Top critical review
One person found this helpful
2.0 out of 5 starsWaiting for Gadot
ByAnthony Handon September 15, 2017
Currently boasting a 92% score on Rotten Tomatoes, 'Wonder Woman' seems to have hit a seam of popularity that I have to admit, I find truly bewildering. Its opening ranges from dull to stupid, it's ending is unbelievably flat, while its middle section flabs as soon as we leave London for Flanders. I guess I'm just not seeing what others are seeing in this.
Applying full disclosure, I'm not a fan of the character. I think the Amazonian goddess angle is dumb and along with Thor, I just find the character to be one of the most ridiculous of the big name superheroes. That's saying something when superheroes are choc-a-bloc with stupid characters. But, even with that, I was more than willing to give Wonder Woman a chance to wow me. Instead, it just bored me with its inanity and kind of angered me with its setting.
Its simplistic story is also a let down. But, it's an "origin story", so there's only so much one can do I suppose, intro/villain appears/defeat villain. 'Wonder Woman' starts off on the mystical and hidden island of Themyscira (somewhere near Turkey I presume), where we see a little poppet version of Diana/Wonder Woman who is already running around and wanting to emulate her elders. The island is totally populated by women, but Diana, we're told, was created from clay by her mother - Queen Hippolyta - and given life by the Greek God Zeus. Zeus, by the way, created the race of Amazons as sworn protectors of mankind (how they do this when they can never leave their hidden Island remains an actual wonder). Diana eventually grows up, meets blue-eyed Steve Trevor (Chris Pine) when he crashes near her Island and is runs off with him to a WWI ravaged Europe to stop the First World War nazis from gassing everybody on the planet...or something.
To be honest, the story is appallingly childish - even for a comic book film - and never really moves along at anything but pretty leisurely pace. Every character, with the exception of the female wonder herself, is pretty limp. With a particularly milquetoast villain, who's twist appearance is so unsurprising, as to be almost insulting and its setting of WWI is a travesty. Although, we can be thankful it's not WWII, which would no doubt have been rendered worse. Another negative is its use of badly created CGI, which remains incredibly unconvincing. The green screen is so obvious at times, it's staggering.
The positives, however, lie solely with Wonder Woman herself and I believe the good will towards this film is almost totally due to Gal Gadot's good performance/look. Plucked from her modelling career, Gadot does well and is charming with her broken accent and fish-out-of-water act. But, this angle is terribly underused and is at its best in the short London section, which is the most amusing section of the film. The opportunity for a few laughs at the expense of stuffy early 20th Century British society is utilised well enough and benefits from great support from an unrecognisable Lucy Davis (Dawn from the Office) as Etta Candy, Steve Trevor's secretary (or "slave" as WW calls her, most likely due to the fact that she hasn't discovered what a job is yet).
At the end we’re left with the feeling that there's definitely something to Gadot's Wonder Woman which promises more from the character in future DCCU films. But, as a film in and of itself 'Wonder Woman' leaves an awful lot to be desired from me, I have to admit. ‘Wonder Woman’ is simply another average big budget Hollywood movie that has received and incredible amount of quite undeserving praise. Perhaps that’s due to the generally low quality of the Hollywood output, I just don’t know.
2.5/5