I bought this book because I knew very little about Whittaker Chambers or Alger Hiss, and being an interested student of the Cold War, decided to buy it. It was not disappointing, rather a good page turner. The author's development of the life story of Chambers was fascinating, as was his rise in academia and the media. Also, the Life of Alger Hiss was brought out carefully.
The author took great care to present Mr. Chambers as he was...warts and all, so that no might say anything was covered up. The same can be said of Hiss, as he is portrayed.
There is one part of this book that stood out as a beacon to me: On page 434, the author writes :What sets the Hiss case apart, then and now, was not its mystery but the passionate belief of so many that Hiss must be innocent no matter what the evidence". I believe that a lot of the turmoil in this country today can be seen in that statement.
I highly recommend this book to any serious reader of history. Thank you.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
Whittaker Chambers: A Biography (Modern Library) Paperback – April 28, 1998
by
Sam Tanenhaus
(Author)
|
Sam Tanenhaus
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$0.00
|
Free with your Audible trial | |
|
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$28.13 | — |
-
Print length656 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherModern Library
-
Publication dateApril 28, 1998
-
Dimensions6.14 x 1.4 x 9.21 inches
-
ISBN-100375751459
-
ISBN-13978-0375751455
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
From the Inside Flap
Whittaker Chambers is the first biography of this complex and enigmatic figure. Drawing on dozens of interviews and on materials from forty archives in the United States and abroad--including still-classified KGB dossiers--Tanenhaus traces the remarkable journey that led Chambers from a sleepy Long Island village to center stage in America's greatest political trial and then, in his last years, to a unique role as the godfather of post-war conservatism. This biography is rich in startling new information about Chambers's days as New York's "hottest literary Bolshevik"; his years as a Communist agent and then defector, hunted by the KGB; his conversion to Quakerism; his secret sexual turmoil; his turbulent decade at Time magazine, where he rose from the obscurity of the book-review page to transform the magazine into an oracle of apocalyptic anti-Communism. But all this was a prelude to the memorable events that began in August 1948, when Chambers testified against Alger Hiss in the spy case that changed America. Whittaker Chambers goes far beyond all previous accounts of the Hiss case, re-creating its improbably twists and turns, and disentangling the motives that propelled a vivid cast of characters in unpredictable directions.
A rare conjunction of exacting scholarship and narrative art, Whittaker Chambers is a vivid tapestry of 20th century history.
A rare conjunction of exacting scholarship and narrative art, Whittaker Chambers is a vivid tapestry of 20th century history.
About the Author
Sam Tanenhaus was the editor of both The New York Times Book Review and the Week in Review section of The New York Times. From 1999 to 2004 he was a contributing editor at Vanity Fair, where he wrote often on politics. His work has also appeared in The New York Times Magazine, The New Republic, The New York Review of Books, and many other publications. Tanenhaus’s book Whittaker Chambers: A Biography won the Los Angeles Times Book Prize and was a finalist for both the National Book Award and the Pulitzer Prize.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
1
Vivian
Jay Vivian Chambers was born on April 1, 1901—April Fool’s Day, as he liked to point out. He was named for his father, Jay Chambers, a graphic artist at the New York World. The boy’s middle name, chosen by his mother, Laha, dismayed her husband and also its bearer, called Vivian all through childhood. Jay, however, refused to utter the hated syllables and so inflicted on his son the nickname Beadle, evidently a comment on his demeanor, watchful, grave, and severe.
In 1903, after a second son, Richard, was born, Laha decided the young family should move from their apartment, near Prospect Park, Brooklyn, and resettle in the suburbs. She loathed New York City and missed the open spaces she had known in her own childhood, spent in Wisconsin.
Jay resisted the move. A city boy from Philadelphia, he enjoyed Brooklyn, its brownstones and tree-lined pavements. He liked too the easy access, by elevated subway, to his Manhattan office and the theaters and galleries he frequented. Also, he had recently lost his job at the World to a news camera, and although he soon found new employment—with a design studio on Union Square that did book covers and magazine illustrations—the venture was in its infancy and its prospects uncertain.
But Laha, insistent and strong-willed, prevailed over Jay, who was passive and retiring, and in 1904 the family moved to Lynbrook, a pretty coastal village on Long Island’s South Shore, twenty miles east of Manhattan, with a population of less than two thousand. The year the Chamberses moved there, Lynbrook got its first water mains and its first brick building, M. L. Levinson’s Hardware Store.
The family took up residence on Earle Avenue, an unpaved street lined with silver maples.4 The house, formerly a postal coach stop, was a sturdy clapboard structure, two stories plus a slope-ceilinged attic. It sat back from the street on a swatch of lawn. Though in need of repair, 228 Earle Avenue gave every appearance of being a suitable place for the young family to achieve stability and for Laha to regain the “paradise” of upper-middle-class respectability she had known in childhood.
Laha’s father, Charles Whittaker, a Scottish immigrant born in 1840, had immigrated to Milwaukee in 1845, with his parents and twelve siblings. In 1869, a language teacher and principal in Milwaukee’s public schools, he married Mary Blanchard, a fetching sixteen-year-old with wide-set eyes and a broad forehead. She came from Wauwatosa, a grouping of frame houses set among oak and maple groves, near the banks of the Menomonee River. The descendant of Huguenots, Mary spoke fluent French. Many years later she taught Vivian the language, using a convent primer.
Even as he advanced his pedagogical career, Charles pursued other interests. He was the founding publisher of Milwaukee’s first city magazine and registered several patents. But he suffered stinging reversals. In 1878, when Laha was seven, her father was forced to auction off the substantial house he had built only two years before near Milwaukee’s exclusive “Yankee Hill,” overlooking Lake Michigan. In 1880 Charles and Mary Whittaker departed Milwaukee, tracing the southern sweep of the Great Lake to Chicago. Laha, their only child, stayed behind at the Home School, a private academy in Racine. In Chicago Charles manufactured and sold brass castings—and again went bankrupt, losing everything just in time to foreclose on Laha’s long-held dream of attending an elite college in the East.
She went instead on the stage, touring the Midwest and Far West with stock companies. After six or seven hard years she gave it up and joined her parents, who had moved again, this time to New York. They were now operating a lunch counter on West Twenty-third Street, in Manhattan, and living above it in tiny, cramped rooms. Laha came to cook and waitress and help care for her father, afflicted with cancer of the tongue. Charles Whittaker died in 1899, at age fifty-nine. He left his widow and daughter a twelve-dollar-a-month Civil War pension, fifty dollars’ worth of kitchen utensils, and a couple of hundred books.
By then Laha had met Jay Chambers, a customer at the eatery. He was short, dark, plump, and boyish—and five years Laha’s junior. A recent graduate of Philadelphia’s Drexel Institute of Art, Science, and Industry, he had come up to New York to work as an illustrator at the World, a job he obtained through his father, James Chambers, a well-known journalist. After a two-year courtship Jay and Laha were married in January 1900 over the strenuous objections of the groom’s mother, Dora, who judged Laha unworthy of her only son. In her indignation Laha taught her sons that their father came from inferior stock, deficient in “breeding.” The truth was that Jay had reached below his station to rescue her, a penniless waitress nearing thirty with a history on the provincial stage.
These distinctions meant little to Jay. He cared only for art. A product of the 1890s, the mauve decade, he quietly deplored middle-class standards of respectability. While Laha strove to establish the family in Lynbrook, Jay stood to the side, mocking. He regarded the suburbs and their inhabitants with droll disdain. He once bet a friend he could walk to Lynbrook’s center, the “Five Corners,” clad only in his pajamas and not attract a single comment from his complacent neighbors. He won the bet. At home he raised the gaudy pennant of aestheticism. He wore a linen “samurai robe,” planted a large replica of the Venus de Milo on the living room floor, and mounted on its walls a permanent exhibition of his bookplates (prized by collectors) and whimsical Christmas cards (prized by his friends).
It amused Jay to adorn the house, but he steadfastly refused to fix it, despite its poor condition. The yellow exterior coat had been bleached of color by the salty ocean winds. The shutters, a sickly green, nagged at their rotted hinges. The interior was even worse. One day a portion of the dining room ceiling dropped. Laha covered the hole with cheesecloth. Vivian and Richard watched transfixed as mice nested in its bulges, their scampering feet leaving “twinkling” impressions. Another project was the wallpaper, aged and blistered. Jay would not replace it. Laha wrapped up her few valuables and took them to Manhattan pawnbrokers, returning with enough cash to hire a team of workmen. When the job was finished, Jay said nothing. Laha’s sobs “were dreadful to hear.”
But she was not deterred. With or without Jay’s encouragement, she was determined to carry her mission forward, to conquer Lynbrook in the name of her sons, anchoring them in the community. She was elected president of the local mothers’ club and was on the committee that founded and staffed the village’s first library. She also secured entrance into the “exclusive” Friday club, limited to thirty-five women, most of them “wives of leading figures,” with newcomers drawn from a waiting list. Laha’s dramatic “monologues” and “readings” were a staple of the club’s afternoon entertainments.
Yet the Chamberses never quite blended in. Neighbors found them “clever” and “brilliant” but faintly disreputable. The house, cluttered with Jay’s artwork and the mismatching “antiques” Laha rummaged up, had the appearance of a seedy museum. And its curators were themselves odd: the plump, aloof artist who rode the commuter train in virtual silence; the actressy wife with her stagey voice and florid gestures, her talk of important “friends” in the theater. Locally, they were referred to as “the French Family.”
Vivian early realized his family was “peculiar.” More painful still, he watched his parents’ marriage crumble. Laha craved affection from all those around her. Jay would not—or could not—give it. The couple enacted rituals of devotion, but the children were not fooled. Each evening Laha ceremonially positioned Vivian and Richard in the front hallway so they could plant a kiss on their father’s cheek when he returned from work. Jay, stooping to receive his welcome, wore a farcical smile. At the dinner table, lavishly spread with “high sauces and cheeses, lobsters, oysters and hot curries,” Jay ate in greedy silence, speaking only to reprove his sons when an elbow sneaked indecorously onto the table. Supper concluded, Jay slipped upstairs to his room, donned his robe, and busied himself with his many hobbies—his bookplates, his elaborate puppet theater, the tiny matchbox houses he built, precise in every detail, and his vast collection of “penny toys.” His sons, forbidden to touch their father’s baubles, grew to loathe them. “An artist must be pampered or he would not be an artist,” says a character in one of Vivian Chambers’s first short stories, written when he was seventeen.
With Jay in retreat, mother and sons gathered in the parlor. Cradling Richard in her arms, Laha rocked in a Windsor chair and sang lullabies. Vivian, creeping amid the shadows cast by the oil lamps, shrank from the desperate melancholia in his mother’s voice, meant, it seemed, for some unseen audience.
Soon Jay was delaying his nightly return from the city. Laha and the boys waited at the table, weakly reassuring one another he would be on the next train, while the sumptuous sauces congealed. Late at night Vivian sat up in his cot listening for his father’s return—the sound of the front door opening and then the tread of feet mounting the stairs. Hours passed in which he heard only Richard’s breathing in the cot beside him and the lisp of “the surf pouring without pause on the beaches.” The Atlantic felt especially near on winter nights “when the cold air brought it in clearly. I was frightened, for it seemed about to pound away the land. It was the sound of inhuman force—the first I knew.” When at last the knob turned downstairs, often past midnight, the boy surrendered himself to sleep, except on those nights when his parents’ voices erupted in fierce quarrels. In the morning, with Jay again out of the house, Laha assailed him in monologues, while she paced the living room floor. Vivian and Richard listened raptly, though ordered to stay in the kitchen, the warmest room in the house, heated by a “big, black, nickel-trimmed coal range.” Once, when Laha emerged, Vivian noticed “black and red marks on her throat.”
Then one evening, probably in 1908, Jay did not return. He had moved back to Brooklyn and its bachelor pleasures. He remained in hiding for at least a year. His sons did not see him. Laha “never attacked my father to us children but she was able to convey to us that we shouldn’t like him.”
It was many years before Vivian realized the origins of her frustration and rage. Jay Chambers was bisexual. But even as a child Vivian had grasped that his father’s life was divided into “separate compartments.” So would the son’s be, with far greater complexity.
Vivian
Jay Vivian Chambers was born on April 1, 1901—April Fool’s Day, as he liked to point out. He was named for his father, Jay Chambers, a graphic artist at the New York World. The boy’s middle name, chosen by his mother, Laha, dismayed her husband and also its bearer, called Vivian all through childhood. Jay, however, refused to utter the hated syllables and so inflicted on his son the nickname Beadle, evidently a comment on his demeanor, watchful, grave, and severe.
In 1903, after a second son, Richard, was born, Laha decided the young family should move from their apartment, near Prospect Park, Brooklyn, and resettle in the suburbs. She loathed New York City and missed the open spaces she had known in her own childhood, spent in Wisconsin.
Jay resisted the move. A city boy from Philadelphia, he enjoyed Brooklyn, its brownstones and tree-lined pavements. He liked too the easy access, by elevated subway, to his Manhattan office and the theaters and galleries he frequented. Also, he had recently lost his job at the World to a news camera, and although he soon found new employment—with a design studio on Union Square that did book covers and magazine illustrations—the venture was in its infancy and its prospects uncertain.
But Laha, insistent and strong-willed, prevailed over Jay, who was passive and retiring, and in 1904 the family moved to Lynbrook, a pretty coastal village on Long Island’s South Shore, twenty miles east of Manhattan, with a population of less than two thousand. The year the Chamberses moved there, Lynbrook got its first water mains and its first brick building, M. L. Levinson’s Hardware Store.
The family took up residence on Earle Avenue, an unpaved street lined with silver maples.4 The house, formerly a postal coach stop, was a sturdy clapboard structure, two stories plus a slope-ceilinged attic. It sat back from the street on a swatch of lawn. Though in need of repair, 228 Earle Avenue gave every appearance of being a suitable place for the young family to achieve stability and for Laha to regain the “paradise” of upper-middle-class respectability she had known in childhood.
Laha’s father, Charles Whittaker, a Scottish immigrant born in 1840, had immigrated to Milwaukee in 1845, with his parents and twelve siblings. In 1869, a language teacher and principal in Milwaukee’s public schools, he married Mary Blanchard, a fetching sixteen-year-old with wide-set eyes and a broad forehead. She came from Wauwatosa, a grouping of frame houses set among oak and maple groves, near the banks of the Menomonee River. The descendant of Huguenots, Mary spoke fluent French. Many years later she taught Vivian the language, using a convent primer.
Even as he advanced his pedagogical career, Charles pursued other interests. He was the founding publisher of Milwaukee’s first city magazine and registered several patents. But he suffered stinging reversals. In 1878, when Laha was seven, her father was forced to auction off the substantial house he had built only two years before near Milwaukee’s exclusive “Yankee Hill,” overlooking Lake Michigan. In 1880 Charles and Mary Whittaker departed Milwaukee, tracing the southern sweep of the Great Lake to Chicago. Laha, their only child, stayed behind at the Home School, a private academy in Racine. In Chicago Charles manufactured and sold brass castings—and again went bankrupt, losing everything just in time to foreclose on Laha’s long-held dream of attending an elite college in the East.
She went instead on the stage, touring the Midwest and Far West with stock companies. After six or seven hard years she gave it up and joined her parents, who had moved again, this time to New York. They were now operating a lunch counter on West Twenty-third Street, in Manhattan, and living above it in tiny, cramped rooms. Laha came to cook and waitress and help care for her father, afflicted with cancer of the tongue. Charles Whittaker died in 1899, at age fifty-nine. He left his widow and daughter a twelve-dollar-a-month Civil War pension, fifty dollars’ worth of kitchen utensils, and a couple of hundred books.
By then Laha had met Jay Chambers, a customer at the eatery. He was short, dark, plump, and boyish—and five years Laha’s junior. A recent graduate of Philadelphia’s Drexel Institute of Art, Science, and Industry, he had come up to New York to work as an illustrator at the World, a job he obtained through his father, James Chambers, a well-known journalist. After a two-year courtship Jay and Laha were married in January 1900 over the strenuous objections of the groom’s mother, Dora, who judged Laha unworthy of her only son. In her indignation Laha taught her sons that their father came from inferior stock, deficient in “breeding.” The truth was that Jay had reached below his station to rescue her, a penniless waitress nearing thirty with a history on the provincial stage.
These distinctions meant little to Jay. He cared only for art. A product of the 1890s, the mauve decade, he quietly deplored middle-class standards of respectability. While Laha strove to establish the family in Lynbrook, Jay stood to the side, mocking. He regarded the suburbs and their inhabitants with droll disdain. He once bet a friend he could walk to Lynbrook’s center, the “Five Corners,” clad only in his pajamas and not attract a single comment from his complacent neighbors. He won the bet. At home he raised the gaudy pennant of aestheticism. He wore a linen “samurai robe,” planted a large replica of the Venus de Milo on the living room floor, and mounted on its walls a permanent exhibition of his bookplates (prized by collectors) and whimsical Christmas cards (prized by his friends).
It amused Jay to adorn the house, but he steadfastly refused to fix it, despite its poor condition. The yellow exterior coat had been bleached of color by the salty ocean winds. The shutters, a sickly green, nagged at their rotted hinges. The interior was even worse. One day a portion of the dining room ceiling dropped. Laha covered the hole with cheesecloth. Vivian and Richard watched transfixed as mice nested in its bulges, their scampering feet leaving “twinkling” impressions. Another project was the wallpaper, aged and blistered. Jay would not replace it. Laha wrapped up her few valuables and took them to Manhattan pawnbrokers, returning with enough cash to hire a team of workmen. When the job was finished, Jay said nothing. Laha’s sobs “were dreadful to hear.”
But she was not deterred. With or without Jay’s encouragement, she was determined to carry her mission forward, to conquer Lynbrook in the name of her sons, anchoring them in the community. She was elected president of the local mothers’ club and was on the committee that founded and staffed the village’s first library. She also secured entrance into the “exclusive” Friday club, limited to thirty-five women, most of them “wives of leading figures,” with newcomers drawn from a waiting list. Laha’s dramatic “monologues” and “readings” were a staple of the club’s afternoon entertainments.
Yet the Chamberses never quite blended in. Neighbors found them “clever” and “brilliant” but faintly disreputable. The house, cluttered with Jay’s artwork and the mismatching “antiques” Laha rummaged up, had the appearance of a seedy museum. And its curators were themselves odd: the plump, aloof artist who rode the commuter train in virtual silence; the actressy wife with her stagey voice and florid gestures, her talk of important “friends” in the theater. Locally, they were referred to as “the French Family.”
Vivian early realized his family was “peculiar.” More painful still, he watched his parents’ marriage crumble. Laha craved affection from all those around her. Jay would not—or could not—give it. The couple enacted rituals of devotion, but the children were not fooled. Each evening Laha ceremonially positioned Vivian and Richard in the front hallway so they could plant a kiss on their father’s cheek when he returned from work. Jay, stooping to receive his welcome, wore a farcical smile. At the dinner table, lavishly spread with “high sauces and cheeses, lobsters, oysters and hot curries,” Jay ate in greedy silence, speaking only to reprove his sons when an elbow sneaked indecorously onto the table. Supper concluded, Jay slipped upstairs to his room, donned his robe, and busied himself with his many hobbies—his bookplates, his elaborate puppet theater, the tiny matchbox houses he built, precise in every detail, and his vast collection of “penny toys.” His sons, forbidden to touch their father’s baubles, grew to loathe them. “An artist must be pampered or he would not be an artist,” says a character in one of Vivian Chambers’s first short stories, written when he was seventeen.
With Jay in retreat, mother and sons gathered in the parlor. Cradling Richard in her arms, Laha rocked in a Windsor chair and sang lullabies. Vivian, creeping amid the shadows cast by the oil lamps, shrank from the desperate melancholia in his mother’s voice, meant, it seemed, for some unseen audience.
Soon Jay was delaying his nightly return from the city. Laha and the boys waited at the table, weakly reassuring one another he would be on the next train, while the sumptuous sauces congealed. Late at night Vivian sat up in his cot listening for his father’s return—the sound of the front door opening and then the tread of feet mounting the stairs. Hours passed in which he heard only Richard’s breathing in the cot beside him and the lisp of “the surf pouring without pause on the beaches.” The Atlantic felt especially near on winter nights “when the cold air brought it in clearly. I was frightened, for it seemed about to pound away the land. It was the sound of inhuman force—the first I knew.” When at last the knob turned downstairs, often past midnight, the boy surrendered himself to sleep, except on those nights when his parents’ voices erupted in fierce quarrels. In the morning, with Jay again out of the house, Laha assailed him in monologues, while she paced the living room floor. Vivian and Richard listened raptly, though ordered to stay in the kitchen, the warmest room in the house, heated by a “big, black, nickel-trimmed coal range.” Once, when Laha emerged, Vivian noticed “black and red marks on her throat.”
Then one evening, probably in 1908, Jay did not return. He had moved back to Brooklyn and its bachelor pleasures. He remained in hiding for at least a year. His sons did not see him. Laha “never attacked my father to us children but she was able to convey to us that we shouldn’t like him.”
It was many years before Vivian realized the origins of her frustration and rage. Jay Chambers was bisexual. But even as a child Vivian had grasped that his father’s life was divided into “separate compartments.” So would the son’s be, with far greater complexity.
Start reading Whittaker Chambers: A Biography on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
The Sandman Act 1
The Sandman offers a dark, literary world of fantasy and horror. Listen free
Product details
- Publisher : Modern Library; Modern Library ed edition (April 28, 1998)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 656 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0375751459
- ISBN-13 : 978-0375751455
- Item Weight : 1.82 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.14 x 1.4 x 9.21 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#939,395 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #5,568 in Political Leader Biographies
- #13,298 in United States Biographies
- #36,401 in World History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.4 out of 5 stars
4.4 out of 5
66 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2020
Verified Purchase
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on June 15, 2017
Verified Purchase
Having read Whittaker Chambers' Witness, I am really impressed by the additional intricate detail Sam Tanenhaus gives in this tour de force of a biography. He really fills in the picture of Chambers' life and struggles. I'm very glad I got it.
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on October 18, 2020
Verified Purchase
After reading Perjury and Witness, I was surprised to learn additional information from this book. Tanenhaus provided an interesting insight into Chambers’ motivations. Definitely would recommend reading this book
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 31, 2003
Verified Purchase
Whittaker Chambers still arouses great passions. He accused Alger Hiss (and others) of spying for the Soviet Union and claims he knew that it was true because he was himself a communist spy and was Hiss's contact. But that story, while a part of this book, isn't the sole focus of this magnificent book. You can read the story of the trials of Alger Hiss, the testimony given, and more about that story in Allen Weinstein's very fine "Perjury" (a book which also arouses strong emotions).
The story of Chambers' life is also told by Chambers himself in his powerful autobiography "Witness". His life is a rather involved tale, and though the spy story is why Chambers became famous (infamous) it isn't reason why he is important. It is hard to recapture the vast esteem in which Stalin and the Soviet Union were held by the "literate" classes in American Society. But it doesn't take too much reading to peel back current revisionist writing that pretends the left rejected Stalin. It wasn't so. They loved Uncle Joe at the time of the Hiss case and made apologies for him even after the horrors of the Gulag were revealed. Even after Hiss' guilt has been proven beyond all but the most determined and self-blinded doubt, you can find those who insist on his innocence.
Whittaker Chambers was a gifted writer and a well regarded editor at Henry Luce's Time magazine. When he admitted his role in spying for the USSR and International Communism it represented the initial break in the dam. In "Witness", Chambers' autobiography, Chambers describes the agony he went through in realizing he had no choice but to take the course of trying to stop Hiss and thereby ruining his own life and irreparably harming his family.
Chambers was pessimistic about the West surviving a mortal struggle with Communism. He is often linked with McCarthy, but he thought McCarthy's recklessness more of a benefit to the other side.
"Witness" was an important best seller and is still in print. In it Chambers pours out his conscience and how his atheism turned to a deep faith and why that turned him against the movement he had embraced and had helped prosper through his gifts as a writer and editor.In this amazing book.
In this wonderful biography, Tanenhaus gives us context for all of this and so much more detail. The author also provides verification (and refutation) of claims made by and about Chambers. This book is beautifully written and carefully researched. The author shows great judgment and insight into all of the issues involved in this rich life at the extremes of human philosophy.
It is wrong to condemn this book and its author because of anger with Chambers. It is beyond all doubt that the thrust of Chambers' story was the truth. In my judgement, it is the truth in all but a few details. Tanenhaus is the reporter of fact and wishes that reality were different cannot change the facts. What is the old saying? You are entitled to your own interpretations, but not your own facts.
We owe Tanenhaus a great deal for putting such wonderful talent and years of hard work in giving us this outstanding book. This book was the subject of a great interview on Booknotes and is still available online. I am glad to see that this book is now part of the Modern Library series. It should be widely read.
The story of Chambers' life is also told by Chambers himself in his powerful autobiography "Witness". His life is a rather involved tale, and though the spy story is why Chambers became famous (infamous) it isn't reason why he is important. It is hard to recapture the vast esteem in which Stalin and the Soviet Union were held by the "literate" classes in American Society. But it doesn't take too much reading to peel back current revisionist writing that pretends the left rejected Stalin. It wasn't so. They loved Uncle Joe at the time of the Hiss case and made apologies for him even after the horrors of the Gulag were revealed. Even after Hiss' guilt has been proven beyond all but the most determined and self-blinded doubt, you can find those who insist on his innocence.
Whittaker Chambers was a gifted writer and a well regarded editor at Henry Luce's Time magazine. When he admitted his role in spying for the USSR and International Communism it represented the initial break in the dam. In "Witness", Chambers' autobiography, Chambers describes the agony he went through in realizing he had no choice but to take the course of trying to stop Hiss and thereby ruining his own life and irreparably harming his family.
Chambers was pessimistic about the West surviving a mortal struggle with Communism. He is often linked with McCarthy, but he thought McCarthy's recklessness more of a benefit to the other side.
"Witness" was an important best seller and is still in print. In it Chambers pours out his conscience and how his atheism turned to a deep faith and why that turned him against the movement he had embraced and had helped prosper through his gifts as a writer and editor.In this amazing book.
In this wonderful biography, Tanenhaus gives us context for all of this and so much more detail. The author also provides verification (and refutation) of claims made by and about Chambers. This book is beautifully written and carefully researched. The author shows great judgment and insight into all of the issues involved in this rich life at the extremes of human philosophy.
It is wrong to condemn this book and its author because of anger with Chambers. It is beyond all doubt that the thrust of Chambers' story was the truth. In my judgement, it is the truth in all but a few details. Tanenhaus is the reporter of fact and wishes that reality were different cannot change the facts. What is the old saying? You are entitled to your own interpretations, but not your own facts.
We owe Tanenhaus a great deal for putting such wonderful talent and years of hard work in giving us this outstanding book. This book was the subject of a great interview on Booknotes and is still available online. I am glad to see that this book is now part of the Modern Library series. It should be widely read.
23 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2011
Verified Purchase
Almost five stars; call it 4.75 stars. A deeply pleasurable read, thanks to Sam Tanenhaus' lean, propulsive prose. Rarely do I read a biography so full of facts that still refuses to get bogged down in them (even though this is of the genre that has the subject being born on the first page. Gimme context first!). A great grounding in a founding figure in postwar American anti-communism, one in which personality shines, if anything, even brighter than history. And Chambers' bizarre personality, and undeniable talents, are inextricable from his role.
My missing 0.25 stars are due only to lost opportunities. In my dreams, this book would have been a twice-as-fat dual biography of Alger Hiss and Whittaker Chambers. How they created themselves, how they met, how they diverged, how America judges them today. I can also imagine reading about how Chambers' closeted sexuality might have fit into his guilty repudiation of political subversion (or have I heard too many jokes about J. Edgar Hoover in drag?); Tanenhaus, however, devotes no more than a page to what seems like it should have been political dynamite in the 1950s. There also should have been a lot more photos. This was a highly visual book -- cinematic, really -- and I wanted to see Chambers' family, and the notorious pumpkin, and photostats of those incriminating scribbles. But the deep themes, such as Chambers' shifting messianism, his turning from one zealotry to another, how he inspired religious conservatives of my parents' generation to treat communism as not just America's enemy but God's, come through bright and clear.
I enjoyed reliving the ebb and flow of Americans' perception of the USSR and communism. Do kids today even know how infatuated intellectuals once were with Lenin and Stalin? How American communists had to pivot on their heels every time Uncle Joe did something like shake hands with Hitler, and then go to war against Hitler? How "Mission to Moscow" made it seem patriotic for Americans to work with Soviet communism? And how the postwar climate that tried to reckon with communism's ghastly reality slid into monotonous, mindless Red-baiting?
The best thing I can say about this biography is that it drives you straight to the Internet to look for the freshest take on the Venona intercepts and other clues about the extent of communist spying in that era. You want to read what Hiss's defenders insist upon. You want to ponder the difference between McCarthyism and reasonable national self-scrutiny. Can America still find room for people with subversive ideas (who may repent of them) if they refrain from subversive acts? How elastic can loyalty be?
My missing 0.25 stars are due only to lost opportunities. In my dreams, this book would have been a twice-as-fat dual biography of Alger Hiss and Whittaker Chambers. How they created themselves, how they met, how they diverged, how America judges them today. I can also imagine reading about how Chambers' closeted sexuality might have fit into his guilty repudiation of political subversion (or have I heard too many jokes about J. Edgar Hoover in drag?); Tanenhaus, however, devotes no more than a page to what seems like it should have been political dynamite in the 1950s. There also should have been a lot more photos. This was a highly visual book -- cinematic, really -- and I wanted to see Chambers' family, and the notorious pumpkin, and photostats of those incriminating scribbles. But the deep themes, such as Chambers' shifting messianism, his turning from one zealotry to another, how he inspired religious conservatives of my parents' generation to treat communism as not just America's enemy but God's, come through bright and clear.
I enjoyed reliving the ebb and flow of Americans' perception of the USSR and communism. Do kids today even know how infatuated intellectuals once were with Lenin and Stalin? How American communists had to pivot on their heels every time Uncle Joe did something like shake hands with Hitler, and then go to war against Hitler? How "Mission to Moscow" made it seem patriotic for Americans to work with Soviet communism? And how the postwar climate that tried to reckon with communism's ghastly reality slid into monotonous, mindless Red-baiting?
The best thing I can say about this biography is that it drives you straight to the Internet to look for the freshest take on the Venona intercepts and other clues about the extent of communist spying in that era. You want to read what Hiss's defenders insist upon. You want to ponder the difference between McCarthyism and reasonable national self-scrutiny. Can America still find room for people with subversive ideas (who may repent of them) if they refrain from subversive acts? How elastic can loyalty be?
8 people found this helpful
Report abuse







