Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

When Law Goes Pop: The Vanishing Line between Law and Popular Culture 1st Edition

3.0 out of 5 stars 3 customer reviews
ISBN-13: 978-0226752921
ISBN-10: 0226752925
Why is ISBN important?
ISBN
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Buy used On clicking this link, a new layer will be open
$19.75 On clicking this link, a new layer will be open
Buy new On clicking this link, a new layer will be open
$33.00 On clicking this link, a new layer will be open
More Buying Choices
19 New from $7.48 27 Used from $1.47
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Prime Student Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


Up to 50% off select Non-Fiction books
Featured titles are up to 50% off for a limited time. See all titles
$33.00 FREE Shipping. Usually ships within 1 to 2 months. Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
click to open popover

Frequently Bought Together

  • When Law Goes Pop: The Vanishing Line between Law and Popular Culture
  • +
  • The Happy Lawyer: Making a Good Life in the Law
Total price: $47.19
Buy the selected items together

Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com Review

Remember the national fascination with the televised Menendez brothers' trial? What about the episode of Law & Order in which the aristocratic Upper East Sider may or may not have pushed his wife into a coma? Oh, wait, that was the Claus von Bülow story--which was also made into a movie. This type of reciprocity of law and popular culture is of concern to NYU law professor Richard Sherwin. To Sherwin, the mingling of law and entertainment flattens discourse, occludes real understanding of the law and legal practices, and threatens democracy insofar as the public loses faith in "real law" when it does not conform to the law as seen at home, in popular culture, and on TV.

Sherwin analyzes the cultural and cognitive models at play in the telling and hearing of legal narratives and critiques the tools of meaning-making by looking closely at specific well-known cases and their outcomes. He also examines the use of public relations consultants to spin and provide a seductive coherence to their clients' cases (think of the "impromptu" press conferences on the courthouse steps). When Law Goes Pop is a rich and erudite critique of law as popular culture. It is a call to be alert to the deleterious effects of what another scholar, Doug Reed, has called "the juridico-entertainment complex," and a timely reminder of what is at stake. --J.R. --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.

From Publishers Weekly

In a brilliant analysis of the jury system in our media-saturated age, Sherwin, a former New York City prosecutor and a professor at New York Law School, expertly examines the role of vivid storytelling in successful litigation, while cautioning against misusing that opportunity to seduce or "illicitly persuade" juries. Citing the media circus surrounding the notorious trials of the Menendez brothers and O.J. Simpson, he argues convincingly that an attorney has a professional obligation to function as a brake on popular passions and prejudices in court, not to feed into the tendency to inflame the audience with techniques that the media uses. Otherwise, lawyers risk undermining society's continued trust in the jury system. The seriousness of that risk impels Sherwin to address the complex interpenetration of media, law and culture in our time to such dazzling effect that this book stands not only as a guide for practicing and aspiring attorneys but also to those interested in current challenges to social stability. In a chapter dedicated to the role of Errol Morris's docudrama, The Thin Blue Line, in the release of Randall Dale Adams after he had served 12 years of a murder sentence in Texas, Sherwin illustrates the methods Morris used to question the case and bring new evidence forward. At the same time, he shows the potential for manipulation that Morris's techniques dangle in front of an unethical advocate. As Sherwin moves from a discussion of the storytelling nuances in such films as Lost Highway, Music of Chance and Martin Scorsese's remake of Cape Fear to a plea for attorneys to take responsibility for their court arguments, to make ethical choices in how they present material to juries and to maintain trust in the jury system, discerning readers will see a truly integrative intelligence at work, proposing possible solutions rather than simply bemoaning problems. (June)
Copyright 2000 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

New York Times best sellers
Browse the New York Times best sellers in popular categories like Fiction, Nonfiction, Picture Books and more. See more

Product Details

  • Paperback: 332 pages
  • Publisher: University of Chicago Press; 1 edition (May 2002)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0226752925
  • ISBN-13: 978-0226752921
  • Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.7 x 9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 15.2 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,257,993 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

5 star
0%
4 star
0%
3 star
100%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See all 3 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Hardcover
Professor Richard Sherwin concludes his book with an explicit statement of his thesis, the usual format for mysteries but not for academic studies. If you are a reader who prefers to know where the case studies are headed before reading the case studies, you might do well to read the last chapter first. I hesitate to advise readers to do so, however. Many of Professor Sherwin's analyses of one or a few movies are rich with insight and will inform, enlighten, and even entertain. In contrast, his theoretical contribution (affirmative postmodern theory) is too skimpy to justify a place in my library. Thus, I recommend that readers locate this book in a local library and consult it regarding legal matters in popular culture.
I recommend Mr. Sherwin's analysis of Errol Morris's "The Thin Blue Line." I shall never watch or show that classic without thinking about Professor Sherwin?s gloss thereon. I disagree with his comparison of the older and younger versions of "Cape Fear." I suspected that each of his characterizations of one film might just as easily be asserted about the other, but he held my interest and impelled me to watch both versions again. Mr. Sherwin appears to believe that films of David Lynch and Quentin Tarantino tell us much about theories or institutions of law and law enforcement. I was not convinced but found the argument interesting.
I recommend highly Sherwin's comparison of the "jigsaw puzzle" closing of Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden in the first Simpson trial to the heroic saga narratives favored by Johnnie Cochran and Gerry Spence. Sherwin is especially good at exposing Mr. Spence's skill. Mr. Spence appears to be the shrewd country lawyer whom he plays on television.
Read more ›
Comment 5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover
Law professor Richard Sherwin argues that the law has fallen prey to the representational form of the mass media, television particularly. The law, in its most noted form, the criminal trial, finds that it must present itself like a television drama in order to conduct its business.
This wouldn't be so bad, argues Sherwin, if the law's ability to curb popular passions, objectively search for "truth," maintain the public's faith in the system, and win the battle between legal truth and the public desire for closure all weren't hamstrung in the process.
In these days when most Americans frame their view of the world based on what they see on television, Sherwin's subject is extremely important. The question is whether this book is worth the effort it will require of many readers. And early on, it's hard to know if it is worth all the trouble.
Mainly, Sherwin couches his central argument in the opaque language of literary criticism and legalese. Perhaps this is done for the sake of greater precision. Nevertheless, as a consequence, all but legal and literary scholars will find themselves back on their heels when reading this dense work. Sherwin does, thankfully, buttress the core of his assertions with illustrations from popular trials, movies and television, which allows many readers to better follow his line of reasoning while getting their feet back under them. Still, the case Sherwin's arguing has been argued at least as well elsewhere and with less technical language.
Tough sledding aside, if you enjoy popular culture and hold the law in high regard, then ready a thick dictionary, find a firm chair, get in good light and read Sherwin's book. Only your stamina will determine whether the outcome was really worth the work.
Comment 9 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
I had to take a Law and Pop Culture class this summer. This book is alright but didn't explain how to analysis a pop culture artifact like it talks about. He just talks about different cases and that is it.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse