
Amazon Prime Free Trial
FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button and confirm your Prime free trial.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited FREE Prime delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
-29% $18.46$18.46
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$1.98$1.98
$3.98 delivery March 5 - 6
Ships from: glenthebookseller Sold by: glenthebookseller
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Who Needs the Fed?: What Taylor Swift, Uber, and Robots Tell Us About Money, Credit, and Why We Should Abolish America's Central Bank Hardcover – May 24, 2016
Purchase options and add-ons
Their animus is reasonable, though, because the Fed’s most famous functiontargeting the Fed funds rateis totally backwards. John Tamny explains this backwardness in terms of a Taylor Swift concert followed by a ride home with Uber.
In modern times, he points out, the notion of credit has been perverted, so that most people believe it’s money and that the supply of it can therefore be increased. This false notion has aggrandized the Fed with power that it can’t possibly use wisely. The contrast between the grinding poverty of Baltimore and the abundance of Silicon Valley helps illustrate the problem, along with stories about Donald Trump, Robert Downey Jr., Jim Harbaugh (the Michigan football coach), and robots.
Who Needs the Fed? makes a sober case against the Federal Reserve by explaining what credit really is, and why the Fed’s existence is inimical to its creation. Readers will come away entertained, much more knowledgeable, and prepared to argue that the Fed is merely superfluous on its best days but perilous on its worst.
- Print length224 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherEncounter Books
- Publication dateMay 24, 2016
- Dimensions6.5 x 1 x 9.75 inches
- ISBN-109781594038310
- ISBN-13978-1594038310
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
"It's not far into John Tamny's Who Needs the Fed? that you realize all of your preconceived notions about the Federal Reserve need to be tossed out the window and forgotten. Instead, markets rule over opaque Fed pronouncements and analysis of the scribblings in monthly Fed Minutes. All investors should read this book."
Andy Kessler, author of Wall Street Meat and Eat People
"Like a blazing sun melting away a dangerously thick fog, this delightfully written, well-argued, and insightful book clears away disastrous misconceptions about money, credit, and the operations of the Federal Reserve. It will become one of the most enormouslyand positivelyinfluential treatises of our time."
Steve Forbes, Editor-in-Chief, Forbes Media
"In the best tradition of Henry Hazlitt and Robert Bartley, Tamny’s book offers a provocative yet principled new look at the role of credit in today’s economy. Properly equating credit” with an economy’s resources, Tamny systematically debunks the case for government or central bank efforts to increase credit."
David Resler, former chief economist, Nomura Securities
"Tamny is a brilliant and insightful writer whose provocative style will stretch your intellectual bandwidth and force you to see the world in a new way."
Anthony Scaramucci, host of Wall Street Week”
"John Tamny makes a strong case that the Fed never had as much influence as either its supporters hoped or its critics fearedand that what power it had in the past is today fast diminishing. In the process, he offers iconoclastic dismissals of popular macroeconomic constructs including money supply, the multiplier, the Phillips curve, the Laffer curve, banks, stimulus, and quantitative easing."
Cliff Asness, founding principal, AQR Capital Management
"John Tamny has written an easy-to-read and crucial-to-know overview of the Federal Reserve today, showing how the well-intentioned actions of central bankers in fact hurt our long-term economic potential. Who Needs the Fed? is an outstanding work of contrarian common sensea must read."
Tom Adams, former CEO of Rosetta Stone, CEO, Workaround LLC
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
On July 15, 2015, pop singer Taylor Swift performed for two straight nights at Nationals Park in Washington, D.C. Globally popular thanks to catchy songs that sometimes describe past romantic relationships with the famous, Swift is one of the most important acts in music.
To properly understand the power that Swift wields, it’s useful to first travel back a little less than a month before her arrival in D.C. It was then that Apple, the creator of the iPod, iPhone, and iPad, and the most valuable company by market capitalization in the world, announced its new Apple Music Streaming service.
Amid its rollout, and with the idea of luring customers away from popular competitors such as Pandora and Spotify, Apple offered a free, three-month trial. Enter Taylor Swift.
Understandably offended that Apple would presume to build a new business on the backs of the musicians who had created the music it was streaming, Swift struck back on Tumblr. Apple Music will not be paying writers, producers, or artists for those three months,” she wrote. I find it to be shocking, disappointing, and completely unlike this historically progressive and generous company.” She added: We don’t ask you for free iPhones. Please don’t ask us to provide you with our music for no compensation.” Swift backed up her words with a threat to withhold streaming rights to 1989, her mega-selling album released ahead of her 2015 tour.
Ever fearful of the bad PR that would blemish their new business line, Apple caved. Within hours the technology giant announced a reversal of its initial offer of free music to its early adapters. Apple promised to pay the artists for music streamed during the trial period.
So newsworthy was Swift’s response to the technology colossus that even the Wall Street Journal’s editorial page, the holy grail of public policy opinion, saw fit to comment with unrestrained awe. The page’s editors marveled at how Swift taught them a good lesson about intellectual property rightsand the danger of taking on a woman who knows what she’s worth.”
Swift also provided the world with a great lesson about credit. Economists frequently act as though cheap credit can be decreed through an announcement from the Fed of a low” interest rate. Swift’s pointedly open letter to Apple was a reminder that when it comes to credit there’s always and everywhere a buyer and a seller.
Apple learned in embarrassing fashion that which doesn’t seem to concern central bankers who are apparently less sensitive to ridicule. It’s one thing to declare the supply of a market good inexpensive from the commanding heights of government, but it’s the height of folly to assume those in possession of the market good will give it to buyers for nothing. Going back to Swift’s threat to withhold songs from 1989, eager buyers of Apple Music were going to experience 1989 scarcity” absent Apple’s reversal.
Importantly, the lessons provided by Swift don’t end there. Everything anyone could ever want to know about the economy and credit is there for the taking. Knowledge is simply a function of keenly observing the world around us.
Mentioned at this chapter’s outset was Swift’s two nights at Nationals Park. When filled to capacity, the cavernous stadium can hold over 40,000 attendees. Swift filled the stadium both nights. Among the attendees were my wife Kendall and some of her friends.
Reaching the baseball stadium proved rather easy, but upon the conclusion of Swift’s concert, there was a mad rush among attendees to get back home. While Washington, D.C.’s Metro serves Nationals Park, the lines to get on a train after the music stopped were endless. Word was that while the Metro would remain in service well past midnight, it would take several hours to transport Swift’s many fans home.
With the Metro an unrealistic option for concertgoers eager to get home before midnight, cabs were the second option. Unfortunately, the District of Columbia Taxi Commission regulates the fares that its cabdrivers can charge. While the Commission allows for slightly higher rates during periods of heavy demand, it can’t be stressed enough that the area around Nationals Park was a madhouse. The cab fares allowed by the Commission weren’t enough to lure drivers (sellers) into a clogged area full of desperate buyers.
Notable about the above is that it’s long been the norm in Washington, D.C. While cabs are similarly allowed to charge passengers extra during major snowstorms, as anyone who has lived in the District long enough knows well, the paltry increase in regulated rates by the Commission has rarely made it worth the time of drivers to be out on frequently perilous roads; as in when passengers (buyers) are most in need of drivers (sellers).
To state the obvious, prices that are set at artificially low levels to please buyers ignore that every transaction has a seller too. Indeed, artificially low prices also ignore the purpose of prices in the first place. In a free market, prices are regulation par excellence.
In a free market, prices reflect not just the desires of buyers and sellers, but also the weather, the news, what’s scheduled to happen next week, etc. Prices frequently fluctuate in a free market as a way of taking into account the ever-changing wants and needs of buyers and sellers in the dynamic world around us. Prices in the information-pregnant markets are the necessary tool to bring together the buyer and seller.
Government regulation of prices doesn’t always fail because people who toil in government are inherently bad. Instead, they fail because no bureaucrat, no matter how smart, can ever possibly divine a price that will reflect a constantly changing marketplace. That’s why government regulation of prices frequently leads to scarcity of supply when it’s needed most. It’s impossible for an individual or a collection of individuals to know even a fraction of the information that the market itself is constantly processing.
As if the proverbial cab-shortage fire on that steamy evening in July needed even more gasoline, it’s against the law for cabdrivers not in possession of a Washington, D.C. cabdriver’s medallion” to pick up passengers there. This rule is meant to protect the market for D.C. drivers already unable to charge what the market will bear, but for Taylor Swift fans it meant that getting home from her concert could potentially take hours.
So, despite a great concert enjoyed by her many fans, the evening had the potential to end badly thanks to the fatal conceit of government officials that they can successfully plan prices. Was a good evening ruined? No.
This story has a happy ending thanks to the intense entrepreneurialism that continues to define the American economy despite the barriers placed in front of this country’s dreamers. Specifically, the story ends well thanks to Uber. Founded in 2009 by Travis Kalanick, Uber’s business model is rooted in the correct understanding of commerce that there are no buyers without sellers, and vice versa.
Kalanick devised an app” that people around the world are adding to their smartphones in increasingly high numbers as evidenced by a private valuation of the San Francisco company that has risen to over $50 billion. Whereas it used to be that only the superrich had the means to ring a bell and summon a driver, thanks to Kalanick’s app anyone with a smartphone can tap the Uber button and have a driver arrive minutes later.
It’s said that the best way to predict how the poor and middle class will live in the future is to observe how the rich live in the present. Uber attests to the veracity of that statement. Once only the rich had drivers” at their beck-and-call, now we all do. So while the story of Uber could on its own be used to explain all any reader would ever need to know about economics, for the purposes of this chapter Uber’s genius will be used to explain credit.
When my wife and her friends realized that the lines for the Metro were too long, and cabs non-existent, they tapped their Uber apps. They were soon relieved to find Uber drivers were in the area and available within minutes. However, an Uber ride that night would cost its passengers 3.6 times the rate the company normally charged its riders. Did my wife and her friends turn off their phones in disgust and delete the app because Uber was charging them so much during a time of need? No, they rejoiced.
Despite Uber’s implementation of surge pricing,” they eagerly tapped on SET PICKUP LOCATION.” A driver was there to take them home within minutes. They happily paid $34.03 for transportation that on a normal night would have cost $9.45.
Uber’s surge pricing” is a worthy metaphor for interest rates. Uber gouged” my wife and her girlfriends that night, but they were only too happy to be gouged. The other option was to potentially wait hours in order to get home. They valued their time and a good night’s sleep far more than the $34.03 fare ultimately paid in order to arrive home at a reasonable hour.
From simplicity genius often springs, and it certainly has with regard to Uber. While the Federal Reserve employs thousands of well-credentialed economists with doctorates from the best schools in order to divine the interest rate it naively presumes to set, Kalanick’s app has ably revealed that the expensively dressed Fed truly has no clothes. It’s no reach to say the economists in the Fed’s employ have IQs that render them among the smartest people in the world. Yet, even the brightest people with the best computers and models at their disposal are not smarter than the market itself. Neither one genius nor a collection of geniuses could ever properly process the infinite decisions occurring in the marketplace every millisecond.
Kalanick’s intuitive understanding of the above truth is the basis of Uber’s immense global popularity. Fully aware of the tautology that there are only buyers as long as there are sellers, Uber ensures that its customers will be able to purchase transportation when they need it most by virtue of it placating the seller too. Surge pricing is the company’s way of luring drivers onto the road, and into the most nightmarish of conditions (rain, snow, after a Taylor Swift concert), so that it can serve its customers.
More to the point, Uber achieves an easy” supply of drivers for its customers not by decreeing their services cheap, but by doing the exact opposite. Pricing is once again the free market’s way of regulating supply of the resources that we deem credit. High prices - on New Year’s Eve pricing from Uber has been known to surge” over 9 times the normal fare - are at times what ensure the existence of a market good that is in high demand.
Contrasting this with the Fed, economists with highly impressive resumes regularly commentate and opine on when the Fed will hike” interest rates, and when the Fed will ease.” Fed officials lap up all the attention from the various forms of business media about what their next move will be.
Even more amusing and disturbing at the same time is that right when credit is needed most, when the economy is most imperiled, or the nightmarish scrum equivalent of the aftermath of a Taylor Swift concert, the Fed’s alleged wise minds almost reflexively cut” interest rates. If Uber did as the Fed does vis-à-vis savers (for someone to borrow, someone must save first), if it scoffed at the needs of its drivers during the periods of highest passenger demand, drivers would never be available when they were most needed for its customers.
What all this handwringing and speculation about price-fixing from the Fed should signal to
Product details
- ASIN : 1594038317
- Publisher : Encounter Books (May 24, 2016)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 224 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9781594038310
- ISBN-13 : 978-1594038310
- Item Weight : 1.04 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.5 x 1 x 9.75 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,159,369 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #104 in Banking Law (Books)
- #1,116 in Macroeconomics (Books)
- #1,408 in Money & Monetary Policy (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book easy to read and understand, with clear narratives. They appreciate the common sense thinking and real-world data presented in a straightforward manner. The book is praised for its insightful approach and usefulness in developing critical thinking regarding economic policy.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book readable and well-written. They appreciate the clear narratives and understandable explanations of how credit is created. Readers enjoy the thoughts expressed in the book and find it an interesting read.
"...Tamny has a real gift for clear writing and making sense of issues that are unnecessarily complicated by the economics profession and the media...." Read more
"This is quite an interesting read. It definitely makes one wonder about the effectiveness of the Fed...." Read more
"Very insightful and easy to read and understand...." Read more
"...First, in favor of the book: the author makes a very good case. Indeed it is safe to say that he finds nothing of value in the Fed’s existence...." Read more
Customers find the book insightful and easy to understand. They appreciate the common sense thinking backed up with real-world data. The book helps develop critical thinking regarding economic policy, which is desperately needed today. Readers praise the well-presented information at a level fairly understandable. They also appreciate the sharp analysis of economic trends and conditions through the author's unique Austrian perspective.
"...denied that Tamny has thought through these issues methodically and logically...." Read more
"...John Tamny describes general economic principles and the role of the government, and specifically the Fed, and how it is generally detrimental to..." Read more
"...His examples are great: Taylor Swift, Jim Harbaugh, Uber, etc." Read more
"Mr. Tamny’s second effort presenting the wonderful world of economics is gratifying for clarifying in lucid and entertaining manor the true workings..." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on July 4, 2016In a triumphant sequel to his essential book Popular Economics, John Tamny has written a treatise on money and credit entitled Who Needs the Fed? What Taylor Swift, Uber, and Robots Tell Us About Money, Credit, and Why We Should Abolish America's Central Bank (Encounter Books).
Ever the original thinker, Tamny offers a view of credit that is a clear challenge to the conventional wisdom. Tamny states emphatically that credit is simply access to real economic resources, such as tractors, computers, airplanes, and labor. Credit cannot be created out of thin air by central banks or governments. The latter point may make heads explode on both the left and the right.
In Part One, Tamny focuses on his view of credit in a most effective way by offering numerous interesting examples from the world of popular culture (Taylor Swift, Hollywood), sports (college football coaches), and politics (Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump). His method is unique in that he has made explaining economics this way a feature of his writing. Using no higher math or statistics, it's what made Popular Economics a classic in the image of Henry Hazlitt's Economics in One Lesson. And this style is what animates his regular commentary on Forbes Opinion and Real Clear Markets.
These examples provide the reader with easy to understand narratives of how credit is actually created in the real world.
Tamny rightfully mocks the Federal Reserve's attempt to deem credit cheap by manipulating interest rates. The Fed ignores the fact that by setting interest rates at an artificially low level, fewer savers will offer up their surplus resources to be lent to those in need of funds for immediate consumptive needs. The end result is not an abundance of credit, but rather its scarcity.
Like the manipulation of other prices by government such as wages or apartment rents, bureaucrats believe they can divine proper prices in a dynamic marketplace where supply and demand conditions are shifting constantly. The hubris is staggering.
Supply-siders do not escape criticism in Chapter 7. Although he considers himself a supply-sider, Tamny believes it's time to ditch the Laffer Curve and focus on finding the income tax rate that actually results in less revenues for the government to raise and then subsequently waste. The reason is simple. The government has no resources of its own. It must extract those resources from the private sector. There is simply no way a politician or bureaucrat, undisciplined by the market, can invest better than someone in the accountable private sector.
Part Two of the book deals with banking and contains the most fascinating chapter of the entire book. In Chapter 11, Tamny takes on the Austrian School's belief in fractional-reserve banking and the notion that money can be "multiplied". This requires the reader to keep an open mind and think through the author's logic and the examples provided. It may take awhile for many to come around to his viewpoint, if at all, but it cannot be denied that Tamny has thought through these issues methodically and logically.
Chapters dealing with the declining importance of the banking industry as a source of credit and the real reason behind the housing boom during the decade of the 2000's smash conventional thinking.
Part Three deals with the Fed and how its impact on the economy is overstated. Tamny shatters the widely believed myth that the Fed controls the supply of money. Production is the source of money; it is an effect of productive economic activity. And since the Fed cannot plan production, it will never have the ability the control the money supply.
I particularly enjoyed the vivid example of Baltimore. This economically depressed city would presumably benefit from the Fed's attempts to inject money into its local banks in an effort to stimulate economic activity. But no sooner would the money arrive it would get loaned out by the banks to businesses and consumers outside of the city. As Tamny makes clear, money migrates to the productive.
The author helpfully reminds us that economic growth and prosperity cannot come from government. Government spending isn't stimulative, simply because politicians can only spend what they extract from the real economy first. Real economic advancement results from entrepreneurial ideas being matched with savings. Economic "stimulus" provided by government is a cruel hoax.
The Fed's manipulation of interest rates is another distortion of markets that is anti-credit creation. As Tamny points out, the Fed's imposition of artificially low interest rates on the way to supposedly easy credit would have to have been one of the few instances in global economic history of price controls actually leading to abundance over scarcity. He again emphasizes that an interest rate is a price like any other. As a price, the interest rate is meant to float to whatever rate maximizes the possibility that those who have access to credit (savers) will transact with those who need access to economic resources (borrowers). So why is it assumed by so many that a handful of bureaucrats at the Fed can define what the proper level of interest rates should be?
It is also assumed by too many people that the Fed's quantitative easing (QE) scheme created a boom in the U.S. stock market. According to Tamny, the Fed wasn't "printing money" to conduct QE. It was doing something much worse by borrowing trillions from America's banks while backed with America's credit. His more credible claim is that the Fed helped to deprive the U.S. economy of a massive rebound that would've taken place absent the central bank and federal government presuming to allocate so many trillions of the economy's resources.
If the Fed's QE machinations were the reason for the rise in stock prices in recent years, why didn't Japan's multiple bouts of QE since the 1990s not boost the Japanese stock market? The Nikkei 225 is no where near the level it was in the late 1980s. A more plausible reason for the rebound in U.S. stocks since early 2009 can be better explained by the impressive recovery in corporate profits from the lows of the last recession.
Tamny addresses the Fed's ludicrous belief in the Phillips Curve, which posits an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment. Essentially, the Fed believes that inflation is created by too much prosperity. Could a theory more antithetical to prosperity possibly be promulgated? It must be stressed that economic growth, if anything, leads to lower prices. Goods that are initially available only to the wealthy become available to the masses as entrepreneurs find ways to lower prices of such goods to serve a much larger market. Historical examples abound, including the automobile, the personal computer, flat-screen televisions, and cell phones. All were once available exclusively to the ultra-wealthy but soon became ubiquitous. That's the beauty of capitalism.
In the final chapter, Tamny states that robots will ultimately be the biggest job creators, because automation will free up humans to do new types of work by virtue of robots eliminating work that was once essential. It seems every major advance that improves human living standards initially creates fears that workers will be displaced. But as Tamny notes, what resources are saved on labor will redound to increased credit availability for new ideas. We "see" the jobs destroyed by advances in technology but the "unseen" is all the new forms of work that will be created.
Tamny repeats key points frequently throughout the book. Some may find that somewhat annoying, but I believe his repetition helps drive critical points home.
Readers outside of the United States may not be quite familiar with the names of the college football coaches cited in Chapter Two, but that shouldn't distract from an understanding of the points Tamny is conveying about labor as a form of credit.
Tamny has a real gift for clear writing and making sense of issues that are unnecessarily complicated by the economics profession and the media. Who Needs the Fed? is a provocative, yet highly enjoyable companion volume to his 2015 book Popular Economics.
- Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2017This is quite an interesting read. It definitely makes one wonder about the effectiveness of the Fed. Unfortunately Tammy's version of things is definitely an alternative one and not likely to be taken to seriously by people who could really influence the Fed and its basically autonomous actions. Still it should be read by monetary policy people in and out of government, because it makes some excellent points. Until then, I'm afraid the author's is a voice in the wilderness.
- Reviewed in the United States on October 11, 2016Very insightful and easy to read and understand. John Tamny describes general economic principles and the role of the government, and specifically the Fed, and how it is generally detrimental to the economy or, thankfully, less relevant than most financial and economic journalists portray. It is vitally important that the electorate be soundly educated in fundamental aspects of how our country operates in order to best govern themselves and this book is an excellent tool for that education. Any adult can relate to the examples that Tamny uses to illustrate his points and demonstrate that fundamental economics is not that complicated - it's mostly common sense. This is a great book to develop critical thinking regarding economic policy, which is desperately needed today. I wish it were required reading for all elected officials and high school students.
- Reviewed in the United States on August 1, 2016What really attracted me to this book was the title, something I am in agreement with. I had not been aware of this author before reading a positive review in Forbes and the WSJ. Among other notables is a review from Andy Kessler, whom I have previously found to be objective, and of course a markets person.
First, in favor of the book: the author makes a very good case. Indeed it is safe to say that he finds nothing of value in the Fed’s existence. Although a supply-sider, he criticizes them also. He is an adamant free-market advocate who favors no reserve requirements for banks and no FDIC. The Fed was originally created to provide liquidity to solvent banks, and has morphed into providing liquidity to insolvent institutions and even forcing solvent ones to take its money. The author favors creative destruction, whereas the Fed is a major player in central planning and the redistribution of assets to the “weak”. “Why keep around that which intervenes in the natural workings of the markets? Didn’t we learn in the twentieth century (often through mass murder and starvation) just how dangerous it is to empower central planners?”
The flip side: The tome is 180 pages whose points could have been successfully made in 45. There is so much repetition that it occurred to me the book could be an anthology of previous articles. Why else would the author repeat the exact same text over and over? Does he assume the reader to have Alzheimer’s? In each of the 21 chapters he defines his meaning of “credit”. He even repeats the exact quotes from Hazlett. Some text is occasionally difficult to read in that some sentences are too long to follow if only read once. He also frequently drops articles (e.g. “the”), probably because he thinks it sounds cool. It doesn’t.
The book has no charts, graphs, tables or formulae. Undoubtedly someone told him that those things discourage readers. It is quite the opposite, as they can be used to illustrate a point. One chapter is devoted to how the price of oil responds solely to the price of the dollar with respect to gold. Being a “data monkey” I have the ability to check that out, and when I did I learned why there was no such chart. Yes, there is a sometimes relationship, but nothing to be relied upon.
His concept of real estate is that it solely constitutes consumption by households, not investment. Interestingly my best investment ever was when I acquired and improved a vacant lot 15 years ago for X dollars. Without any subsequent improvement that property currently produces 1.25 X each year in profits. If I were to characterize that as something other than an investment I would possibly call it a winning lottery ticket. I wish I had more of those.
My real reason for acquiring the book is that with a title like that, the author must have some idea as to what non-Fed variables might be of interest. That is, I agree that the Fed is detrimental, so if I had previously been a “Fedwatcher”, what do I watch now? Fortunately I found one (just one) that might prove to be valuable.
If you need a guidebook on being skeptical of the Fed, get the book. His examples are great: Taylor Swift, Jim Harbaugh, Uber, etc.
Top reviews from other countries
Stephan HallerReviewed in Germany on January 4, 20195.0 out of 5 stars One of the best books on economics and money
John Tamny did an outstanding job in debunking a lot of the myths regarding the federal reserve,QE, keynesianism, monetarism and even the flaws in austrian economics.
I don't agree with him on the gold standard, but that is a minor issue.
Definitely a great book everyone, especially lawmakers, should read.
Robert KennedyReviewed in Canada on September 3, 20164.0 out of 5 stars Four Stars
We need less interference from theoretical financial experts





