Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
90% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
+ $3.99 shipping
94% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
75% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Follow the Author
OK
Who Wrote the New Testament?: The Making of the Christian Myth Paperback – August 2, 1996
|
Burton L. Mack
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
Are you an author?
Learn about Author Central
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
-
Print length336 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherHarperOne
-
Publication dateAugust 2, 1996
-
Dimensions0.84 x 6.12 x 9.25 inches
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Customers who bought this item also bought
Not God's People: Insiders and Outsiders in the Biblical World (Volume 1) (Religion in the Modern World, 1)Lawrence M. Wills Ethelbert Talbot Professor of Biblical Studies Episcopal Divinity SchoolPaperback
Editorial Reviews
Review
From the Inside Flap
With innovative scholarship and an engaging, detective-like style, an eminent and controversial scholar of Christian origins presents the first comprehensive yet popular explanation of who wrote the New Testament--and why.
Burton L. Mack, who won wide acclaim for The Lost Gospel, scrupulously examines the Christian Testament and fleshes out both the social and the cultural context from which it emerged. In contrast to the widely held view of the gospels as complementary accounts of single set of events, Mack offers a history of divergent Christian communities and their anonymous writers who wrote widely different chronicles for distinct purposes and audiences over a period of more than one hundred years. He delineates how Christians in later centuries assigned the names of apostles and disciples to the anonymous stories about Jesus and his teachings, adjusted the chronology, and erased cultural differences in an effort to present a coherent history of the faith and invest the new church with authenticity.
This trailblazing reconstruction of early Christianity, which makes cutting-edge scholarship thoroughly accessible to a popular audience, reveals how the Christian Bible was created. Who Wrote the New Testament? challenges us to envision the New Testament as dynamic myth, reinterpreted many times through the course of Western cultural history, rather than as the static statement of any single truth. Much as The Iliad and The Odyssey mythologized events and figures in the remote Greek past, the New Testament writings, Mack shows, transform the historical Jesus, a counter-cultural philosopher with no grand messianic pretensions, into the Christ, the dying and rising son of God. Ultimately, then, the New Testament consists of a powerful religious mythology comparable to those of other great religions.
Vital reading for all serious students of the Bible and Christian origins, Who Wrote the New Testament? should also prove enormously enlightening for those who seek to uncover the true story of how the historical Jesus was transformed into the mythologized Christ of faith.
From the Back Cover
In this groundbreaking and controversial book, Burton Mack brilliantly exposes how the Gospels are fictional mythologies created by different communities for various purposes and are only distantly related to the actual historical Jesus. Mack's innovative scholarship--which boldly challenges traditional Christian understanding--will change the way you approach the New Testament and think about how Christianity arose.
"Finally! Someone has penetrated the theological agenda that has informed a century of New Testament scholarship to provide a thoroughgoing historical overview of Christian origins. Mack's consummate account of early Christian writings as the mythmaking products of diverse social formations, and of the final selection and shaping of these writings into the Christian Bible according to the requirements of an emergent 'centrist' myth, not only provides a compelling explanation for the continuing fascination with this text throughout the history of Western culture but sets forth a new framework for understanding that text itself." (Luther H. Martin, author of Hellenistic Religions)
About the Author
Burton L. Mack is John Wesley Professor of the New Testament at the school of Theology at Claremont and the author of The Lost Gospel: The Book Q and Christian Origin and A Myth of Innocence: Mark and Christian Origins.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- ASIN : 0060655186
- Publisher : HarperOne; Edition Unstated (August 2, 1996)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 336 pages
- Item Weight : 1.05 pounds
- Dimensions : 0.84 x 6.12 x 9.25 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#283,821 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #499 in New Testament Criticism & Interpretation
- #748 in New Testament Commentaries
- #919 in Folklore & Mythology Studies
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Mack does not discuss the historical Jesus at all. The interest here is in the communities that formed after his death and what they believed and wrote about him.
There were some helpful sections, so this book was not a complete waste. But it just did not wow me. Nothing was groundbreaking for me. I’d encourage Marcus Borg, John Crossan, or Bart Ehrman if you are looking for more nuanced approaches in critical studies of the New Testament.
Gary Greenberg's 101 Myths of the Bible and Walter Williams' The Historical Origin of Christianity are not bad either.
I bought this title with From God to Gods by Shivan and Zakovitch.
Top reviews from other countries
There are many rival theories as to how best explain the Historical Jesus and the origins of Christianity. I disagree with Burton Mack's characterization of Jesus as a Cynic philosopher whose followers took things a bit out of hand after his untimely death (I strongly recommend Bart Ehrman or Laura Fredriksen's treatments of Jesus as a Apocalyptic Prophet in this regard). However, Mack's expert knowledge of the Book of Q (see 'The Lost Gospel') allows an exploration of the early church that is mind-boggling in its complexity. Though at times highly speculatory, Mack presents an environment of theological diversity among early Christians that extends far beyond the familiar "Pauline vs Gnostic" rivalry. The world of first century Judaism and Christianity suddenly becomes a lot more strange and the development of the New Testament canon comes to read like an action thriller - the bizarre circumstances of books being compiled and redacted, judgements and proclamations being issued against entire towns and cities, communities collapsing and coalescing make an engrossing read.
Mack is a radical and makes no secret of it. His theories will not impress everyone and I reserve much greater caution in accepting every one of his ideas about Christian origins and development. However, one thing will be clear in coming away from reading this book - the New Testament as we understand it cannot, in any real sense, be called 'Divinely inspired' or 'Guided by the Holy Spirit' - to do so now would be an act of mortal blasphemy in itself.
Likewise, anyone buying this book in the expectation of discovering that the texts presently comprising the New Testament are verbatim transcripts of God’s word through carefully selected scribes will also be disappointed. No such claim is considered and the book’s sub-title should be borne in mind – ‘The Making of the Christian Myth’.
This book is not for the faint-hearted. The author is a scholar with considerable depth of knowledge and, though well written, his book is a weighty one requiring some application on the part of the reader.
Some readers might feel that his inferences concerning the various Jesus communities which sprang up after his death are overly conjectural in places. He will not have got everything right, but his account of how these texts came into being is persuasive. And he also deals with how it was that certain texts were eventually selected for inclusion while others were not.
I found this book most instructive.
Burton Mack through his studies attempts to visualise early Jesus Movements that started in Galilee in the 30s and 40s of the first century AD. These early Jesus followers were seeking a kingdom, to take them away from their sufferings under the harsh Roman rule, a kingdom that they identified as "the Kingdom of God." So different Jesus movements evolved forming different groups and these groups began to write their thoughts down, share it, saved it, embellished it and reworked it till it eventually resulted in the New Testament.
In the Early founding days, there were five different prominent Jesus groups such as (1) The Community of Q (Q refers to Quelle meaning 'source' of the sayings of Jesus) who produced the Sayings Gospel Q, (2) the Jesus School that produced the pre-Markan pronouncement stories, (3) the True Disciples who produced the Gospel of Thomas, (4) the Congregation of Israel who composed the pre-Markan sets of miracle stories, and (5) the Jerusalem Pillars about whom we have only an early report from Paul in his letter to the Galatians. All these groups shared the common feature of the idea of "the kingdom of god." But the road from Jesus to the Christian religion only emerged in the 4th century developed from the myth of Jesus as the son of God firmly in place.
As many references refer to the Book of Q, here is a reference, < http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Lost-Gospel-Christian-ebook/dp/B00APGJZWS/ref=dp_kinw_strp_1 >
Because there is a general poverty of public knowledge of the origins of the Bible, Burton Mack has written this most comprehensive research into how he perceived the early Bible was in all probability derived. The writings included in the New Testament were not written by whose names that are attached to them.
(1) Most literature of the early Christian period was written anonymously, and
(2) the apostolic age was a second century creation, and
(3) that the later attribution of this literature to names associated with apostles can be explained in ways that showed it was not considered dishonest.
In the early period of collecting lore, interpreting teachings, and trying out new ideas to fit the novel groupings spawned by the different Jesus followers, many minds, voices, and hands were involved in on the drafting of the written materials. No one thought to take credit for the writings. Most of the writings in the New Testament were either written anonymously and later assigned to a person of the past or written later as a pseudonym for some person thought to have been important from the earliest period.
Modern Christian readers have interpreted the New Testament as a sort of "Christian Charter" or "constitution" written by a college of apostles, and that was what the 4th Century Christian centrists had intended but this charter was created for the 4th Century church by means of literary fictions. It is neither an authentic account of Christian beginnings nor an accurate account of the history of the Christian church. True religious historians would describe it as myth.
Burton Mack then goes into great depths and detail to analyse and to show the fallacies of the "Gospels" and the "Letters of the Gospels" and kept his arguments within the boundaries of the Bible and scriptures and to show that most of the contents of the New Testament were written by anonymous authors in the name of the Gospels and passed as historical events when in fact they were mostly allegorical or mythical stories made up to glorify Christianity and the Kingdom of God.
At the end Burton Mack criticises "the attitudes of the evangelical North American Christians," but it could equally apply to any evangelical Christian in Europe, that "they will always seek some some citation from the Bible regardless of how allegorical or mythical it might be to justify any of their own beliefs or policies and believe that this citation must be blessed by God because it was mentioned in the Bible." Evangelicals tend to assume that anything associated with the Bible must have the authenticity as though it was the literal word of God, almost in the same way Muslims consider their Quran is the literal word of Allah.
The book is certainly worthy of a good study as it opens avenues of thought that have been suppressed for centuries by the defenders of religious myths.
Heavy going at times but well worth the effort.













