Buy new:
$20.00$20.00
$4.99
delivery:
Aug 16 - 18
Payment
Secure transaction
Ships from
basementseller101
Sold by
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
Buy used: $8.99
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
91% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
99% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
78% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Who's in Charge?: Free Will and the Science of the Brain Hardcover – November 15, 2011
Purchase options and add-ons
“Big questions are Gazzaniga’s stock in trade.”
—New York Times
“Gazzaniga is one of the most brilliant experimental neuroscientists in the world.”
—Tom Wolfe
“Gazzaniga stands as a giant among neuroscientists, for both the quality of his research and his ability to communicate it to a general public with infectious enthusiasm.”
—Robert Bazell, Chief Science Correspondent, NBC News
The author of Human, Michael S. Gazzaniga has been called the “father of cognitive neuroscience.” In his remarkable book, Who’s in Charge?, he makes a powerful and provocative argument that counters the common wisdom that our lives are wholly determined by physical processes we cannot control. His well-reasoned case against the idea that we live in a “determined” world is fascinating and liberating, solidifying his place among the likes of Oliver Sacks, Antonio Damasio, V.S. Ramachandran, and other bestselling science authors exploring the mysteries of the human brain.
- Print length272 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherEcco
- Publication dateNovember 15, 2011
- Dimensions6 x 0.93 x 9 inches
- ISBN-100061906107
- ISBN-13978-0061906107
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together

What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Most purchased | Highest ratedin this set of products
21 Lessons for the 21st CenturyYuval Noah Noah HarariPaperback
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Gazzaniga is a towering figure in contemporary neurobiology. . . . Who’s in Charge? is a joy to read.” — Wall Street Journal
“A fascinating, accessible, and often humorous read for anyone with a brain! And a must-read for neuroscientists, psychologists, psychiatrists, and criminal attorneys.” — Library Journal (starred review)
“Fascinating. . . . Gazzaniga uses a lifetime of experience in neuroscientific research to argue that free will is alive and well.” — Salon.com
“Terrific. . . . [An] engrossing study of the mechanics of thought.” — Publishers Weekly
“A fascinating affirmation of our essential humanity.” — Kirkus Reviews
“From one of the world’s leading thinkers comes a thought-provoking book on how we think and how we act. . . . An exciting, stimulating, and at times even funny read that helps us further understand ourselves, our actions, and our world.” — CNBC.com, Best Books for the Holidays
“An utterly captivating and fascinating read that addresses issues of consciousness and free will and, in the end, offers suggestions as to how these ideas may or may not inform legal matters.” — Daily Texan
“[The] scope of Michael S. Gazzaniga’s Who’s in Charge? is huge―it tackles the age-old debate of free will [and] offers a lot to consider about what Gazzaniga deems the ‘scientific problem of the century.’” — Portland Mercury
“Fascinating. . . . [An] intriguing and persuasive treatment of the moral implications of modern neuroscience.” — Reason.com
“This exciting, stimulating, and sometimes even funny book challenges us to think in new ways about that most mysterious part of us―the part that makes us think we’re us.” — Alan Alda, actor and host of Scientific American Frontiers
From the Back Cover
The father of cognitive neuroscience and author of Human offers a provocative argument against the common belief that our lives are wholly determined by physical processes and we are therefore not responsible for our actions
A powerful orthodoxy in the study of the brain has taken hold in recent years: Since physical laws govern the physical world and our own brains are part of that world, physical laws therefore govern our behavior and even our conscious selves. Free will is meaningless, goes the mantra; we live in a “determined” world.
Not so, argues the renowned neuroscientist Michael S. Gazzaniga in this thoughtful, provocative book based on his Gifford Lectures——one of the foremost lecture series in the world dealing with religion, science, and philosophy. Who’s in Charge? proposes that the mind, which is somehow generated by the physical processes of the brain, “constrains” the brain just as cars are constrained by the traffic they create. Writing with what Steven Pinker has called “his trademark wit and lack of pretension,” Gazzaniga shows how determinism immeasurably weakens our views of human responsibility; it allows a murderer to argue, in effect, “It wasn’t me who did it——it was my brain.” Gazzaniga convincingly argues that even given the latest insights into the physical mechanisms of the mind, there is an undeniable human reality: We are responsible agents who should be held accountable for our actions, because responsibility is found in how people interact, not in brains.
An extraordinary book that ranges across neuroscience, psychology, ethics, and the law with a light touch but profound implications, Who’s in Charge? is a lasting contribution from one of the leading thinkers of our time.
About the Author
Michael S. Gazzaniga is internationally recognized in the field of neuroscience and a pioneer in cognitive research. He is the director of the SAGE Center for the Study of the Mind at the University of California, Santa Barbara. He is the author of many popular science books, including Who’s in Charge? (Ecco, 2011). He has six children and lives in California with his wife.
Product details
- Publisher : Ecco; First Edition (November 15, 2011)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 272 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0061906107
- ISBN-13 : 978-0061906107
- Item Weight : 1.05 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.93 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,409,131 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #592 in Free Will & Determinism Philosophy
- #1,193 in Neuroscience (Books)
- #1,811 in Popular Neuropsychology
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the author

Michael S. Gazzaniga is internationally recognized in the field of neuroscience and a pioneer in cognitive research. He is the director of the SAGE Center for the Study of the Mind at the University of California, Santa Barbara. He is the author of many popular science books, including Who’s in Charge? (Ecco, 2011). He has six children and lives in California with his wife.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Free Your Mind
The question of free will is one that has burned for an answer ever sense it was posed by early philosophers. Do we have free will or are we just biological machines in a deterministic world? In the past few decades the field of neuroscience has been able to shed some light on the subject if not completely answer it. In the book "Who's in Charge?" Michael Gazzaniga attempts to fuse the two subjects and ask, what does the brain tell us about free will? The author of this book is currently a well-known professor of psychology at the University of California and is often cited as being one of the founding fathers of the field of cognitive neuroscience. Michael Gazzangia is no newcomer to the world of literature, he has written extensively from his own research on split brain patients and what he calls the left brain interpreter. Previous publications include works such as "Human: The Science Behind What Makes Us Unique", "The Ethical Brain", "The Mind's Past" and "Natures Mind: The Biological Roots of Thinking, Emotions, Sexuality, Language and Intelligence". These publications along with a plethora of other scientific journals produced by this author, beautifully interweave the study of neuroscience with even more complex topics of ethics, emotions, what makes us unique and ultimately what makes us human. His latest book, "Who's in Charge?" ,once again involves the reader in both the world of philosophy and neuroscience and is a wonderfully exciting read. Gazzaniga introduces concepts in both philosophy and neuroscience that any reader would be fascinated with, and his firsthand experience in neuroscience make it that much more interesting. Unfortunately this time around it appears as though Gazzaniga has bit off more than he can chew. The book suffers from a lack of focus on both subjects, philosophy and neuroscience, and ends up making some rushed generalizations and sloppy conclusions as a result. Although this book is an incredibly interesting and easy read, it may not be as informative or detailed as some readers like me may be hoping for; it is because of this I give the book three out of five stars.
The book begins by Gazzangia giving us what will become the thesis and overall theme. It is quickly stated that while the rest of the field of neuroscience appears to be being pulled in the direction of determinism, the idea that humans have no free will, this is not accurate. The author makes the bold claim at the beginning of the book that, "We are personally responsible agents and are to be held accountable for our actions, even though we live in a determined universe". A large part of the first half of the book after this point is devoted to a brief history of the field of neuroscience and the discoveries that have led to the deterministic view it appears to hold today. At this point we are treated to a fascinating tour of topics in neuroscience. These topics range from asking, is the brain a blank state or does it come with genetic constraints, to how do neural connections form and how does learning occur? The author ends this section with a look at the evolutionary perspective of how our ancestors choices shaped the brain and the constraints that we have today and pointing out how many of the findings in previous topics have led to deterministic views of our free will. Gazzangia does a great job of summarizing findings in neuroscience findings and framing them to see the development of determinism in the field. One by one we see how genetic constraints on cognitive ability, conditioned learning, and an evolutionary perspective have been chipping away at our notion of free will over the years.
A large portion of the book looks at findings in neuroscience that have to do with function of the brain. However the largest and personally speaking most interesting, area of neuroscience focused on, is the work of Gazzangia himself. Gazzangia is credited with the discovery of the majority of the cognitive phenomena surrounding split brain patients. Split brain patients have undergone a surgery to sever the corpus callosum separating the right and left hemispheres of the brain. The author explained this done in very extreme cases of violent and frequent seizures. Studies on individuals, by Gazzangia, who had undergone this surgery found some interesting effects on separation of visual fields and processing ability. A classic example is the drawing test, in which the participant is shown a picture to their left eye or right hemisphere. The participant would report seeing no picture at the time, but when later asked to draw any picture of their choice they would often draw the picture that was previously shown to them. When asked why they drew this picture, most participants would make up elaborate stories as to what motivated them to draw the picture, but none seemed to realize that they were previously shown it. Most interestingly however is that it was found that splitting the hemispheres resulted in the separation of action and conscious awareness for things taking place in the right hemisphere. The author sites a number of examples of the right hemisphere being exposed to a certain action/emotion/movement without the knowledge of the left hemisphere. A favorite example of mine from the book is when one patient is shown a fire safety video to the left eye (which goes to the right hemisphere). The patient begins to feel nervous and anxious but has no idea why and interprets it as Dr. Gazzangia is making her feel uneasy that day. From studies like this and many others the author decides that it is the left brain that holds the analyzing ability but only after our brain has acted.
It is through a number of examples like the one above that the author explains our current understanding of consciousness in the field of neuroscience. It appears as though our consciousness and thus our believed sense of free will appears to come from a post hoc analysis of unconscious actions our brain has already done. Our brain is in control and only later does the left hemisphere attempt to come up with a narrative as to why we have acted or why we feel the way we do. The author here pushes the examples even further to demonstrate that our brain is thousands of unconscious actions that all make it to the left hemisphere for a post hoc analysis. If this truly is the case then it appears obvious that we are simply experiencing free will falsely after we have already acted. Our free will is an illusion and we are no more in charge of choosing to do something than we are of jumping when scared by something. This would be the conclusion that most studying the field of neuroscience would make, however Gazzangia is not convinced.
At this point the book takes a turn toward a more philosophical approach to freewill and for me a more sloppy approach as well. Gazzangia is not convinced that our free will is an illusion based on the experience of it being unified and also because of the social implications it would have on society. Gazzangia here in my opinion commits a cardinal sin by never defining exactly what free will is. Does free will mean having complete autonomy over our actions? Does it mean that we are in no way determined by outside forces of environment, genetics and physical laws? This is a reoccurring problem as from this point on the author attempts to reframe the findings of neuroscience to show it allows room for free will and responsibility, without giving a criteria of how one could do this. The closest this book comes to actually defining free will is when the author asks questions like "what do we want to be free from? We don't want to be free from our experience of life, we need that for our decisions [are decisions of any use if all is determined?] .We actually don't want to be free from causation, we use that for predictions." This is certainly not a criteria for free will nor is it an end all definition as far as the field of philosophy is concerned.
The second half of the book begins with the author taking a far too brief look at the study of quantum mechanics and the field of physics. He explains how the Newtonian laws of physics appear to break down and no longer apply at the quantum level; they are what physicists call an "emergent property". This concept is key to Gazzangia's theory of free will, just as the sum of the actions of quantum physics results in Newtonian physics without being directly caused by them, so too is our free will an "emergent property" of the thousands of unconscious actions of our brain. The author also devotes some time to the study of chaotic systems like whether and how the smallest change causes unpredictable outcomes throughout larger systems. This is meant to be an analogy to how unpredictable and undetermined the brain could act as a system but isn't ultimately fleshed out. Here it is also stated that "responsibility lies not with the individual but with the interaction of multiple brains in society". Gazzangias neatly wraps up the book by providing a number of experiments in both neuroscience and psychology that demonstrate the social nature of humans to showcase that responsibility and free will are best observed as an emergent property of multiple brains interacting.
Overall I'm conflicted about this book. Gazzangia's first- hand experiences with split brain patients is fascinating and provides some amazing accounts into the left hemisphere interpreter of our consciousness. The author is skilled at painting a vivid picture of the field of neuroscience and findings in it. The reader is provided with great deal of discussion on the unconscious mechanisms of the nervous system, such as fight or flight or release of neurotransmitters. We are introduced to a number of research techniques used by neuroscientists such as fMRI brain scanning technology and single neuron measuring techniques. Sadly, the same amount of time and detail neuroscience is given is not granted to the philosophical side of the argument. The author completely fails to provide a definition for what exactly free will is, which leaves his conclusion that we do have it appear to be unjustified. The author also fails to address the wide ranging philosophical views on free will; whereas multiple modern studies were cited in neuroscience, most philosophers mentioned were ancient Greeks or far removed from our modern time. The study of physics and quantum physics is looked over very briefly and I feel lacks examples, evidence and proper explanation. This makes it all the stranger when the author hangs his hat on the idea of emergent properties in physics being an analogy to how consciousness and free will operate in the mind.
For me this book was an absolutely fascinating look at various studies in neuroscience and the real world consequences of them and I would recommend it to others based on that merit alone. However as far as the author's thesis is concerned, I remain unconvinced due to a lack of supporting evidence and a far too brief look at competing theories and finer details. The book overall provided a satisfying overview but ultimately left me wanting more. In the end I may still not know if I have free will, but I most certainly have a better and more robust understanding of neuroscience and how it has dealt with the question of free will.
Let me also say up front that this book is useful in explaining how the brain operates on two levels. Gazzaniga explains how the "right brain" is driven by the senses and acts on an immediate, subconscious level. The "left brain" applies a conscious after-the-fact reasoning that attempts to make sense of the actions that the subconscious mind has already taken. The left-brain's "interpreter module" is always at work inventing theories to "explain" what the right half of the brain has already "decided" on the basis of reflexive subconscious instinct.
Gazzaniga gives powerful examples of how easily the "interpreter module" can be deceived into coming to false conclusions. Suffice it to say that our brains can work against us by making poor decisions on the basis of perceived information that is false or unreliable. Understanding how the conscious mind rationalizes decisions that the subconscious mind has already acted on has relevance in helping us to make better decisions in every aspect of life. The book should be read for this reason alone. It explains how our conscious mind is far more fallible than we ever imagined.
The book answers some most intriguing questions about the relationship between the brain and consciousness:
=============
We are still left with this thorny little problem: What is going on in the brain to produce this magnificent ability that humans have, how did it come about, and how do you capture it? Fortunately for job security and today's graduate students, the mystery is alive and well, but some of the secrets are being revealed, which we will now explore.
=============
Here are some of the mysteries revealed:
* Are the brain's neural circuits hard-wired by DNA genetics, or are they created by the acquisition of experience as the organism lives?
* Does the brain "learn" by experience or is it pre-programmed with instinctive responses that are activated by encounters with reality?
* Are babies born with brains already "wired" to understand physical properties, for example why dropped objects fall down but not up, or why animate objects differ from inanimate ones?
* How did our brain evolve from the brains of lower primates? Which of our evolutionary human ancestors would be recognized as the first "human?"
* Are there unique structures in the human brain that make it qualitatively superior to every other species?
* Are the neurons in the human brain structured differently from those in the brains of other animals?
* Are particular mental processes and memories stored in one location in the brain or are they dispersed throughout the brain as a whole?
* Is the brain a "bottom-up" or "top-down" device, i.e. does consciousness control the brain, or is consciousness the sum of the brain's "dumb / automatic" processes?
Gazzaniga answers these questions in interesting detail, in so far as they CAN be answered based on our current state of knowledge. Some of the answers are surprising. For example, it seems that certain survival behaviors (fear of snakes and other predators, for example) ARE hardwired in the brains of humans and animals, but that over a period of thousands of years these instincts have been shown to "wash out" in cases where predator species have become extinct and are no longer threats. Gazzaniga explains numerous ingenious experiments that discern which behaviors are learned and which are innate. There are many surprising revelations about the structure and function of the human brain.
Gazzaniga also wonderfully explains that consciousness is a complex phenomenon. He says trying to understand consciousness by analyzing neurons in the brain would be like trying to figure out the traffic patterns of a large city by looking at the carburetor of one automobile!
Thus has Gazzaniga explained the FINITE capacities of the human brain up to the current state of knowledge. What is lacking is a theory to explain why the brain has a seemingly INFINITE capacity. Every structure in the universe appears to have constraints except the human brain. As we live our lives we accumulate a mental image of every sight, sound, and physical activity we have experienced since assuming consciousness. We layer more memories into our consciousness without losing the old. Our ability to learn seems to be unlimited. A person who is fluent in five languages can become fluent in five more.
HOW can an organ the size of a bowling ball store what appears to be an infinite amount of information? Can this be a purely biological, chemical, and electrical process? Is there some hidden dimension to the brain that CAN'T be explained in terms of physical processes?
And WHY HAVE our brains acquired the power to discern the nature of the universe? We are able to express in mathematical formulas the entire spectrum of the universe, from the quantum mechanics of the subatomic scale to the megastructures that anchor the galaxies. A few pounds of matter in the head of each of us is able to comprehend the entire scale of creation!
Our brain is unique as the only anti-entropic entity in the universe. The natural trend of the universe is that order descends into chaos. The brain creates order FROM chaos. The brain has the capacity to create fantastic wealth from the most common materials that are found in nature. It allows us to create the most sublime artistic expressions.
The brain's capabilities seem to go far beyond the requirements of mere evolution to insure the survival of the species. Wouldn't human beings be more prolific as a species if we were a bit LESS intelligent, smart enough to feed and breed but NOT smart enough to divert energies into non-reproductive agendas like art and philosophy? (Gazzaniga might express the question as: "Why did the conscious aspect of the brain develop when the subconscious works so well?" Consciousness slows us down with rationalizing decisions that the unconscious mind has already made, wasting time and energy and coming to conclusions that are often wrong.)
I know there is no scientific basis for answering these questions yet, but it sure would have been interesting if Gazzaniga had given us his speculative insights!* Also the book is a little weak in the back chapters because it goes into a relatively uninteresting discussion of how consciousness relates to ethics, such as why some humans are altruists and some are criminals. This question boils down to "free will" --- whether or not we really have any conscious choice about the decisions we make.
Discussions along these lines have always seemed pointless to me. If we don't have free will then we are merely robots responding to stimuli. If that were so there would be no need for conscious decision making, which Dr. Gazzaniga points out time and again is an inefficient and sometimes even detrimental aspect of our brains. The fact that we ARE sentient proves to me that we have free will. Otherwise, why waste the body's resources creating a conscience? Isn't it a law of nature that energy is never expended for no purpose? I am tired of this discussion and would have rather read speculations as to how the brain can store a seemingly infinite amount of information and process that information so as to discern the nature of the universe.
The discussion of free will aside, this book is a fascinating, practical, and entertaining read for laypersons. It thoroughly discusses the finite aspects of the brain, but would have been even more interesting if Gazzaniga had engaged in a bit of speculation about the brain's seemingly infinite capabilities. The insights into the mechanisms of the brain and its relationship to the consciousness we call the mind are more valuable than what I've read in every previous book on the subject combined.
* if Gazzaniga had given us his speculative insights! Connectome: How the Brain's Wiring Makes Us Who We Are by Sebastian Seung was released on 2/7/2012. It is an excellent complement to this book. It contains exactly the types of speculative insights I was looking for, such as whether we will ever learn enough about the functioning of the brain's neural networks to duplicate human intelligence in a machine, or to immortalize ourselves by uploading our consciousness.


![Free Will [Deckle Edge]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71M+MkYZA9L._AC_UL200_SR200,200_.jpg)





