Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Got a mobile device?
You’ve got a Kindle.
You’ve got a Kindle.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Enter your mobile phone or email address
Send link
Processing your request...
By pressing "Send link," you agree to Amazon's Conditions of Use.
You consent to receive an automated text message from or on behalf of Amazon about the Kindle App at your mobile number above. Consent is not a condition of any purchase. Message & data rates may apply.
Flip to back Flip to front
Where to Invade Next Hardcover – February 28, 2008
by
Stephen Elliott
(Editor),
The Editors of McSweeney's
(Editor)
Enhance your purchase
On February 27, 2007, during an interview with Amy Goodman, General Wesley Clark described a 2002 Pentagon conversation in which he was told that America was planning to invade Iraq. From the same source, he learned of a classified memorandum listing six other countries the United States intended to "take out" over the next five years. Most of us will never get to see this memo, but we know it exists.
Now, editor Stephen Elliott, authors Jason Roberts, Eric Martin, and Andrew Altschul, and a team of twenty researchers have re-created this document for the present day. Where to Invade Next contains seven essays, 100 percent factual, laying out in stark detail how the arguments for invasion could be made. A biting look at the role of propaganda in foreign policy, this book outlines exactly how our leaders might make the case for war.
Now, editor Stephen Elliott, authors Jason Roberts, Eric Martin, and Andrew Altschul, and a team of twenty researchers have re-created this document for the present day. Where to Invade Next contains seven essays, 100 percent factual, laying out in stark detail how the arguments for invasion could be made. A biting look at the role of propaganda in foreign policy, this book outlines exactly how our leaders might make the case for war.
- Print length96 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherMcSweeney's
- Publication dateFebruary 28, 2008
- Dimensions6.25 x 0.75 x 9 inches
- ISBN-101932416935
- ISBN-13978-1932416930
Inspire a love of reading with Amazon Book Box for Kids
Discover delightful children's books with Amazon Book Box, a subscription that delivers new books every 1, 2, or 3 months — new Amazon Book Box Prime customers receive 15% off your first box. Sign up now
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Special offer: 3 months free
For a limited-time, get the best audio entertainment with Audible Premium Plus, free for 3 months. Get this deal from Audible
Product details
- Publisher : McSweeney's (February 28, 2008)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 96 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1932416935
- ISBN-13 : 978-1932416930
- Item Weight : 12.3 ounces
- Dimensions : 6.25 x 0.75 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #4,937,426 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #15,718 in American Literature Criticism
- #35,354 in Literary Criticism & Theory
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.1 out of 5 stars
4.1 out of 5
7 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on March 24, 2008
I picked this up at the International Spy Museum in Washington D.C. Basically what the book entails are snapshots of seven different countries (Iran, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Syria, Sudan,and North Korea) that consist of government, why they are a threat to the United States, and how they can be eliminated as a threat. While very informative, I very seriously doubt it is to be taken seriously. At 82 pages, it's a very quick read.
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on April 18, 2008
Here's what I think:
In satire, the writer professes to approve the very thing he or she wishes to attack. The satirist dos so by means of irony: there is discordance between what is said and what is meant. The thing about Where To Invade Next is that it's so convincing in its approval that it hard to tell what is actually meant. There are none of the usual clues to reassure the reader of the writer's true intent. When you read The Onion, you know that they don't really mean anything they say. Where To Invade Next does not have this literary wink. There is no reassuring message that says "We are actually opposed to invasion. This is just a joke."
This is a sort of raw satire, satire stripped of its disclaimers, and it landed on me like a bomb. For an evening I was plunged into the mind of a player operating at the highest levels of world politics. It is a mind burning with terrifying paranoia, genuine care twisted into hate.
This is a different kind of satire. It does not merely mock abusive and violent persons, it takes you inside their minds. In this way it is very effective. Unless, of course, McSweeney's really has gone over to the neo-cons. You just can't tell.
In satire, the writer professes to approve the very thing he or she wishes to attack. The satirist dos so by means of irony: there is discordance between what is said and what is meant. The thing about Where To Invade Next is that it's so convincing in its approval that it hard to tell what is actually meant. There are none of the usual clues to reassure the reader of the writer's true intent. When you read The Onion, you know that they don't really mean anything they say. Where To Invade Next does not have this literary wink. There is no reassuring message that says "We are actually opposed to invasion. This is just a joke."
This is a sort of raw satire, satire stripped of its disclaimers, and it landed on me like a bomb. For an evening I was plunged into the mind of a player operating at the highest levels of world politics. It is a mind burning with terrifying paranoia, genuine care twisted into hate.
This is a different kind of satire. It does not merely mock abusive and violent persons, it takes you inside their minds. In this way it is very effective. Unless, of course, McSweeney's really has gone over to the neo-cons. You just can't tell.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on February 12, 2016
Michael Moore's 'Where to Invade Next' is the most important documentary I have ever seen. It so vividly covers the social advances once part of our nation, adopted by others and leaving us far behind most of the rest of the western world.
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 28, 2012
This is supposed to be satire?
It fails miserably. Satire is supposed to have clues. Just because you give your book an irreverent title doesn't mean someone will go "oh, okay, they're just joking".
This book and these authors, instead of creating "raw satire" (so it's satire that you literally cannot tell it's satire so it's raw? lolwut?), outline outstanding reasons to invade these seven other countries.
Their research and the clear, concise way they lay it out is terrific and they do me excellent case for regime change. They've convinced me we should go to war with these countries.
So if they set out for satire, they're miserable, abysmal failures.
It fails miserably. Satire is supposed to have clues. Just because you give your book an irreverent title doesn't mean someone will go "oh, okay, they're just joking".
This book and these authors, instead of creating "raw satire" (so it's satire that you literally cannot tell it's satire so it's raw? lolwut?), outline outstanding reasons to invade these seven other countries.
Their research and the clear, concise way they lay it out is terrific and they do me excellent case for regime change. They've convinced me we should go to war with these countries.
So if they set out for satire, they're miserable, abysmal failures.
Reviewed in the United States on October 17, 2012
This "book" was slanderous, insensitive, and I could hear the chanting of "USA!" "USA!" at the end of each page. A hate book for uninformed people. I am curious at how it got into any kind of circulation. We still condemn acts of extremism these days don't we? Encouraging invasion and airstrikes (where to strike) to weaken islamic leaders and render them "impotent"? Each brown country was either "built on Anti-Americanism" or had an "unstable" dictator. Translation of "madrassa" is NOT an establishment of Islamic religious schools, it actually just translates to school. Finishing with "Now its time for the United States to step forward and secure this region" ... I can't go on... It was so pathetic. One for the paper recycle bin.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Mh
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent and perfect condition
Reviewed in Canada on June 6, 2020Verified Purchase
The best seller
