Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

Buy Used
$7.87
+ $3.99 shipping
Used: Very Good | Details
Sold by thrift_books
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Book has appearance of light use with no easily noticeable wear. Millions of satisfied customers and climbing. Thriftbooks is the name you can trust, guaranteed. Spend Less. Read More.

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 3 images

Who's Afraid of Relativism?: Community, Contingency, and Creaturehood (The Church and Postmodern Culture) Paperback

4.3 out of 5 stars 11 customer reviews

See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Price
New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Paperback
"Please retry"
$9.82 $7.87

The Amazon Book Review
The Amazon Book Review
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
click to open popover

Customers Viewing This Page May Be Interested In These Sponsored Links

  (What's this?)
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE
The latest book club pick from Oprah
"The Underground Railroad" by Colson Whitehead is a magnificent novel chronicling a young slave's adventures as she makes a desperate bid for freedom in the antebellum South. See more

Product Details

  • Paperback
  • Publisher: Baker Pub Group
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0801039738
  • ISBN-13: 978-0801039737
  • Product Dimensions: 8.5 x 5.5 x 0.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 10.9 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (11 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #560,495 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customers Viewing This Page May Be Interested In These Sponsored Links

  (What's this?)

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
The big ideas presented, our dependency as creatures, our deep need for community (even the fact that there is no existing outside of community), and our understanding of language are brilliant. This book, paired with Who's Afraid of Postmodernism (which I preferred, but that's probably because the issues it deals with are more relevant to me, which then just proves the treatise of this book), shows powerfully how much evangelical and Christian thought has been impacted (and not for the better) by modernist thought and the Enlightenment.
Comment 6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Kindle Edition
Note: I received a free Kindle copy of this book courtesy of NetGalley.

In this work, Smith sets out to apply the epistemological insights of Wittgenstein, Rorty, and Brandom to the the church's struggle with understanding the nature of truth. His root conviction, that humans are contingent beings, ultimately and practically dependent on God and on the communities of discourse they inhabit, is the main driver of his argument. In other words, the book does not begin with an assumption that a certain philosophical position is correct, and that the church, therefore, ought to adopt it. Instead, given the Christian claim about human finitude, an account of knowledge like that found in these philosophers is more in line with the Christian faith than the more common contention for "absolute" truth.

Smith's book is an easy read (given the subject matter). After an introductory chapter, the following chapters each pick a philosophical discussion partner. The essentials of each scholar's position are developed, a film that illustrates the claims is described, and then the material is applied to the church. A final chapter (not counting the summative Epilogue) brings in the postliberalism of George Lindbeck, whose "cultural linguistic" model of religion is lifted up as an example of having learned the epistemological lessons Smith wishes to convey.

With his embrace of "relativism," some will fear that Smith has jumped from the evangelical (even the Christian) ship. This work is nothing of the sort. In each chapter he is careful to distinguish the relativism he defends, the reality that all human discourse is relative to a particular community and tied to particular situations, from mere arbitrariness - what many assume relativism is.
Read more ›
Comment 6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
James K. A. Smith continues his sympathetic engagement with postmodern thought in Who's Afraid of Relativism? Community, Contingency, and Creaturehood. As the latest contribution to The Church and Postmodern Culture series, Smith's book is a marked instance of scholarly outreach, distilling high level philosophical discourse into a form that is digestible for non-specialists. A fine embodiment of "philosophy in service of the church".

Understood as a sequel to his well received volume, Who's Afraid of Postmodernism?, Smith's latest book shifts attention from the Continent to American soil, taking up the controversial school of thought known as pragmatism. For it is in pragmatism that we find the possibility of a robust and sophisticated relativism. A relativism that goes beyond its parodied, more sophomoric forms (e.g. "That may be true for you, but for me...").

Pervading Smith's account is the contention that “pragmatism [provides] a robust philosophy of contingency that is wholly compatible with the Christian doctrine of creation” (29). Moreover, pragmatism is better able to affirm our contingent, socially-dependent state as creatures than the more dominant and conventional accounts of human knowing (epistemology) that are often embraced by evangelicals.

To set out his case for a "Christian pragmatism/relativism", Smith turns our attention to three of pragmatism's leading proponents: Ludwig Wittgenstein, Richard Rorty, and Robert Brandom. Each of whom receive a chapter elucidating their thought. Whether one subscribes to Smith's final proposal or rejects it, this volume undoubtedly serves as a user-friendly introduction to three key philosophers "whose works are notoriously difficult and slippery.
Read more ›
Comment 4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Kindle Edition
A lot of authors and defenders of the faith have taken up the mantle of maintaining the absolute truth of the gospel and the Word of God. One common argument is that if everything is relative, then everything becomes more and more meaningless without reference to something absolute. For example, if the concept of relativity itself is relative, one asks "relative to what?" If the "what" itself is also relative, then what is it then relative to, and the questioning becomes an endless trip down rabbit's hole. This approach is more combative and may even be perceived as forceful and aggressive. Is this the only way? According to author and Professor of Philosophy and Theology at Calvin College, relativism is nothing to be afraid of. It can even become a tool that helps "loot the Egyptians." or to use the argument for relativism in an positive way. Based on his background and expertise in French philosophical thought, Smith's thesis is based on the work of three prominent persons with regards to culture and thought surrounding relativity. In a counter-intuitive manner, he argues that Christians ought to be "relativists" in the first place, but with a disclaimer. It ought to be read with the three works:

Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations
Richard Rorty’s Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature
Robert Brandom’s Articulating Reasons

It is easy to be caught up in the philosophy, concepts, and definitions of terms that we can be lost in the maze of arguments. The language can get rather technical and if readers are unfamiliar with philosophy, this book can be rather dense and requires time and energy to comprehend. The best way to read this book is in conjunction with the mentioned works of Wittgenstein, Rorty, and Brandom.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Most Recent Customer Reviews


Pages with Related Products. See and discover other items: christianity