Which Path to Persia?: Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran 1st Edition, Kindle Edition
Learn more
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
You’ve got a Kindle.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Enter your mobile phone or email address
By pressing "Send link," you agree to Amazon's Conditions of Use.
You consent to receive an automated text message from or on behalf of Amazon about the Kindle App at your mobile number above. Consent is not a condition of any purchase. Message & data rates may apply.
- Highlight, take notes, and search in the book
Crafting a new policy toward Iran is a complicated, uncertain, and perilous challenge. Since it is an extremely complex society, with an opaque political system, it is no wonder that the United States has not yet figured out the puzzle that is Iran. With the clock ticking on Iran's pursuit of nuclear capabilities, solving this puzzle is more urgent than ever.
In Which Path to Persia? a group of experts with the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at Brookings lays out the courses of action available to the United States. What are the benefits and drawbacks of airstrikes? Can engagement be successful? Is regime change possible? In answering such questions, the authors do not argue for one approach over another. Instead, they present the details of the policies so that readers can understand the complexity of the challenge and decide for themselves which course the United States should take.
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. --This text refers to the paperback edition.
Review
"In this straightforward and jargon-free book, six American commentators and policy analysts offer a menu of options that Washington can pursue in its dealings with Tehran." Library Journal
"Pollack, research director for the Saban Center, collaborates with five colleagues for this timely and cogent analysis of U.S.-Iranian relations.... [they] carefully identify the potential missteps facing policymakers in this valuable-if wonky-primer." Publishers Weekly
--This text refers to the paperback edition.About the Author
Kenneth M. Pollack is director of research at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution. His books include A Path out of the Desert: A Grand Strategy for America in the Middle East (Random House). Daniel L. Byman is a senior fellow at the Saban Center, director of the Center for Peace and Security Studies at Georgetown University, and author of The Five Front War: The Better Way to Fight Global Jihad (Wiley). Martin Indyk is director of the Saban Center, former U.S. ambassador to Israel, and the author of Innocent Abroad: An Intimate Account of American Peace Diplomacy in the Middle East (Simon & Schuster). Suzanne Maloney is a senior fellow at the Saban Center. She has worked on the State Department's Policy Planning Staff where she provided analysis of Middle East issues. Michael E. O'Hanlon is a senior fellow in Foreign Policy Studies at Brookings and author of Budgeting for Hard Power (Brookings).
Saban Center Senior Fellow Bruce Riedel served as chairman of President Obama's Strategic Review of U.S. Policy toward Afghanistan and Pakistan and is the author of The Search for al Qaeda (Brookings).
Product details
- ASIN : B002S537QE
- Publisher : Brookings Institution Press; 1st edition (October 1, 2009)
- Publication date : October 1, 2009
- Language : English
- File size : 2271 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Enhanced typesetting : Not Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Not Enabled
- Print length : 241 pages
- Lending : Not Enabled
- Best Sellers Rank: #3,373,814 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #1,903 in International Diplomacy (Kindle Store)
- #3,231 in National & International Security (Kindle Store)
- #5,985 in International Diplomacy (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Four strategies are discussed: Diplomatic, Military, Coup (CIA etc.), and "Accepting the Unacceptable: Containment". The only "Unacceptable" option for them is Containment. The recommended approach is to use the Diplomatic approach to make Iran an unacceptable offer that the global public will think to be acceptable, and then to use a Coup if a way can be found to do that (and they think that maybe we can hire Iranian generals to cooperate in this), and otherwise to use Israel to do the invasion if possible; or else, as a last resort, for the U.S. to invade directly. Israel is a major focus, as being likely to perform the 'bad cop' role in a good-cop bad-cop routine, to get the job done while fooling enough of the public to believe that it should have been done (e.g., that Israel needed to do it in order to protect Israel from an attack). Another presumption is that propaganda needs to be a key part of the solution.
The authors don't say that America is right and Iran is wrong, but everything that they do say starts with that supposition or assumption, as something that's not even worth questioning, much less discussing at all.
I give the document one star because I can't give it none and because the document is what you'd expect individuals such as George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Jeb Bush, and other well-financed politicians, to consider, but which no decent and intelligent person would take seriously, at all. Its full title ought to be "Which Path To Regime-Change in Iran?" That would be a more honest and informative title for this book.
An excellent article about this book was published online on 2 March 2015: "Obama-Netanyahu 'Fallout' is Theater - Planned in 2009" and it conveys in more depth the nature of this document.
The authors are Kenneth M. Pollack, former Director on the National Security Council, Senior Research Professor at the National Defense University, and Persian Gulf CIA analyst; Daniel L Byman, Director of the Center for Peace and Security Studies and Associate Professor at Georgetown University, other credentials include the RAND corporation and the 9/11 Commission; Martin Indyk, former Ambassador to Israel, former Assistant Sec. of State, former member of the National Security Council, is noted as being an expert on the Arab-Israeli conflict; Suzanne Maloney, former employee on the State Department's Policy Planning Staff where she was an analyst and made recommendations on Iran, Iraq, and the Middle East, former Middle East adviser at ExxonMobil Corporation, as well as the Task Force on U.S-Iran Relations at the Council on Foreign Relations; Michael E. O' Hanlon, Director of Research for the 21st Century Defense Initiative and Senior Author of the Brookings Iraq Index, former defense budget analyst; Bruce Riedel, former Chairman of Obama's Strategic Review of U.S. Policy toward Afghanistan and Pakistan, 30 year CIA veteran, retired, with postings in Europe and the Middle East, former National Security Council, Dept. Ass. Sec. of Defense, and senior adviser for NATO (WPtP? p.xii -xiii) This information is useful, just so the reader knows exactly what interests are contemplating this issue. We can deduce from here that: the NSC, CIA, RAND, ExxonMobil, CFR, State Dept., Israel, NATO, the White House, and two academics have interests, finances, and know how, enough to form policy recommendations to the U.S. and possibly Israel. (Pollack was accused of acting as an informant in an Israeli espionage ring.)
Buy this if you are dedicated, but otherwise it is available online. I gave it 3 stars because of its detail about the strategies.
[...]
