Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Why Have Children?: The Ethical Debate (Basic Bioethics) Hardcover – February 3, 2012
See the Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed
Christine Overall offers a careful investigation into the moral issues surrounding the choice to have a child, demonstrating in the process how wide-ranging those issues really are. She never forgets that it is women who gestate and deliver babies -- not machines, not society, and not gender-unspecified reproducers. This book is a useful read not only for people considering parenthood, but for parents who want to think harder about their choices.(Hilde Lindemann, Professor of Philosophy, Michigan State University)
Why Have Children? asks a question of central importance to most human lives. This topic has received little philosophical attention but clearly deserves it. Overall's book, with its clear-headed analysis, consideration of a wide range of factors, and thought-provoking proposals will shape the debate for years to come.(Amy Mullin, Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto)
Christine Overall has taken a topic that had been under-analyzed and produced a book of such exceptional thoroughness and breadth that it is hard to imagine anyone surpassing her for some time to come.(Dena S. Davis, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University)
Christine Overall's latest book includes everything we've come to expect from her: relentless pursuit of the argument, crystalline prose, and a persistent drive to engage with the toughest and most important questions. At the heart of this conceptually sophisticated and factually rigorous book is a seemingly simple point: babies are borne by women. If you think that, by now, any philosopher writing about reproduction or population ethics would be keenly aware of this fact and its implications, you really need to read Why Have Children?(James L. Nelson, Professor of Philosophy, Michigan State University)
Cogently argued and exhaustively researched, Overall's newest will be of particular interest to thoughtful adults engaged in this debate, as well as students and professionals in philosophy and sociology.(Publishers Weekly)
…Overall is clearly invested in making her work accessible to a range of readers. Given the current national conversation about reproductive rights, I wish work like Overall's was not only accessible, but required reading.(Tammy Oler Bitch)
About the Author
Christine Overall is Professor of Philosophy and University Research Chair in the Department of Philosophy at Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario. She is the author of Aging, Death, and Human Longevity: A Philosophical Inquiry and other books.
Top Customer Reviews
The title sounds ominous, as though the book will be vastly critical of children or of people who have children. It isn't, though. Instead, Overall looks at what it means, morally, to have a child in present-day North America in clear, easy to read, and even warm language that shows a great deal of respect for children and for parents and that comes to no damning conclusions (except against deliberately-created extremely large families).
Mostly, Overall examines philosophical arguments that have been put forward both for and against having children and takes them down from the high-flown theoretical, in which no realistic human beings seem to be involved, to reality, where women must have or not have the children philosophers debate over. She looks at what these arguments, both pro- and anti-procreation, mean for women, their status, and their control over their own bodies. Many of the models fall apart when moved into the real world, where it's shown they imagine realities that could only exist if women were used as breeding machines or people were forced to be sterilized or use lifelong birth control.Read more ›
That said, it appears as though Overall selectively ignores or willfully misinterprets counter arguments to her claims, namely those of Benatar's "better to never have been" philosophy. What's more, the author then attempts to knock down these now incomplete arguments or misinterpretations ad nauseum. This 'dance' grows tiresome and frustrating. Added to this, she has a troubling habit of making claims and assumptions about other theories and thinkers that are flat-out unsubstantiated.
It pains me to only be able to give a book about a topic so important and under-discussed 2 stars but I expected its handling to be done so with a little more objectivity and care.
I agree with Dr. Overall's overall point that the decision to have kids requires more justification than the decision not to. In fact, I think she doesn't go far enough in cautioning people about the choice to reproduce. She brings up David Benatar's work (Better Never to Have Been), but completely misunderstands (and misconstrues) most of his well thought-out arguments. For example, she claims that even bad lives are better than no lives all, which Benatar (and most lay persons) refute almost instantly.
Dr. Overall claims that having children is a serious ethical issue, but then she throws it all out the door at the end: When someone asks her if they should have kids, she responds with "Don't miss it!" What the heck? You write a whole book discussing the ethical implications of reproduction and then say "oh well, go for it."
Having children is simply a natural given that is beyond morality because it comes automatically to us like the need to eat; it is not an aberration or misuse of our human potential, only in cases where children are born into misery or potential mothers are unfit to bring up children. In any case, nature has never asked our permission, it simply implanted this drive.
All we can do is a decision against procreation - celibacy, abortion or child infanticide. This has always happened, either to an individual desire to flee life (hermits) or due to unfortunate personal circumstances (poverty, illness etc.) or in cases of emergency due to regional events (war, famine etc.). Before the advent of mechanical birth control pregnancy simply happened, and I would argue that our own inventions cannot possibly carry any ethical obligations beyond the application of said invention (when NOT to use them, but never in favour of them, at least not in a democratic society).
The fundamental fact is and remains that you cannot view an individual human life as a 'separate event': it is a chain - life begets life. This is a fact beyond any moralizing.
From a generational standpoint it is a contract: you have been given life, you hand on this very gift. It is deeply imbedded in our instincts to secure human existence; hence it has to be considered an unqualified good (unless you view our existence as 'problematic' or even 'bad' as some loony fringes do in their pathological self-hatred).Read more ›