Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Buy Used
$9.00
FREE Shipping on orders over $25.
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Solid used copy with visible wear.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

What's Liberal About the Liberal Arts?: Classroom Politics and "Bias" in Higher Education Hardcover – September 11, 2006

3.2 out of 5 stars 9 customer reviews

See all 4 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Price
New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$4.24 $0.01

Wake Up America: The Nine Virtues That Made Our Nation Great--and Why We Need Them More Than Ever by Eric Bolling
"Wake Up America" by Eric Bolling
Wake Up America is a much-needed call to arms for America’s citizens to preserve and protect our country's present and future. Learn more
click to open popover

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Bérubé, a Penn State literature and cultural studies professor, doesn't deny that college campuses are "teeming with liberal faculty" in this circuitous retort to what he sees as an intensification over the last five years of conservative complaints about liberal "bias" in academe. Rather, the self-described progressive postmodernist (editor of The Aesthetics of Cultural Studies) vies with cultural conservatives for the position of "lonely voice in the wilderness": while conservatives feel embattled in the university setting, academics, Bérubé says, are beleaguered in the country at large, where the right wing dominates all three branches of government and much of mainstream media. Universities are necessarily liberal, Bérubé asserts, as independent intellectual inquiry is fundamental to democracy. Moreover, the authoritarian right's outraged objections to "anti-American" campuses are a testament to their "disbelief that liberalism still survives." Bérubé's points about the ascendance of the right will be well taken by progressives, but the level of meandering detail he devotes to his teaching experience and his own literature curriculum may feel less relevant to nonacademic readers
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

From Booklist

Berube, a literature professor who admits to being a liberal progressive but maintains that he is politically noncommittal in the classroom, explores the charges by the Right that America's universities are biased toward liberalism. Drawing on 20 years of teaching and recent troubling developments in academe, Berube answers conservative critics and, more fascinating, explores the dilemma of liberal teachers in encouraging open debate but opposing racism, sexism, and homophobia. Debunking stories of professors failing students who don't toe the liberal party line, Berube maintains that the real threat to open debate is conservatives seeking to squelch liberal ideas in the name of "fairness" to more conservative perspectives. He cites academic bills of rights in some states that are aimed at discouraging challenges to conservative ideas on creationism and other topics. Threats of lawsuits by students claiming that their views have been ridiculed are having a chilling effect on classroom dialogue. Berube offers a passionate appeal for preserving the best notions of the liberal-arts education, a discipline that promotes critical thinking and independent inquiry. Vanessa Bush
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

New York Times best sellers
Browse the New York Times best sellers in popular categories like Fiction, Nonfiction, Picture Books and more. See more

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 288 pages
  • Publisher: W. W. Norton; First edition. edition (September 11, 2006)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0393060373
  • ISBN-13: 978-0393060379
  • Product Dimensions: 9.3 x 6.4 x 1.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 3.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (9 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,656,874 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Hardcover
In her Amazon review of this book below, Ms. Malter chooses to dismiss its entire contents based on her own personally negative view of the Middle East Studies Department at Columbia U (which see portrays in so monolithic a manner as to defy reason). This reductive approach to what is ultimately an impressively sane and balanced consideration of the type of liberalism prevalent in most American humanities departments (as a member of one of them, I have to say that the descriptions are dead-on), seeks simply to shut down the extraordinarily useful and humane conversation that Berube is seeking to begin here. It therefore demonstrates precisely the sort of anti-intellectualism that Berube argues is threatening both the American university and democracy more generally. In a sense, Ms. Malter has proven Berube's point. I can't speak positively enough about this book, and I hope especially that it will be engaged by leftist and rightist extremists and not only the classic-liberal readers that Berube has tended to attract.
4 Comments 24 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
The first eighty or so pages of this book are well-worth reading. The author takes on many of the specific claims about the "liberal bias" in education and refutes a few of the attempts to paint colleges as dangerous places for students to "come out" as a conservative.

Then the author moves into a discussion of some of the books he teaches, but the literary criticism is only tangentially related to the topic of classroom politics or bias, or, for that matter, liberalism.

The material on postmodernism is interesting and has a political element, but would be better placed in a primer on pomo.

Finally, the last chapter is a ringing endorsement of the sort of liberalism that has been out of fashion since the Kennedy era but that is nonetheless safe. Thus pages applauding Social Security (the folks down at the local book club will nod and smile) but no comments about affirmative action, US military adventures, gay marriage or other more current issues. Their absence is conspicuous. The far left is dismissed as either a collection of lunatics or Bush fans in disguise (voting for Nader being equivalent to voting for Bush). And, of course, none of this has a thing to do with the liberal arts or charges of bias.
7 Comments 9 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
The book is at times well-focused and cogent. In other places, it is chatty, diffuse, and self-indulgent. This book would be twice as good if it were one third shorter.
Comment One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
On page 96, Professor Berube makes this false and terribly unfair comment: "Canadian professor J. Phillippe Rushton's belief in the genetic superiority of the white race." Rushton is the author of a scientific monograph, "Race, Evolution and Behavior: A Life History Perspective", in which he discusses what is know about race differences and how they evolved, and offers a theory to explain the observed pattern of physical and behavior differences observed in whites, blacks, and Orientals.

What's wrong with Berube's characterization? First, the race differences Rushton writes about are a matter of scientific observation, not "belief". Second, he writes number of separate physical and behavioral traits, not of overall superiority or inferiority of any one race. Third, according to Rushton's analysis, whites are uniformly intermediate between blacks and Orientals! [See Table 1, on page 19 of the Abridged edition, searchable on this website.] It would take a great deal of special pleading and tortuous logic to extract a "genetic superiority of the white race" out of this data. Needless to say, Rushton does not attempt this task.

Liberals like Berube may find repellant the empirical fact that significant race differences exist in such matters as intelligence and brain size, but it is not kosher to shoot the messengers who report such news.
1 Comment 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
This is a strange book, a hodgepodge of topics, a little bit of autobiography, a little bit

of worry that the secret police will come to take away his son, some philosophical debating,

assorted academic anecdotes, and even some words about the apparent topic of the book.

The author is also strange. I have never before noticed an author post replies to reviews.

This is not necessarily bad, but it is unusual. Perhaps this review will draw a comment, also.

Perhaps it will stop the comments, by pointing them out.

The title is "What's Liberal About the Liberal Arts?" and the question mark is part of the title.

The subtitle is "Classroom Politics and 'Bias' in Higher Education" and the inner quotes are

part of the subtitle. I've seen lots of attacks on liberal educators, some of which seemed

justified and some of which turned out to be false. The quoted "bias" seemed to indicate a

debunking or counterattack, so I was immediately interested.

Chapter one is personal. The author had an outspoken conservative student in a class. He is shown

as disruptive. The author treated him fairly. In chapter two, the author debunks three claims

of liberal academic misbehavior. So far he has me convinced there is at least one fair liberal

professor and no more than 99.44% of the conservative complaints are justified. Well, it's a

start. Maybe there will be more.

The author is a skilled writer and rhetorician. Here and through most of the book he lines up

a few facts or beliefs as if the next line was going to be "therefore <conservative person/idea

is <wrong/bad/evil/whatever" but he does not write that.
Read more ›
5 Comments 14 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse