- File Size: 3394 KB
- Print Length: 213 pages
- Page Numbers Source ISBN: 1138212911
- Simultaneous Device Usage: Up to 4 simultaneous devices, per publisher limits
- Publisher: Routledge; 1 edition (October 17, 2016)
- Publication Date: October 17, 2016
- Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
- Language: English
- ASIN: B01M1XZ4CU
- Text-to-Speech:
Enabled
- Word Wise: Enabled
- Lending: Not Enabled
-
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#998,289 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
- #1352 in Censorship & Politics
- #791 in Education Philosophy & Social Aspects
- #160 in Censorship (Kindle Store)
What’s Happened To The University?: A sociological exploration of its infantilisation 1st Edition, Kindle Edition
|
Frank Furedi
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
Are you an author?
Learn about Author Central
|
Learn more
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Universities used to promote social and personal transformation. They now confirm a socio-political demand for conformity: they will provide a safe space in which you can endorse and celebrate your already established boiler-plate identity, as victim of historical injustice. On top of this, universities have now reneged on any responsibility for changing the conditions which in turn has caused social injustice. Furedi gives a brilliant analysis of how, sociologically, we have permitted this to happen. It should be compulsory reading for anyone interested in what has happened to the university." - Thomas Docherty, Professor of English and of Comparative Literature, University of Warwick
"Frank Furedi offers a lucid challenge to what he sees as limitations to free speech in the academy. Passionate and richly illustrated it provides an important starting point for debate." - Mary Evans, LSE Centennial Professor, London School of Economics
"This is a remarkably brave, much needed, timely, and challenging analysis of the current state of higher education. Furedi reflects upon the infantilisation of the university from the growth of paternalism towards students, the increasing presence of intolerance, the curtailing of academic freedom to the less obvious demands for ‘learning outcomes’. Those with an invested interest in these processes will not like this book: all the better! It demands to be widely read." - Sandra Walklate, Eleanor Rathbone Chair of Sociology, University of Liverpool
"Mr. Furedi, an emeritus professor at England’s University of Kent, argues that the ethos prevailing at many universities on both sides of the Atlantic is the culmination of an infantilizing paternalism that has defined education and child-rearing in recent decades. It is a pedagogy that from the earliest ages values, above all else, self-esteem, maximum risk avoidance and continuous emotional validation and affirmation. (Check your child’s trophy case.) Helicopter parents and teachers act as though "fragility and vulnerability are the defining characteristics of personhood."" - Excerpt from the article 'Free Thought Under Siege', by Daniel Shuchman, appearing in the Wall Street Journal, Nov. 2016.
"What’s Happened to the University is a tour de force, offering the most insightful explanation I have seen of higher education’s abandonment of its fiduciary duty to foster intellectual freedom and the pursuit of truth. Furedi’s focus on the cultural, political, and psychological forces leading to "infantilization" captures the heart of the matter." - Donald A. Downs, University of Wisconsin-Madison
About the Author
Product detailsWould you like to tell us about a lower price? |
Customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The essential point is that once upon a time we went to college to be tested—to be tested on our ideas, on our knowledge, on our ability to meet challenges and expand our horizons. Now students come to college to be validated. The ethos of the elementary school has been transferred to higher education. Students want the ‘adult’ equivalent of bluebird stickers affixed to their papers; they want pats on the head; they want encouragement. They want their ‘victimhood’ to be acknowledged, respected and rewarded. They have spent most of their lives under adult supervision and they are comfortable with administrators and counselors telling them what to do and how to think. They want safety; they fear discomfort. They do not value academic freedom or freedom of speech if those bedrock principles impinge on their world in ways that upset them. And they are the judges of what upsets them. Perceived slights may be completely unintentional, but if they are ‘perceived’ they are absolutely real.
Talcott Parsons described this elementary and secondary school model as “permissive therapeutics”; permissive therapeutics are now the operating pedagogical principles in higher education. There are two basic problems with this: a) they destroy the content, quality and integrity of higher education; and b) they are inordinately expensive to implement. Hence (in part), the absurd costs of contemporary higher education—armies of tutors, handholders, counselors and ‘diversity industry’ non-teaching academic staff are hired. They displace tenure track faculty (and bury the faculty in rules, processes and shibboleths). The instructional budget shrinks; tenure track faculty are replaced by contingent faculty without job security and the possibilities of controlling and intimidating the faculty multiply.
One simple example: a teacher calls on a student in class. The student perceives that s/he is being oppressed and complains. Another student perceives that s/he is being oppressed because s/he is not being called on. Both students are ‘uncomfortable’. Some may be overly sensitive; others may be unprepared for class and don’t want to be embarrassed; they know that if they play the ‘discomfort’ card they can go to class without having to read the material. Since the teachers can be reported to the political correctness and identity politics apparatchiks or savaged on anonymous student evaluations they take the path of least resistance and stop calling on students in class. ‘Comfort’ is restored; the students learn less and do not need to be accountable.
We now pay much more for ‘higher education’ and get much less. How did we arrive at this insanity? The short answer is that College of Education pedagogy has been extended to the world of putative adults. Activists in support of identity politics and faculty obsessed with race/class/gender victimology embraced the template. Corporate administrators anxious to please students so that they could collect their tuition and featherbed their bureaucracies were only too happy to join in the effort.
For the longer explanation, read this important book. One caveat: the book is styled with very small type and 40+ lines per page of text. Someone failed to proofread it, because it is filled with errors—misspellings, omitted words, and so on. The book is still very readable; social science jargon is kept to a minimum. The errors do not impact intelligibility but they are annoying.
Bottom line: a very important book.
Top international reviews
I concur with points being raised by the author, albeit I am on Chapter 6. It is a timely and very important piece, however do not allow the typos to put you off.
You've read the top international reviews
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
There's a problem loading this menu right now.










