Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$15.53$15.53
FREE delivery: Thursday, April 18 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $12.30
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
95% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Woke Racism: How a New Religion Has Betrayed Black America Hardcover – October 26, 2021
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
Purchase options and add-ons
New York Times bestselling author and acclaimed linguist John McWhorter argues that an illiberal neoracism, disguised as antiracism, is hurting Black communities and weakening the American social fabric.
Americans of good will on both the left and the right are secretly asking themselves the same question: how has the conversation on race in America gone so crazy? We’re told to read books and listen to music by people of color but that wearing certain clothes is “appropriation.” We hear that being white automatically gives you privilege and that being Black makes you a victim. We want to speak up but fear we’ll be seen as unwoke, or worse, labeled a racist. According to John McWhorter, the problem is that a well-meaning but pernicious form of antiracism has become, not a progressive ideology, but a religion—and one that’s illogical, unreachable, and unintentionally neoracist.
In Woke Racism, McWhorter reveals the workings of this new religion, from the original sin of “white privilege” and the weaponization of cancel culture to ban heretics, to the evangelical fervor of the “woke mob.” He shows how this religion that claims to “dismantle racist structures” is actually harming his fellow Black Americans by infantilizing Black people, setting Black students up for failure, and passing policies that disproportionately damage Black communities. The new religion might be called “antiracism,” but it features a racial essentialism that’s barely distinguishable from racist arguments of the past.
Fortunately for Black America, and for all of us, it’s not too late to push back against woke racism. McWhorter shares scripts and encouragement with those trying to deprogram friends and family. And most importantly, he offers a roadmap to justice that actually will help, not hurt, Black America.
- Print length224 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPortfolio
- Publication dateOctober 26, 2021
- Dimensions6.25 x 0.79 x 9.29 inches
- ISBN-100593423062
- ISBN-13978-0593423066
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may ship from close to you
Editorial Reviews
Review
"McWhorter brings us much-needed pointed social commentarywith humor and grace. Give this book to those who are questioning the new religion, even those who have found it. Woke Racism has the capacity to melt the hatred and fervor that is now all the rage, and to bring love and forgiveness, logic and discourse, back into fashion.”—Heather E. Heying, evolutionary biologist and coauthor of A Hunter-Gatherer’s Guide to the 21st Century
“Scathingly brilliant and strawman-killing from the get-go, Woke Racism will make you stop in your tracks no matter what your politics are—and very possibly reexamine some of your deepest held convictions. Masterfully and beautifully written, this book is a powerful appeal for common sense.”—Amy Chua, professor at Yale Law School and author of Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother and Political Tribes
“Honest commentary about racial controversies is rare, and John McWhorter is a writer who can be counted on to provide it. Woke Racism is a heartfelt evisceration of the sloppy thinking that forms the foundation of so much social justice activism today. It’s an essential contribution to our national discussion about racial inequality, and McWhorter’s willingness to put unvarnished truth above politically correct niceties deserves our gratitude.”—Jason L. Riley, Wall Street Journal columnist and author of Maverick
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Portfolio (October 26, 2021)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 224 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0593423062
- ISBN-13 : 978-0593423066
- Item Weight : 14.4 ounces
- Dimensions : 6.25 x 0.79 x 9.29 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #32,928 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #93 in Discrimination & Racism
- #105 in Political Commentary & Opinion
- #112 in Political Conservatism & Liberalism
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

John McWhorter teaches linguistics, philosophy, and music history at Columbia University, and writes for various publications on language issues and race issues such as Time, the Wall Street Journal, the Daily Beast, CNN, and the Atlantic. he told his mother he wanted to be a "book writer" when he was five, and is happy that it worked out.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Woke Racism, John McWhorter
November 19, 2021
“The failure of so many thinkers to understand the difference between the effects of racism
In the past and racism in the present has strangled discussions about race for decades.”
John McWhorter
Woke Racism, 2021
John McWhorter is an independent thinker – a rare (at risk of becoming extinct) individual in today’s academy. He is professor of linguistics at Columbia University, where he also teaches American studies and music history. At age 56, with a PhD from Stanford, he has written almost two dozen books. In his spare time, he is a contributing editor at The Atlantic and an opinion columnist for The New York Times. He describes himself as a “cranky, liberal Democrat.” He is a black man who believes that affirmative action should be based on class, not race, and that woke racism hurts those it claims to help.
In this book, he argues that woke racism represents a third wave of anti-racism, “…from people wishing they hadn’t missed the late 1960s.” This wave, he claims, has assumed the traits of a religion, with white privilege as original sin. The third wave “has taken it from the concrete political activism of Martin Luther King to the faith-based commitments of a Martin Luther.” He castigates the proselytizers of this religion, “The Elect,” as “pious, unempirical virtue signalers.” They resemble, in his words, early Christians who “thought of themselves as bearers of truth, in contrast to all other belief systems…” Like other such movements, they appeal “to an idealized past, a fantastical future, and an indelibly polluted present.” For the Elect, black people’s noble past is Africa, a glorified future is one without hate, but the present consists of oppressors and oppressed. He finds the Elect’s sanctimony insulting to blacks, who are led to believe that victimhood is destiny and success is due to special treatment. When conservative blacks deny victimhood, they are smeared by the Elect: Virginia’s Lieutenant Governor-elect Winsome Sears is a “white” supremacist and South Carolina’s Senator Tim Scott is an “Uncle Tom.”
Mr. McWhorter does not deny the existence of racism. He writes: “Racism, in all its facets, is real, but since the late 1960s a contingent of black thinkers has tended to insist that things are as bad [today] as they were in 1940, leaving many black people who actually experienced Jim Crow a tad perplexed and even put off.” The passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Fair Housing Act of 1968 were positive steps toward racial equality, but they feed the argument “that black people could [no longer] have a basic pride in having come the whole way…” In the 1950s, black leaders criticized minstrel shows like Amos ‘n Andy for not showing successful black people Today, black leaders denigrate shows like Julia for not showing poverty and racism experienced by American blacks.
Interracial marriages in 1970 represented less than one percent of all marriages in the United States. Today, according to a 2020 Pew Research Center survey, “about 17% of new marriages in the U.S. are interracial couples.” Blacks represent about 11% of college graduates today; fifty years ago, that number was less than five percent. These are facts ignored by the Elect. Ironically, colleges often teach black students a view of whites as oppressors. Mr. McWhorter quotes a Pew Research Center survey, which noted that nine percent of black high school students report experiencing racism regularly; “the number doubles among black college graduates to 17.5 percent.” “Half of black people with college degrees say that racism has made them fear for their safety; just a third of younger black students do.”
It is the condescending attitude of the Elect toward blacks that troubles him most. He writes: “An enlightened America is supposed to hold a public figure accountable for her ideas. On the issue of the Revolutionary War, Hannah-Jones claim is simply false, but our current cultural etiquette requires pretending that isn’t true – because she is black.” The claim that America is systemically racist ignores societal changes over the past several decades. Is there further to go? Of course. Are those like me brought up in educated white families privileged relative to blacks brought up in poverty? Of course. But should the focus be on pretending there has been no change or celebrating the fact that racism has declined over the past fifty years? Privilege is less a factor of race and more a matter of class.
McWhorter writes that if we could accept “three real-world efforts that combine political feasibility with effectiveness” that would address what ails America today: “There should be no war on drugs; society should get behind teaching everybody to read the right way; and we should make solid vocational training as easy to obtain as a college education.” In the book, he elaborates on all three. As to accusations that he is not “black enough:” “I know racism when I encounter it, even when it’s subtle. I have written about it often. And yet I still believe every word I am writing in this book.”
Professor McWhorter is better educated than most of his critics who comprises the “Elect,” which gives this short book heft at a time when emotion outranks composure. “Reason,” he writes, “must prevail. This is the heart of the enlightenment. The abolitionists knew it; Civil Rights leaders knew it; today’s liberals know it. Only the Elect propose that rationality, where it discomfits them, is mere ‘whiteness’.”
I encourage all my friends, especially those who consider themselves liberal Democrats, to read this book. Heather MacDonald, in City Journal, wrote words on science being viewed through the lens of “equity,” which apply to Mr. McWhorter’s book: “Step by step, we are shutting down the very processes of open inquiry and the cultivation of excellence that have freed humanity from so much unnecessary suffering.” Dispassionate discussion on race is being similarly treated. Anti-racism is racist, as it targets the group, not the individual. It is contrary to Martin Luther King’s plea that people should be judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin. Common sense and tolerance, with a focus on the person should be our guides regarding race, not the absolutism of religious puritanism. This is a powerful book.
I was also uncomfortable with them being labeled as white, which, to me, erased a history of literal eons of persecution, as if it magically dissipated after WWII.
Similarly, I was uncomfortable with any criticism of Israel being labeled as antisemitic. No one is above criticism and attempts to label people with legitimate complaints as antisemitic is disingenuous.
However, there is a lot of antisemitism disguised as criticism regarding Israel, and I was wondering why these people, who consider themselves adept at detecting and rejecting discrimination, couldn't see it, or why they refused to listen to Jewish people who felt discriminated against.
This book gives you an alternative framework for viewing the people who turned against Jews, who have supported the rights of marginalized group, including LGBTQ rights since the 1960s, the Palestinians who actually want to coexist with Israel in their own state, and who were themselves victims, not perpetrators, of lynchings (not many, but it happened, and every lynching was a travesty).
The author himself is on the left, so this isn't some right-wing takedown job. Highly recommend for people committed to equality, but feel like something has gone terribly wrong on the left.
The narrative that McWhorter critiques has been developing since the late 1960's first in academia, then the major news media and has more recently gone mainstream in the writings of Ta Nehisi Coates, Ibram X. Kendi, Robin DiAngelo and Nikole Sheri Hannah-Jones to name a few. I first encountered it in required affirmative action seminars and speeches as an employee of a large technology firm in the 1980's culminating in one led by the fanatical Jane Elliott in which we were segregated from our coworkers by eye color and subjected to humiliating slurs and exercises in a mock classroom. That experience altered my intuition and I began to consider other sources. Elliott's rhetoric on racism essentially corresponded to what has become the dominant mainstream narrative on race today and by now she seems to have risen to the status of saint in the “religion” that McWhorter calls "woke racism". McWhorter is only one such alternate source to consider. (There are a growing number of others.) His critique is informed, nuanced and articulate. His frustration with what he sees comes across particularly well in the audiobook where he is the reader. It's a damning critique of the dominate narrative about race; one that I think is spot on in most respects.
The one significant flaw I see in McWhorter's analysis, particularly irritating to this reader, is his characterization of this "Woke Racism" as a religion rather than an ideology. His concept of religion seems wholly negative, consisting primarily of the unquestioned acceptance of irrational ideas and beliefs. While it's hard to fault him for having this impression given the numerous examples to be found of such, I find it to be very misinformed on the whole and in my own experience where doubt and questioning are very much an accepted part of the faith and practice of Christianity. Alternatively, I’ve encountered many self proclaimed “rational” agnostics and atheists whose adherence to their beliefs and opinions fits well within McWhorter’s concept of religion.
While it's certainly true that many irrational and immoral things have been justified in the name of religion. I think that without religion things would be much worse. It takes an appeal to a transcendent authority, explicit or implied, for moral judgments and reasoning, like the kind McWhorter takes for granted, to apply them to others who don't happen to agree with them. It's the unacknowledged assumption behind all our moral judgements. Reason can justify any evil action for those who have the power and the will to do them. Reason can't prove that murder is wrong for someone with the power to get away with it. Without some transcendent authority we're reduced to "might makes right" and our moral judgements apply only to those who happen to agree with them. Reasonable human beings live in a world that assumes that which they cannot really prove independently. While it's certainly true that religion has been used to justify evil, we still need its tacit assumptions to justify that judgement. Reason can distinguish moral issues from non-moral ones, but it can't independently make moral judgments.
McWhorter is no theologian, and it shows, but given his view of religion I think his critique is well argued and very much worth considering. My hope, though, is that it will do more for its readers than to justify noninvolvement in very helpful efforts to better the lives of black Americans. Among the ineffectual or harmful efforts in this area, critiqued by this book, are very helpful efforts that deserve our substantial and unqualified support. Seek them out, give them your support and get involved.
Top reviews from other countries
Made me think about other New Religions rising and their damage.
You don't need a creational foundation to create a religion, it's a type of belief structure that John will walk you through. We aren't insane, and this fabulous panacea will be our bible that we connect ourselves with to push back against the Elect. The author is a bona fide intellectual, and his work clarified my disordered thoughts about this topic into an organized format.
The book starts with three examples of people who unfairly lost their jobs in 2020 because of statements that most people would find inoffensive but for which they were pilloried on social media simply because they were white. Of the accusers, the author asks “What kind of people do these things? Why do they get away with it? And are we going to let them continue to?” This book is a call to push back against woke activists. The author then gives a brief resumé of the history of antiracism in America:
“First Wave Antiracism battled slavery and legalized segregation. Second Wave Antiracism, in the 1970s and ‘80s, battles racist attitudes and taught America that being racist is a moral flaw. Third Wave Antiracism, becoming mainstream in the 2010s, teaches that because racism is baked into the structure of society, whites’ “complicity” in living within it constitutes racism itself, while for black people, grappling with the racism surrounding them is the totality of experience and must condition exquisite sensitivity toward them, including a suspension of standards of achievement and conduct.”
So the current woke trend denigrates blacks by implying that they are fragile and have to be protected, and worse, that they should not be asked to meet the same standards of achievement and behavior as other groups. Does anyone expect blacks to be motivated by this? No, but it motivates the activists. Then he says:
“People in positions of influence are regularly being chased from their posts because of claims that they are insufficiently antiracist. School boards across the country are forcing teachers and administrators to waste time on “antiracist” infusions into their curricula that make no more sense than anything proposed under China’s Cultural Revolution. Did you know that objectivity, being on time, and the written word are “white” things?”
The author provides a table where a sample of 10 antiracist tenets (left column) are given with their corollaries (right column) to show their absurdity and self-contradiction. I shall take three rows from that table which are representative of the rest. Each tenet is followed by the ‘BUT’ that illustrates the activists’ lack of logic because they keep contradicting themselves:
TENET: “Silence about racism is violence” BUT: “Elevate the voices of the oppressed over your own.”
TENET: “You must strive eternally to understand the experiences of black people” BUT: “You can never understand what it is to be black, and if you think you do you’re a racist.”
TENET: “Show interest in multiculturalism”. BUT: “Do not culturally appropriate. What is not your culture is not for you, and you may not try it or do it.”
Notice the childishness of the demands. It’s like a three-year-old who wants the rules constantly changed to allow them to win.
The author looks for a label for woke people other than “social justice warriors” or “the woke mob” which he regards as too dismissive. He takes his cue from the author and essayist Joseph Bottum who compares the woke to religious groups who consider themselves “the elected ones” in the eyes of God. McWhorter borrows this idea to call the woke the ‘Elect’ which is the label he uses throughout the book. Meaning they see themselves as above the rest of us. He even compares them to medieval Catholic Inquisitors who condemned heretics and he asks us to notice that the ‘Elect’: “do not see that they, too, are persecuting people for not adhering to their religion.”
Chapters 3 and 4 expand on these themes with more examples of woke intolerance, but Chapter 5 takes the next step by advocating three policies that will actually help blacks. Here they are:
1. Stop the war on drugs.
2. Teach black children to read with the phonics method which works better for them.
3. Advocate for vocational training instead of telling everyone they should go to college.
The author gives his reasoning and it is roughly this: The first one will move thousands from prison into legal jobs. The second one will reduce illiteracy. The third one is a proven success (in countries like Germany, although he does not mention it). At least his solutions are more constructive than woke defeatism.
In the final chapter he suggests how we can fight back:
“The Elect, in terms of the combined efforts of their warriors and their quiet supporters, are today a mob, pure and simple. They are unreachable for the simple reason that they are arguing from religion rather than reason, trying to foist their dogma into the public square out of a misguided sense that they are the world’s first humans to find the Answer to Everything. “
“The Elect must be othered. We must stop treating them as normal. Already, the term “woke” is used in derision . . . it isn’t enough. How do we step up with such a destructive current of cognitive interference in our way, wielded by people with power, and chilling us with the threat of social excommunication?”
The author finishes with sample dialogues that we might use to engage the woke but I find them a bit tame and wish that the author had gone further. He is still in employment as a university professor so his opinions will make him a target for some activists. This may be why he takes an overly gentle tone throughout his book. I have read other books critical of woke ideas and they generally take a soft line as well, exposing the injustices and hypocrisy of woke activists but not demolishing woke ideas in the way they could and should. In the humble spirit of the book, let’s see what more can be said about woke racism.
In the past we thought there were different races of humans. So when different ‘races’ showed disdain toward each other we called it racism. We know better now, that we are all one race. End of racism. But the woke want to recreate race by saying “race is a social construct”. This is the argument of subjectivists. You can’t argue with subjectivists but this book rejects that depressing idea and so should we.
Migratory patterns have organized us into ethnic groups like Asians, Caucasians, Africans, American Indians, Aborigines. Within these there are tribes. Then there are the innumerable groups based on shared interest. All it means is that we humans have a natural affinity for people like ourselves. Our tribe, our language, our interests. We all do it and accept it when others do it too. It’s not ‘racism’ it’s groupism. But our group preferences can sometimes lead to unwise actions. Such as telling one tribe to massacre another (the Bible).
Anyone who has not spent their life in a cave would be aware that numerous studies have shown that there are differences between ethnic groups. But these are only average differences. The important finding is that the differences within each group are far greater than the average differences between ethnic groups. Therefore a sports team is recruited on the basis of ability not ethnicity. Unless they like losing. And an HR department also selects candidates on ability not ethnicity. Unless they want their company’s share price to go down. We all ‘get this’.
So what does the author mean by “Did you know that objectivity, being on time, and the written word are “white” things?”. This is one of the critical sentence in the book and it can be explained like this: knowing the proportion of blacks in the American population, and allowing for the statistics on the average abilities of this group, it still remains that blacks are under-represented in American universities, law schools and medical schools. And even when these places admit more blacks by lowering their academic barriers, the results (unsurprisingly) do not translate into proportionally more black graduates. Why? The hint is in the phrase “white things”. As a black professor teaching black students for many years, McWhorter tells us the issue is mainly a cultural one. He observes that black Americans are, generally, less fond of study. And that they ostracize other blacks who are fond of study for “acting white”. The author would like to see this change. He cares about blacks succeeding and wants this to happen. This means dropping the unhelpful racist idea of “acting white”. Against this you have the woke antiracists who have no solutions to offer except to tell blacks they should be more racist by blaming whites. That’s crazy.
The absurd irony of all this is that ‘whites’ are the least ‘racist’ group. It is the only group which is ashamed of its slavery, ashamed of its segregation, has tried to atone for these and continually bends over backwards to show remorse and make amends. No other ethnic group is making anything like this effort. Perhaps the woke activists are unhappy about this. Seeing as the whites have slackened off on being ‘racist’, let’s make the blacks more ‘racist’ to keep things running nicely. The woke activists actually regard that as an achievement.
If we need to see the worst effects of ‘racism’ then it is not to America we should look. Consider Nigeria (1967-1970), Uganda (1972), Cambodia (1975-1979), Somalia (1990-1992), Rwanda (1994), Sudan (1983-2005), Ethiopia (2020-2022). Those alone add up to millions expelled or slaughtered for being in the wrong tribe or group. Not a wonder many of them would like to emigrate to ‘racist’ America.
Black Lives Matter. But if we say “Everyone’s Lives Matter”, which is more inclusive, we are told we are not being respectful. So inclusion is not so great after all, unless it is applied to the right people (who must be identified by our woke masters). American crime statistics have shown a startling demographic that varies little from year to year and the author brings it to our attention. That a black man is far more likely to be murdered by a black man than a white man (by a factor of about ten). Whites show a genuine outpouring of remorse every time a black is murdered by a white. In contrast the woke news media weaponize it and gleefully rake in the proceeds. The several blacks murdered by blacks on the same day go unnoticed. Presumably because no white cops were involved. The author wonders why blacks don’t care more about these absurdities. His book is trying to help, by using analyses and explanations, then solutions.
Read the book. It is far better than my review.
Reviewed in France on October 31, 2021












