Buy new:
-37% $14.44$14.44
Delivery Thursday, November 21
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: DahlHaus Books
Save with Used - Good
$9.57$9.57
Delivery Friday, November 22
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Rascal Games Studio
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
What Liberal Media?: The Truth about Bias and the News Paperback – January 1, 2003
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length357 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 2003
- Dimensions6.14 x 0.95 x 9.21 inches
- ISBN-100465001777
- ISBN-13978-0465001774
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Popular titles by this author
It Ain't No Sin to Be Glad You're Alive : The Promise of Bruce SpringsteenHardcover$12.56 shippingGet it as soon as Friday, Nov 22Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Lying in State: Why Presidents Lie -- And Why Trump Is WorseHardcover$13.80 shippingGet it as soon as Tuesday, Nov 19Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
What Liberal Media?: The Truth About Bias and the NewsHardcover$13.82 shippingGet it as soon as Friday, Nov 22Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Editorial Reviews
From The New Yorker
Copyright © 2005 The New Yorker
Review
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Basic Books; Reprint edition (January 1, 2003)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 357 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0465001777
- ISBN-13 : 978-0465001774
- Item Weight : 1.15 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.14 x 0.95 x 9.21 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #3,508,991 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,583 in Social Media Guides
- #4,775 in Journalism Writing Reference (Books)
- #12,602 in Communication & Media Studies
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Eric Alterman is Distinguished Professor of English, Brooklyn College, City University of New York. From 1995-2020, he was The Nation’s “Liberal Media" columnist and is now a contributing writer to the magazine and also to The American Prospect. In the past, he has been a senior fellow of the Center for American Progress, the World Policy Institute and The Nation Institute, a columnist for Rolling Stone, Mother Jones, The Guardian, The Daily Beast, MSNBC.com, The Forward, Moment and the Sunday Express (London) as well as a contributor to The New Yorker, The Atlantic and Le Monde Diplomatique, among other publications. Alterman has also been named a Media Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, a Schusterman Foundation Fellow at Brandeis University, a Fellow of the Society of American Historians and a member of the Usage Panel of the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language.
Alterman is the author of the national bestseller What Liberal Media? The Truth About Bias and the News, as well eleven other books, including We Are Not One: A History of America’s Fight Over Israel, published late in 2022 by Basic Books, which was added to The New Yorker’s list of the best books of that year after both the list was initially published. In past years, he has won the George Orwell Prize, the Stephen Crane Literary Award and the Mirror Award for media criticism (twice). Alterman holds a PhD in US history from Stanford (minoring in Jewish Studies), an M.A. in international relations at Yale and a B.A. from Cornell. He lives in Manhattan and tweets at @eric_alterman and has an open Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/alterman.eric
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book well-researched, insightful, and convincing. They also describe it as readable and an excellent addition to anyone's reading list. Opinions are mixed on the value for money, with some finding it excellent and others saying it's not worth the read.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book well-researched, insightful, and convincing. They appreciate the excellent references and premise. Readers also mention it's a compelling case supported by facts and opinions.
"...a tool to recognize one direction of bias slant, in a readable, comprehensive and pretty convincing package...." Read more
"This book is a MUST READ. It is a complete and very well documented refutation of one of the Big Lies the Conservatives repeat endlessly, namely..." Read more
"...Well researched and documented...." Read more
"...This book is worth the purchase price, and presents a lot of facts that most of the public may not be aware of...." Read more
Customers find the book readable, comprehensive, and convincing. They say it's a great read and an excellent addition to anyone's reading list.
"...does is provide a tool to recognize one direction of bias slant, in a readable, comprehensive and pretty convincing package...." Read more
"...Its a shame bc the author is very good, he just doesn't really look hard enough or care to...." Read more
"...This is a great read and an excellent addition to anyone's reading list who is interested in exploring what is really going on in the media trenches..." Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the value for money of the book. Some mention it's excellent and an excellent addition to anyone's reading list, while others say it's not worth the read and of poor quality.
"...All in all, an excellent book that succeeds in discrediting a notion that was sold to the American people and continues to harm our democratic..." Read more
"...The problem is Bias and Slander are very poor quality books...." Read more
"...This is a great read and an excellent addition to anyone's reading list who is interested in exploring what is really going on in the media trenches..." Read more
"Excellent book. performs as advertised. Very pleased with purchase." Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
by Eric Alterman could be seen as the liberal answer to Slander by Anne Coulter and Bias by Bernard Goldberg.
Eric Alterman makes a very strong case that it is not the supposedly predominantly liberal reporters who influence what news we see on TV, hear on the radio and read in the papers, but it is the far more conservative and influential owners and editors who make those decisions.
Furthermore, the entire myth of the Liberal media is one invented and promulgated by the right to suit their own ends, by their own admission. Read and find out for yourself!
Slander and Bias were received with much praise by the right wing establishment because these books stated what the right wanted said.
The problem is Bias and Slander are very poor quality books. I am a physician and as such I judge non-fiction writing by its ability to back up the facts that it presents. Slander and Bias are virtually un-referenced and therefore, as far as any one can tell, the attacks and innuendo thrown about by Goldberg and Coulter may as well be pure invention. In fact, fully 1/3 of Goldberg�s book is dedicated to griping about his former relationship with Dan Rather. This gives one the distinct feeling That Goldberg saw an opportunity to cash in on a right wing trend in America through his position as a supposed Liberal media insider. I see little value in his book based on it�s own obvious BIAS.
Coulter�s position is obvious, with her having made recent statement�s such as calling the Columbia shuttle disaster an expensive plane crash and bashing the �Liberal media� for being distracted for one minute from the nations War mania to cover it. The woman clearly has issues. This combined with the fact that Slander is so thinly referenced as to be transparent make it a weak counterpart to the excellently researched and referenced What Liberal Media?
Is there bias in the media's political and social coverage? You betcha. Is it both conservative and liberal? Yep. And is there also plenty of "entertainment" that panders and/or leans in either direction? Of course (but barely touched in any of the three).
What this book does is provide a tool to recognize one direction of bias slant, in a readable, comprehensive and pretty convincing package.
But I also find that Goldberg's theory of network news' liberal bias, at least on social issues, remains plausible. And Coulter's not just funny in a slanderous kind of way, she's also correct in her attack on the NY Times (the only paper I consistently read) as socially liberal masquerading as mainstream. (Ignore the business section. In that respect all media is obviously "conservative." But the various Style sections are not just liberal - they're radically un-mainstream. Maybe that's "balanced" reporting?)
By the way, anyone else notice that both Alterman and Coulter are Cornell grads? So much for conspiratorial university unanimity.
Alterman explains and documents the forces which prevent any significant degree of progressivism from appearing in the overwhelming majority of newspapers, magazines, and radio and television broadcasts. He finds only two liberal radio talk show hosts, both on one small station in California late at night and thru the wee hours of the morning. I remember three liberal talk show hosts in New York City, Fred Gale, Alex Bennett, and the gretest talk show host of all, Malachy McCourt, all of whom were forced off the air by a steady barrage of conservative complaints and threats to boycott advertisers. (Read more in Malachy's book Singing My Him Song)
Many conservative reviewers fault Alterman for using anecdotal evidence; they (perhaps intentionally) miss the point. Yes, he provides a leaven of anecdotal evidence, which he uses to illustrate points he has made and to make for easier reading; nothing but facts and analysis thereof can be terminally boring, and Alterman does not bore, nor should he!
I have just one small carp: the footnotes are all in a separate section at the end of the book, instead of at the bottom of each page where they belong. This imposes on the reader the infernal nuisance of keeping two places and continually flipping back and forth.
This book should be required reading, not only for all prospective journalists but for all citizens who need to know what is going on in the world so that they can vote intelligently.
watziznaym@gmail.com
Well researched and documented.
A bit dated, though, as it refers to people like Roger Ailes and Bill O'Reilly as if they were still media movers and shakers.


