The Wars of Scotland, 1214-1371 (New Edinburgh History of Scotland, 4) 1st Edition
by
Michael Brown
(Author)
|
Michael Brown
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
ISBN-13:
978-0748612383
ISBN-10:
0748612386
Why is ISBN important?
ISBN
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Buy new:
$29.95
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
More Buying Choices
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
Review
Michael Brown has done an admirable job … this is a highly readable survey that provides an excellent introduction to the period., Scotia
The fruit of recent scholarship is gathered into a fresh, readable, informative, and balanced account. The original Edinburgh History of Scotland was the standard Scottish historical narrative for nearly two generations; if this volume is typical, its replacement will fulfill that role for at least as long … Highly recommended., Choice
This is a superb book which should be widely read., History: The Journal of the Historical Association
The fruit of recent scholarship is gathered into a fresh, readable, informative, and balanced account. The original Edinburgh History of Scotland was the standard Scottish historical narrative for nearly two generations; if this volume is typical, its replacement will fulfill that role for at least as long … Highly recommended., Choice
This is a superb book which should be widely read., History: The Journal of the Historical Association
About the Author
Michael Brown is Reader in Scottish History at the University of St Andrews. He has written books on James I, the Black Douglases and volume four in the New Edinburgh History of Scotland, 'The Wars of Scotland, 1214-1371'.
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
The Sandman Act 1
The Sandman offers a dark, literary world of fantasy and horror. Listen free
Product details
- Publisher : Edinburgh University Press; 1st edition (April 30, 2004)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 392 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0748612386
- ISBN-13 : 978-0748612383
- Item Weight : 1.36 pounds
- Dimensions : 9.2 x 1.3 x 6 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#595,473 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #326 in Scotland History
- #742 in Military History (Books)
- #1,374 in European History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.7 out of 5 stars
4.7 out of 5
21 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on October 10, 2016
Verified Purchase
I love the New Edinburgh series...I'm up to this, the fourth volume and hope to get them all eventually.
Reviewed in the United States on December 10, 2004
If you are interested in the historical background to Mel Gibson's Braveheart, this might be the book you want. It turns out that Mel Gibson got the name of William Wallace right, and his stubborn refusal to yield to Edward Longshanks right, but not much else.
Scotland had enjoyed almost a century of internal peace under the kings David I, Alexander II, and Alexander III. When Alexander III died without a male heir the Scottish nobles became uneasy: even if Scotland had stabilized under "the Good King" Alexander, it was still an unruly place with ambituos noblemen and aggresive norse lords in the north and west. When his daughter (the maid of Norway) died in Orkney 1290, the [...] hit the fan - now the throne was up for grabs.
This book describes the old-fashioned political system of the Scottish kingdom, and why it became so vulnerable in a succesional crisis. It then continues with the complex political games in the crisis of the succesion - nobles switched allegiance as often as we change underwear. It is an interesting fact how international the Scottish crisis was: claimants to the throne came from Norway, Flanders, France, and England. The political intruiguing involved not only England and Scotland, but also Gwynnedd, Irish sub-kings, France, Holy Roman Empire, Scandinavia, and the Papal curia. William Wallace turns out to have been a comparatively minor character in all this.
Sometimes the sheer number of names is overwhelming, and there is a lack of pictures. The writing is a bit dry, and the subject gets a very, almost too, scholarly treatment.
The main strengths of the book, I think, are that the author thoroughly describes the causes of the political crisis that led to the wars and that he puts them into their European context.
Scotland had enjoyed almost a century of internal peace under the kings David I, Alexander II, and Alexander III. When Alexander III died without a male heir the Scottish nobles became uneasy: even if Scotland had stabilized under "the Good King" Alexander, it was still an unruly place with ambituos noblemen and aggresive norse lords in the north and west. When his daughter (the maid of Norway) died in Orkney 1290, the [...] hit the fan - now the throne was up for grabs.
This book describes the old-fashioned political system of the Scottish kingdom, and why it became so vulnerable in a succesional crisis. It then continues with the complex political games in the crisis of the succesion - nobles switched allegiance as often as we change underwear. It is an interesting fact how international the Scottish crisis was: claimants to the throne came from Norway, Flanders, France, and England. The political intruiguing involved not only England and Scotland, but also Gwynnedd, Irish sub-kings, France, Holy Roman Empire, Scandinavia, and the Papal curia. William Wallace turns out to have been a comparatively minor character in all this.
Sometimes the sheer number of names is overwhelming, and there is a lack of pictures. The writing is a bit dry, and the subject gets a very, almost too, scholarly treatment.
The main strengths of the book, I think, are that the author thoroughly describes the causes of the political crisis that led to the wars and that he puts them into their European context.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on November 8, 2006
This is a very fine, very readable, and thoughtful history of medieval Scotland. It gives a very good context for the Scots "wars of independence." But very, very little of the book is actually about war. Don't go to this book if you want to know in more than the most general terms what happened at Stirling Bridge, Falkirk, or Bannockburn---the longest battle account is about one page.
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Mr. C. Murray
4.0 out of 5 stars
Four Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on December 21, 2015Verified Purchase
Very good book, Michael Brown is extremely profound at medieval Scottish history.
Gregg & Kathryn
5.0 out of 5 stars
Five Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 30, 2015Verified Purchase
Great aide for research for my degree.
Christian G. Cameron
5.0 out of 5 stars
Five Stars
Reviewed in Canada on September 14, 2016Verified Purchase
An excellent synopsis of a difficult subject. Easy to read, superb bibliography, and a careful treatment of complex issues.
Malarchy
5.0 out of 5 stars
Fascinating History
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on August 24, 2012Verified Purchase
The Wars of Scotland is absolutely terrific historical analyais. Covering the period 1214-1371 in which Scotland battled successfully for its survival against England, the work is a fascinating peek into the events and the people who influenced them. Despite the title, the book is not really about wars. There is very little reproduction of battle and no real military analysis. Instead, Michael Brown has put together a brilliantly cogent analysis of the various factions competing for power both within and without Scotland in the 13th and 14th centuries.
Where Brown succeeds so expertly is in not reducing his analysis merely to the exploits of kings. It is all too easy to tell the story of a nation as if it was the story of the nation's leader. Brown delves into the aspirations and struggles of the class of people who strove for power. This is a story of Robert the Bruce but it is also the story of the Balliols, Stewarts, Gordons, MacDonalds and many many more from the north of Scotland, from Ireland, England, France, and Rome.
Wars of Scotland is the 4th book chronologically in the New Edinburgh History of Scotland series and it is inarguably one of the best. Brown's treatment of the material seems vigorously fair, the people he describes are multi-faceted. Robert the Bruce is not just a war leader, not just the man who murdered his rival, not just a leader who balanced factions against one another. The people described really emerge from the pages.
The work begins at the start of the reign of Alexander II. This period is also covered in the 3rd book of the series Domination and Lordship . Brown's coverage is better. Alexander's attempts to centralise authority are set in the context of continued rivalry with the MacWilliams and the divergent culture of the Gaelic west. Brown does not devote too much time to Norwegian interests, perhaps because those interests had so severely diminished by the end of the work's time period. Above all though is the continual tension with England and attempts by all of the Scottish kings to prevent English overlordship.
It is through the prism of the threat from England that this period is analysed. The factions within Scotland jockey for position against one another all the while knowing that support from England or antipathy towards it can tip the hand. The early wars in this period are described by Brown in quite an overarching and general manner. There is very limited detail on the actual wars themselves, more what these wars meant in the longer term. William Wallace and his campaign for instance are not detailed in terms of the relative military virtue but instead Wallace's place within the feudal oligarchy and the impact on later decision makers plays more strongly in Brown's analysis.
Still, this is a period of conflict and the outcomes of that conflict are manifold. Brown uses the case of Berwick to show the impact of war most clearly. From being Scotland's richest burgh, it becomes a meaningless English outpost. Brown's analysis makes this really quite a sad case. Berwick should now be one of the most significant places in Britain but it isn't and this period is why.
As well as the various mainstream factions within Scotland, Brown also cleverly devotes a separate section to the Isles. His analysis of the rise of the MacDonalds is remarkably clear. Such clarity is not always evident. Instead of delving into the details of MacDonalds being a critical component of the most famous Bruce victory, Brown analysis the rise in terms of power structures. It is the weakening of a rival that gives John of Islay the opportunity which he takes.
While the rise of the Stewarts is within the mainstream, Brown does not really devote quite so much time to explaining how they managed to be the ones to outlast the rest. The Stewarts just seem ever-present. As other houses fall, the Stewarts continue. Without devoting specific attention to the Stewarts, Brown gives an impression of their rise being inexorable.
Brown's narrative is fast-flowing and easy to consume. He is writing about an exciting time in Scottish history and he does so in a way that really makes it easy to engage. While this is not exactly popular history, it is very accessible and given it covers one of the crucial phases in the history of Scotland it should be read by a wide audience.
One aspect that isn't really fleshed out is detail on the lives of ordinary folk. There is not a huge amount about social conditions or the economic environment. The church gets a lot of detail because it is a power structure. The only real references to ordinary folk are the fates of the burghers of Berwick who are on the receiving end of some pretty nasty English brutality and a brief reference to the impact of the Black Death. Given that this form of plague happened only once and that it happened during the period in question, it is perhaps a bit of a surprise to see it play such a minor role in the narrative. Equally, there is not a huge amount about any technological development. The arrival of the English long bow for instance as a weapon of massive amounts of destruction seems an obvious starting point.
Minor quibbles aside, Wars of Scotland is really excellent. It is a well-written piece of historical analysis that covers a genuinely fascinating part of British history. Rather than going into the detail of various wars, this is the broad sweep of history, it is the outcomes and their impact that really matter. Where Brown succeeds above other historical analysts is that this is not the story of a King, it is the story of a complex web of power structures. It is the story of the Scottish State and in telling the story of that State, it is the story of the many factions and outsider competitors all striving against one another in shifting allegiances. Wars of Scotland is first rate, well worth reading.
Where Brown succeeds so expertly is in not reducing his analysis merely to the exploits of kings. It is all too easy to tell the story of a nation as if it was the story of the nation's leader. Brown delves into the aspirations and struggles of the class of people who strove for power. This is a story of Robert the Bruce but it is also the story of the Balliols, Stewarts, Gordons, MacDonalds and many many more from the north of Scotland, from Ireland, England, France, and Rome.
Wars of Scotland is the 4th book chronologically in the New Edinburgh History of Scotland series and it is inarguably one of the best. Brown's treatment of the material seems vigorously fair, the people he describes are multi-faceted. Robert the Bruce is not just a war leader, not just the man who murdered his rival, not just a leader who balanced factions against one another. The people described really emerge from the pages.
The work begins at the start of the reign of Alexander II. This period is also covered in the 3rd book of the series Domination and Lordship . Brown's coverage is better. Alexander's attempts to centralise authority are set in the context of continued rivalry with the MacWilliams and the divergent culture of the Gaelic west. Brown does not devote too much time to Norwegian interests, perhaps because those interests had so severely diminished by the end of the work's time period. Above all though is the continual tension with England and attempts by all of the Scottish kings to prevent English overlordship.
It is through the prism of the threat from England that this period is analysed. The factions within Scotland jockey for position against one another all the while knowing that support from England or antipathy towards it can tip the hand. The early wars in this period are described by Brown in quite an overarching and general manner. There is very limited detail on the actual wars themselves, more what these wars meant in the longer term. William Wallace and his campaign for instance are not detailed in terms of the relative military virtue but instead Wallace's place within the feudal oligarchy and the impact on later decision makers plays more strongly in Brown's analysis.
Still, this is a period of conflict and the outcomes of that conflict are manifold. Brown uses the case of Berwick to show the impact of war most clearly. From being Scotland's richest burgh, it becomes a meaningless English outpost. Brown's analysis makes this really quite a sad case. Berwick should now be one of the most significant places in Britain but it isn't and this period is why.
As well as the various mainstream factions within Scotland, Brown also cleverly devotes a separate section to the Isles. His analysis of the rise of the MacDonalds is remarkably clear. Such clarity is not always evident. Instead of delving into the details of MacDonalds being a critical component of the most famous Bruce victory, Brown analysis the rise in terms of power structures. It is the weakening of a rival that gives John of Islay the opportunity which he takes.
While the rise of the Stewarts is within the mainstream, Brown does not really devote quite so much time to explaining how they managed to be the ones to outlast the rest. The Stewarts just seem ever-present. As other houses fall, the Stewarts continue. Without devoting specific attention to the Stewarts, Brown gives an impression of their rise being inexorable.
Brown's narrative is fast-flowing and easy to consume. He is writing about an exciting time in Scottish history and he does so in a way that really makes it easy to engage. While this is not exactly popular history, it is very accessible and given it covers one of the crucial phases in the history of Scotland it should be read by a wide audience.
One aspect that isn't really fleshed out is detail on the lives of ordinary folk. There is not a huge amount about social conditions or the economic environment. The church gets a lot of detail because it is a power structure. The only real references to ordinary folk are the fates of the burghers of Berwick who are on the receiving end of some pretty nasty English brutality and a brief reference to the impact of the Black Death. Given that this form of plague happened only once and that it happened during the period in question, it is perhaps a bit of a surprise to see it play such a minor role in the narrative. Equally, there is not a huge amount about any technological development. The arrival of the English long bow for instance as a weapon of massive amounts of destruction seems an obvious starting point.
Minor quibbles aside, Wars of Scotland is really excellent. It is a well-written piece of historical analysis that covers a genuinely fascinating part of British history. Rather than going into the detail of various wars, this is the broad sweep of history, it is the outcomes and their impact that really matter. Where Brown succeeds above other historical analysts is that this is not the story of a King, it is the story of a complex web of power structures. It is the story of the Scottish State and in telling the story of that State, it is the story of the many factions and outsider competitors all striving against one another in shifting allegiances. Wars of Scotland is first rate, well worth reading.
15 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Mr. J. Fitzpatrick
5.0 out of 5 stars
Five Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on April 24, 2015Verified Purchase
Insightful and detailed book which appeals beyond Academe.
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Pages with related products.
See and discover other items: scotland history books








