Buy new:
$73.69$73.69
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: BSRN store
Save with Used - Very Good
$22.87$22.87
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: BooksMaxxing
Return this item for free
We offer easy, convenient returns with at least one free return option: no shipping charges. All returns must comply with our returns policy.
Learn more about free returns.- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select your preferred free shipping option
- Drop off and leave!
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Wilson's War: How Woodrow Wilson's Great Blunder Led to Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, and World War II Hardcover – March 29, 2005
Purchase options and add-ons
President Woodrow Wilson famously rallied the United States to enter World War I by saying the nation had a duty to make “the world safe for democracy.” But as historian Jim Powell demonstrates in this shocking reappraisal, Wilson actually made a horrible blunder by committing the United States to fight. Far from making the world safe for democracy, America’s entry into the war opened the door to murderous tyrants and Communist rulers. No other president has had a hand—however unintentional—in so much destruction. That’s why, Powell declares, “Wilson surely ranks as the worst president in American history.”
Wilson’s War reveals the horrifying consequences of our twenty-eighth president’s fateful decision to enter the fray in Europe. It led to millions of additional casualties in a war that had ground to a stalemate. And even more disturbing were the long-term consequences—consequences that played out well after Wilson’s death. Powell convincingly demonstrates that America’s armed forces enabled the Allies to win a decisive victory they would not otherwise have won—thus enabling them to impose the draconian surrender terms on Germany that paved the way for Adolf Hitler’s rise to power.
Powell also shows how Wilson’s naiveté and poor strategy allowed the Bolsheviks to seize power in Russia. Given a boost by Woodrow Wilson, Lenin embarked on a reign of terror that continued under Joseph Stalin. The result of Wilson’s blunder was seventy years of Soviet Communism, during which time the Communist government murdered some sixty million people.
Just as Powell’s FDR’s Folly exploded the myths about Franklin Roosevelt and the New Deal, Wilson’s War destroys the conventional image of Woodrow Wilson as a great “progressive” who showed how the United States can do good by intervening in the affairs of other nations. Jim Powell delivers a stunning reminder that we should focus less on a president’s high-minded ideals and good intentions than on the consequences of his actions.
A selection of the Conservative Book Club and American Compass
- Print length352 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherCrown Forum
- Publication dateMarch 29, 2005
- Dimensions6.4 x 1.12 x 9.3 inches
- ISBN-101400082366
- ISBN-13978-1400082360
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Review
“Jim Powell makes a persuasive case against Woodrow Wilson. But I disagree with Jim. During the latter part of his second term Wilson was nearly comatose, thereby making him the perfect progressive interventionist politician, in my opinion.” —P. J. O’Rourke, author of Peace Kills and Parliament of Whores
“Wilson’s War makes a compelling case that Woodrow Wilson was America’s worst president and an unmitigated disaster for the world. In a learned exposition of the Law of Unintended Consequences, Jim Powell shows how U.S. intervention into World War I strengthened the hand of Soviet Communism and led directly to the rise of Hitler and World War II. Wilson’s War exposes how America’s court historians have misled the public for generations.” —Thomas J. DiLorenzo, author of The Real Lincoln and How Capitalism Saved America
“Wilson’s War is a highly controversial interpretation of twentieth-century political history, which asserts that its worst evils—Communism and Nazism—were unintended consequences of President Wilson’s decision to enter World War I on the Allied side.” —Richard Pipes, Baird Professor of History, Emeritus, Harvard University
Praise for FDR's Folly and The Triumph of Liberty
“Thoroughly documented, relying on an impressive variety of popular and academic literature, both contemporary and historical.” —Milton Friedman, Nobel Laureate
“I found Jim Powell’s book fascinating. I think he has written an important story, one that definitely needs telling.” —Thomas Fleming, author of The New Dealers’ War and Liberty!
“Jim Powell is a man of great energy, determination, obstinacy, and courage, and all these qualities have gone into his work.” —Paul Johnson, author of A History of the American People and Modern Times
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
HOW DID THAT MONSTROUS WAR HAPPEN?
World War I marked the end of a glorious era, the most peaceful period in modern history. The last general European war had concluded a century earlier, in 1815, when the French emperor Napoleon Bonaparte was defeated and banished to a shabby house on St. Helena, a British-controlled island in the South Atlantic Ocean, about 1,140 miles west of South Africa.
The Napoleonic Wars helped convince several generations that war was an evil to be avoided. The dapper Corsican Napoleon had emerged as a military strongman amid the wreckage of the French Revolution. In 1799 and 1800 he led successful French military campaigns against Austro-Hungarian armies in Italy and Germany. In 1799 he seized power in a coup. He declared himself to be consul for life. He resolved to conquer Egypt, gain French territory in the Caribbean, and extend his influence throughout the Mediterranean. He annexed Piedmont and forced a more congenial government on the Swiss Confederation.
Napoleon established the first modern police state. He tapped Joseph Fouche, who had been educated for the clergy but had never taken his vows as a priest, to organize a secret police force. As a Jacobin during the French Revolution, Fouche had organized mass shootings. He developed Napoleon's spy network throughout Europe, and he arranged to have adversaries abducted and shot.
The nationalist fury that swept through Germany during the mid-twentieth century, providing political support for Hitler, began to develop after Napoleon humiliated the German-speaking people. He defeated the Austrian army at Austerlitz (1805) and crushed the Prussians at Jena (1806). Prussian generals turned out to be cowards, and the Prussian army quickly disintegrated. Prussia had built a system of forts that were expected to provide a sturdy defense, but they generally surrendered without much resistance. Napoleon ordered that German-speaking states, including Bavaria, Wurttemberg, Baden, Hesse-Darmstadt, Nassau, and Berg, be combined to form the Confederation du Rhin--the Confederation of the Rhine. The French had already, in 1792, annexed territories west of the Rhine, notably Cologne and Mainz.
Napoleon dismissed corrupt old tyrants, an action that local people surely appreciated, but in many cases they were replaced by Napoleon's relatives, who became corrupt new tyrants. He imposed his Code Napoleon on conquered territories. Based on Roman law and some 14,000 decrees issued during the French Revolution, this was a simplified civil law code providing uniform rules for people to live by. Napoleon abolished the hodgepodge of feudal laws and customs. As historian J. M. Thompson noted, "The Code Napoleon contained less than 120,000 words and could be carried in the pocket."
Some 100,000 of Napoleon's troops occupied Prussia at the nation's expense. In 1807 he signed the Treaty of Tilsit with Russia, stripping Prussia of German-speaking provinces north and west of the lower Elbe River, and Polish provinces to the east.Altogether, Prussian territory was cut from 89,120 square miles to 46,032. Napoleon demanded that the Prussian government pay him 140 million francs. This amounted to a huge tax that devastated the economy. Making things worse was Napoleon's "Continental System," aimed at harming Britain by closing Europe's ports. The Continental System meant that Prussia couldn't earn its accustomed revenues from grain exports.
When Napoleon was paid off, he withdrew his forces from Prussia and turned his attention elsewhere, and the Prussian king pondered how his state might regain its place in the world. He was persuaded to name Karl vom Stein as chief minister. Stein was fascinated by Anne-Robert-Jacques Turgot, who had urged dramatic reforms on the last French king to possess absolute power, Louis XVI. Stein persuaded Frederick William III to issue the Edict of Emancipation, in October 1807, which abolished feudal privileges and restrictions on the sale of land. In other words, he opened up property markets, erasing legal distinctions among aristocrats, merchants, or peasants. Stein also extended civil rights to Jews. He was convinced these reforms would unleash the energies of the people.
Prussia also reformed what was left of its army: ineffective officers were dismissed; junior officers were promoted on merit; army policies were adopted to improve efficiency. The long process of rebuilding got under way. The consequences of the Napoleonic Wars were devastating as they played out decades later in Prussia and throughout Europe.
The Napoleonic Wars themselves were bad enough. Historian Paul Johnson observed that the wars "set back the economic life of much of Europe for a generation. They made men behave like beasts, and worse. The battles were bigger and much more bloody. The armies of the old regimes were of long-service professional veterans, often lifers, obsessed with uniforms, pipe clay, polished brass, and their elaborate drill—the kings could not bear to lose them. Bonaparte cut off the pigtails, ended the powdered hair, supplied mass-produced uniforms and spent the lives of his young, conscripted recruits as though they were loose change. His insistence that they live off the land did not work in subsistence economies like Spain and Russia, where if the soldiers stole, the peasants starved. . . . Throughout Europe, the standards of human conduct declined as men and women, and their growing children, learned to live brutally."
The savagery was shocking. Reporting on Napoleon's campaign in Spain, historian Antonina Vallentin wrote: "French corpses piled up in the mountain ravines. . . . Drunk with fury against the servants of Christ who preached hatred, the French soldiers sacked the churches, carried away the objects of veneration, profaned the House. The village priests slaughtered the French who sought refuge among them. Farms were left burning like torches when the French had passed by. The wounded and the ill were murdered as they were being taken from one place to another. The roads were strewn with denuded corpses; the trees were weighed down with the bodies of men hanged; blind hate was loosed against hate, a nameless terror roamed the deserted countryside, death came slowly through the most frightful mutilations."
Napoleon's worst horrors occurred during the Russian campaign. In the spring of 1812, he assembled some 600,000 soldiers—his "Grand Army" including Prussians, Austrians, and Italians. They crossed the Niemen River, which flows from western Russia into the Baltic, and headed east in a front some 300 miles wide. Napoleon wanted a decisive battle that would force Czar Alexander I to become his subject, but the czar's forces harassed Napoleon's soldiers in skirmishes, then withdrew into the interior of the country, destroying fields, towns, and cities as they went, denying Napoleon the opportunity to replenish his supplies. The farther Napoleon advanced, the farther Russian forces withdrew, and the more devastation Napoleon encountered. His forces entered Smolensk, only to find it consumed by flames.
According to historian Christopher Herold, "The progress of his carriage along a road choked with limping cripples, stretchers, and ambulances set him into a somber mood. In Smolensk he passed carts loaded with amputated limbs. In the hospitals the surgeons ran out of dressings and used paper and birch bark fibers as substitutes; many of those who survived surgery died of starvation, for the supply service had virtually broken down. In addition to the battle casualties, hundreds of men fell victim to the Russian secret weapon, vodka, dying by the roadside from a combination of raw spirits and exposure. Such, it must be emphasized, was the condition of the Grand Army not during its tragic retreat but during its victorious advance."
Although Napoleon's supply lines were stretched to the limit, he could see that his forces would disintegrate if they spent the winter in Smolensk. He decided they must continue on to Moscow. The September 1812 Battle of Borodino was among the few engagements—there were some 30,000 French casualties and 45,000 Russian casualties. On September 14, Napoleon reached the outskirts of Moscow with about 90,000 soldiers. He stopped advancing and waited for a Russian delegation to surrender, but they never came. By the time Napoleon actually entered Moscow, it was burning.
French soldiers reveled in the riches they looted from the city, but they needed food. Foraging in the countryside yielded less and less. Their boots had worn out, and they had nothing else to wear. They didn't have winter clothing when the weather turned bitter cold in October. By then, Napoleon recognized that he had to retreat, and he headed for Smolensk. As his soldiers retreated, they were attacked by Cossack fighters and peasant guerrillas. One of Napoleon's generals, Philippe-Paul Segur, recalled that "the earth was littered with battered helmets and breastplates, broken drums, fragments of weapons, shreds of uniforms, and blood-stained flags. Lying amidst this desolation were half-devoured corpses."
The first heavy snowfall was on November 6. Segur wrote, "Objects changed their shape; we walked without knowing where we were or what lay ahead, and anything became an obstacle. . . . Yet the poor wretches [Napoleon's soldiers] dragged themselves along, shivering, with chattering teeth, until the snow packed under the soles of their boots, a bit of debris, a branch, or the body of a fallen comrade tripped them and threw them down. Then their moans for help went unheeded. The snow soon covered them up and only low white mounds showed where they lay." Cossack fighters and peasant guerrillas massacred the stragglers, and Russian armies joined the rout. When Napoleon's Grand Army had been reduced to about 9,000, he went ahead to rais...
Product details
- Publisher : Crown Forum
- Publication date : March 29, 2005
- Edition : First Edition
- Language : English
- Print length : 352 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1400082366
- ISBN-13 : 978-1400082360
- Item Weight : 1.28 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.4 x 1.12 x 9.3 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #241,239 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #5,771 in United States History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book informative and well-written, with one noting it's required reading for both amateur and professional historians.
AI Generated from the text of customer reviews
Select to learn more
Customers find the book informative and interesting, with one customer noting it is required reading for both amateur and professional historians.
"...He gives the reader a riveting, chilling account of Stalin’s show trials and the collectivization of the kulaks (“dekulakization”) which resulted in..." Read more
"...book begins by examining the roots of World War I, with details about the origins of the war I'd not read before...." Read more
"...Wilson’s ineptitude with ample supporting evidence, it gives a solid summary of conditions that led to 2 of the most abusive totalitarian regimes..." Read more
"...It is interesting and well written. It answered some questions that I did not know I had. I had already read Sigmund Freud's book on Wilson...." Read more
Customers praise the book's writing, with one noting its well-argued presentation.
"...an impressive, almost Johnsonesque grasp of history with a matching talent for writing...." Read more
"...Overall, a well argued book with some flaws." Read more
"Well this is an outstanding book. It is interesting and well written. It answered some questions that I did not know I had...." Read more
"...It was well written even though it was somewhat disturbing. Don't think that current politicians are the only bad ones." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2011Format: HardcoverVerified PurchaseMr. Jim Powell in his book Wilson's War presents a very compelling case that Woodrow Wilson was one of the worst Presidents the United States ever had. Wilson failed so miserably because of his needless intervention in World War I and his failed diplomacy during and after this war. According to Mr. Powell Wilson's first beig mistake was to enter the World War in the first place. If Wilson had kept the United States out of this war not only would numerous American lives have been spared but the war would have ended in a draw. There would have been no vindictive Versailles Treaty and reparations that destabilized an already weak Germany economy and society. The tragic rise of Adolf Hitler would have been averted,saving countless lives.
Wilson's second big error was encouraging the Kerensky government in Russia to remain in the war despite the wishes of the Russian people. Thus economic problems in Russia continued and Lenin was able to rise to power. Again this mistake cost countless lives.
Wilson had his ideals. Yet the man was arrogant and self conceited, tending to equate dissent with evil and treason. Thus in some respects America became a police state during World War I. Wilson's arrogance was also displayed in earlier foreign interventions in Mexico and the Caribbean.
It should also be noted that Wilson instigated the first draft conscription of American young people for a war not on the American mainland. The conscripted militia was originally called to fight only to repel foreign invasion, suppress domestic rebellion, and help enforce the law. Wilson changed this sound policy with his draft. Wilson's new policy led directly to the Vietnam debacle and the destabilization of American society with drugs and often violent dissent. Since then experience has taught the hard lesson that any government or regime that sends conscripts to fight a foreign war ends up either overthrown or with grave problems not experienced previously.
Mr. Powell mentions but does not dwell on the role of the international bankers in bringing the United States into foreign wars. J.P. Morgan lent the allied governments one billion dollars. He was an influential man, and would naturally use this influence to recover his loans.
Another malignant change of the Wilson administration was the permanent change of the Democratic Party from the laissez faire populist party of 1917 to the big government monstrosity of today. Wilson gave government offices and patronage only to so called progressives who believed in Wilson's pro government ideas. Entry into World War I brought many New England elitists and other statists into power and the Democratic Party. And from the transformed Democratic Party these statists have never left.
- Reviewed in the United States on October 10, 2019Format: KindleVerified PurchaseI have just finished reading WILSON’S WAR by Jim Powell from cover to cover. Mr. Powell earns his five stars with room to spare. He displays an impressive, almost Johnsonesque grasp of history with a matching talent for writing. As the title says, Wilson’s “Great Blunder” led to Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, and World War II with his 1917 declaration of war upon Germany. But Wilson committed a second blunder almost as great. If Wilson had supported Admiral Kolchak in 1918 with weapons and supplies, he might have avoided many of the consequences of his initial 1917 blunder. Of course, he would still have sacrificed his Fourteen Points on the altar of the League of Nations, but the subversive activities of the Comintern which pitted National against International Socialism would not have happened. WILSON’S WAR does not mention Admiral Kolchak. Neither does the book make clear that it was England – not Germany – who started the First World War and that Germany, alone among the Powers, made strenuous efforts to prevent it. (See my book THE TWO EDWARDS for details) This is first of all because the victors write history, but also because putting the blame (for WW1) squarely on England where it belongs would put postwar Germany in a much more favorable light for which the world may not yet be ready.
But none of this detracts from the overall value of the book. Mr. Powell delivers Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan’s important but little-known views of Germany’s policy of unrestricted submarine warfare and the Lusitania affair neither of which called for an American declaration of war. He gives the reader a riveting, chilling account of Stalin’s show trials and the collectivization of the kulaks (“dekulakization”) which resulted in the deaths of millions. These and other horrors are credibly and cohesively presented in Mr. Powell’s book. It is a cracking good read and required reading for amateur and professional historians alike.
- Reviewed in the United States on August 7, 2012Format: HardcoverVerified PurchaseIn this remarkable book Jim Powell shows that Woodrow Wilson was not that apostle of peace as which he is usually portrayed. On the contrary, Jim Powell proves that Wilson was determeind to bring the United States into the 1st World War right from the outset. He only needed an excuse to implement his nefarious plan, which came about in 1917. By entering the war on the side of the allies, he brought about Versailles which, in its turn, produced Hitler and the Nazi party in Germany,the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, which created Lenin and Stalin, the greatest mass murderer of all time and in the end the 2nd World War, the greatest catastrophy Europe and, in fact, the whole world had ever experienced. He didn't "make the world safe for democracy" as he had announced, he made the world "safe for Bolshevism" and the enslavement of millions of people. Above all, the chapters dealing with the situation in Russia after the October Revolution which graphically describes the unimaginable suffering of millions of innocent people ought to make one think twice about who was the greatest monster in the world at that time. Stalin had already killed tens of milliones of his own people when Hitler still had an almost clean record. Nevertheless, the allies - especially Halifax, Churchill and Roosevelt - decided to side with the Soviet Union against Germany, thus causing the death of about 50 million people, the total destruction of Europe and the dissolution of the British Empire. Was it really worth it?
Top reviews from other countries
Miklos RothReviewed in Australia on April 9, 20205.0 out of 5 stars Wilson’s war:
Format: KindleVerified PurchaseHi and thank you for this brilliant book! My favourite subject at school was and still is History! I always thought, knowing plenty about this subject, until I read this book! Imagine those who don’t like it, or today’s generations who don’t study, how much they’re misinformed? One thing is for sure, there will be consequences, shame I won’t be around!






