|Print List Price:||$8.00|
Save $5.01 (63%)
Why Ayn Rand Is Wrong (and Why It Matters) Kindle Edition
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Top Customer Reviews
Two Senses of Self is really just a semantical argument. What do we mean when we say "self"? If you already know who you are and where your nose ends and someone else's begins, you can skip through this, Objectivist. Oh, and don't be sucked in by the paragraph about the people in the car at the beginning -- it's got nothing to do with what he's really saying, just a foreshadowing for ...
The Case Against Egoism. This is where he discusses how people can act as a group or collective, subordinating individual needs and opinions to work for the higher good. He fails to recognize that when individuals do this, they are still working for their *individual* good. He seems never to have read Ayn Rand's discussion of how people can hold certain values (truth, justice)in such high esteem that they can die for them, and how that is not a contradiction of rational self-interest but an extension of it. I am surprised that he's missed these discussions since they are all over Objectivist literature. Also, he's never writing about "rational self-interest"; he's writing about egoism. They are not the same things and he's missed this entirely! I don't know how if he's read and studied Ayn Rand as extensively as he's claimed.
A Shot In The Arm -- This is a sophistical discussion of empathy and how it must mean something important about our connectedness as human beings if we can feel each other's pain, etc. I guess the idea that I can be I -- alone -- and yet still connected through various important commonalities to other separate individuals is too complicated a concept to be admitted here.Read more ›
Do yourself a favor: accept the author's position that he doesn't exist as an individual self and save your money.
I was wrong; Although I'm no more sympathetic to Rand's philosophy or politics than Asher is, his attack on her rings hollow to my ears. Asher fails to either do justice to Rand's philosophy, nor to effectively dispute it. Rather he makes some vague New Age-y arguments about personality and empathy. If I were an objectivist, I doubt I would've lost any sleep over this attack.
Asher's main (indeed, only) attack on Rand is on her doctrine of Egoism, which he sorts of describes, by quoting her, as the view that all people do live for their own selves, and not for others. Strangely, in the passage quoted Rand refers to this as a Normative statement ("the pursuit of his own rational self interest... is the highest moral purpose of [man]'s life"), but Asher ascribes to her a belief in Egoism as a Positive fact ("Importantly, psychological egoism is not a statement about how we should live, but rather a description of how certain psychologists think we do live").
So which is it? And crucially, what role does the doctrine of Egoism play in Rand's philosophy? Everyone is wrong about some things; Even if Asher manages to unravel one of Rand's beliefs, does this undermine the whole of her philosophy?Read more ›
Most Recent Customer Reviews
The author seems like s nice enough guy, but both his critiques of Ayn Rand and the counter virtues he sought to extol came off so tepid as to be barely noticed.Published 6 months ago by Jon I Stevenson II
In discussing this book with my Dad, who was Rand's personal student and IMHO knows a lot more about her and her philosophy than even her official proponents, here're some points... Read morePublished 12 months ago by I'm no expert, yet...
What a great little book swimming against the tide of unbridled egotism/individualism ruining our world. Read morePublished 13 months ago by Robert Peate
So Rand writes:
"The pursuit of his own rational self interest... is the highest moral purpose of [man]'s life".
This is nonsense. Read more
A has been. Why 17 and not 15? So it is 23 now. who cares,One to three four five six.Published on April 29, 2014 by Eric Glenn Eaton
In the first chapter, LA exclaims how much he respects Ayn Rand's views and perspective. For Objectivists, this is seductive - it will lead them in. Read morePublished on January 9, 2014 by Karl G. Kowalski
What a waste of eight dollars! This group of pages is not what an Ayn Rand reader would expect as an argument refuting her ideas of individuality.Published on May 2, 2013 by Michael A. Capodanno
Not so much here that I hadn't thought of already. What else is there to say. Need four more words.Published on April 21, 2013 by Ruth I. Orts
Set up an Amazon Giveaway
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Look for Similar Items by Category
- Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Philosophy > Ethics & Morality
- Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Politics & Government > Ideologies & Doctrines > Conservatism & Liberalism
- Kindle Store > Kindle Short Reads > 90 minutes (44-64 pages) > Politics & Social Sciences
- Kindle Store > Kindle eBooks > Politics & Social Sciences > Philosophy > Ethics & Morality
- Kindle Store > Kindle eBooks > Politics & Social Sciences > Politics & Government > Ideologies & Doctrines