region well inside the Indian territory.
Also why is Pakistan blamed for starting the Kargil escalation while India is left scot free for instigating war in the Siachin region?
Similarly China's psychology is very nicely explained by the notion that a powerful centre is absolutely vital for a peaceful China to develop. A weak centre on the other hand is an open invitation for foreign powers to starts chipping away pushing the country into chaos and dissent.
I loved the read as it read like a specialist travelogue.



