This book gave me a lot of food for thought. But because the authors are scholars and wrote as such, I need to read it a second time to make sure I understand the breadth and depth of their argument. They argue in defense of "a comprehensive union: a union of will (by consent) and body (by sexual union); inherently ordered to procreation and thus the broad sharing of family life; and calling for permanent and exclusive commitment...a moral reality: a human good with an objective structure, which is inherently good for us to live out" [p. 6]. And in doing so, they showed many consequences of accepting the revisionist view of marriage, which runs contrary to the conjugal view.
I won't be sorry to set aside the time I need to reexamine their line of reasoning. In fact, I look forward to reading it again.
Other Sellers on Amazon
Sold by:
YC Investment LLC
(14 ratings)
93% positive over last 12 months
93% positive over last 12 months
In Stock.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$28.31
+ $3.87 shipping
+ $3.87 shipping
Sold by:
PLANET-OF-BOOKS
Sold by:
PLANET-OF-BOOKS
(80 ratings)
98% positive over last 12 months
98% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$28.31
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
Mega BookShelf
Sold by:
Mega BookShelf
(3638 ratings)
95% positive over last 12 months
95% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
What Is Marriage?: Man and Woman: A Defense Paperback – December 11, 2012
by
Sherif Girgis
(Author),
Ryan T Anderson
(Author),
Robert P George
(Author)
&
0
more
|
Sherif Girgis
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Ryan T Anderson
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Robert P George
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$0.00
|
Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$24.99 | — |
-
Print length152 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherEncounter Books
-
Publication dateDecember 11, 2012
-
Dimensions5.75 x 0.5 x 9.25 inches
-
ISBN-109781594036224
-
ISBN-13978-1594036224
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
Review
"What Is Marriage? There is the question. Thanks to these three eloquent authors for so cogently reminding us of that, and for showing us how reflective reason answers it."
-- Cardinal Timothy Dolan, Archbishop of New York
"This book brilliantly explains why the definition of marriage is so critical and why the strengthening of marriages is absolutely essential to our freedom and our future."
-- Dr. Rick Warren, Author of The Purpose Driven Life and Pastor of Saddleback Church
"A lot more is at stake in the marriage debate than the definition of a word, and this book reveals just how much. Its defense of marriage is philosophical and sociological, not theological, but people of all faiths will find it illuminating and edifying."
-- Shaykh Hamza Yusuf, Zaytuna College
"What Is Marriage? is the most insightful, eloquent, and influential defense of marriage as it has been historically and rightly understood. People of all traditions--and everyone who cares about the future of this central and sacred social institution--owe Sherif Girgis, Ryan T. Anderson, and Robert P. George an extraordinary debt."
-- Meir Soloveichik, Associate Rabbi at Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun and Director of the Straus Center for Torah and Western Thought at Yeshiva University
"With many countries on the verge of redefining a basic social institution, What Is Marriage? issues an urgent call for full deliberation of what is at stake. The authors make a compelling secular case for marriage as a partnership between a man and a woman, whose special status is based on society's interest in the nurture and education of children."
-- Mary Ann Glendon, Learned Hand Professor of Law, Harvard University
"What a joy to see this book by Sherif Girgis, Ryan T. Anderson, and Robert P. George, which presents the most philosophically astute and historically accurate defense of traditional marriage to date. It exposes the incoherence of attempts to radically redefine marriage by showing the inherent wisdom in what is our oldest social institution."
-- David Novak, J. Richard and Dorothy Shiff Chair in Jewish Studies, University of Toronto
-- Cardinal Timothy Dolan, Archbishop of New York
"This book brilliantly explains why the definition of marriage is so critical and why the strengthening of marriages is absolutely essential to our freedom and our future."
-- Dr. Rick Warren, Author of The Purpose Driven Life and Pastor of Saddleback Church
"A lot more is at stake in the marriage debate than the definition of a word, and this book reveals just how much. Its defense of marriage is philosophical and sociological, not theological, but people of all faiths will find it illuminating and edifying."
-- Shaykh Hamza Yusuf, Zaytuna College
"What Is Marriage? is the most insightful, eloquent, and influential defense of marriage as it has been historically and rightly understood. People of all traditions--and everyone who cares about the future of this central and sacred social institution--owe Sherif Girgis, Ryan T. Anderson, and Robert P. George an extraordinary debt."
-- Meir Soloveichik, Associate Rabbi at Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun and Director of the Straus Center for Torah and Western Thought at Yeshiva University
"With many countries on the verge of redefining a basic social institution, What Is Marriage? issues an urgent call for full deliberation of what is at stake. The authors make a compelling secular case for marriage as a partnership between a man and a woman, whose special status is based on society's interest in the nurture and education of children."
-- Mary Ann Glendon, Learned Hand Professor of Law, Harvard University
"What a joy to see this book by Sherif Girgis, Ryan T. Anderson, and Robert P. George, which presents the most philosophically astute and historically accurate defense of traditional marriage to date. It exposes the incoherence of attempts to radically redefine marriage by showing the inherent wisdom in what is our oldest social institution."
-- David Novak, J. Richard and Dorothy Shiff Chair in Jewish Studies, University of Toronto
About the Author
Sherif Girgis is a Ph.D. student in philosophy at Princeton University and a J.D. candidate at Yale Law School. After graduating Phi Beta Kappa and summa cum laude from Princeton, where he won prizes for best senior thesis in ethics and best thesis in philosophy, as well as the Dante Society of America's national Dante Prize, he obtained a B.Phil. in moral, political, and legal philosophy from the University of Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.
Ryan T. Anderson is William E. Simon Fellow at the Heritage Foundation and the editor of Public Discourse: Ethics, Law, and the Common Good, the online journal of the Witherspoon Institute. A Phi Beta Kappa and magna cum laude graduate of Princeton University, he is a Ph.D. candidate in political philosophy at the University of Notre Dame. He has worked as assistant editor of First Things and was a Journalism Fellow of the Phillips Foundation. His writings have appeared in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, First Things, the Weekly Standard, National Review, the New Atlantis, and the Claremont Review of Books.
Robert P. George is a Visiting Professor at Harvard Law School and McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence and Director of the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions at Princeton University. He is a member of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, and previously served on the President's Council on Bioethics and as a presidential appointee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights. He is a former Judicial Fellow at the Supreme Court of the United States, where he received the Justice Tom C. Clark Award. He is a recipient of the United States Presidential Citizens Medal and the Honorific Medal for the Defense of Human Rights of the Republic of Poland.
Ryan T. Anderson is William E. Simon Fellow at the Heritage Foundation and the editor of Public Discourse: Ethics, Law, and the Common Good, the online journal of the Witherspoon Institute. A Phi Beta Kappa and magna cum laude graduate of Princeton University, he is a Ph.D. candidate in political philosophy at the University of Notre Dame. He has worked as assistant editor of First Things and was a Journalism Fellow of the Phillips Foundation. His writings have appeared in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, First Things, the Weekly Standard, National Review, the New Atlantis, and the Claremont Review of Books.
Robert P. George is a Visiting Professor at Harvard Law School and McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence and Director of the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions at Princeton University. He is a member of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, and previously served on the President's Council on Bioethics and as a presidential appointee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights. He is a former Judicial Fellow at the Supreme Court of the United States, where he received the Justice Tom C. Clark Award. He is a recipient of the United States Presidential Citizens Medal and the Honorific Medal for the Defense of Human Rights of the Republic of Poland.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Chapter One: Comprehensive Union
For all the difficulty and ambiguity of making value judgments, the broadest outlines of the good life are plain to most of us. One man has a healthy body and a happy family, an enriching complement of hobbies and a keen sense for Bob Dylan. By day he teaches high-school seniors to savor the rhythm and wit of Chaucer’s poetry; by night friends help him savor red Bordeaux. A second man is debilitated, depressed, desensitized and detached. It doesn’t take a poet or a saint to see who is better off.
It is equally clear that there is nothing special about Dylan, Chaucer, or Bordeaux that gives the first man his advantage. There is no single good life, but a range of good lives: countless ways of blending the basic ingredients of human thriving. But the ingredients themselvesthe most foundational ways in which we can thrive, what we call basic human goods”are more limited. They include only those conditions or activities that make us better off in themselves, whether or not they bring us other goods. It makes sense for us to want these for their own sake. Health, knowledge, play and aesthetic delight are a few examples, and another is friendship.
Yet another basic human good, we think, is marriage. A critical point here is that marriage and ordinary friendship do not simply offer different degrees of the same type of human good, like two checks written in different amounts. Nor are they simply varieties of the same good, like the enjoyment of a Matisse and the enjoyment of a Van Gogh. Each is its own kind of good, a way of thriving that is different in kind from the other. Hence, while spouses should be friends, what it takes to be a good friend is not just the same as what it takes to be a good spouse.
What, then, is distinctive about marriage? All sorts of practices are grafted onto marriage by law and custom, but what kind of relationship must any two people have to enjoy the specific good of marriage? This framing of the question, though unusual, should not seem mysterious; we could ask it just as well of other basic human goods.
For all the difficulty and ambiguity of making value judgments, the broadest outlines of the good life are plain to most of us. One man has a healthy body and a happy family, an enriching complement of hobbies and a keen sense for Bob Dylan. By day he teaches high-school seniors to savor the rhythm and wit of Chaucer’s poetry; by night friends help him savor red Bordeaux. A second man is debilitated, depressed, desensitized and detached. It doesn’t take a poet or a saint to see who is better off.
It is equally clear that there is nothing special about Dylan, Chaucer, or Bordeaux that gives the first man his advantage. There is no single good life, but a range of good lives: countless ways of blending the basic ingredients of human thriving. But the ingredients themselvesthe most foundational ways in which we can thrive, what we call basic human goods”are more limited. They include only those conditions or activities that make us better off in themselves, whether or not they bring us other goods. It makes sense for us to want these for their own sake. Health, knowledge, play and aesthetic delight are a few examples, and another is friendship.
Yet another basic human good, we think, is marriage. A critical point here is that marriage and ordinary friendship do not simply offer different degrees of the same type of human good, like two checks written in different amounts. Nor are they simply varieties of the same good, like the enjoyment of a Matisse and the enjoyment of a Van Gogh. Each is its own kind of good, a way of thriving that is different in kind from the other. Hence, while spouses should be friends, what it takes to be a good friend is not just the same as what it takes to be a good spouse.
What, then, is distinctive about marriage? All sorts of practices are grafted onto marriage by law and custom, but what kind of relationship must any two people have to enjoy the specific good of marriage? This framing of the question, though unusual, should not seem mysterious; we could ask it just as well of other basic human goods.
Start reading What Is Marriage?: Man and Woman: A Defense on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- ASIN : 1594036225
- Publisher : Encounter Books; 1st Edition (December 11, 2012)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 152 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9781594036224
- ISBN-13 : 978-1594036224
- Item Weight : 9 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.75 x 0.5 x 9.25 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#399,099 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #148 in Human Sexuality (Books)
- #429 in Government Social Policy
- #432 in Social Philosophy
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.7 out of 5 stars
4.7 out of 5
287 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2015
Verified Purchase
13 people found this helpful
Report abuse
5.0 out of 5 stars
The most significant work on the civic institution of marriage that I have ever read
Reviewed in the United States on June 10, 2015Verified Purchase
I am not ashamed to say that this book has changed my mind on several key issues related to same-sex marriage. It is concise, coherent, compelling, accessible, and more generous in its argumentation and conclusions than I had ever thought possible.
Given the upcoming Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage, I highly recommend this book to anyone who is still willing to entertain the idea that principled and universally accessible reasoning to support the traditional view of marriage has ever existed. For those on either side of this issue who would be intellectually honest, the reasoning that is presented in this book can be used as a crucible in which to challenge or refine your own beliefs. For those who no longer care, it offers a compelling explanation of why you should.
Given the upcoming Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage, I highly recommend this book to anyone who is still willing to entertain the idea that principled and universally accessible reasoning to support the traditional view of marriage has ever existed. For those on either side of this issue who would be intellectually honest, the reasoning that is presented in this book can be used as a crucible in which to challenge or refine your own beliefs. For those who no longer care, it offers a compelling explanation of why you should.
14 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on July 3, 2015
Verified Purchase
This is a remarkable and timely book. As a Catholic Christian, I find it difficult if not impossible to explain why I believe marriage is between a man and woman without bring in the Church, God, or the like. This book, through reason, philosophy and natural law, explains why traditional marriage makes sense and why we should care about it and defend it. This book is great for anyone looks for reasons other than theological. It's also a short read; a bit dense at time, but at only 100 pages, one could read it within a couple of weeks while working full-time. I plan on reading it again in light of the recent SCOTUS ruling and plan on studying it more closely in order to better give an explanation of my beliefs. Every reasoned person should read this book, regardless of where you stand on the matter. At the very least, you'll understand why people like myself believe what we do. This book is a great investment.
10 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on December 3, 2018
Verified Purchase
While I don't agree with everything it says, this book is a well written and well laid out argument. I feel the authors made their points well and I understand where there thinking was coming from. In today's society, I think reading this book can help both sides understand each other a little better.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
5.0 out of 5 stars
If you think your mind is made up read this book. It is very smart and compelling.
Reviewed in the United States on July 14, 2015Verified Purchase
I had lots of opinions but not an answer to this question, "What is marriage?" The authors are very well educated from respected universities. They make a great case for marriage. It is not a religious book. Anyone with the tiniest bit of open mind can learn from this book. At least, to really know the other side. I would recommend this book, especially to college students who sometimes are assigned to defend a topic they might know nothing about.
10 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on November 25, 2014
Verified Purchase
The authors provide a succinct and cogent philosophical assessment of marriage. As they continually point out, and effectively show, the gay marriage debate is not really about homosexuality per se; it is essentially about the nature of marriage. The question then is how any argument is able to ground it's position on marriage. The revisionist position is internally incoherent and prima fascia inconsistent with reality. The conjugal view, however, is both internally consistent and respectful of principles of dignity, equality, and individual rights (but not in the revisionist sense; for meaning cannot be spoken of meaningfully once it has been reduced). If one is interested in thinking more deeply on such an important issue, then this is certainly worth reading.
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 4, 2016
Verified Purchase
This book is a philosophical defense of marriage. It is extremely well researched and packed with good information. At times the book is difficult to read because of the complex philosophical nature of the topic. I found myself rereading paragraphs numerous times because I could not understand what the author was trying to get across. I think that Ryan T. Anderson's book is a much easier read than this title. However, I did find it beneficial to read this book because it challenged me. I've never had to think so much to comprehend a topic, so it's a lot different than most books. I would recommend it as a companion to Anderson's more recent work.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
R. Wright
5.0 out of 5 stars
A superb defence of traditional marriage
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on March 30, 2015Verified Purchase
This excellent book, written by three experts in philosophy and law (from Princeton, Harvard, and Notre Dame) is a defence of the traditional understanding of marriage (the conjugal view) as a union of one man and one woman, freely chosen for life, and to the exclusion of all others.
They note that the revisionist view,supportive of gay marriage, rests on a view of marriage supported by a misleading conception of equality and discrimination. Revisionists assume that equality means that any adult should be able to marry, otherwise some will be treated unequally, and that to deny marriage to adults on grounds of sexual orientation is discrimination and therefore bad. They see marriage as simply an emotionally-based bonding of two adults.
However, such a view could not explain why friendships, no matter how intense or long-lasting, and which have at its centre an emotionally-based bonding, are of no interest whatsoever to the state, whilst the state is deeply involved in regulating conjugal marriage: in terms of its beginning, consummation (which can only occur legally if there is genital ie potentially fertile, sex and not any other kind of sex), its ending, intestacy rules, and fiscal policy re married person's tax allowance etc.
The state is involved in regulating marriage only because marriage is the near-universally accepted way of producing and rearing children.The authors demonstrate this at the end of this short (about 100 pages) but tightly-argued book by inviting us to consider a thought experiment: imagine that humans were a species that reproduced asexually, and that infants were born fully able to make their way in the world. The existence of marriage would then be unthinkable. They show that marriage reform does not simply extend marriage but redefines it for all, and that the basis for such redefinition (emotional fulfilment) leaves no firm ground - none - for not recognising 'every relationship describable in polite English'. This will lead to the deinstitutionalisation of marriage.
The consequences of this is that children will, on the whole, be more poorly socialised and lead more impoverished lives, and there will also be negative consequences for adults (parents, victims of criminality etc.) but also for the state in terms of expanding legal and financial costs.This is simply an extrapolation of trends solidly recorded by social science research over the last 35 years: compared to children in other households, children born to and raised by two natural parents are less likely to be poor, criminal, educationally-underachieving, alcohol-abusing, drug-abusing, mentally ill, physically abused (by a long way!), suicidal and, if female, a teenage pregnancy. This has imposed hige costs to children, adults and the state. The protection of children is the key reason why marriage is, of its very essence, a multi-discriminatory institution (a married man discriminates positively towards his family in terms of his time, money, emotional energy, sexual exclusivity, and against a sexual relationship with siblings, polyamorous relationships, same-sex relationships, minors and those who are mentally retarded; all of these - think about it - are there to primarily protect the interests of children).
The authors deal with objections to the conjugal view (what about infertile couples? what about objections to inter-racial marriage in the past?) skilfully and convincingly. They also touch on the threat to religious liberty and show how intolerant, misguided and just plain wrong is the tendency to describe all opponents of gay marriage as homophobes (as they point out, even homoerotic societies such as Ancient Greece never contemplated gay marriage. I have one reservation: they say (on page 11) that they reject the argument that marriage should be conjugal because it always has been. Yet if an institution has key features which have existed near-universally, this is powerful evidence that it is highly functional to a society. It should also be noted that this book is written by Americans and that examples from elsewhere are very thin on the ground.
All in all, this is an outstanding, logical and evidence-based defence of conjugal marriage, which should prove required reading for all who are interested in the future of our most important institution, but especially for those in countires (such as Ireland) which have not (yet) legally adopted the revisionist view.
They note that the revisionist view,supportive of gay marriage, rests on a view of marriage supported by a misleading conception of equality and discrimination. Revisionists assume that equality means that any adult should be able to marry, otherwise some will be treated unequally, and that to deny marriage to adults on grounds of sexual orientation is discrimination and therefore bad. They see marriage as simply an emotionally-based bonding of two adults.
However, such a view could not explain why friendships, no matter how intense or long-lasting, and which have at its centre an emotionally-based bonding, are of no interest whatsoever to the state, whilst the state is deeply involved in regulating conjugal marriage: in terms of its beginning, consummation (which can only occur legally if there is genital ie potentially fertile, sex and not any other kind of sex), its ending, intestacy rules, and fiscal policy re married person's tax allowance etc.
The state is involved in regulating marriage only because marriage is the near-universally accepted way of producing and rearing children.The authors demonstrate this at the end of this short (about 100 pages) but tightly-argued book by inviting us to consider a thought experiment: imagine that humans were a species that reproduced asexually, and that infants were born fully able to make their way in the world. The existence of marriage would then be unthinkable. They show that marriage reform does not simply extend marriage but redefines it for all, and that the basis for such redefinition (emotional fulfilment) leaves no firm ground - none - for not recognising 'every relationship describable in polite English'. This will lead to the deinstitutionalisation of marriage.
The consequences of this is that children will, on the whole, be more poorly socialised and lead more impoverished lives, and there will also be negative consequences for adults (parents, victims of criminality etc.) but also for the state in terms of expanding legal and financial costs.This is simply an extrapolation of trends solidly recorded by social science research over the last 35 years: compared to children in other households, children born to and raised by two natural parents are less likely to be poor, criminal, educationally-underachieving, alcohol-abusing, drug-abusing, mentally ill, physically abused (by a long way!), suicidal and, if female, a teenage pregnancy. This has imposed hige costs to children, adults and the state. The protection of children is the key reason why marriage is, of its very essence, a multi-discriminatory institution (a married man discriminates positively towards his family in terms of his time, money, emotional energy, sexual exclusivity, and against a sexual relationship with siblings, polyamorous relationships, same-sex relationships, minors and those who are mentally retarded; all of these - think about it - are there to primarily protect the interests of children).
The authors deal with objections to the conjugal view (what about infertile couples? what about objections to inter-racial marriage in the past?) skilfully and convincingly. They also touch on the threat to religious liberty and show how intolerant, misguided and just plain wrong is the tendency to describe all opponents of gay marriage as homophobes (as they point out, even homoerotic societies such as Ancient Greece never contemplated gay marriage. I have one reservation: they say (on page 11) that they reject the argument that marriage should be conjugal because it always has been. Yet if an institution has key features which have existed near-universally, this is powerful evidence that it is highly functional to a society. It should also be noted that this book is written by Americans and that examples from elsewhere are very thin on the ground.
All in all, this is an outstanding, logical and evidence-based defence of conjugal marriage, which should prove required reading for all who are interested in the future of our most important institution, but especially for those in countires (such as Ireland) which have not (yet) legally adopted the revisionist view.
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
JP Dixon
5.0 out of 5 stars
Well worth reading by those on both sides of the debate over marriage.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 7, 2013Verified Purchase
In all the sound and fury over the gay marriage debate one question is not seriously examined. What exactly is marriage? It is so part of our culture that we take it for granted. This book defends the traditional definition of marriage in exclusively secular terms and makes it clear that it can be defended without resorting to attacks on homosexuality or religious appeals. That will challenge some on the pro-gay marriage side who reflexively equate support for traditional marriage with homophobia. Those who oppose redefining marriage will find themselves challenged by the rigour of the case and its secularity. Many opponents seem to be acting from the gut and come dangerously close to not defending marriage as much as being anti-gay.
The authors argue that marriage as traditionally defined is a wider social good in a way that other relationships are not. This is not to denigrate these but to make the point about the particular role of traditional marriage. Inevitably this view rests on marriage between one man and one woman for life as the ideal arrangement for raising children. This may stick in the throats of some, but is an argument which they need to address with more than chants about "change" and "progress".
Also, if marriage is purely about love and a vaguely understood "commitment" why stop at same sex marriage? What about polyamory? The authors also point out the work of noted scholars who support same-sex marriage as a way of fundamentally reworking the family rather than making the existing institution of marriage more "inclusive". Is this widely known and understood?
So, whatever your point of view this is an important work and one which I hope will contribute to a more honest and mature debate on the fundamental subject, with all the emotion stripped away; what is marriage, why do we have it and what is its future?
The authors argue that marriage as traditionally defined is a wider social good in a way that other relationships are not. This is not to denigrate these but to make the point about the particular role of traditional marriage. Inevitably this view rests on marriage between one man and one woman for life as the ideal arrangement for raising children. This may stick in the throats of some, but is an argument which they need to address with more than chants about "change" and "progress".
Also, if marriage is purely about love and a vaguely understood "commitment" why stop at same sex marriage? What about polyamory? The authors also point out the work of noted scholars who support same-sex marriage as a way of fundamentally reworking the family rather than making the existing institution of marriage more "inclusive". Is this widely known and understood?
So, whatever your point of view this is an important work and one which I hope will contribute to a more honest and mature debate on the fundamental subject, with all the emotion stripped away; what is marriage, why do we have it and what is its future?
11 people found this helpful
Report abuse
movamental
5.0 out of 5 stars
All men must read this
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on December 29, 2014Verified Purchase
What i have read thus far, it is on point. This book is not coming from a religious perspective, which is a deliberate effort of the authors and i commend them for it. The authors could successfully use a faith based on the one God perspective, but in their effort not to annoy the fence sitters, the atheists and the thrill seeking pagans, they use logic/truth. Marriage is not about a government certificate of control, but between a man and woman is the bedrock of society. Worth the read.
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
The Wanderer
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good book but the examples are geared for an american audience
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 17, 2013Verified Purchase
This is a good book and it lays out some very good legal philosophy regarding the nature of marriage, it touches briefly on the metaphysical dimension but then the authors are political philosophers so this is to be expected.
Two weaknesses from my point of view were the overly american examples, baseball was used at one point, and the glancing blow it gave to cartesian dualism, but overall and given the authors specialty this is not a major drawback. I would recommend this book to philosophers and non-philosophers alike.
Two weaknesses from my point of view were the overly american examples, baseball was used at one point, and the glancing blow it gave to cartesian dualism, but overall and given the authors specialty this is not a major drawback. I would recommend this book to philosophers and non-philosophers alike.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Narwhal85
5.0 out of 5 stars
A masterpiece on marriage
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on March 28, 2013Verified Purchase
What is Marriage? is well argued, well researched and persuasive. With all the discussion in the West on redefining marriage there remains a fundamental question left unanswered, what is marriage? The authors provide a robust definition and provide a cogent case for their definition. I think I can confidently claim that whether you are for traditional marriage or for a change you will find within these pages a challenge to either change your views or to prop them up with further support. Buy it and lend your copy out.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Pages with related products.
See and discover other items: robert ryan













