Buy new:
$19.00$19.00
FREE delivery: Monday, April 3 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $7.19
Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
92% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
81% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
86% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
What's the Matter with Kansas?: How Conservatives Won the Heart of America Paperback – May 1, 2005
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
Enhance your purchase
With a New Afterword by the Author
The New York Times bestseller, praised as "hilariously funny . . . the only way to understand why so many Americans have decided to vote against their own economic and political interests" -(Molly Ivins)
Hailed as "dazzlingly insightful and wonderfully sardonic" (Chicago Tribune), "very funny and very painful" (San Francisco Chronicle), and "in a different league from most political books" (The New York Observer), What's the Matter with Kansas? unravels the great political mystery of our day: Why do so many Americans vote against their economic and social interests? With his acclaimed wit and acuity, Thomas Frank answers the riddle by examining his home state, Kansas-a place once famous for its radicalism that now ranks among the nation's most eager participants in the culture wars. Charting what he calls the "thirty-year backlash"-the popular revolt against a supposedly liberal establishment-Frank reveals how conservatism, once a marker of class privilege, became the creed of millions of ordinary Americans.
A brilliant analysis-and funny to boot-What's the Matter with Kansas? is a vivid portrait of an upside-down world where blue-collar patriots recite the Pledge while they strangle their life chances; where small farmers cast their votes for a Wall Street order that will eventually push them off their land; and where a group of frat boys, lawyers, and CEOs has managed to convince the country that it speaks on behalf of the People.
- Print length322 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateMay 1, 2005
- Dimensions5.64 x 0.89 x 8.31 inches
- ISBN-109780805077742
- ISBN-13978-0805077742
Frequently bought together

- +
- +
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
From The New Yorker
Copyright © 2005 The New Yorker
Review
“The best political book of the year.” ―Nicholas Kristof, The New York Times
“Frank is a formidable controversialist-imagine Michael Moore with a trained brain and an intellectual conscience.” ―George F. Will, The Washington Post
“Brilliant.” ―Barbara Ehrenreich, The New York Times
“Mr. Frank re-injects economic-class issues into the debate with sardonic vehemence.” ―Jerome Weeks, The Dallas Morning News
“A searing piece of work . . . one of the most important political writings in years.” ―The Boston Globe
“Dazzlingly insightful and wonderfully sardonic . . . Frank has made much sense of the world in this book.” ―Chicago Tribune
“Impassioned, compelling . . . Frank's books mark him as one of the most insightful thinkers of the twenty-first century, four years into it.” ―Houston Chronicle
“Very funny and very painful . . . Add another literary gold star after Thomas Frank's name.” ―San Francisco Chronicle
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : 080507774X
- Publisher : Picador; First edition (May 1, 2005)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 322 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9780805077742
- ISBN-13 : 978-0805077742
- Item Weight : 10.4 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.64 x 0.89 x 8.31 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #95,630 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #257 in Political Conservatism & Liberalism
- #419 in U.S. Political Science
- #923 in U.S. State & Local History
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Questions frequently asked Thomas Frank.
- Kansas, really?
- Aren’t you one of these liberals that you’re always scolding?
- Is it true that President Trump uses “The Wrecking Crew” as a field manual?
- “The Baffler” – what’s that all about?
- You don’t look particularly cool. Why do you write about coolness?
- Why aren’t you, like, a college professor or something?
- Why all these books about politics? I mean, that’s hardly the right subject for a culture critic or whatever it is you call yourself.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviewed in the United States on July 6, 2015
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Frank wants to explain a dilemma. On the one hand, the Republican Party has embraced a set of policies and enacted a wide range of legislation that hurts most Americans economically and provides a benefit to only a very small segment of the American population. Statistics provided by the Fed and the IRS have documented over the past twenty-five years a sharp and dramatic concentration of wealth in the upper one percent of the population. For instance, in 1979 20% of the national wealth as defined by the Federal Reserve was concentrated in the top 1%, while in 1997 39% was, and with the three rounds of Bush tax cuts focused on primarily benefiting the wealth and our largest corporations, it is not hard to imagine that that figure might have climbed to 45% or higher. And yet Americans continue to vote for members of a party that seems to be dedicated to intensifying that trend (a large number in the GOP are now talking about a national sales tax and eliminating the income tax-as opposed to Europe, which has a value added tax but also a tax on the wealthy, which is not what is being suggested here-which would dramatically increase this shift of wealth away from the middle class). How is this possible?
By examining the political scene in his home state of Kansas, Frank is able to show how Republicans have managed to attract a vast segment of the American population by fomenting culture wars, by fixating millions on issues that resonate deeply such as abortion, gun rights, gay rights, defense of marriage amendments, nonexistent religious persecution (as seen in the absurd GOP letters mailed in Arkansas, West Virginia, and elsewhere that if Kerry were elected the Bible would be banned), and similar issues. Despite the fact that the GOP actually passes no legislation related to any of these cultural concerns, and despite the fact that what the party actually does is pass a great deal of legislation that continues the concentration of the national wealth in the hands of a conservative economic elite, these cultural wedge issues have been deployed repeatedly to get people across America to vote against their own best interests.
For me the most striking pages in the book come near the end when Frank talks about the problems that the Democrats have caused themselves by ascribing more and more to the policies set forth by the Democratic Leadership Council (the DLC). These Democrats have attempted to move the Democratic Party further and further from its base in ordinary workers, and more and more to a pro-business stance. The result has been that on economic matters, the Democrats look more and more like Republicans. As Michael Lind in his insightful book UP FROM CONSERVATIVISM has pointed out, Americans tend to be conservative on social and cultural issues, and liberal on economic matters. But Frank points out that by moving to a conservative position on economic issues, they have lost their one great point of contact with the American masses. Millions of Americans, faced with a Democratic party that no longer has anything unique to offer them on economic issues, have shifted sharply over to a Republican party that at least speaks to their cultural and social concerns. In short, the DLC is a recipe for disaster. As leading Democrats who espouse DLC principals like Joe Lieberman and Hillary Clinton continue to push an economic agenda built around the concerns of business rather than working class Americans, we can expect Republicans to continue to prosper in the future. Frank argues, and I think he is correct, that it will only be when the Democrats recover their populist economic roots that they will reverse the trend of the past two elections. I hope that Frank's next book is devoted entirely to this issue. The Democrats need a wake up call, and while this book partially achieves that by explaining the success of the Republican Party, I think we also need one that explains more explicitly the failures of the Democrats.
This is a must-read book for everyone interested in politics in America, whether from the left or right. Though Frank is a leftist, those on the right will gain additional insight into why their side has achieved much of their success, while those on the other side can start understanding why so much of America votes to further policies that are so detrimental to their own well being.
The theme of the book, of course, is that nasty, reactionary Republicans have stolen the minds and affections of blue-collar or non-wealthy Kansans by tricking them into believing and championing sordid, evil social values like anti-abortion and anti-immorality crusades and favoring tax breaks for corporations that according to Frank are impoverishing them. In Frank's (in)famous phrase, they vote against their own economic interests.
Like most leftists Frank is long on invective and accusations and short on facts and statistics. In fact, most of his assertions have been thoroughly rebutted by an assortment of people including Princton professor Larry Bartels who published a review in the Princeton Quarterly called "What's The Matter With What's The Matter With Kansas?" In his review, Bartels dissects Frank's claims of who and why Kansans shifted their votes to Republicans after a somewhat radical previous century.
Frank simply can't understand (or claims not to understand) why "poor" Kansans would vote against their economic interests (a phrase repeated many times by libs and leftists since the publication of Frank's book in 2003.) Frank believes that the impoverished lower-middle class Kansans have cut their own financial throats by championing social issues instead of economic ones. He relates the story of past populist Kansans who championed the rights of the poor people and inveighed against the rich plutocrats on Wall Street and other places where nasty, evil, rich plutocrats congregate. Frank is bewildered by the fact that these poor Kansas conservatives are not raging, leftist radicals like himself.
Frank also bashes modern coarse culture (one of his few truthful observations) and the Clinton administration which he claims subverted the progressive message of the Democrat Party for a cozy alliance with rich interests in order to get votes. Frank thinks the Democrat Party went off the rails by trying to cuddle up to big business and triangulate. In Frank's mind, the Dem Party should be Karl Marx's party I guess, although he never owns up to his particular political philosophy. But you can easily draw your own conclusions reading chapter after chapter of Frank's corporation and capitalism bashing.
What Frank makes clear very early on is his hatred of capitalism which he regards as little more than a legalized criminal activity. In one early section Frank depicts some "evil" corporations and hustlers who supposedly raped honest Kansans and took off with a lot of their dough leaving them stranded. Horrors, money and crooks! Will wonders never cease? Of course there's never been any financial malfeasance by crooks in other countries or especially Marxist countries. Certainly not capitalism-free countries like North Korea where the citizens don't have to worry about corporate thieves. Because there isn't any money to be stolen in those countries.
Frank never bothers to ask the question as to how wealth is created in the first place. Because he obviously doesn't know how it's created. Maybe Franks, like a lot of libs and leftists, wealth just is. Yes, there was this big pile of loot, and evil Republicans got there before anybody else, took the lions share, and now won't share that ill-gotten swag with anybody else. Yeah, that's probably what happened. (I've actually read an article by a lib columnist, Barbara Reynolds, in a Twin Cities newspapers some years ago who came up with that crazy explanation. She stated the wealthy whites came to America "and took all the good jobs." It was a while before I could continue reading her little screed because I was laughing too hard. Maybe Frank was channeling the dizzy lib columnist. Because facts are in short supply in this book.)
And by Frank's "reasoning" people should never put their money in banks or other financial institutions because occasionally someone embezzles money. Or even charities. You know, like the ex-mayor of San Diego who just got caught taking several million dollars intended for a public charity. The ex-Democrat mayor. Of course the motto of Dems seems to be "your money is my money", so what's wrong with stealing a few million?
Frank also expends a lot energy roiling up hatred for the evil, nasty, wealthy Kansas Republicans (mods) of his youth who according to Frank snubbed him and made his life miserable. A despicable lot all of them according to Frank. Which is contrary to my experience when attending school. The biggest hoodlums I knew from school and most likely to make your life miserable were mostly kids from lower-middle class or poor homes who wanted to prove how tough they were. The few rich kids I knew were very nice people. But maybe they were Democrats instead of icky Republicans. Darn, I wish I knew that at the time.
Frank divides the Kansas Republicans into two groups: the mods and the cons. The mods (moderates) are those snooty, rich Pubbies who live in fashionable homes in the larger populated areas of Kansas, while the cons (conservatives) are the ones who watch FOX News, listen to conservative talk radio, and vote strictly on false, social issues completely ignoring economic issues. Of course these social issues like abortion and homosexual rights are issues devised by the evil Republican Party overseers who like impoverishing people just for funs sake. The evil Republican overseers want to keep the party faithful ignorant and focused on phony social issues the better to fleece them and the country.
Frank actually believes that conservative Kansans (and by extension all American conservatives) completely ignore economic issues in order to promote anti-progressive ideas and campaigns. Among a number of other of Frank's silly conclusions, that one is thoroughly destroyed by Professor Bartels. In fact Bartel's research shows that economic reasons are the main reasons conservative Kansans vote for Republicans. Social or moral reasons are secondary or tertiary. Another of Frank's assertions is that lower-middle class or working class Kansans have shifted their votes dramatically from Democrats to Republicans in the last thirty years strictly due to social issues. False says Prof. Bartels.
I found especially amusing Frank's claim that Republicans ignore economic issues when most of the conservative literature I read concerns economic issues. But don't believe me. Go to National Review on-line and read the articles for yourself. NRO publishes articles about many issues, but economic issues definitely trump all others. But maybe all those NRO readers and writers are simply nasty, wealthy mod Republicans who want to destroy America.
Another think that gets my goat about this book is the thoroughly false notion that all non-wealthy Republican voters (like me) are all Bible-thumping, minority-hating, war-mongering yahoos who don't know what's good for them. Of course, liberals have been saying that to the country since the sixties when I was a kid. Personally speaking, I'm an agnostic. And an ex-Democrat. I became a Dem when I was kid because my parent were strong Dems and I championed the Civil Rights movement of the sixties. When I was a teen I believed a lot of the stupid class-warfare stuff Frank believes now. I managed to overcome my dislike of capitalism by reading Solzhenitsyn in my early twenties and seeing how the opposite of capitalism, Marxism, is the real destroyer of wealth and society.
And if voting for Republicans leaves you impoverished, then Frank will have to explain why the two poorest ethnic groups in America (Blacks and Hispanics) are the strongest Democrat Party voting base. Blacks in particular have been brainwashed and taught to hate "racist" Republicans. So they've been voting for Democrats over 90% of the time for most of the recent presidential elections. Obama got 96% of the Black vote in the 2008 election. But their economic progress stalled or declined in Obama's four years. Obama is Franks's dream candidate...an out and out leftist/progressive who wants to grind conservative Republicans into the dust. And yet things got worse for his core constituency. The worst thing that ever happened to Black Americans since the sixties was hitching their star to the Democrat Party. The Dem policies implemented to help Black Americans couldn't have been more destructive if they'd been devised by the Klan.
I guess Frank is inherently unable to get a clue. He claims to have spent his youth as a conservative, Reagan-championing Republican. Until he found out what awful crooks capitalists are and how putrid the free-market system is. But Franks provides little or no economic data to support his crazed theories. He expects the reader to swallow whole his lies about ignorant, impoverished Kansas conservatives without looking up things for yourself. You'll find that Kansas conservatives (and Kansas in general) are doing alright. No thanks to people like Frank whose policies would truly make Kansas (and America) an economic wasteland.









