Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Watermelons: The Green Movement's True Colors Paperback – January 1, 2011
British author James Delingpole tells the shocking story of how an unholy mix of junk science, green hype, corporate greed and political opportunism led to the biggest – and most expensive – outbreak of mass hysteria in history.
In Watermelons, Delingpole explains the Climategate scandal, the cast of characters involved, their motives and methods. He delves into the background of the organizations and individuals who have sought to push global warming to the top of the political agenda, showing that beneath their cloak of green lurks a heart of red.
Watermelons shows how the scientific method has been sacrificed on the altar of climate alarmism. Delingpole mocks the green movement’s pathetic record of apocalyptic predictions, from the “population bomb” to global cooling, which failed to materialize. He reveals the fundamental misanthropy of green ideology, “rooted in hatred of the human species, hell bent on destroying almost everything man has achieved”.
Delingpole gives a refreshing voice to widespread public skepticism over global warming, emphasising that the “crisis” has been engineered by people seeking to control our lives by imposing new taxes and regulations. “Your taxes will be raised, your liberties curtailed and your money squandered to deal with this ‘crisis’”, he writes.
At its very roots, argues Delingpole, climate change is an ideological battle, not a scientific one. Green on the outside, red on the inside, the liberty-loathing, humanity-hating “watermelons” of the modern environmental movement do not want to save the world. They want to rule it.
Delingpole is the bestselling British writer who helped expose the Climategate scandal in his Daily Telegraph blog. He also writes a column for The Spectator. His other books include 365 Ways to Drive a Liberal Crazy (Regnery, 2010) and Welcome to Obamaland (Regnery, 2009).
- Print length304 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPublius Books
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 2011
- ISBN-100983347409
- ISBN-13978-0983347408
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Product details
- Publisher : Publius Books (January 1, 2011)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 304 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0983347409
- ISBN-13 : 978-0983347408
- Item Weight : 1.08 pounds
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,801,750 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,435 in Environmental Policy
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
AGW = "Anthropogenic Global Warming." Don't be intimidated. It just means "Man-Made Global Warming," which could be abbreviated as MMGW. And it's a crock, folks. It's an absolute crock. It has been defended and promoted by a group of seedy men, including a large crowd at the UN --- and, if you haven't noticed that the UN has been trying to get a lot bigger than its britches, transforming itself from a forum for discussion into a Global Legislator (a la EU), then I don't think you're very observant. AGW was a big push by the UN bureaucrats (and their wannabes) to put the UN on top of the world, dictating to the lowly peasants what they should and should not do --- all of this without being elected, just like the (ho ho) "President of Europe."
Where do we go to vote these creeps out of office? Nowhere! Welcome to 21st century democracy, "a la Europe."
As for AGW (or MMGW), that continues to be one of the most embarrassing theories ever put forward by scientists. There is no evidence at all to support it, although bloviating politicians such as Al Gore think it's the gospel truth (and are expecting to make billions once they have suckered you and me into believing them). The main idea is "carbon credits," by which companies which actually make stuff have to buy "carbon credits" from people who don't do anything but gaze at the South American jungles. It's a really crazy-weird attempt to make megabucks off the fact that humans breathe in oxygen and breathe out carbon dioxide, while plants breathe in carbon dioxide and breathe out oxygen. Therefore, MORE carbon dioxide makes for MORE plants and jungles, which make MORE oxygen for us and other animals.
The tiny helpless "environmental" group known as the World Wildlife Foundation recently tried to scoop up SIXTY BILLION DOLLARS from its claims on Brazilian jungles. When you see figures like 60 billion, you should be aware that WWF and Greenpeace are not "helpless tiny" movements. They are competing in the same space as Big Oil and all their "enemies," and they need to be called out as "Big Green" and asked just what they are doing for the cause of conservation.
James Delingpole deserves many literary prizes for detailing all of the crimes committed by the AGW folks: suppressing evidence they don't like, assassinating the reputations of scientists they don't like, censoring the "scientific literature" --- really, the list goes on and on, and...
YOU NEED TO READ THIS BOOK!
"Nazi Germany took a stronger approach to pushing eco-ideology. It was the first nation to ban smoking on public transport (Hitler thought it a filthy habit: tobacco, he believed, was "the wrath of the Red Man against the White man, vengeance for having been given hard liquor"). It was also the first to take the concept of "animal rights" seriously (in 1933 Goering--ah, the big cuddly softie--said that anyone found guilty of animal cruelty or experimentation would be sent to the concentration camps)."
"Our teeming population is the strongest evidence our numbers are burdensome to the world, which can hardly support us from its natural elements. Our wants grow more and more keen and our complaints more bitter in all mouths, while nature fails in affording us our usual sustenance. In every deed, pestilence and famine and wars have to be regarded as a remedy for nations as the means of pruning the luxuriance of the human race."
No, not Paul Ehrlich 1968. Nor the Prince of Wales 2010. This was the utterance of Carthaginian priest Tertullian in his "Treatise of the Soul" in 210 AD, when the world's population was a mere 250 million. Since then it has grown to over 6.5 billion. Frankly, which planet would you rather inhabit? Tertullian's blissfully uncrowded car-free zone? Or our current congested hell of long life-expectancies, modern dental care, paid holidays, iPods, contraception, literacy and penicillin?"
For those that rate his book one star, mostly because he has an English degree instead of a science degree, remember your chief spokesman, Al Gore, flunked out of the 3 Universities/colleges that he tried, in the first couple of semesters. In reality, Delingpole's credentials are impeccable. He reminds of the movie "Three Days of the Condor", a spy thriller. Robert Redford is the actor that played the part of a "reader" in a CIA literary unit. It was a small group whose jobs where to read anything and everything in the world that could be a threat when you "connect the dots" to use a modern phrase. They would then write a report to headquarters on what they found. Instead of headquarters written feedback, an assassin shows up to murder the unit. He misses Redford because he used an unauthorized back door to get lunch for the unit. This precipitates a massive manhunt to find him. A memorable scene is a powerful politician complaining to Redford's boss over the fact that Redford is running circles around his pursuers with unexpected skill. He complains, "Who trained him?" The boss replies in a voice tone that clearly implies, how can you be so stupid, while saying, "He's a reader, he reads stuff and knows more than any of us!"
That statement is an exact description of James Delingpole. He is a READER and knows history including Tertullis writing about the disaster of global over population in the 3rd century, where the population was only 250 million compared to 7 Billion today.
I also have personal experience to verify Delingpole's position. As an engineer, I have funded and managed my company's support of university studies. I was stunned to learn that "scientists" can be so focused on verifying their assumptions that they totally miss data, information, or other possibilities to the point of making wrong conclusions. In fact, in one incident, a large body of data pointed completely in another direction while one small data set that might have supported the assumption, was easily proven to be insignificant. Then it dawned on me, we were concluding our funding and he was trying to cast doubt to get us to continue or to have a data set to give to our competitor to get funding from them to prove a false position that would discredit our data. Coincidentally, a trade magazine wrote a piece on how universities studies should be taken with a 'grain of salt' because the conclusions were always vague if not false in an effort to 'sell' the need for more funding to study the issue. BINGO! Global Warming! Global Cooling funding had dried up!
Finally, if man is just a puny destroyer of the planet including the wonderful cute animals like "Spotted Owls" or "Polar Bears", how can he possibly control the Earth's temperature? Assuming we could, do we get a chance to vote on the temperature that we like? Delingpole did not consider a vote but he did cite history, where warming periods greatly increased the quality of life, availability of food, less disease, etc.
Top reviews from other countries
At that point I understood that I was dealing not with science but with a belief system akin to religion.
My doubts about the idea of global warming came from three pieces of knowledge
1 I knew it had been warmer in the past , when grapes were grown in the north of England.
2 I knew there had been a long period of cold called the little ice age
3 it did not seem so long since a new ice age was being predicted with a similar degree of certainty and panic.
I thought there had been plenty of natural climate variation in the past. Why was this modest period of warming any different?
I started to look for more information, and at last found it in this book. It provided a great starting point for further research.
If you want to read one book which will balance the hysterical media coverage of this subject, this is the one. It's well written and amusing while treating the subject seriously.
Thank you, James for your courageous work. It's much easier to be a "warmist" these days.
Bob Liddell





