- Hardcover: 304 pages
- Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers (April 9, 2003)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0742523411
- ISBN-13: 978-0742523418
- Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.9 x 9.3 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #10,395,701 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Why Nicaragua Vanished: A Story of Reporters and Revolutionaries
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Featured resources in history
Explore these featured titles, sponsored by Springer. Learn more
What really happened in Nicaragua? Robert Leiken analyzes the shocking misreporting of American journalists and their failure to understand why the Sandinistas lost in 1990. Written with verve and calm, his account will open your eyes to a parade of media stereotypes. Though not an angry book, it will make a reasonable person angry. (Harvey C. Mansfield, professor of government, Harvard University)
Robert Leiken has been seeking and telling the truth about events in Nicaragua for more than 20 years. Not everyone else has done so. Here is his report on what he has learned, and what everyone interested in Nicaragua should know. (Michael Barone, senior writer, U.S. News & World Report, and co-author of The Almanac of American Politics)
Provides intriguing answers to these questions and for the first time tests media coverage of a major foreign policy crisis against an independent analysis of the events covered. Beautifully written, Why Nicaragua Vanished is perfect for all interested in the media, foreign policy, Latin America, or U.S. intellectual life. (Sir Read Alot Book Review)
The book is highly detailed, and often persuasive. (Columbia Journalism Review)
Robert Leiken has produced a masterpiece of serious scholarship, sound reasoning, and lucid writing. His detailed examination of media bias should have a profound impact on the way Americans view news coverage of foreign policy, and, one hopes, on the way journalists view themselves. (Robert Kagan, author of A Twilight Struggle: American Power and Nicaragua, 1977?1990)
About the Author
Robert S. Leiken is the director of the Immigration and National Security Program at the Nixon Center in Washington, D.C. and a non-resident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.
Browse award-winning titles. See more
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Top Customer Reviews
From the ideology of the Sandinistas, to the causes and makeup of the Contra rebellion, to the propaganda battle waged over human rights, to the coverage of elections in 1984 and 1990, Why Nicaragua Vanished is both devastating in its refutation of long-standing myths about Nicaragua's civil war and convincing in its analysis of reporters who let a system of stereotypes blind them to the reality of what they were reporting on.
My point is not that none of his criticisms of reporters, pollsters, academics or the Commission on Nicaragua Pre-Election Polls have any merit; he over-generalizes, over- reaches, quotes selectively, and minimizes or ignores countervailing evidence, but in some regards he has a case. Nor is my point that none of his criticisms apply to me, some of them do, in varying degrees (though his explicit attack on me is a complete distortion and in bad faith given our prior correspondence). My point rather is that he simply is not interested in understanding and engaging the actual arguments of his targets(with the partial exceptions of Preston and Kinzer). He is only interested in plucking phrases out of context to use in supporting his ax-grinding. Given his treatment of me, I can only conclude that nothing he says about anybody else can be trusted. One would have to search out and read every single source that Leiken quotes or cites in order to see whether or not he has been accurate and fair (and in some cases to see whether his source deserves credence, whether there is any reliable foundation for his proffered evidence, given his habit of accepting at face value whatever he is told by highly tendentious sources like Virgilio Godoy and Roger Guevara Mena).
Leiken had a chance to produce a book that would have been useful and challenging, and he threw it away out of ideological dogmatism and political animus. The intellectual instincts of his sectarian past persist. He's got a lot of nerve accusing others of bad faith and intellectual dishonesty.