Buy new:
$18.34$18.34
FREE delivery: Wednesday, Dec 28 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $7.95
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.59 shipping
99% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
90% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Why You Should Be a Socialist Hardcover – Illustrated, December 10, 2019
| Nathan J. Robinson (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
Enhance your purchase
A primer on Democratic Socialism for those who are extremely skeptical of it.
America is witnessing the rise of a new generation of socialist activists. More young people support socialism now than at any time since the labor movement of the 1920s. The Democratic Socialists of America, a big-tent leftist organization, has just surpassed 50,000 members nationwide. In the fall of 2018, one of the most influential congressmen in the Democratic Party lost a primary to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a 28-year-old socialist who had never held office before. But what does all this mean? Should we be worried about our country, or should we join the march toward our bright socialist future? In Why You Should Be a Socialist, Nathan J. Robinson will give readers a primer on twenty-first-century socialism: what it is, what it isn’t, and why everyone should want to be a part of this exciting new chapter of American politics.
From the heyday of Occupy Wall Street through Bernie Sanders’ 2016 presidential campaign and beyond, young progressives have been increasingly drawn to socialist ideas. However, the movement’s goals need to be defined more sharply before it can effect real change on a national scale. Likewise, liberals and conservatives will benefit from a deeper understanding of the true nature of this ideology, whether they agree with it or not. Robinson’s charming, accessible, and well-argued book will convince even the most skeptical readers of the merits of socialist thought.
- Print length336 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherAll Points Books
- Publication dateDecember 10, 2019
- Dimensions10.51 x 1.19 x 5.89 inches
- ISBN-101250200865
- ISBN-13978-1250200860
![]() |
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Nathan Robinson’s articles, and Current Affairs generally, have been consistently challenging and thought-provoking, with incisive critique and informative discussion, lucid and provocative, and focused on well-chosen issues of major significance. I find myself regularly recommending Robinson’s articles to others, and re-reading them myself. Unusually valuable contributions.” ―Noam Chomsky
"Nathan J. Robinson and Current Affairs are consistently excellent, writing at a very high standard, and offering serious and compelling alternative perspectives. Very worth following and reading." ―Glenn Greenwald, co-founder of The Intercept
"Nathan Robinson is one of the clearest, most insightful writers working today. Why You Should Be a Socialist is a scrupulous, carefully-argued work that will challenge liberals and confound conservatives." ―Ryan Cooper, National Correspondent for The Week
“Current Affairs editor Robinson profiles the progressive movement shaking up the Democratic Party’s old guard and makes the case for a new brand of socialism in this cogent debut.” ―Publishers Weekly
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : All Points Books; Illustrated edition (December 10, 2019)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 336 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1250200865
- ISBN-13 : 978-1250200860
- Item Weight : 1.2 pounds
- Dimensions : 10.51 x 1.19 x 5.89 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #701,848 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #236 in Radical Political Thought
- #533 in Elections
- #948 in Communism & Socialism (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
It’s true, as Robinson points out, that it is only the left that seems to have any solutions. When you’re ideologically wedded to the market—as the right is—and it is the market that is creating the problems in the first place, you can have no possible solutions to offer. Cutting taxes and deregulation is just going to make matters worse, but you can’t admit that because that is the foundation of your political philosophy.
So if we’re going to do anything to solve our social and political problems, we by necessity have to look to the left. The left, at a minimum, does not cripple itself by limiting its own funding and ability to provide useful services and programs. But is socialism, specifically, the answer?
The answer depends on how you define socialism, and definitions are tricky. Not only is socialism intrinsically difficult to define, but it also has a host of negative historical connotations to battle against. When the average person hears the word socialism, the Soviet-style variety is unfortunately what comes to mind. While the difference between Stalinism and guaranteed healthcare should be obvious, some people simply can’t shake the Soviet connection. In the end, whether or not you would call yourself a socialist is largely a matter of how you might define the term. (Although it raises the question of why you would want to stubbornly cling to a term with that kind of historical baggage.)
Ironically, this book has ultimately confirmed that I will not be calling myself a socialist, based on how Robinson defines the term and on its historical baggage. In Robinson’s own words: “Personally, I consider myself both a radical and a pragmatist. I think there should be no borders, no prisons, and no bosses. That makes me a utopian socialist.” Elsewhere, he writes that “in the long term I’d like to live in a stateless society in which the means of production are democratically controlled.”
Well, at least you know what you are dealing with. While I agree with Robinson’s diagnosis of the major social and economic problems, and with his critique of conservatism, and with his vision of a more equitable society, I am far less confident that I would want to live in a society with no state, no borders, and no prisons. He has apparently more confidence than I do in my ability to predict what a world like that would actually be like. I work under the assumption that imagination and reality do not always perfectly correlate, and what you think you want does not always materialize in the way you might think. This becomes more of a problem the further you move away from the current state of affairs.
I do, however, share Robinson’s belief that political problems can be solved, and that the world can be made to be a more fair and equitable place. We might both agree on things like universal healthcare and education, and that progressive taxation can reduce economic and political inequality. We are probably both in favor of getting money out of politics and that the free market is inefficient in all the ways that matter most.
But where we disagree seems to be at the critical juncture where socialism turns into progressivism. In line with Karl Popper’s “piecemeal social engineering,” and with Joseph Stiglitz’s version of progressive capitalism, I would much prefer incremental reform to a complete overhaul of the system.
The law of unintended consequences is highly relevant here, and in addition, we already know that capitalism can create high levels of growth and wealth and a variety of goods and services to match a variety of preferences. It seems both more realistic and less risky to leverage the better aspects of capitalism in a mixed economy where the wealth that is created is redistributed in a more equitable manner, not unlike the Nordic countries of today. The thing is, you can agree with all of Robinson’s policy recommendations (universal healthcare and education, more robust worker rights, etc.) without also thinking that we should one day live in a stateless society or completely upend the system we have. But maybe that’s what makes socialism different from progressivism, and if so, then I have renewed confidence in calling myself a progressive.
Despite Robinson’s radical positions, the book is certainly worth the read. He correctly outlines the problems, makes a strong moral case for taking action, suggests effective policy recommendations, and delivers strong critiques of the competing political ideologies. But his insistence on the necessity of a utopian vision, and his overconfidence in knowing what drastic changes would or would not be preferable upon implementation make this book unlikely to convert many people over to radical socialism. This book may very well convert people over to the left—which I think it should—but it will likely stop far short of the stateless society that he thinks he wants.








