Hanson's main focus is to exchange tactical warfare discussions for those of the experiential recreations of the individual hoplite. To do this, he draws the reader into the bronze panoply of helmet, greaves, breastplate and shield and plunges us straight into the rush of snapping spears and the crushing, suffocating press of the rear columns. Each chapter in the second part offers a survey of individual aspects of battle, from who the individual soldiers were and what bound them to step-by-step assessment of the battle itself.
These meetings, Hanson tells us, were never about the glory of war, or the passage into manhood, but deliberate, mutual agreements to resolve conflicts as quickly as possible in order to minimize the loss of farmers.
Hanson explores such topics as the value of a commanding officer fighting and dying alongside his men, the driving bond by which men fought, and the principle of standing your ground, a concept in which Ancient Greek warfare was rooted in.
More than historical description and analysis, Hanson provides reflection on what the principle of ancient Greek warfare meant for the Greeks and what it could mean today if we thought seriously of conducting ourselves shamelessly an honorably in conflict as the Greeks strove to do.
Other Sellers on Amazon
Added
Not added
$38.40
& FREE Shipping
& FREE Shipping
Sold by: Book Depository US
Sold by: Book Depository US
(927388 ratings)
90% positive over last 12 months
90% positive over last 12 months
In stock.
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
Shipping rates and Return policy Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
Added
Not added
$37.14
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by: ZiFiti
Sold by: ZiFiti
(1789 ratings)
96% positive over last 12 months
96% positive over last 12 months
Only 10 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates and Return policy Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Flip to back Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
The Western Way of War: Infantry Battle in Classical Greece Paperback – April 1, 2009
by
Victor Davis Hanson
(Author),
John Keegan
(Introduction)
| Victor Davis Hanson (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
Enhance your purchase
The Greeks of the classical age invented not only the central idea of Western politics―that the power of state should be guided by a majority of its citizens―but also the central act of Western warfare, the decisive infantry battle. Instead of ambush, skirmish, or combat between individual heroes, the Greeks of the fifth century B.C. devised a ferocious, brief, and destructive head-on clash between armed men of all ages. In this bold, original study, Victor Davis Hanson shows how this brutal enterprise was dedicated to the same outcome as consensual government―an unequivocal, instant resolution to dispute. Linking this new style of fighting to the rise of constitutional government, Hanson raises new issues and questions old assumptions about the history of war. A new preface addresses recent scholarship on Greek warfare.
- Print length320 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherUniversity of California Press
- Publication dateApril 1, 2009
- Dimensions6 x 0.8 x 9 inches
- ISBN-100520260090
- ISBN-13978-0520260092
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Victor Davis Hanson is Professor of Classics at California State University, Fresno, and author and coauthor of many books, including The Landmark Thucydides: A Comprehensive Guide to the Peloponnesian War.
Start reading The Western Way of War: Infantry Battle in Classical Greece on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : University of California Press; Second Edition, With a New Preface (April 1, 2009)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 320 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0520260090
- ISBN-13 : 978-0520260092
- Item Weight : 15.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.8 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #744,160 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #803 in Ancient Greek History (Books)
- #1,184 in Conventional Weapons & Warfare History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Victor Davis Hanson is Professor of Greek and Director of the Classics Program at California State University, Fresno. He is the author or editor of many books, including Who Killed Homer? The Demise of Classical Education and the Recovery of Greek Wisdom (with John Heath, Free Press, 1998), and The Soul of Battle (Free Press, 1999). In 1992 he was named the most outstanding undergraduate teacher of classics in the nation.
Customer reviews
4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5 out of 5
132 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
5.0 out of 5 stars
a Great Book of a renowned Historian
Reviewed in the United States on June 17, 2020
“…Even breastplate might be driven into breastplate, as men in the front row lost control and were literally pushed into the enemy ranks, jammed together “chest against chest”. (Tyrtaios 8.33). And repeated sharp sounds indicated when ash spears snapped under the pressure of contact in what Sophocles called “the storm of spears” (Ant.670). The live sounds were more animal-like than human: the concerted groans of men exerting themselves, pushing forward in group effort with their bodies and shields against the immovable armor of the enemy –grunts such as one hears around men sweating at work in field or shop, for battle, after all as Homeric man knew, was “work” of the worst kind...Here arose a tortured symphony of shrieks as a man went down with a wound to the groin, the steady sobbing of a soldier in extremis, a final grasp of fright as the spear thrust found its way home. Ugly indeed, Tyrtaios wrote, is the corpse in the dust (11.19)…There was also an increased smell of sweat from the thousands toiling in the sun, the odor of blood and entrails from fresh, open wounds, and the occasional sent of excrement along the fearful or recently killed –though possibly the sense of smell was dulled along with vision and hearing…”In our times of political correctness a warning should be added to the book, informing the reader that it contains descriptions of violence not suitable for young readers.The Western Way of War describes the way of infantry battle in Classical Greece. The author masterfully, takes the reader into the battlefield where the Ancient Greeks slaughtered each other with extreme brutality. In a vivid and exciting style, Hanson uses every available source to reconstruct the collision between hoplites.Many books have been written on the subject. But this is the first time that a scholar dares to describe the face of the hoplite battle, as it was experienced by those who participated in it. Hanson owes a lot to Sir John Keegan and his classical work “The face of Battle”, the first scholarly essay that focused on the practical mechanics of battle and the experiences of the individual soldiers of the time.The book covers a period of three hundred years, from the 7th till the 5th century B.C. Three are the main theses in the book :1.The Greek conflicts were tightly connected with the land, which was of great importance since the population of Greece was, in its overwhelming majority, living of it. Hanson, who also comes from a rural family and a farmer himself, remarks that the mere threat of the fields by the enemy troops was enough to raise their owners to take the arms to defend them.2.It refutes the ‘traditional’ academic view on the collision of the hoplites. The hoplites did not use exquisite tactics. Even when they did use a few stratagems in some cases, their importance was not critical in the outcome of the battle. They simply moved in close order against the enemy aiming at a pitched battle. The two opposing phalanxes charged against each other trying to push the enemy back in a reverse tug-of-war style. Those who participated in such conflicts experienced the horror of war at its extreme form. However this inhuman slaughter had its positive side: In most cases the war was decided there, in the battlefield. The winner of the battle was recognized as the winner of the war.3.The tradition of the hoplites was maintained unchanged during the 7th and 6th century BC. However, after the first decades of the 5th century it started to change. During the Persian Wars (490-480BC) Greeks came to contact with the Persians, which used different battle tactics. Since then the Greeks made a broad use of cavalry and of light troops. By the end of the 5th century the war became perennial, exterminating and more sophisticated. Despite this, the hoplite tradition was maintained in the Macedonian phalanx and in the Roman legions. Even later, up to the middle of the 19th century, the European armies depended on their close order infantry. Companionship and discipline, the main principles of the hoplite phalanx were maintained unchanged. Even when war tactics were critically affected by technology, the West despised the “hit and run” tactics of its eastern adversaries, and maintained the principles of the companionship of the fellow soldiers and the “esprit de corps”, aiming always at crashing the opponent with a single blow. All this comes straight from the Greek way of war, the war of the farmer-warrior who fought for his land where his own values were rooted.
Reviewed in the United States on June 17, 2020
Images in this review
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on December 21, 2018
Verified Purchase
7 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on August 12, 2019
Verified Purchase
Victor Davis Hanson explains in great detail just how the ancient Greek cities went about the task of killing each other's citizens. It makes a remarkable story. For several hundred years they went after each other in a very particular way. I am a life long history fan and have had an interest in things military for over 50 years. I learned a great deal and a lot of odd and disconnected facts in my noggin got put into perspective.
Hanson writes in a way that the ordinary, non specialist reader can easily grasp and assimilate. Highly recommended.
Hanson writes in a way that the ordinary, non specialist reader can easily grasp and assimilate. Highly recommended.
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on November 23, 2016
Verified Purchase
Victor Davis Hanson is unmatched in his writing's of ancient warfare. The foundation of the Western and modern military mindset was laid out by the Greeks (Macedonians and Romans to follow). The Greeks were primarily heavy infantry armies. Unlike the Persians and many other Near Eastern armies, they did not rely upon cavalry (although some modification will come under Alexander the Great), along with chariots as those armies had. As Hanson describes; "The Greek battlefield was the scene of abject terror and utter carnage." The Greek word "Othismos"- a "pushing" describes Greek city state warfare at its best. Very little ingenuity in tactics were used. The Persians would bring change to Greek city state warfare by using their cavalry, archers and chariots that would force the Greeks to "think outside of the box." The Hopelite-the Greek heavy shield bearing infantryman and his partners to his left and his right were inseparable, for if they loosened formation they were finished. The same came with the Phalanx trooper developed by Philip and improved upon by his more dynamic son Alexander. The basis for the Macedonian Phalanx and the Roman Cohort and Legion had its roots in the Greek way of war. Greeks were "citizen soldiers." not the Carthaginian mercenaries or Persian mass levy's. The were men with a "stake" in their respective society.
10 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2021
Verified Purchase
Victor Davis Hanson has given us a brilliant overview of how and why warfare developed the way it did in Ancient Greece. He then ties this way of war to the modern Western way of war in a seamless and easy to understand fashion. What a joy to read! This is how history should be conveyed: it is accessible, insightful, and immediate in a way that many ancient history books are not. Bravo!
Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2015
Verified Purchase
One of the best military history novels EVER written. Period. Belongs on all military historians shelves next to Keegan, von Clausewitz, Fuller...etc. Examines phalanx warfare during Greece's city-state era using first person accounts garnered from historical documents. Covers the human aspects of battle - the fear, the sounds, they discomfort, the fatigue that almost places one in the center of the phalanx. The Western Way of War refers to the Western World's pursuit of the "decisive battle" (as opposed to the eastern methods of the prolonged struggle). Very incisive, especially given today's global situation.
10 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on December 23, 2017
Verified Purchase
Glad I was a Tanker in the Army. Would not want to be an Infantryman in any age.
Thank God they taught the West how to FIGHT!! I always knew I was a soldier. NOT a "warrior".
Thank you Mr. Hanson. I know why.
Aim High! It allows for bullet drop.
Thank God they taught the West how to FIGHT!! I always knew I was a soldier. NOT a "warrior".
Thank you Mr. Hanson. I know why.
Aim High! It allows for bullet drop.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 17, 2020
Verified Purchase
You sort of need to be a history buff for this book, which I am. But it lays out the information in an easy to follow way. Should be required reading for all military leaders.
Reviewed in the United States on February 18, 2015
Verified Purchase
This is a detailed and comprehensive study of the Greek style of warfare in the classical era. It's premise is that the best examination of those events is from the writings of contemporary authors. Hanson explores the social aspects of Greek warfare along with the strategies, tactics, and equipment. He also explains the origins of western democracy in the Greek philosophy towards war and citizenship. Read this book and you will understand fully both how and why the Greeks fought as they did, and how modern democracy was born out of the Greek citizens defense of the city-state.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Scorchio
3.0 out of 5 stars
Thought-provoking book about ancient Greek warfare that is ultimately uncovincing
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on August 1, 2018Verified Purchase
This is a slightly unusual book made up of chapters on topics like armour and alcohol. The author clearly knows the primary sources well and has thought long and hard about hoplite warfare. The author argues that during the hoplite period the Greeks practiced a particular type of ritialistic warfare, where battles took place by agreement on open terrain at particular times. The hoplites would arrive with armour bearers who would carry their impossibly heavy armour and shields. The armour, shield and helment were so impractical in the Greek climate that the hoplites would suit up at the very last minute, and then advance for a savage and brief clash with an enemy formation. The clash would involve a charge of spears where hoplites would push their spears entirely through enemy plate armour, and then descend into a pushing match, where the rear ranks of the phallanx would push their shields into the backs of those in front, forming a giant crush until one side or the other pushed through the enemy phallanx and broke their line. The author argues that this form of warfare, where each side tries to finish the war as quickly as possible with a single brutal confrontation is somehow the "western" way of war. He argues that modern warfare as practiced by western states has its roots in these hoplite battles.
The idea is interesting, and perhaps if I knew the primary material as well as the author, I would agree with everything he writes. However, a big weakness of the book is that there is not much discussion of the plausibility of the author's argument, or of alternative interpretations of the evidence. For example, the author argues that the pushing match was a key part of the battle, where each row of the phallanx pushes their shields into the back of the row in front. This idea seems implausible: how can anyone defend themselves effectively when they are being crushed from behind in this way? Perhaps the author has an explanation for how this was possible despite the implausibility. But he doesn't discuss the implausibility or any explanation. There are other astonishing facts that are not discussed as much as one might expect. For example, the hoplite shield is said to be 1" to 1.5" thick, which is a truly astonishing thickness compared to, say, the Roman scutum which was less than a centimetre thick. There are a lot of these unsatisfying points in the book, which makes one wonder whether the entire arguments holds water.
The broader idea that hoplite warfare is some sort of template for modern western warfare seems even more tenuous. The ancient Greeks were not primarily a western people in the modern sense of the word. The Greeks primarily belonged to the group of ancient civilizations clustered around the eastern Mediteranean. The idea that modern western Europe is somehow uniquely a successor of ancient Greece in a way that other places are not is nonsense. The immediate successors of the Greeks were the Macedonians who spread Greek culture across the eastern Mediteranean and west Asia, then the eastern part of the Roman Empire, which continued to be a great Greek empire until 1453. We in the west have been profoundly influenced by the Greeks, but their influence on the Islamic world has also been profound. Arguably Greek civilization has had a much greater influence on Christian Orthodox countries such a Russia, which have a much stronger claim on being the successors of Greek Byzantine civilization than we do.
Perhaps there is a uniquely "western" way of war that somehow reflects western culture rather than simply being a result of the west having overwhelming military supremacy on the open battlefield for the last few hundred years. But the idea that we can uniquely trace this method of war back to the ancient Greek hoplites in an unbroken line seems implausible.
The idea is interesting, and perhaps if I knew the primary material as well as the author, I would agree with everything he writes. However, a big weakness of the book is that there is not much discussion of the plausibility of the author's argument, or of alternative interpretations of the evidence. For example, the author argues that the pushing match was a key part of the battle, where each row of the phallanx pushes their shields into the back of the row in front. This idea seems implausible: how can anyone defend themselves effectively when they are being crushed from behind in this way? Perhaps the author has an explanation for how this was possible despite the implausibility. But he doesn't discuss the implausibility or any explanation. There are other astonishing facts that are not discussed as much as one might expect. For example, the hoplite shield is said to be 1" to 1.5" thick, which is a truly astonishing thickness compared to, say, the Roman scutum which was less than a centimetre thick. There are a lot of these unsatisfying points in the book, which makes one wonder whether the entire arguments holds water.
The broader idea that hoplite warfare is some sort of template for modern western warfare seems even more tenuous. The ancient Greeks were not primarily a western people in the modern sense of the word. The Greeks primarily belonged to the group of ancient civilizations clustered around the eastern Mediteranean. The idea that modern western Europe is somehow uniquely a successor of ancient Greece in a way that other places are not is nonsense. The immediate successors of the Greeks were the Macedonians who spread Greek culture across the eastern Mediteranean and west Asia, then the eastern part of the Roman Empire, which continued to be a great Greek empire until 1453. We in the west have been profoundly influenced by the Greeks, but their influence on the Islamic world has also been profound. Arguably Greek civilization has had a much greater influence on Christian Orthodox countries such a Russia, which have a much stronger claim on being the successors of Greek Byzantine civilization than we do.
Perhaps there is a uniquely "western" way of war that somehow reflects western culture rather than simply being a result of the west having overwhelming military supremacy on the open battlefield for the last few hundred years. But the idea that we can uniquely trace this method of war back to the ancient Greek hoplites in an unbroken line seems implausible.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
David W.
5.0 out of 5 stars
Unbelievably good. Visceral look at infantry battle, like nothing I've read previously.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on October 9, 2018Verified Purchase
Definitely recommend this, even if you're not a massive history buff. Easy to read prose, incredible detail and really puts the reader in the middle of everything, easily the best, most gripping and visceral look at what it would have been like to be alive (temporarily maybe) in one of these brutal, quickly-over battles.
lady jane grey
4.0 out of 5 stars
Four Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 30, 2016Verified Purchase
fascinating description of classical warfare
Dave Kiely
4.0 out of 5 stars
The way we were
Reviewed in Canada on November 9, 2014Verified Purchase
Well written and logically describing the possibilities of ancient war. Academic interests are met in a way that still pique the interest of casual readers. Very interesting read.
Anaxarque
5.0 out of 5 stars
Un grand clasique.
Reviewed in France on January 2, 2005Verified Purchase
Le modèle occidental de la guerre, de V D Hanson, nous plonge dans les guerres grecques de l'antiquité. Ce qui impressionne le plus, c'est son écriture. Hanson se place du coté du guerrier,nous ressentons les angoisses, les peurs du combattant.
Hanson ose fait un parralele avec les guerres modenes. Pour lui, les fondements de la guerre occidentale n'ont pas changé depuis l'antiquité (cette thèse est encore aujourd'hui contreversée). C'est un clasique à ranger à coté de l'histoire de la guerre de J Keegan, et de Bellone de R Caillois.
Hanson ose fait un parralele avec les guerres modenes. Pour lui, les fondements de la guerre occidentale n'ont pas changé depuis l'antiquité (cette thèse est encore aujourd'hui contreversée). C'est un clasique à ranger à coté de l'histoire de la guerre de J Keegan, et de Bellone de R Caillois.








