- Paperback: 224 pages
- Publisher: Holt Paperbacks; 1st edition (July 24, 2007)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 9780805083064
- ISBN-13: 978-0805083064
- ASIN: 0805083065
- Product Dimensions: 5.5 x 0.5 x 8.5 inches
- Shipping Weight: 7.2 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 98 customer reviews
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #810,614 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ Free Shipping
+ Free Shipping
Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design Paperback – July 24, 2007
|New from||Used from|
See the Best Books of the Month
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for the best books of the month in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
“The idea that evolution and God should be at odds is among the strangest of doctrines, an attempt to make the divine follow our particular notions of how He should operate. Michael Shermer explains what really happened, in terms that should be accessible to any faithful reader.” ―Bill McKibben
“Michael Shermer is one of America's necessary minds. A reformed fundamentalist who is now an experienced foe of pseudo-science and superstition, he does us the double favor of explaining exactly what creationists believe, and then of demonstrating that they have no case. With his forensic and polemical skill, he could have left them for dead: instead he generously urges them to stop wasting their time (and ours) and do some real work.” ―Christopher Hitchens
“A readable and well-researched book on what is perhaps the most vital scientific topic of our age. Anyone who has been snowed into thinking that there is a real scientific controversy over evolution by natural selection will be enlightened by Why Darwin Matters, which is both genial and intellectually uncompromising.” ―Steven Pinker
About the Author
Michael Shermer is the author of The Believing Brain, Why People Believe Weird Things, The Science of Good and Evil, The Mind Of The Market, Why Darwin Matters, Science Friction, How We Believe and other books on the evolution of human beliefs and behavior. He is the founding publisher of Skeptic magazine, the editor of Skeptic.com, a monthly columnist for Scientific American, and an adjunct professor at Claremont Graduate University. He lives in Southern California.
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Historian of Science Michael Shermer in his book Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design masterfully and amusingly takes the Intelligent Design theorists to task and shows how, in large measure, the Intelligent Designers do not have a case and how religious people can both believe in God and also accept scientific evidence.
The book begins with Shermer and a colleague exploring the Galapagos Isles; the same Isle's that Charles Darwin explored before authoring On the Origin of Species. He notes that the Isle's are difficult to get around, and are very threatening to certain kinds of life, and that over time he saw how animals that were on the Isle's during Darwin's journey there had changed and adapted to be better suited to survive. As he puts it "There can be no doubt: evolution happened."
Shermer then goes on the defensive, showing that evolution is a historical science; you don't see it while it is occurring as much as you do after it has occurred. He also points out that not only biology gives us evidence of evolution, but paleontology, geology, anthropology, and so forth. So, we can have a strong conviction of evolution and it is because various sciences and studies converge to the exact same conclusion. If evolution did not happen, it would be very odd for people of many disciplines to all converge to the same general framework.
Next, Shermer gives the various reasons people don't believe in the theory, and shows they are ill founded or have been countered. In large measure, part of the problem is about words, which as an analytic philosopher I would say most problems come from. When people hear the word theory, generally they take that to mean that this is someones idea that their acceptance or non-acceptance of will be of little difference. In science, a theory is based on empirical evidence, and is used to interpret the evidence. So, evolution is a theory based on evidence, and is able to explain life and complexity more than satisfactorily. For this reason, it is universally accepted in the scientific community, but people outside of it do not understand the meaning of the term, so they feel that Darwin's theories are of no more importance than those of Mary Baker Eddy. Newsflash: Darwin was right and Eddy was... well I don't want to go there but you get my point.
After explaining Darwin's theory, Shermer gives the arguments from the Intelligent Design side. He points out that most of them are just asking a question rather than making an argument. For instance, Intelligent Design theorist Stephen C. Meyer points out that the Cambrian Explosion is incompatible with Darwinism because these animals just appeared rather than descending from prior known forms of life, and states that even Darwin himself was perplexed by this. Shermer then points out that the current fossil record shows that the Cambrian Explosion was not really an explosion and that it is explainable by natural selection and random mutation. I must say, for a Cambridge philosophy graduate, Meyer makes me ashamed to be a philosopher. Yikes!
Shermer concludes by talking about the conflict between science and religion (which is not a conflict at all as far as I am concerned), and invokes the late paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould's idea of non-overlapping magisteria; which is that science and religion are about two different things, the former is about the empirical world, and the other is about morals, values, and so on.
Here I must disagree with Shermer and Gould. First, there is an overlap in some religions with science because some religions believe in miracles which are by definition "A violation of the laws of nature" as Scottish philosopher David Hume stated. Also, I am not sure that religion has its own magisteria to claim if it is solely about ethics; there are many moral philosophers, psychologists, and theorists who engage in these questions everyday, and some do it better than those who are religious. It would be better to say that religion is not interested in the same questions as science, and that there really is no conflict unless we make it into one.
I will close with this quote from Shermer's book, which sums up the whole debate and problem very beautifully:
"Darwin matters because evolution matters. Evolution matters because science matters. Science matters because it is the preeminent story of our age, an epic saga about who we are, where we came from, and where we are going."
Because science matters and because many in America are uniformed about these matters, I strongly recommend that you pick up Shermer's book and educate yourself. If we are going to have a conversation that is constructive, we must be informed.
Shermer's survey of recent court cases regarding evolution in public education was also lucid and concise. Shermer pulled his punches here, as there are a lot of embarrassing details in the recent trials that could have been trotted out if Shermer really wanted to drive the point home, but what he wrote was sufficient.
The book is actually very light on evidence for evolution. For that, I'd recommend Jerry Coyne's 'Why Evolution is True'. There are a few places where Shermer talks about cutting edge physics without going into much detail, which I think would read, to the outsider, like stories even more fantastical than any religious explanation. I think if you're going to get into multi-verses and bubble universes, you really have to be prepared to spend some time on it. If those sections pique your interest, you might start with Lawrence Kraus's 'A Universe from Nothing' and then go from there.
My only big beef with the book was the two chapters dedicated to explaining why there is no conflict between religion and science and why Christians (and conservatives) should embrace evolution. Shermer seems to really confuse the issue here. He demonstrates that evolution can explain human morality, and he seems to think that this will excite the theists, because it supports their view of a moral world. What he fails to recognize is that he's actually making matters 'worse' from the theistic perspective. Those theists who reject evolution are already concerned with the idea that evolution could replace the need for a divine Creator, and now Shermer demonstrates that evolution means we don't need a divine Law Giver either! Shermer seems to think that theists are concerned with moral laws for their own sake, but theists obey the laws because of the Law Giver.
In a similar manner, the chapter on 'no conflict between science and religion' was not argued well. Shermer endorses Gould's NOMA view, where science deals with material things and religion deals with immaterial things, with a God that is outside of space and time and so beyond the reach of science. But it is unclear how just asserting that God is outside of space and time somehow makes it immune to all the criticisms that Shermer levels against the non-NOMA approaches, and he doesn't even try to walk the reader through it. Maybe, as an atheist, his heart wasn't really in it. (I wrote longer comments on the problems of NOMA in my review of the otherwise-excellent 'The Rocks Don't Lie', if you're interested.)
Despite feeling like the chapters taking a conciliatory position re:religion were weak, the book was informative and occasionally insightful. It's a breezy read, and if you want to get a philosophy-of-science view of the Intelligent Design movement, this book is a fine place to turn.
Most recent customer reviews
and eloquent about the spirituality of science . . . An invaluable primer.Read more