Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Women Who Make the World Worse: and How Their Radical Feminist Assault Is Ruining Our Schools, Families, Military, and Sports Hardcover – December 29, 2005
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length256 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherSentinel HC
- Publication dateDecember 29, 2005
- Reading age18 years and up
- Dimensions6.24 x 1.06 x 9.24 inches
- ISBN-109781595230096
- ISBN-13978-1595230096
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From Booklist
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
From the Back Cover
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : 1595230092
- Publisher : Sentinel HC (December 29, 2005)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 256 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9781595230096
- ISBN-13 : 978-1595230096
- Reading age : 18 years and up
- Item Weight : 15 ounces
- Dimensions : 6.24 x 1.06 x 9.24 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,914,071 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #4,921 in Political Conservatism & Liberalism
- #10,265 in Popular Culture in Social Sciences
- #28,526 in Westerns (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book great, interesting, and fun to read. They say it's well-researched, informative, and documented. Readers also praise the writing quality as well-written and articulate.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book great, interesting, and fun to read. They say it's important for people looking for a broader view.
"...sports and other key issues are well worth the read, but what should be especially eye-opening was her demonstration of how modern-day feminists..." Read more
"...After all, she is only first in her class in high school, athletic, well liked, respected and being courted by top colleges while still in her..." Read more
"...This book is a must read! I highly recommend it!" Read more
"...This book by the way is excellent." Read more
Customers find the book well-researched, informative, and thought-provoking. They also say it's well-documented and eye-opening.
"...I expected to find something as well organized, logical and enlightended about the females who make the world a dark place as I found in the "..." Read more
"...The content of the book is interesting, and thought-provoking, but not all that surprising...." Read more
"...EXTREMELY Well researched and documented book. Very eye opening. A must read for all women especially...." Read more
"...Her book is well written and researched, and is also very informative for those of us who go about our lives and don't follow all the day-to-day..." Read more
Customers find the writing quality of the book well-written and articulate.
"...Whatever your opinion on women's rights, she is articulate...." Read more
"...In terms of the rest of the book I found it quite readable although there wasn't much in it that I was unaware of, with the exception of some of the..." Read more
"...Kate O'Beirne's book reflects the views of so many women. Her book is well written and researched, and is also very informative for those of us who..." Read more
"...She writes with great eloquence. Her personal experiences and anecdotes are sprinkled throughout the book...." Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Who Make the World Worse" without reading the book - in fact there are websites that recommend this tactic. Once again the Left, when it can't win in an honest debate, resorts to deceit and manipulation, a point which Kate O'Beirne brings up in her book. It's legitimate, and understandable, especially given the author's combative style, for liberals to refuse to read her book - there are plenty of books by left-wing writers that I couldn't stand to read myself. What is not acceptable is for them to abuse the forum that Amazon provides for honest criticism. Don't read the book - fine. But if you want to review the book, at least read it first. Don't poison the marketplace of ideas.
O'Beirne's withering contempt for radical feminism is obvious
on almost every page but with the mountain of well-documented
evidence and historical fact she marshals, that contempt is richly deserved. Her chapters on institutional day care, the
radicals' anti-family agenda, women in the military and college
sports and other key issues are well worth the read, but what should be especially eye-opening was her demonstration of how modern-day feminists have systematically lied about the ideas and goals of their early 20th-century forebears in the service of their pro-abortion, anti-family agenda. One can, as I do, be in favour of a woman's right to choose to end a pregnancy (subect to reasonable regulation). But we are also obliged to engage the issue honestly and fairly. Moreover, those who oppose abortion on principle deserve a lot more tolerance from the pro-choice side than they've gotten up to now.
The radical feminists' bad-faith caterwauling aside, the life
choices of all women, whether to become traditional homemakers or
leaders in business and public affairs, should be respected and
honoured. No one has made this case better than Kate O'Beirne.
As I read this book, I kept thinking of Ayn Rand's dictum "A=A." Women have distinct and obvious differences that feminists deny-or half-deny. That is the feminists want equality, but on an unequal basis. They want women to retain corporate seniority, while taking off time to rear children. They are trying to have their cake and eat it, too-(Ayn Rand again.)
Two key chapters are "In the classroom . . . Boys will be Girls" and "G. I Janes." The feminist movement is trying to masculinize women and feminize men. The practical result is that men are, by state fiat, marginalized, and women are being put at risk in firefights by having lower standards. This is exactly what the Enemy and the terrorists want.
The crucial chapter is the last one, where O'Beirne lays the metaphysical case for differences between men and woman. The essence of the chapter can be distilled to the discussion on public toilets:
"In 2005 Olga Gershenson of the University of Massachusetts at Amherst and Barbara Penner of University College in London invited contributions for the collection they were editing entitled Toilet Papers: The Gendered Construction of Public Toilets. This feminist scholarship `will work from the premise that public toilets, far from being banal or simply functional, are highly charged spaces, shaped by notions of propriety, hygiene and the binary gender division.' They point out that `public toilets are among the very few openly segregated spaces in contemporary Western culture,' and so `provide a fertile ground for critical work interrogating how conventional assumptions about the body, sexuality, privacy, and technology can be formed in public space and inscribed through design.'"
"If even the biological imperative to, ahem, either stand or sit is seen as an example of the repressive `gender division' and a result of `conventional assumptions' about sex differences, it's little wonder that feminists reject the convincing evidence about the less immediately obvious differences in male and female anatomy, beginning with the brain." (193)
Exactly!
On avenue that O'Beirne does not pursue is the male's "superior systemizing skills" (196). She suggests that the male's facility "for understanding and building systems" makes them hard-wired to be "good scientists, engineers, architects, electricians, bankers, and toolmakers." (192,196).
One system that O'Beirne does not mention is philosophy. C. S. Lewis noted that "the proper glory of the masculine mind [is] its disinterested concern with truth for truth's own sake, with the cosmic and the metaphysical, is being impaired." (Present Concerns, 51). The best example of thy systemizing, organizing, and philosophizing skill is Thomas Aquinas's "Summa Theoloigca." Ayn Rand's philosophy was posthumously systemized and organized by Dr. Leonard Peikoff.
This is crucial, since ideas carry consequences. If males, in then general, have better systemizing skills, then the feminists would take heed to their alternative voice.
The author centers on the more radical theorists among feminist academics to illustrate her point. Many of these women attack men in the classroom and berate "the patriarchy." She argues that, since women have the ability to bear children, they have to make choices that men do not. This carries into some interesting discussions about comparable worth and whether women have made strides in their careers and compensation versus men. O'Beirne interviews women who were devoted to their careers and others who were more family oriented. She believes that the only reason women, on average, make less than men is because they choose to leave the work force to bear children.
