Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Watermelons: The Green Movement's True Colors Paperback – January 1, 2011
British author James Delingpole tells the shocking story of how an unholy mix of junk science, green hype, corporate greed and political opportunism led to the biggest – and most expensive – outbreak of mass hysteria in history.
In Watermelons, Delingpole explains the Climategate scandal, the cast of characters involved, their motives and methods. He delves into the background of the organizations and individuals who have sought to push global warming to the top of the political agenda, showing that beneath their cloak of green lurks a heart of red.
Watermelons shows how the scientific method has been sacrificed on the altar of climate alarmism. Delingpole mocks the green movement’s pathetic record of apocalyptic predictions, from the “population bomb” to global cooling, which failed to materialize. He reveals the fundamental misanthropy of green ideology, “rooted in hatred of the human species, hell bent on destroying almost everything man has achieved”.
Delingpole gives a refreshing voice to widespread public skepticism over global warming, emphasising that the “crisis” has been engineered by people seeking to control our lives by imposing new taxes and regulations. “Your taxes will be raised, your liberties curtailed and your money squandered to deal with this ‘crisis’”, he writes.
At its very roots, argues Delingpole, climate change is an ideological battle, not a scientific one. Green on the outside, red on the inside, the liberty-loathing, humanity-hating “watermelons” of the modern environmental movement do not want to save the world. They want to rule it.
Delingpole is the bestselling British writer who helped expose the Climategate scandal in his Daily Telegraph blog. He also writes a column for The Spectator. His other books include 365 Ways to Drive a Liberal Crazy (Regnery, 2010) and Welcome to Obamaland (Regnery, 2009).
- Print length304 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPublius Books
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 2011
- ISBN-100983347409
- ISBN-13978-0983347408
Product details
- Publisher : Publius Books (January 1, 2011)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 304 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0983347409
- ISBN-13 : 978-0983347408
- Item Weight : 1.05 pounds
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,850,012 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,424 in Environmental Policy
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
For those that rate his book one star, mostly because he has an English degree instead of a science degree, remember your chief spokesman, Al Gore, flunked out of the 3 Universities/colleges that he tried, in the first couple of semesters. In reality, Delingpole's credentials are impeccable. He reminds of the movie "Three Days of the Condor", a spy thriller. Robert Redford is the actor that played the part of a "reader" in a CIA literary unit. It was a small group whose jobs where to read anything and everything in the world that could be a threat when you "connect the dots" to use a modern phrase. They would then write a report to headquarters on what they found. Instead of headquarters written feedback, an assassin shows up to murder the unit. He misses Redford because he used an unauthorized back door to get lunch for the unit. This precipitates a massive manhunt to find him. A memorable scene is a powerful politician complaining to Redford's boss over the fact that Redford is running circles around his pursuers with unexpected skill. He complains, "Who trained him?" The boss replies in a voice tone that clearly implies, how can you be so stupid, while saying, "He's a reader, he reads stuff and knows more than any of us!"
That statement is an exact description of James Delingpole. He is a READER and knows history including Tertullis writing about the disaster of global over population in the 3rd century, where the population was only 250 million compared to 7 Billion today.
I also have personal experience to verify Delingpole's position. As an engineer, I have funded and managed my company's support of university studies. I was stunned to learn that "scientists" can be so focused on verifying their assumptions that they totally miss data, information, or other possibilities to the point of making wrong conclusions. In fact, in one incident, a large body of data pointed completely in another direction while one small data set that might have supported the assumption, was easily proven to be insignificant. Then it dawned on me, we were concluding our funding and he was trying to cast doubt to get us to continue or to have a data set to give to our competitor to get funding from them to prove a false position that would discredit our data. Coincidentally, a trade magazine wrote a piece on how universities studies should be taken with a 'grain of salt' because the conclusions were always vague if not false in an effort to 'sell' the need for more funding to study the issue. BINGO! Global Warming! Global Cooling funding had dried up!
Finally, if man is just a puny destroyer of the planet including the wonderful cute animals like "Spotted Owls" or "Polar Bears", how can he possibly control the Earth's temperature? Assuming we could, do we get a chance to vote on the temperature that we like? Delingpole did not consider a vote but he did cite history, where warming periods greatly increased the quality of life, availability of food, less disease, etc.
And clearly the scientific evidence for dangerous, CO2-caused, AGW has declined (not even a correlation for one thing). This fact would cause most honest observers to revise their conclusions. But clearly a core of the official (paid) "climate scientists" - i.e., the co-called consensus - and their less esteemed myrmidons remain recalcitrant, in specter if no longer in numbers, out of all proportion. Why?
In opposition to the AGW agenda we have those persons who may be called "climate rationalists" ("deniers" by their detractors), who have come to wonder about the thinking processes (or lack thereof) of the alarmists. Why are some of the alarmists NOT modifying their views - ever, for any reason? Why is there not at least some measure of joy in the news that the disaster they were fervently anticipating is apparently not going to happen? From whence comes their apparent disappointment?
Sure, there will always be hard-core hangers-on to lost causes such as "911 truth" and "cold fusion". And clearly many professionals have a vested interest in, or at least a subsurface attraction to, AGW for reasons of employment or financial opportunity - regardless of realities and practicalities. And there are some people with no expertise who are merely incorrigible, and have no capability for independent thoughts anyway. But - does anyone WANT a climate disaster? I bet not many. So likewise, are we willing to bet that few if any people would want a political agenda that would bankrupt and starve the people and nations of the world?
* * * * * * * * *
Here James Delingpole has written what is really two books, or so it seems to me. The first, Chapters 1-6 seems to be the Delingpole of the Telegraph Blog. It is all excellent stuff and well presented and documented. Perhaps he wanted to establish his bona fides for those who have not already been reading him.
The second book, Chapters 7-11, which begins with the "watermelons" chapter, is disquieting, as it presents the case (as others have done before, but perhaps not as declaratively) that the answer to my question just above the line of stars is: DON'T MAKE THAT BET. There is a green agenda that supersedes all other issues, particularly scientific truths. Among the proponents of AGW, Climate Change, Extreme Weather Events, or other OSTENSIBLY environmental issues are those for whom these issues are merely tools to a leftist program. And these are not just preferences, but desires felt to the bone. Regardless of truth or consequences, the issues are either useful tools to be brandished, or inconvenient distractions to be ignored. The agenda is anti-industrial, even misanthropic to an extreme. Delingpole makes a strong and convincing case. And he says it outright as he does everything he writes. Warning taken.
Those persons in the AGW and related camps, who are of a more benevolent persuasion with regard to the human race as a whole, would be wise to look around and see with whom they are in bed.
Top reviews from other countries
Perhaps slightly of the conspiracy agenda but the facts are there. Suss it out for yourself.
Doug
At that point I understood that I was dealing not with science but with a belief system akin to religion.
My doubts about the idea of global warming came from three pieces of knowledge
1 I knew it had been warmer in the past , when grapes were grown in the north of England.
2 I knew there had been a long period of cold called the little ice age
3 it did not seem so long since a new ice age was being predicted with a similar degree of certainty and panic.
I thought there had been plenty of natural climate variation in the past. Why was this modest period of warming any different?
I started to look for more information, and at last found it in this book. It provided a great starting point for further research.
If you want to read one book which will balance the hysterical media coverage of this subject, this is the one. It's well written and amusing while treating the subject seriously.
Thank you, James for your courageous work. It's much easier to be a "warmist" these days.
Bob Liddell


